Vivaldi Partners Social Currency Study 2010

1,410
-1

Published on

www.vivaldipartners.com

0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,410
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
52
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Vivaldi Partners Social Currency Study 2010

  1. 1. $OCIALCURRENCYWhy brandsneed to buildand nurturesocial currency© 2010 Vivaldi PartnersAll rights reserved.
  2. 2. Vivaldi Partners$ocial Currency Study | US 2010 125 Park Avenue, Suite 1500 New York, NY 10017Copyright © 2010 Vivaldi Inc. All rights reserved. USANo part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in Tel +1 212 965 0900any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, without Fax +1 212 965 0992written permission. E-mail info@vivaldipartners.comCover Art: Melanie Eckl Web www.vivaldipartners.com
  3. 3. Table of ContentsEditorial 2Executive Summary 4Introducing the Concept of Social Currency 8Impact on Industries and Categories 20Managerial Implications g p 5 58Acknowledgements 64 1
  4. 4. Editorial I have been studying brands for the last twenty years. During this time, there has been significant progress in understanding why brands are important and how brands Brands are socially constructed objective become important drivers of innovation and realities. Brands get bu lt t oug expe- eal t es. a ds built through e pe g growth. riences, through people accepting them There has been significant progress in the and making them part of the fabric of their development of financial frameworks to lives. monetize and measure the value of brands, This process of building strong brands is very legal frameworks to protect brands, and a personal and also very social. host of managerial approaches to build, grow, grow nurture and manage brands. brands Today, one of the most important strengths of a brand is its social currency, the extent to However, nothing has prepared us to deal which people share the brand or information with today’s revolution in building strong about the brand with others as part of their brands. The rapid evolution of the Internet everyday social lives. and, in particular, the rise of the social2
  5. 5. of media, technologies and networks not I am convinced that this study sheds newonly changes our lives, it irrevocably light on the complex and difficult under-changes how brands are built. taking of building strong brands today.I am pleased to present, on behalf of Vivaldi I hope that our work will stimulate thoughtsPartners and the many talented people who and more research, encourage new andwork i our company, thi study of th k in this t d f the better b tt practices i b i ti in business, and l d th d lead thepower of social currency in building strong way into an exciting future of creating valuebrands. for companies.For the first time, we deconstruct socialcurrency. We find that social currency is notjust about conversation, buzz or community.It is all this and much more. We find that itdoes not impact every brand equally. We Erich Joachimsthaler, PhDfind that certain levers of social currency are Founder and CEOmore important than others in driving value Vivaldi Partnersfor companies. 3
  6. 6. AFFILIATION IDENTITY CONVERSATION SOCIAL CURRENCY INFORMATION UTILITY ADVOCACY4
  7. 7. Executive Summary Social currency is the extent to which people share the brand or information about the brand as part of their everyday social lives at work or at home. Our study shows that social currency significantly drives brand loyalty. Moreover, brands with a high social currency command a price premium. Social currency is a means, not the end; nor is it just about buzz or conversation. Rather it is about creating meaningful experiences around the brand. Which of the six levers on the left are key to effectively create social currency varies between categories and their specific customer, consumer, and competitive context. The successful brands in our study strive to be an integral part of people’s daily lives by enabling them to connect, interact, and benefit from like-minded brand users. The good news: the study shows that a set of key principles emerge that help companies to build, nurture and manage social currency and create value. 5
  8. 8. This craving for commun of every man individual from the beginning of t6
  9. 9. PHOTOGRAPHY BY ESCHIPUL/FLICKRity is the chief miseryly and all humanityime. Fyodor M. Dostoyevsky, 1881 M Dostoyevsky 7
  10. 10. Why brands need social currency AFFILIATION Brands represent significant assets for companies. The strength of brands is closely li k d to several well-known asset linked t l ll k t IDENTITY CONVERSATION dimensions that drive the relationships with customers or consumers. SOCIAL Because of the increasing social nature of CURRENCY Internet and mobile technologies, consumers, and customers adopt these INFORMATION UTILITY technologies and platforms and integrate them into their daily life routines and ADVOCACY contexts. This also changes how they interact in all parts of life with people, products, brands, and businesses.8
  11. 11. PHOTOGRAPHY BY NASAHence, all companies need to learn how to In order to manage social currency, com-make their brands more social, and how to panies must adopt new approaches andinteract in new ways with their customers. In tools. If the traditional model of brandshort, they need to develop social currency. marketing was centered around the key principles of positioning, targeting, andHaving social currency increases a brand’s messaging, the model of building socialengagement with consumers and interaction g g currency i centered on i is d interaction, colla- i llwith customers, it grants access to boration, conversation, and co-creation. Ifinformation and knowledge, it helps brands used to be built through creatingcompanies to create unique brand identities, mindshare, the new model of building socialand it develops permission to interact with currency is about creating share of dailyconsumers or customers. In today’s age, life.building social currency is probably the mostimportant investment companies can make Companies who adopt the new processesto create value for themselves. Consumers and tools in building social currency willand customers will benefit as well as they prosper in today’s age of digital and socialincreasingly participate in social platforms, revolution and have a chance of creatingand use social technologies. new levels of business performance. 9
  12. 12. How social increasingly covers the range of experiences on how consumers interact with brands, currency products and companies from traditional to develops in digital experiences. daily life Social Currency is neither a product feature, nor a communications or PR campaign that Social currency of a brand develops organ- is completely managed by any one company. ically in the network of people – consumers, customers, suppliers, partners. From this perspective, social currency is a far more delicate asset to build, nurture and Social currency is not a communications maintain than brand equity. Traditional approach, it is an experiential concept. It brand management has been a successful develops from experiences that consumers p p a driver f many b d M di for brands. Many of the Top f th T have in the context of their daily life. 1000 global brands have grown over the last Hence, context matters. Understanding twenty years. All these brands derive social currency requires to understand how strength from deep relationships and the context of daily life changes and interactions with customers or consumers,10
  13. 13. PHOTOGRAPHY BY JURVETSON/FLICKRand by that, social currency is not a new Many of these social media sites are activelyphenomenon. Brand building has always used today by major brands to strengthenbeen about establishing deep relationships customer service, introduce or co-createwith customers or consumers and share new products and entertain people.their experiences with friends and peers – In addition, there are thousands of smalltheir everyday social environment. networks, forums and blogs that are notHowever, especially with the development of steered by the brands themselves, but stillsocial platforms on the Internet, which has are important in creating social currency.become a major sharing and connecting Today, building of social currency takespoint, social currency has become a real many forms, some of them being supportedsource of strength for many brands. by digital applications, others are non-JustJ t as major services lik F b k T itt j i like Facebook, Twitter, digital di it l experiences i th d il life of con- i in the daily lif for MySpace have become means for sumers. Some experiences are supported byeveryday personal exchange, brands have applications and tools of companies andgrown in that space as information and others are self-created by customers andexperiences about brands are being shared. consumers. 11
  14. 14. Social currency: a shared domain of brands and consumers Social S i l currency represents a shared asset of t h d t f consumers and company-owned brands. It originates from interaction between customers Social and consumers. Currency However, companies can stimulate the creation of social currency through means that cultivate a sense of community, strengthen consumer interaction and provide value to the com- munity. When done credibly brands earn trust Brand Consumer and can grow into an integral, almost symbiotic role in customers’ lives.12
  15. 15. PHOTOGRAPHY BY DJWHELAN/FLICKRImpact of socialcurrency on brandperformanceOurO study shows that social currency d h h i lsignificantly impacts different aspects of brand Brand Priceperformance: Loyalty Premium1. Across categories and brands, 53% of exp. power correlation consumers consumers’ brand loyalty can be explained 53 53% 73 73% by social currency. Social2. Users of brands with high social currency Currency show a significantly higher willingness to pay a price premium (correlation=0.73). Source: Vivaldi Partners Research based on regression analyses of brand loyalty on social currency levers 13
  16. 16. Affiliation 49 What share of your users has a sense of community? f i ? 27 AFFILIA IDENTITY Identity 47 SOC How many of your users can CURR identify with other users? 43 INFORMATION ADVO Information 35 How many feel they exchange fruitful information with others? 2214
  17. 17. Conversation 72 What share of your brand users recognizes and stirs b ? i d i buzz? 49 9ATION CONVERSATIONCIAL Utility 63RENCY How many derive value from interacting with other users? 50 UTILITYOCACY Advocacy 64 6 How many act as disciples and stand up for your brand? 38 Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey December 2009, Exemplary results for selected brands and categories 15
  18. 18. How social currency creates value in categories Although social currency consists of six core levers, a brand does not necessarily need to access each lever in order to drive loyalty and top line growth. Instead, certain Impact of social currency levers on brand loyalty within selected categories AUTOMOTIVE (VOLUME) AIRLINES BEER SKIN CARE FAST FOOD SPORTSWEAR ONLINE RETAIL CONSUMER IT B2B TECHPHOTOGRAPHY BY PHILLIE CASABLANCA/FLICKR
  19. 19. categories seem to be less dependent on food). Such activities will then directly driveproviding a strong sense of community or re-purchase or repeated visits respectively.relying on the user-base to exchange news, In contrast, consumer brands in the IThints or other information. category, like Apple or Microsoft need toFor example, categories like fast food or example efficiently address most levers as complexitybeer rely less on strong affiliation amongst of products implicitly leads to highertheir users but can still tap into social exchange levels and especially tangiblecurrency by helping users to learn from each products are providing today’s light housesother (beer) or by strengthening the to convey one’s personality traits just likeidentification levels with other patrons (fast automobiles have for the last century. Affiliation Conversation Utility Advocacy Information IdentitySource: Vivaldi Partners Research based on regression analyses of brand loyalty on social currency levers 17
  20. 20. Find out if 3. Customers or consumers are willing to tell others about your brand or social currency recommend it further. This advocacy for is important your brand is one of the key value for you drivers. 4. The more information customers or consumers have about your product or If you agree with some of the following service, the more likely they develop statements, it is very likely that social preferences for your brand or business. currency is an important driver for your By helping consumers to become business and brand. brand “knowledgeable ” you empower them to knowledgeable, share their knowledge with others. 1. Some of your customers or consumers proactively talk about your products and services with others. By engaging in »SOCIAL CURRENCY IS these conversations, you can stimulate LIKE A GOOD JOKE […] f th conversations and discussions further ti d di i USING CONTENT […] IN [ ] by for example providing additional ORDER TO LUBRICATE A talking points, perspectives and points SOCIAL OCCASION« of view. RUSS KLEIN 2. The social exchange with others involving your brand is an integral part of peoples’ lives. This exchange provides an opportunity for you to build 5. Customers or consumers invaluable utility for customers or develop a strong sense of consumers by helping them to increase identity and an ability to express their own social relevance, for example. themselves to others by using your18
  21. 21. brand. You can create value for your brand and business by reinforcing the identity-driving elements of your brand.6. The value of your brand is closely related to the affiliation and sense of com- h ffili i d f munity it creates among other like- minded people. You can create value by promoting the community and building exchange »WHERE IN THE LATE opportu- 1700S IT WAS MIRRORS, , nities. NAILS AND BUTTONS – IN THE 21ST CENTURYAll brandsand busi- THE SHINY OBJECTS AREnesses need ACCESS, ENTERTAINMENTa social AND KUDOS«strategy. If t t MARK SAGEyou can affir-matively respond to three or more of the sixstatements, your opportunities for buildingvalue through social currency areenormous.If you would agree on less statements, youmust carefully evaluate the hidden potentialof social currency for your brand andbusiness. You might choose to focus on justone or two levers of social currency. 5 PHOTOGRAPHY BY TIBCHRIS/FLICKR
  22. 22. How jetBlue enables a strong sense of community At first sight, the airline industry seems to be, by definition, a social category. There are not many brands that could claim bringing together thousands of people in bi i t th th d f l iIR NES one place every day. Airline brands can. But does this given trait of mass transpor- tation allow airline brands to get a head start over brands in other categories in terms of social currency? RLIN After all, most of the social encounters around air traveling would seem rather futile and random to many. On the other hand, airlines have been known as early pioneers in creating and nurturing customer communities via frequent flyer and other loyalty programs. Hence, studying social currency in the context of airline brands promises to be an interesting and worthwhile trip to take.
  23. 23. In our study, jetBlue turns out as a role are part of a community through the brand.model for the entire airline category. With a Not surprisingly, trust with the brand is verysocial currency score as high as 65% it out- high (See CHART 1).performs legacy carriers such as American The deep integration in the company’sAirlines (48%) or Delta (37%). Only Virgin strategy may b ill be illustrated by the new db hand Southwest Airlines can keep pace with jetBlue terminal at New York’s JFK airport.jetBlue’s performance in the social arena. Rather than constructing a merely functionalDiving deep into the specific characteristics terminal for departures and arrivals, focusof the different airlines’ customer bases we was laid on human interaction. The waitinghave found a specific social trait to jetBlue area mimics New York City landmarks, suchthat no other airline can claim to this extent: as the steps of the Metropolitan Museum ofA close-knit customer community. First, the Art, where travellers can exchange withmajority of jetBlue customers can identify each other physically or virtually. In additionwell with other jetBlue customers. More- to capturing the hustle and bustle of NYC,over, 61% of jetBlue customers feel like they the terminal creates a community feeling.AIRLINES: SOCIAL POTENTIAL IS TAPPED RARELY CHART 1 CHART 2 “I could rely on this brand to solve any problems” Sense of community 61% Trust in brand 78% 84% 0% 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, Average Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale across beer category 21
  24. 24. CATEGORY RANKING # Brand Social Currency 1 JETBLUE 65% 2 VIRGIN 58% 3 SOUTHWEST 54% 4 CONTINENTAL 53% 5 AMERICAN AIRLINES 48% 6 UNITED 42%IR NES 7 DELTA 37% SOCIAL CURRENCY MAP RLIN high BRAND LOYALTY D SOCIAL CURRENCY high
  25. 25. SOCIAL CURRENCY LEVERS Affiliation Conversation Utility Advocacy Information Identity 67% 72% 51% 75% 55% 69% 57% 62% 52% 63% 57% 57% 50% 64% 41% 72% 44% 53% 52% 55% 41% 69% 45% 59% 49% 48% 39% 53% 47% 52% 41% 41% 33% 49% 42% 44% 41% 41% 26% 41% 33% 40%BRAND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS TAL SOUTHWESST CONTINENT AMERICAN JETBLUE UNITED VIRGIN DELTA Quality Perception 50 60 70 80 90 100 CONTINENTAL SOUTHWEST AMERICAN JETBLUE UNITED VIRGIN DELTA Brand Trust 50 60 70 80 90 100 CONTINENTAL SOUTHWEST AMERICAN JETBLUE UNITED VIRGIN DELTA Recommendation 50 60 70 80 90 100Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale 23
  26. 26. How social currency sets premium brandsUT MOT E TOM TIVE further apart The automotive industry can be divided into major categories by two dimensions: domestic vs. imported brands and volume vs. luxury brands. Interestingly, especially the latter dimension also shows an effect in terms of their social currency systems. As high-involvement products, automobiles offer a continuous platform for conversation to both, volume and premium car owners. Further, identification with other owners is i hi h i d d f h quite high independent of the segment. However, premium brand drivers show a much stronger sense of their brand’s community. In that context peer recognition becomes key whilst gaining valuable information around the brand itself through others has less effects on re-purchase decisions. Inversely, volume brand drivers show a lower need to affiliate with others, but appreciate the value they can sift by learning from other drivers.
  27. 27. BMW drivers form an exceptional example Honda for example, despite performingfor a perceived community experience as weak on trust (71%), has highly loyal userstwo thirds feel a strong affiliation with other who actively act as brand ambassadors andBMW owners. who directly draw value as individuals from the exchange with other Honda ownersLuxury car b d show significantly hi hL brands h i ifi l higher (35%) – see CHART 1.social currency levels in general, implyingthat, with buying a car, drivers seek to not Ford, in contrast, seems to merely formonly enter a social peer group but also to identification levels between its driversgrow as an individual by becoming an active through its heritage but cannot extend thatmember. social belonging to also generate a strong community feeling (see CHART 2).2)Investigating individual brands moreclosely, it becomes obvious that also volume For a domestic brand this should be a keycar brands can utilize social currency levers objective, as this also affectsto provide additional selling propositions. recommendation levels.AUTOMOTIVE: VOLUME CAR BRANDS COMPETE ON SOCIAL CHART 1 CHART 2 “Through other users of this brand Identity Affiliation I get valuable information” 48% 37% 40% 35% 20% 0%Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, US Pre-Recall (December 2009) and Post-Recall (February 2010), Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale 25
  28. 28. NAPSHOT TOYOT How Toyota suffered from the gas pedalUT MOT E TOM TIVE recall T: No surprise – Toyota’s recently admitted quality problems heavily shifted owners’ SN brand perception. After all, quality had been the essence of the Toyota brand for the last two decades. Before the news on malfunctioning gas pedals surfaced, nearly every Toyota driver would fully agree on Toyota’s exceptional quality levels and reliability of its cars. Just a f weeks l t th few k later these scores d dropped d dramatically. In an instant, long-built brand equity eroded. Automobiles not only offer functional value but also, by virtue of the fact that they provide an important opportunity for a person to convey his or her identity, have always been very social products.
  29. 29. Toyota faced challenges in accessing these benefits than the erosion of its qualityvalue drivers in an American market; it had image.to compete against Ford’s clear Americana Fewer Toyota owners drawassociation or the exclusivity offers of luxury value from being a memberbrands such as BMW or Ferrari. of the T f h Toyota community iAgainst these challenges, Toyota managed now. Moreover, less than ato provide a large share of their owner-base third would want to identify themselveswith a brand experience that successfully with other Toyota owners – a drop of 19%!made them identify with and feel united to This clearly raises another issue on the CEOother Toyota owners. They earned social agenda: For Toyota, renovating its brand’scurrency - an effort which served as a social currency will be just as crucial assafeguard against competition from other returning to six-sigma standards inAsian makes. production.However, now, after the recall, Toyota facesa relatively worse decline in providing social PRE POST RECALLTOYOTA DRIVERS: PRE-POST-RECALLl Quality perception wears away Very good quality FROM 96% DOWN 16v TO 80% Reliability FROM 92% DOWN 19v TO 73%l Social bonding erodes relatively worse: Affiliation (with other drivers) FROM 29% DOWN 8v TO 21% Identity (through other drivers) FROM 46% DOWN 19v TO 28%Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, US Pre-Recall (December 2009) and Post-Recall (February 2010), Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale 27
  30. 30. CATEGORY RANKINGUT MOT E TOM TIVE # Brand Social Currency 1 BMW 69% 2 MERCEDES 68% 3 LEXUS 66% 4 HONDA 54% 5 TOYOTA* 45% 6 FORD 44% * Data presented in the tables on this page prior to re-call 2009/10 SOCIAL CURRENCY MAP high BRAND LOYALTY D SOCIAL CURRENCY high
  31. 31. SOCIAL CURRENCY LEVERS Affiliation Conversation Utility Advocacy Information Identity 65% 81% 59% 77% 65% 70% 60% 76% 57% 81% 62% 72% 63% 75% 53% 76% 66% 65% 42% 67% 41% 75% 48% 52% 29% 66% 29% 69% 29% 46% 37% 49% 33% 46% 48% 48%BRAND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS MERCEDES TOYOTA HONDA LEXUS FORD BMW Quality Perception 50 60 70 80 90 100 MERCEDES TOYOTA HONDA LEXUS FORD BMW Brand Trust 50 60 70 80 90 MERCEDES 100 TOYOTA HONDA LEXUS FORD BMW Recommendation 50 60 70 80 90 100Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale 29
  32. 32. Why big beer brands carry a social handicap Beer is an unarguably social product, regularly consumed in a social context. Further, beer brands on average enjoy well above average quality and trust levels (see CHART 1). Given its consumption context and also its strong loyalty scores, one would expect that beer brands should be able to leverage their social nature. However, this only proves to be the case for niche brands. In a mass-market setting, beer is about commoditized consumption, not about ER nursing a community feeling of consumers of the same brand. Where mass brands like Corona, Coors, orEE Miller are struggling, however, is when it comes to a dialog about the brand. Ob- viously people are enjoying the taste but do not feel inclined to discuss their beer brands. A different usage pattern can be
  33. 33. observed with niche brands, like Sam packaging innovations, like vented wide-Adams or even Irish Guinness. mouth cans, temperature-linked packaging.They provide their consumers with a product However, market-leading Budweiser provesthat not only stirs communication but even that there is a way to access social currencyhas h bilih the ability to f form communities and ii d beyond the niche. A h b d h i h Anheuser B h’ b d Busch’s brandprovide a strong feeling of identification managers heavily invested especially inwith other drinkers of the same brand social media to generate more buzz and(see CHART 2). affiliation around »Bud«.Instead of providing a unique story around However, the case also shows, that they didtheir brand, mass market brands instead not succeed completely. Such undertakingsseem to have, at the expense of their social need to be based on a consistent strategycurrency values, focused too heavily on and clearly be linked to a brand’s values.developing their product strengths: mar- Still, there are ways for volume brands inginal, but socially irrelevant product and the beer category to create social currency.BEER: STRONG POTENTIAL, BUT UNFOCUSED ENERGY POTENTIAL CHART 1 CHART 2 Quality Trust “I feel a connection to other users of this brand” 89% 86% 47 57Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, Average Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale across beer category 31
  34. 34. CATEGORY RANKING # Brand Social Currency 1 SAM ADAMS 53% 2 GUINNESS 51% 3 HEINEKEN 47% 4 BUDWEISER 43% 5 COORS 36% 6 CORONA 33% 7 MILLER 28% SOCIAL CURRENCY MAP high ER BRAND LOYALTYEE D SOCIAL CURRENCY high
  35. 35. SOCIAL CURRENCY LEVERS Affiliation Conversation Utility Advocacy Information Identity 47% 57% 45% 66% 45% 55% 50% 55% 42% 59% 48% 51% 46% 54% 37% 60% 38% 46% 45% 48% 32% 54% 35% 46% 33% 39% 31% 41% 28% 44% 28% 38% 21% 44% 29% 37% 28% 26% 13% 44% 23% 36%BRAND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS MS BUDWEISERR SAM ADAM GUINNESS HEINEKEN CORONA COORS MILLER Quality Perception 50 60 70 80 90 100 SAM ADAMS BUDWEISER GUINNESS HEINEKEN CORONA COORS MILLER Brand Trust 50 60 70 80 90 100 SAM ADAMS BUDWEISER GUINNESS HEINEKEN CORONA COORS MILLER Recommendation 50 60 70 80 90 100Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale 33
  36. 36. Why buzz alone will not build social currency Fast food represents a category with excep- tional consumer polarization. When it comes ST F OD to choosing their favorite brand, fast food patrons very quickly form distinct camps of clear supporters and critics. Virtually any-AS FOO one with a minimum of fast food dining experience will know an immediate answer to the question: »Burger King or McDonalds?«. Hence, every fast food brand has its own community of patrons that regularly y p g y consume, talk about or even defend the brand. Also, similar to the beer category, fast food brands are clearly social-driven, as con- sumption patterns are often embedded into a broader social setting – meeting up with friends, having a snack with co-workers or similar. However, in terms of social currency, Burger King scores lowest overall of all fast food
  37. 37. companies in our study (21% - see CHART 1). The result: Burger King turns out last place.This is really curious given the buzz the Only 20% of Burger King customers thinkbrand has generated through its social that they get to learn something newmedia efforts around the scary looking King through the community (See CHART 2).and the award-winning subservient chicken award winning Similar poor results for the quality ofcampaign. information being shared and the appre- ciation of others’ opinions.What the results of our study suggest is:online buzz does not equal conversational Overall, Burger King’s social media effortsvalue to customers. Only if conversations seem to have targeted too narrow of a targetare meaningful to customers, brands will group neglecting the social needs of itsprofit from increased social currency among broader customer base. basetheir customer base. The brand may have created conversationDigging deeper, we have studied the extent that stayed “meaningless” both to theto which whatever is said, the buzz, is majority of customers as well as to therelevant to customers of a brand. brand itself.FAST FOOD: BUZZ DOES NOT EQUAL SOCIAL CURRENCY CHART 1 CHART 2 Social Currency Scores “Through other users of this brand I get to learn something new” 20% 21 30 44%Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, Average Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale across beer category 35
  38. 38. CATEGORY RANKING # Brand Social Currency 1 DUNKIN‘ DONUTS 44% % 2 STARBUCKS 42% 3 KFC 30% ST F OD 4 WENDY‘S 30% 5 PIZZA HUT 30% 6 TACO BELL 28%AS FOO 7 MCDONALD‘S 23% 8 BURGER KING 21% SOCIAL CURRENCY MAP high BRAND LOYALTY D SOCIAL CURRENCY high
  39. 39. SOCIAL CURRENCY LEVERS Affiliation Conversation Utility Advocacy Information Identity 40% % 50% % 33% % 60% 6 % 33% % 47% % 53% 45% 31% 48% 35% 43% 25% 38% 19% 45% 23% 31% 25% 30% 20% 44% 24% 35% 26% 37% 15% 46% 19% 35% 22% 37% 18% 44% 18% 28% 18% 29% 15% 29% 17% 29% 16% 24% 16% 24% 19% 24%BRAND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS NG D‘S BURGER KIN STARBUCKS S MCDONALD TACO BELL PIZZA HUT WENDY‘S DUNKIN` KFC Quality Perception 50 60 70 80 BURGER KING 90 100 MCDONALD‘S STARBUCKS TACO BELL PIZZA HUT WENDY‘S DUNKIN` KFC Brand Trust 50 60 70 80 90 100 BURGER KING MCDONALD‘S STARBUCKS TACO BELL PIZZA HUT WENDY‘S DUNKIN` KFC Recommendation 50 60 70 80 90 100Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale 37
  40. 40. Why women love sharing their thoughts on Clinique In the skin care domain, male target groups obviously tend to be less talkative about IN C RE their skin treatment. Market leaders like Gillette have not builtKI CAR significant levels of social currency at all. Probably due to the functional focus of the brand, even their loyal and satisfied (94%) users do not share experiences or infor- mation with each other (only 14% would do so) – see CHART 1. Very popular and »fun-brands« th t t f b d that target a f t focused segment d t have fared better, however only managing to create a limited sense of community (e.g. only one out of four Axe users feels affiliated to others). Women across all ages, as opposed to men, tend to seek social exchange regarding this product category. Skin care remains a much more relevant issue for females and peer-to- peer distribution concepts like Avon’s are hard to imagine within a male setting.
  41. 41. Therefore, it makes most sense to investi- common, challenges. They typecast womengate and compare two female-centered – establishing the basis around whichbrands: Clinique and Dove. women could form micro communities.Clinique has successfully built a strong Volume brand Dove has been praised for itscommunity f li around i classical pre- i feeling d its l i l re-launch around »real b l h d l beauty«, which h hi h hasmium positioning. Every second user claims gained them business success and a highlythat she identifies with other Clinique users authentic image. That said, Dove remains(48%) and engages in conversations around unable to provide a sense of community, asthe brand (51%) – see CHART 2. In contrast the brand’s buzz is conversation worthy butto many of today’s brands, Clinique would unsustainable. Additionally, by appealing tonot be a typical Web 2.0 protagonist 2 0 protagonist. every woman, the brand doesn’t encourage woman doesn tInstead it has managed to build social community bonds (e.g. women who use acurrency by really engaging its consumers specific product for their special skin type).around its heritage and, importantly, by For Dove to gain social currency, it will haveacknowledging women’s unique, yet to translate real beauty into real community.SKIN CARE: BRANDS AS PLATFORMS FOR ENGAGEMENT CHART 1 CHART 2 “I can identify myself well with Satisfied with brand other users of this brand” 94% Do share experience 48% 14% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, US Pre-Recall (December 2009) and Post-Recall (February 2010), Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale 39
  42. 42. CATEGORY RANKING # Brand Social Currency 1 CLINIQUE 42% 2 AXE 37% 3 AVON 37% IN C RE 4 DOVE 29% 5 NIVEA 23%KI CAR 6 GILLETTE 17% SOCIAL CURRENCY MAP high BRAND LOYALTY D SOCIAL CURRENCY high
  43. 43. SOCIAL CURRENCY LEVERS Affiliation Conversation Utility Advocacy Information Identity 30% 51% 32% 57% 35% 48% 25% 39% 30% 49% 33% 46% 30% 41% 28% 44% 37% 41% 18% 36% 20% 46% 22% 33% 14% 28% 16% 41% 15% 25% 7% 19% 11% 29% 14% 22%BRAND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS CLINIQUE GILLETTE NIVEA AVON DOVE AXE Quality Perception 50 60 70 80 90 100 CLINIQUE GILLETTE NIVEA AVON DOVE AXE Brand Trust 50 60 70 80 90 100 CLINIQUE GILLETTE NIVEA AVON DOVE AXE Recommendation 50 60 70 80 90 100Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale 41
  44. 44. The sportswear quest for dailyPO TSW AR ORT WEA life relevance Community experience lies at the heart of every major sportswear brand. Ever since, iconic brands such as Nike, Adidas, or Reebok have created and promoted com- munity sports experiences to the fullest fullest. In the early 90s, Adidas launched their hugely successful “Streetball Challenge”. Similarly, Nike has engaged its brand in numerous sports sponsorships from region- al to global level over the last decades. With the th rapid emergence of th I t id f the Internet and t d especially the social web in recent years, major sportswear brands have moved into the online domain to re-connect with con- sumers. Various initiatives such as Nike+ or miAdidas have been rolled out to create new and meaningful experiences for consumers around their brand. In our study the smaller, fashion-oriented sportswear brands take over the lead in terms of social currency. Puma clearly
  45. 45. comes first with a social currency score of identity (60%) – being important levers to50% followed by Sketchers (38%) and build social currency in the sportswearAdidas (38%), the only global power brand category – the brand outperforms itsto reach a top-3 position. competitors.ThisThi result comes as a bi surprise f l big i from a Arguably, Puma’s strategic evolution to- bl ’ i l itraditional brand equity perspective as wards a lifestyle focus has helped the brandpowerhouses such as Nike and Adidas fall to gain extra social currency with consumersbehind. However, social currency does not that would not have been accessible for afocus on traditional brand equity measures smaller player with a rather narrowsuch as brand awareness. It measures the sportswear focus.social value a brand provides within its own It also apparently enabled the brand to takecustomer base. over a more significant role in consumers’Compared to larger brands, Puma seems to daily lives – resulting in increased con-have created the biggest social value. versation, affiliation, and identification bet-Especially in the areas affiliation (45%) and ween Puma users.SPORTSWEAR: BRAND FOCUS IMPACTS SOCIAL CURRENCY CHART 1 CHART 2 Social Currency Scores Identification with other users 60% Affiliation with other users 30 50 45% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale 43
  46. 46. INDUSTRY RANKINGPO TSW AR # Brand Social Currency ORT WEA 1 PUMA 50% 2 SKETCHERS 38% 3 ADIDAS 38% 4 REEBOK 34% 5 NIKE 30% 6 NEW BALANCE 29% SOCIAL CURRENCY MAP high BRAND LOYALTY D SOCIAL CURRENCY high
  47. 47. SOCIAL CURRENCY LEVERS Affiliation Conversation Utility Advocacy Information Identity 45% 47% 45% 57% 47% 60% 27% 43% 30% 54% 33% 43% 29% 41% 32% 47% 28% 49% 27% 43% 22% 53% 26% 35% 21% 31% 25% 36% 26% 38% 21% 37% 23% 45% 16% 31%BRAND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS CE RS N. BALANC SKETCHER REEBOK ADIDAS PUMA NIKE Quality Perception 50 60 70 80 90 100 N. BALANCE SKETCHERS REEBOK ADIDAS PUMA NIKE Brand Trust 50 60 70 80 90 100 N. BALANCE SKETCHERS REEBOK ADIDAS PUMA NIKE Recommendation 50 60 70 80 90 100Source: Vivaldi Partners social currency survey, Top2-Box-Scores on a 5 point scale 45
  48. 48. AIL Why Amazon is a retail success but no socialNL E RETA star Perhaps as a consequence of today’s information overload, customers especially appreciate relevant information. Under- standably, online categories, where infor- mation is exchanged frequently, perform well within the information lever. Merely being information rich is not the only critical success factor for social currency, as the cases of Amazon and eBay show. Amazon’s revenues might put it ahead of g p LIN eBay’s game, but concerning overall social currency, it trails (Amazon 42% vs. eBay 50%). One cannot deny Amazon’s strengths, because it does seem to be able to inspire more positive conversation amongst its customers (46% vs. eBay 37%). However, it is challenged when it comes to elevating these conversations into a more sustainable sense of community.

×