Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Camm Presentation E Crime June 2011
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Camm Presentation E Crime June 2011

329
views

Published on

CAMM presentation during eCrime congress June 2011

CAMM presentation during eCrime congress June 2011


0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
329
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Security very important issue to peopleBut look at other areas – vendor lock-inAt the same time business teams (marketing) go to cloud services with their credit cards – as IT is tooooo slow
  • Picture kindly taken from a Microsoft presentationProbably more secure than your local IT – but how to measure thatRisk cannot be outsourced to cloud – so how to measure what the riks with the cloud provider, type and delivery model isIf I use IaaS I still am responsibel for application mangement and potentially OS management
  • There is 4 main layers”Hotel stars” for the consumers / CEO level -> security aware consumers can make comparation between the services they use, write blogs and echo their analysis. (Instead of numbers we can for sure use e.g. Credit rating style classification ”AA+” etc.Diamond diagrams with clearly defined and easily understandable dimensions are provided for the IT decision makers. Them to understand on high level what they purchase and what they still need to take care by themselves i.e. High level responsibility map in regards of SecurityLayer 3 consists the main control objectives, but not indivisual controls i.e. Only the ”corners of diamonds”Layer 4 has been devided in to two sectionsPublic Wikipedia.org section that has HOW TO guidance i.e. How a company can implement this control objective -> there would be hundreds of these pages and due to that we need to have single template to make it readable. Ugins public wikipedia would emphasize that this really is Transparent & open initiativeCompany specifid ”How we did it documentation” -> can be in what ever format the company prefersDocuments inside of company can logically fall to different confidentiality cathegories
  • Transcript

    • 1. Managing risks in the supply chain
      14 June, 2011
      Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
      1
      Vladimir Jirasek
      CAMM Steering Group
      Twitter @vjirasek
    • 2. People do not fully trust The Cloud
      People say that they are concerned that their information is not secure in The Cloud
    • 3. Is the Cloud Secure?
      14 June, 2011
      Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
      3
      Can be as secure as any other IT system
      Depends on the model chosen
      Understand the responsibilities
      All eggs in one basket is the real question
      Implicit trust on provider
      Exit and lock-in
    • 4. Problem to be solved – trust in the supply chain
      14 June, 2011
      Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
      4
      Suppliers for the cloud provider
      Your business
      Your cloud provider
      End to end assurance
    • 5. 14 June, 2011
      Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
      5
      CAMM MISSIONProvide an objective framework to transparently rate and benchmark the capability of a selected solution to deliver information assurance maturity across the supply chain
    • 6. Achieving Transparency & layers of CAMM
      1. Consumer
      3. Architects
      2. CIO
      4. Experts
      Selfassess
      Audited
      Selfassessment
      Audited on17.03.2012
      Governance
      4
      3
      A.Average3.8
      A.Average3.4
      HR
      3
      3
      ”Public How To atwww.wikipedia.org”
      IT Services
      3
      3
      C.Average3.3
      C.Average3.4
      Physical
      4
      5
      SecretNDA Public
      E.Average4.6
      E.Average4.4
      Continutity
      5
      4
      Incident
      mgmt
      ”Company specificHow we did it”
      4
      4
      CAMM allows different levels of confidentiality - e.g. only auditor sees full set of results or public disclosure via web site
    • 7. Overall structure of CAMM components
      14 June, 2011
      Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
      7
      TPAC
      Final maturity scores
      Mapping to other standards
      Free GRC app
      Scoring model
      Non CAMM audit results
      Maturityscores
      Weightingframework
      Please see next slide for details about importing CAMM audit results
      WorkBench
      App
      Audited controls
      Controls framework
      Auditors
    • 8. Utilize your current investmentto an another standard e.g. ISO
      The Statement Of Applicability (SOA) of source standard is used as a baseline for translation
      CAMM Guidance documents will help auditors with ”yellow” area intepretations
      14 June, 2011
      Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
      8
      Souce standard
      Target standard
      e.g. ISO 2700x SOA
      CAMM
      Translate
      Not implemented > to be CAMM audited
      Auditor intepretation of applicability
      1=1 applicable, no need of intepretation
    • 9. Stakeholders
      Consumers – Can form trust relationship based on understantable facts
      Companies – Can form trustworthy supply chains to provide real trustworthiness to consumers & other customers
      Governents – Canhavemore confidence in corporategovernance to remove barriers from global single e-markets
      Service Providers & Consultancies – Can buildcompetences to achieve the target
      Industry Associations – can excel in defining harmonized model implementations
      Consumer
      Government
      CAM Commitee
    • 10. Progress
      It is anticipated for the initial set of COMMON controls and associated guidance to be completed by Q4 2011. The following details the key milestones:
      Major client, standards and service provider organisations engaged
      Development of framework and appropriate weighting mechanism underway
      Development of the framework
      Control framework created and reviewed
      Scoring model created
      Development of the guidance
      Guidance material to be completed by end of October 2011
      Pilot
      Pilot with major organisation planned for summer 2011
      Development of Free GRC tool
      Major GRC vendor engaged to ad CAMM module