Paris JUG Second Anniversary
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Paris JUG Second Anniversary


  • 2,879 views vs, or how a commercial entity can cohabitate with an open source project and still play it "fair". vs, or how a commercial entity can cohabitate with an open source project and still play it "fair".



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



10 Embeds 1,676 1649 9 7 3 2 2 1 1
http://mason 1 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Paris JUG Second Anniversary Paris JUG Second Anniversary Presentation Transcript

  • vs Vincent Massol ( 9 February 2010
  • Presentation: Vincent Massol ● 10 years doing open source development ● 7 years as a « pure player »  (i.e. Not paid) ● Creator of Cargo, Cactus, committer on Maven ● Founder OSSGTP ● Wrote several books on JUnit and Maven ● XWiki developer since 2005 ● CTO of XWiki SAS since December 2006 ● Blog: ● Twitter: vmassol
  • Presentation: ● Open source project at ● Second Generation Enterprise Wiki ● Generic Web development platform ● LGPL licence ● 15 active committers
  • Presentation: XWiki SAS ● Commercial company at ● Business Model ● Support, custom development, training, hosting, consulting ● No proprietary code, all under LGPL license ● 28 employees (12 committers, 7 contributors)
  • Community-Driven Open Source ● Business-friendly licence (e.g. LGPL) ● Separate & sites ● Meritocracy ● All Community members have the same power ● Benefits for Users ● Assurance the project won't disappear ● Allow investing on it ● Especially since XWiki is a dev platform ● Benefits for XWiki SAS ● Viral spread + international development ● Ecosystem which can compete with companies with more money (requires extension system)
  • How not to be « Evil » ● Published Project Governance ( ● Published Company Manifesto and Values ● ● ● Votes for anything important, with veto ● Vote for accepting new committers ● Need good quality patches, takes 3-6+ months of continuous patch for XWiki SAS newcomers to get voted in, same process as anyone else
  • Handling Conflicts of Interest ● Make sure to have committers not from the company ● Veto for all votes and vote all important decisions ● Roadmaps, new committers, etc ● Dedicate a person responsible for the well being of the community ● Dedicated XWiki SAS developers for the open source project ● All code under an open source license
  • Future Improvements ● Defined Governance for content ● Proposal sent: ● Add ads but same rules for everyone. ● Special distributions on ● To draw non-tech users ● More Bounties ● Non profit association