• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Chisholm
 
  • 521 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
521
Views on SlideShare
521
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Chisholm Chisholm Presentation Transcript

    • Development of a High RiskObstetrics Telehealth Network Christian A. Chisholm, M.D. University of Virginia School of Medicine
    • Background  UVA Telemedicine network  Arkansas ANGELS
    • UVA Telehealth Network
    • UVA Telehealth Network
    • Definition of Need  Large, widely dispersed population in a geographically diverse state  Insufficient number of MFM specialists, geographic concentrated in urban areas  Poor prenatal care access  Not meeting HP2010 goals (access to prenatal care, preterm birth, perinatal mortality)
    • Geographic distribution of MFM services in Virginia Note MFM services in Lynchburg only 2 days/month
    • Getting started  Established Telehealth network helps greatly  Even with an established network, grant support will facilitate early success  Governor’s Productivity Investment Fund  HRSA Office for Advancement of Telehealth
    • Community Partners  Commitment to patients with greatest access limitations  Health departments, community health centers  Skill level of local providers  Communication, record-sharing, logistics of delivery
    • Harrisonburg Community Health Center
    • Harrisonburg Community Health Center
    • Culpeper Health Department
    • Central Shenandoah Health District
    • Central Shenandoah Health District
    • Barriers to Success  Lack of support from local obstetrical community  Misunderstanding of role; perceived threat to local services  Miscommunication about location of delivery  Difficult patient population  Reimbursement for uninsured patients
    • Early Outcome Data  Population: predominantly Hispanic, most non-English speaking, most uninsured  Most common problem leading to MFM referral: diabetes. Others include hypertension, thyroid disease, multiple gestation, prior poor obstetrical outcome
    • Early Outcome Data  Cohort prior to establishment of telehealth MFM program:  Mean GA first PNV: 17.2 weeks  25% entered care after 20 weeks  10.7% rate of missed visits  After MFM telehealth program:  Mean GA first visit 14.7 weeks (deceptive)  None entered care after 20 weeks  4.4% rate of missed visits
    • Early Outcome Data  Other outcomes: too early / too few to assess for differences  Preterm birth  Background rate of 10.2% reflects all women  Our subset has a higher risk for preterm birth  Diabetes control  Infant mortality  Will need more time to show a difference  Arkansas program showed 26% reduction in infant mortality!
    • Early Outcome Data  Continuity – post-natal care and pediatric care  Patient satisfaction - HIGH!  Provider satisfaction – HIGHER!
    • Reduced Patient Travel  HRSA sites: 20,000 miles of patient travel saved per 6 month block  HCHC site: over 60,000 miles saved since initiation of program  Opportunity to save substantial expense to Medicaid in patient transportation  Other specialties available
    • MFM Telehealth in Virginia!