Camm Presentation E Crime June 2011

  • 308 views
Uploaded on

CAMM presentation during eCrime congress June 2011

CAMM presentation during eCrime congress June 2011

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
308
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • Security very important issue to peopleBut look at other areas – vendor lock-inAt the same time business teams (marketing) go to cloud services with their credit cards – as IT is tooooo slow
  • Picture kindly taken from a Microsoft presentationProbably more secure than your local IT – but how to measure thatRisk cannot be outsourced to cloud – so how to measure what the riks with the cloud provider, type and delivery model isIf I use IaaS I still am responsibel for application mangement and potentially OS management
  • There is 4 main layers”Hotel stars” for the consumers / CEO level -> security aware consumers can make comparation between the services they use, write blogs and echo their analysis. (Instead of numbers we can for sure use e.g. Credit rating style classification ”AA+” etc.Diamond diagrams with clearly defined and easily understandable dimensions are provided for the IT decision makers. Them to understand on high level what they purchase and what they still need to take care by themselves i.e. High level responsibility map in regards of SecurityLayer 3 consists the main control objectives, but not indivisual controls i.e. Only the ”corners of diamonds”Layer 4 has been devided in to two sectionsPublic Wikipedia.org section that has HOW TO guidance i.e. How a company can implement this control objective -> there would be hundreds of these pages and due to that we need to have single template to make it readable. Ugins public wikipedia would emphasize that this really is Transparent & open initiativeCompany specifid ”How we did it documentation” -> can be in what ever format the company prefersDocuments inside of company can logically fall to different confidentiality cathegories

Transcript

  • 1. Managing risks in the supply chain
    14 June, 2011
    Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
    1
    Vladimir Jirasek
    CAMM Steering Group
    Twitter @vjirasek
  • 2. People do not fully trust The Cloud
    People say that they are concerned that their information is not secure in The Cloud
  • 3. Is the Cloud Secure?
    14 June, 2011
    Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
    3
    Can be as secure as any other IT system
    Depends on the model chosen
    Understand the responsibilities
    All eggs in one basket is the real question
    Implicit trust on provider
    Exit and lock-in
  • 4. Problem to be solved – trust in the supply chain
    14 June, 2011
    Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
    4
    Suppliers for the cloud provider
    Your business
    Your cloud provider
    End to end assurance
  • 5. 14 June, 2011
    Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
    5
    CAMM MISSIONProvide an objective framework to transparently rate and benchmark the capability of a selected solution to deliver information assurance maturity across the supply chain
  • 6. Achieving Transparency & layers of CAMM
    1. Consumer
    3. Architects
    2. CIO
    4. Experts
    Selfassess
    Audited
    Selfassessment
    Audited on17.03.2012
    Governance
    4
    3
    A.Average3.8
    A.Average3.4
    HR
    3
    3
    ”Public How To atwww.wikipedia.org”
    IT Services
    3
    3
    C.Average3.3
    C.Average3.4
    Physical
    4
    5
    SecretNDA Public
    E.Average4.6
    E.Average4.4
    Continutity
    5
    4
    Incident
    mgmt
    ”Company specificHow we did it”
    4
    4
    CAMM allows different levels of confidentiality - e.g. only auditor sees full set of results or public disclosure via web site
  • 7. Overall structure of CAMM components
    14 June, 2011
    Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
    7
    TPAC
    Final maturity scores
    Mapping to other standards
    Free GRC app
    Scoring model
    Non CAMM audit results
    Maturityscores
    Weightingframework
    Please see next slide for details about importing CAMM audit results
    WorkBench
    App
    Audited controls
    Controls framework
    Auditors
  • 8. Utilize your current investmentto an another standard e.g. ISO
    The Statement Of Applicability (SOA) of source standard is used as a baseline for translation
    CAMM Guidance documents will help auditors with ”yellow” area intepretations
    14 June, 2011
    Common Assurance Maturity Model Common-Assurance.com
    8
    Souce standard
    Target standard
    e.g. ISO 2700x SOA
    CAMM
    Translate
    Not implemented > to be CAMM audited
    Auditor intepretation of applicability
    1=1 applicable, no need of intepretation
  • 9. Stakeholders
    Consumers – Can form trust relationship based on understantable facts
    Companies – Can form trustworthy supply chains to provide real trustworthiness to consumers & other customers
    Governents – Canhavemore confidence in corporategovernance to remove barriers from global single e-markets
    Service Providers & Consultancies – Can buildcompetences to achieve the target
    Industry Associations – can excel in defining harmonized model implementations
    Consumer
    Government
    CAM Commitee
  • 10. Progress
    It is anticipated for the initial set of COMMON controls and associated guidance to be completed by Q4 2011. The following details the key milestones:
    Major client, standards and service provider organisations engaged
    Development of framework and appropriate weighting mechanism underway
    Development of the framework
    Control framework created and reviewed
    Scoring model created
    Development of the guidance
    Guidance material to be completed by end of October 2011
    Pilot
    Pilot with major organisation planned for summer 2011
    Development of Free GRC tool
    Major GRC vendor engaged to ad CAMM module