Asean myanmar-mass atrocitiesistanbul2013
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Asean myanmar-mass atrocitiesistanbul2013

on

  • 257 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
257
Views on SlideShare
257
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Asean myanmar-mass atrocitiesistanbul2013 Asean myanmar-mass atrocitiesistanbul2013 Presentation Transcript

  • Yuyun Wahyuningrum, Senior Advisor on ASEAN and Human Rights, Human Rights Working Group (HRWG) Indonesia, E-mail: wahyuningrum@gmail.com Global Convening to End Mass Atrocities, Istanbul, Turkey, 17-19 June 2013
  • ASEAN as emerging power?  “Today, ASEAN is not only a well-functioning, indispensable reality in the region It is a real force to be reckoned with far beyond the region It is also a trusted partner of the United Nations in the field of development” Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations, 16 February 2000
  • 1. 2. 3. ASEAN Political Security Blueprint  The promotion and protection of human rights in accordance with the ASEAN Charter, the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, and the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action Promotion of peace and stability through:  Tolerance and respect for diversity  Conducting dialogue among different groups, and  Pursuing poverty alleviation and narrowing development gaps The promotion norms that enhance ASEAN defense and security cooperation  Developing and publishing an ASEAN Security Outlook  Holding voluntary briefings on regional political and security developments and  Developing an ASEAN early warning system (based on existing mechanisms) to prevent the occurrence and/or escalation of conflicts View slide
  • ASEAN Political Security Community  4. Support for conflict resolution and pacific settlement of disputes through:  Promoting the ASEAN Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC)  Strengthening existing modes of pacific settlement of disputes  Undertaking conflict management and conflict resolution research studies, and  Developing ASEAN modalities for good offices, conciliation and mediation 5. The strengthening of research activities on peace, conflict management and conflict resolution by identifying priority research topics, with a view to:  Providing recommendations on promoting peace, conflict management and conflict resolution  Enhancing existing cooperation among ASEAN think tanks to study peace, conflict management and conflict resolution  Undertaking studies to promote gender mainstreaming in peacebuilding, peace process, and conflict resolution, and  Developing a pool of experts from ASEAN Member States as resource persons to assist in conflict management and conflict resolution activities. View slide
  • ASEAN Political Security Community   Directing activities in ASEAN Political Security Pillar toward efforts to prevent mass atrocities require a flexible interpretation, because it is clear that the pillar was not drafted with mass atrocities prevention in mind.  At the moment Indonesia is proposing a review on the Pillar before the 2015 ASEAN Community – can be the entry point to highlight the missing link with mass atrocities prevention activities and implication to the building of ASEAN Community  Another entry points: early warning and response, civilian protection and peace keeping operation
  • The 3Cs in Human Rights Architecture ASEAN Human Rights Systems Conventions: Norms/ Commission/Committee ASEAN Human Rights Court?? Instruments ACWC 2010 AICHR 2009 ACMW 2008
  • ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation (AIPR)   Established as a follow-up of the ASEAN Leaders’ Joint Statement that was adopted on May 8, 2011  The Terms of Reference of AIPR was adopted during the 21st ASEAN Summit in Cambodia in 2012.  Its headquarter is in Jakarta, Indonesia  Principles of the AIPR:  Respect for the independence, sovereignty, equality, territorial integrity and national identity of all ASEAN Member States,  Shared commitment and collective responsibility in enhancing regional peace, security and prosperity  Non-interference in the internal affairs of ASEAN Member States  Mandate: shall be the ASEAN Institution for research activities on peace, conflict management and conflict resolution, as requested by ASEAN Member States
  • ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation (AIPR)  Function:   Undertake research and compile ASEAN’s experiences and best practices, the promotion of gender mainstreaming, existing dispute settlement mechanisms, on peace, conflict management and conflict resolutions, – with the view of providing recommendation upon request by ASEAN member states, to ASEAN bodies  Capacity building  Pool of expertise and support for ASEAN bodies  Networking  Dissemination of information  Structure: Governing Council, Executive Director, Advisory Board – from ASEAN member states
  • ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)   Created 1994 within the context of post- Cold War uncertainties, as a mechanism for boosting cooperative security between states.  Its founders envisioned that it would eventually transition from a focus on confidence building to a deeper level of regional cooperation - preventive diplomacy (PD)  the ARF defines PD in a way that generally precludes a regional role in containing and resolving member states’ internal conflicts  In recent years, it has expanded its focus to include nontraditional transnational security issues such as maritime security, counter- terrorism, and natural disaster relief and response
  • ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)  There are two entry points to be used to bring the discussion on preventing mass atrocities in ARF:  The Eminent and Experts Persons group (EEP), whose role is to present “non- binding and professional views or recommendations to the ARF participants, when they are requested to undertake in-depth studies and researches or serve as resource persons in ARF meetings on issues of relevance to their expertise”;  The Friends of the Chair (FoC) group, comprised of the incoming ARF chairing country’s foreign minister, the foreign minister of a non-ASEAN ARF country, and the foreign minister of the immediate past ARF chairing country, and whose role is to advise the Chair when the ARF is not in session . (FoC has yet to be invoked.)
  • Limitations   ASEAN is self-limited in playing role in preventing mass atrocities  The language of the TOR of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR), TOR AIPR, ARF and other ASEAN’s documents repetitively emphasize “respect for sovereignty” and “non-interference in internal affairs of states” as paramount values  ASEAN does not make reference to mass atrocities or four crimes (that constitute R2P)  Bringing the conflict to ASEAN can mean that the issue will be likely determined by political bargaining.
  • Suggestion: Bilateral Approach   Getting a progressive member state that has authority over the issue and trusted by Myanmar Government as the champion – Indonesia?
  • Would Myanmar’s chairmanship of ASEAN in 2014 would be the opportunity to gain momentum? 