SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)                                Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL




Michael Eugene Porter (born May 23, 1947)[ is the Bishop William Lawrence University
Professor at Harvard Business School. He is a leading authority on company strategy and the
competitiveness of nations and regions. Michael Porter’s work is recognized in many governments,
corporations and academic circles globally. He chairs Harvard Business School's program dedicated
for newlyappointed CEOs of very large corporations.

WORK UNDER REVIEW:

     Porter, M.E. (1979) "How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy", Harvard Business Review,
      March/April 1979.
     Porter, M.E. (2008) "The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy", Harvard Business
      Review, January 2008, pp. 79-
      93.Porter’sfiveforces”haveshapedagenerationofacademicresearchandbusinesspractice.
      Porterherereaffirms,up-dates,andextends
      theclassicwork.Healsoaddressescommonmisunderstandings,providespracticalguidance
      forusersoftheframework, andoffersadeeper viewofitsimplicationsforstrategy today.


REVIEWED BY:

         NAME       : VIPUL PATIL
         COURSE    :       PHARMATECH AND HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (MPHARM+MBA)
         DEPARTMENT:         PHARM ANALYSIS
         ROLL NO      :      20
         YEAR    :      FIRST YEAR

INTRODUCTION

    The Five Forces model of Porter is an outside-in business unit strategy tool that is used to make
    an analysis of the attractiveness (value...) of an industry structure.

    It captures the key elements of industry competition.

    1.   Threat of new entrants
    2.   Bargaining power of suppliers
    3.   Bargaining power of Buyers
    4.   Threat of substitute products
    5.   Intense rivalry among existing players


1|P a g e
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)                                           Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL




              As differentfromoneanotherasindustriesmight appearon thesurface,the
               underlyingdrivers ofprofitability arethe same.
               Buttounderstandindustrycompetitionandprofitability.
              Ineach ofthecases, one must analyze theindustry’s
               underlyingstructureintermsofthe fiveforces.
              Understandingthe
               competitiveforces,andtheirunderlyingcauses,revealstherootsofanindustry’s
               currentprofitabilitywhileprovidingaframeworkforanticipating and
               influencingcompetition(and profitability) overtime.

     We will consider each parameter in details:

(1)THREAT ON NEW ENTRANTS:

        New entrants bring new capacity.
        Have desire for market share.:
        Can bring in heavy cash flows and shake up competition.Eg.Pepsi,Microsoft.
        it can put cap on profitability.
        Incumbents hold down prices or boost investments to deter new entrants.
        Brings reaction from incumbents.

         BARRIERS OF ENTRY:

Supply side economies of scale: larger volume enjoys lower cost eg.intel.

Demand side benefits of scale:buyer patronize the company products.(networking effects)

Customer switching cost: larger the swiching cost harder it will be for entrants to gain customer.

Capital requirement:large capital investment can deter new entrantsif particular capital requirement is
unrecoverable likehigher to finance expenditure likeadvertisin and R&D.




2|P a g e
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)                                           Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL



Incumbency advantages independent of sizes: incumbents have quality advantages over new entrants like
propriety technology, best raw material sources, established brand entities and cumulative experience.
Allin turn contribute to efficiency.

Unequal access to distribution channels: wholesalers and retailers so committed to incumbent that new
entrant have to bypass distribution or create his own.

Restrictive government policy: government can encourage new entrants through subsidies or hinder
them by imposing ban or licensing requirements.

Expected retaliation:public statement from incumbent’s reaction to new entrant can act as barrier.



(2)POWER OF SUPPLIER:

                       Powerful suppliers capture more value for themselves by charging higher prices,
                        limiting quality or services and shift costs towards industry participants.
                       They squeeze out profitability of industry.Eg.supplier of labor.

SUPPLIER GROUP IS POWERFUL IF:

Supplier is more concentrated than industry:egMicrosoft’s monopoly in operating systems.

Supplier group doesn’t rely on industry for its revenues: supplier serving much industry will try to extract profit
from all sides but will reasonable discount if one is large volume buyer.

Switching costs: If switching cost from buyer is high then it is difficult to play supplier against one
another.

Supplier which offers differentiated product: There is no substitute for suppliers product pharmaceutical
companies over hospitals and pilots union.

Forward integration threat: When industry participantsmake too much profit.



(3)POWER OF BUYER:

                       Powerful buyer is flipside of powerful supplier by forcing down prices,
                        demanding better quality or more services.
                       They play industry participants against one another.
                       They are powerful if they have negotiating leverage.
                       They their clout to pressure price reductions.


Buyer has negotiating leverage if


3|P a g e
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)                                      Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL



   i.   Few buyer &large relative purchase wrt single vendor:eg.bulk chemicals
  ii.   Standardized products or undifferentiated: then buyer play against one another.
 iii.   Switching costs: if less buyers change vendors.
 iv.    Backward integration threatenPepsi threaten to make bottles.
  v.    Intermediate buyer: when they can influence end customer purchasing decision.


Buyer group is price sensitive if:

   i.   Product has significant fraction in costs structure: Then buyer bargain hard &shop around.
  ii.   The buyer group earns low profits: BUYER UNDER PRESSURE TO TRIM COSTS.
 iii.   Qualityofbuyerislittleaffectedby products or services: If quality is affected by industry then
        buyer is not price sensitive.
 iv.    Buyer is price insensitive if:
            1. If product or services pay many times over by improving performance.
            2. If product is more undifferentiated.



(4)THREAT OF NEW SUBSTITUTE:

     A substitute per- forms the same or a similar function as an industry’s product by a
      different means
      E.g.-mail is a substitute for express mail.
     Substitutes are always present, but they are easy to overlook because they may appear to be
      very different from the industry’s product. When the threat of substitutes is high, industry
      profitability suffers.
     They also reduce the bonanza an industry can reap in good times.eg In emerging
      economies, for example, the surge in demand for wired telephone lines has been capped
      as many consumers opt to make a mobile tele- phone their first and only phone line.

The threat of a substitute is high if:

1. The better the relative value of the substitute, the tighter is the lid on an industry’s profit potential
eg.skype has overcome long distance calling being in expensive.

2. The buyer’s cost of switching to the substitute is low. Switching from a proprietary, branded drug
to a generic drug usually involves minimal costs,

3. technological changes or competitive discontinuities in seemingly unrelated businesses can have
major impacts on industry profitability eg. Improvements in plastic materials, for example, allowed
them to substitute for steel in many automobile components.




4|P a g e
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)                                  Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL




(5)RIVALRYAMONGEXISTINGCOMPETITORS: Rivalry exists in form of including

               pricediscounting,
               newproductintroductions,
               advertisingcampaigns,and
               Serviceimprovements.


     Degree of rivalry depends on intensitywith which they compete &basison which they compete

  Itheintensityofrivalryamgreatestif:
     1. Numerous competitors both in size and power.
     2. Slow growth precipitates fight.
     3. Exit barriers arehigh.
     4. Rivalry is high if goals go beyond economic performance of industry.eg state owned company
         have goals of employment and prestige.als clashes of personality and ego.
     5. Firms cannot read each other’s signals.

         Rivalry also affects basis of competition. Dimensions whether rivals converge on same
         dimension or different.

PRICE DIMENSION: Destructive to profitability of industry and transfer profit to customers.
Diverts attention of customers towards product features and service.

 Pricecompetition ismostliabletooccurif:
   1. Productsidentical &fewswitchingcostsforbuyers.
   2. Fixedcostsarehighandmarginal costsare low.
   3. Large capacity expansion.
   4. Product is perishable

        OTHER DIMENSION(NON-PRICE RIVALRY ): On product features, supportservices,
        deliverytime,orbrandimage,
        Features:
            o no erosion of profitability.
            o Improves customer value.
            o Support higher prices.
            o Improve value over substitute or raise barrier for new entrant.
            o POSITIVE SUM COMPETITION.
            o HIGHER AVERAGE profitability

5|P a g e
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)                                      Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL



             o   Expand industry.

                 Thus nature of competition is towards positive direction.


Limitation on rivalry :

                 Factors not considered IN PORTER FIVE FORCES are
                     o TOO MANY “ME TOO”:every one wants too be in rat race every one wants too
                         devlop same product this factor should be kept in mind wrt rivalry.
                     o SUDDEN CHANGE IN MACRO ENVIORNMENT:cannot be ignored bcoz any
                         change in enviornment can cause all competition among rival TOO BLEED TO
                         DEATH.
                         Eg any hike in crude prices will cause airlines with very bad impact on
                         profitability like kingfisher airlines.
                     o LACK OF BUSSINESS MATURITY:Many rivals can lessen impact of competition by
                         forming allainces and mergers among themselves which we refer as bussiness
                         maturity.




FACTORS,NOT FORCES:

            1. INDUSTRY GROWTH RATE: fast growth promises more opportunities but narrow focus can
               cause bad strategy development.
            2. TECHNOLOGY &INNOVATION: also acts to make industry attractive or in attractive
            3. GOVERNMENT:can support industry eg.patent barrier orconversely by favouring unions &
               bankruptcy rules.
            4. COMPLEMENTARY PRODUCT &SERVICES: combination add to the product value.


ADVANTAGES OF PORTER FIVE FORCES:

   i.    The value of Porters model is more that it enables managers to think about the current situation
         of their industry in a structured, easy-to-understand way as a starting point for further analysis.
   ii.   It helps company to know average profitability of its industry and how it is changing over time.
  iii.   They provide baseline for sizing up companies strengths and weaknesses
  iv.    It tells us where company stands versus buyers,suppliers,entrants,rivals and substitutes.
  v.     It helps in understanding industry structure towards fruitful possibilities for strategic action like
                        Positioning company.
                        Shaping industry structure.
                        Expanding profit pool defining industry.



6|P a g e
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)                                   Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL




LIMITATION OF PORTER FIVE FORCES:

   i.   The model is best applicable for analysis of simple market structures, analysis of all five
        forces gets very difficult in complex industries with multiple interrelations, product groups, by-
        products and segments.
  ii.   Narrow focus on particular segments of such industries, however, bears the risk of missing
        important elements.
 iii.   The model assumes relatively static market structures. in today’s dynamic markets.
        Technological breakthroughs and dynamic market entrants from start-ups or
        other industries may completely change business models, entry barriers and relationships
        along the supply chain within short times.
 iv.    Inside-out strategy is ignored (core competence)
  v.    It does not cope with synergies and interdependencies within the portfolio of large corporations
        (parenting advantage)
 vi.    The environments which are characterized by rapid, systemic and radical change require more
        flexible, dynamic or emergent approaches to strategy formulation (disruptive innovation)
 vii.   Sometimes it may be possible to create completely new markets instead of selecting from
        existing ones (blue ocean strategy)




7|P a g e
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)   Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL




APPLICABILITY:

    1. PHARMA INDUSTRY:




8|P a g e
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)   Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL




RETAILING INDUSTRY




9|P a g e
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)             Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL




AVIATION INDUSTRY




                                        THE END


10 | P a g e
MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1)   Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy
ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL




11 | P a g e

More Related Content

What's hot

Porter 5 forces model
Porter 5 forces modelPorter 5 forces model
Porter 5 forces modelRaj vardhan
 
What is strategic fit
What is strategic fitWhat is strategic fit
What is strategic fitAnu Vanu
 
Chapter Two: Value Chain
Chapter Two: Value ChainChapter Two: Value Chain
Chapter Two: Value ChainGeeg geeh
 
Michael Porter's 5 forces model
Michael Porter's 5 forces modelMichael Porter's 5 forces model
Michael Porter's 5 forces modelMC Tubera
 
Supply Chain Management chap 1
Supply Chain Management chap 1Supply Chain Management chap 1
Supply Chain Management chap 1Umair Arain
 
Supply chain management ch02 chopra
Supply chain management ch02 chopraSupply chain management ch02 chopra
Supply chain management ch02 chopraJamil Ahmed AKASH
 
Porter's Generic Strategies
Porter's Generic Strategies Porter's Generic Strategies
Porter's Generic Strategies Ryan Braganza
 
Porter's Five Forces
Porter's Five ForcesPorter's Five Forces
Porter's Five ForcesMayur Khatri
 
Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM)
Competitive Profile Matrix(CPM)Competitive Profile Matrix(CPM)
Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM)KaleemSarwar2
 
Resources based view
Resources based viewResources based view
Resources based viewRetno Kusuma
 
Philip Kotler Chapter 1
Philip Kotler Chapter 1Philip Kotler Chapter 1
Philip Kotler Chapter 1Nataraj Pangal
 
How competitive forces shape strategy?
How competitive forces shape strategy?How competitive forces shape strategy?
How competitive forces shape strategy?Ashish Verma
 

What's hot (20)

Porter 5 forces model
Porter 5 forces modelPorter 5 forces model
Porter 5 forces model
 
Product line stretching
Product line stretchingProduct line stretching
Product line stretching
 
Porter's 5 Force Model
Porter's 5 Force ModelPorter's 5 Force Model
Porter's 5 Force Model
 
What is strategic fit
What is strategic fitWhat is strategic fit
What is strategic fit
 
Chapter Two: Value Chain
Chapter Two: Value ChainChapter Two: Value Chain
Chapter Two: Value Chain
 
Power and Politics
Power and PoliticsPower and Politics
Power and Politics
 
Michael Porter's 5 forces model
Michael Porter's 5 forces modelMichael Porter's 5 forces model
Michael Porter's 5 forces model
 
Supply Chain Management chap 1
Supply Chain Management chap 1Supply Chain Management chap 1
Supply Chain Management chap 1
 
Supply chain management ch02 chopra
Supply chain management ch02 chopraSupply chain management ch02 chopra
Supply chain management ch02 chopra
 
Porter’s Five Forces Templates
Porter’s Five Forces TemplatesPorter’s Five Forces Templates
Porter’s Five Forces Templates
 
Porter's Generic Strategies
Porter's Generic Strategies Porter's Generic Strategies
Porter's Generic Strategies
 
Chap001
Chap001Chap001
Chap001
 
Wal mart
Wal martWal mart
Wal mart
 
Porter's Five Forces
Porter's Five ForcesPorter's Five Forces
Porter's Five Forces
 
Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM)
Competitive Profile Matrix(CPM)Competitive Profile Matrix(CPM)
Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM)
 
Kotler Keller - Marketing Management 15th edition, Chapter 01
Kotler Keller - Marketing Management 15th edition, Chapter 01Kotler Keller - Marketing Management 15th edition, Chapter 01
Kotler Keller - Marketing Management 15th edition, Chapter 01
 
Resources based view
Resources based viewResources based view
Resources based view
 
Ch 2
Ch 2Ch 2
Ch 2
 
Philip Kotler Chapter 1
Philip Kotler Chapter 1Philip Kotler Chapter 1
Philip Kotler Chapter 1
 
How competitive forces shape strategy?
How competitive forces shape strategy?How competitive forces shape strategy?
How competitive forces shape strategy?
 

Similar to Porter Five Forces Review Assignment

Week 4 Discussion_ BUS 599A Rotten Apple  Please respond.docx
Week 4 Discussion_ BUS 599A Rotten Apple  Please respond.docxWeek 4 Discussion_ BUS 599A Rotten Apple  Please respond.docx
Week 4 Discussion_ BUS 599A Rotten Apple  Please respond.docxcockekeshia
 
Michael porter's five force model ( porter's competitive enviroment analysis)
Michael porter's five force model ( porter's competitive enviroment analysis)Michael porter's five force model ( porter's competitive enviroment analysis)
Michael porter's five force model ( porter's competitive enviroment analysis)Suleyman Ally
 
On competition chapter 1 the five competitive forces that shape strategy
On competition chapter 1 the five competitive forces that shape strategyOn competition chapter 1 the five competitive forces that shape strategy
On competition chapter 1 the five competitive forces that shape strategyNIDA Business School
 
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand thAwareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand thkacie8xcheco
 
Competitive strategy
Competitive strategyCompetitive strategy
Competitive strategysatya pal
 
Michaelporter pedrofranciscomedinamarn-130918105151-phpapp02
Michaelporter pedrofranciscomedinamarn-130918105151-phpapp02Michaelporter pedrofranciscomedinamarn-130918105151-phpapp02
Michaelporter pedrofranciscomedinamarn-130918105151-phpapp02Ahmed Zidan
 
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docx
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docxAwareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docx
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docxrock73
 
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docx
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docxAwareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docx
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docxcelenarouzie
 
Michael porter’s
Michael porter’sMichael porter’s
Michael porter’sjyoti goyal
 
strategic controlling
strategic controllingstrategic controlling
strategic controllingducanh2003
 
4. External Environ.ppt
4. External Environ.ppt4. External Environ.ppt
4. External Environ.pptAshnaTabassum
 
New microsoft office word document
New microsoft office word documentNew microsoft office word document
New microsoft office word documentPrabin Lal K
 
Porters five model
Porters five modelPorters five model
Porters five modelHEMA SANKAR
 
Porter’s 5 Forces Model- a brief overview
Porter’s 5 Forces Model- a brief overviewPorter’s 5 Forces Model- a brief overview
Porter’s 5 Forces Model- a brief overviewBrainware University
 
Five forces industry analysis
Five forces industry analysisFive forces industry analysis
Five forces industry analysisMahendra Bohra
 

Similar to Porter Five Forces Review Assignment (20)

Week 4 Discussion_ BUS 599A Rotten Apple  Please respond.docx
Week 4 Discussion_ BUS 599A Rotten Apple  Please respond.docxWeek 4 Discussion_ BUS 599A Rotten Apple  Please respond.docx
Week 4 Discussion_ BUS 599A Rotten Apple  Please respond.docx
 
Michael porter's five force model ( porter's competitive enviroment analysis)
Michael porter's five force model ( porter's competitive enviroment analysis)Michael porter's five force model ( porter's competitive enviroment analysis)
Michael porter's five force model ( porter's competitive enviroment analysis)
 
Nokia
NokiaNokia
Nokia
 
On competition chapter 1 the five competitive forces that shape strategy
On competition chapter 1 the five competitive forces that shape strategyOn competition chapter 1 the five competitive forces that shape strategy
On competition chapter 1 the five competitive forces that shape strategy
 
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand thAwareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th
 
Competitive strategy
Competitive strategyCompetitive strategy
Competitive strategy
 
Michaelporter pedrofranciscomedinamarn-130918105151-phpapp02
Michaelporter pedrofranciscomedinamarn-130918105151-phpapp02Michaelporter pedrofranciscomedinamarn-130918105151-phpapp02
Michaelporter pedrofranciscomedinamarn-130918105151-phpapp02
 
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docx
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docxAwareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docx
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docx
 
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docx
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docxAwareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docx
Awareness of the fi ve forces can help a company understand th.docx
 
Michael porter’s
Michael porter’sMichael porter’s
Michael porter’s
 
strategic controlling
strategic controllingstrategic controlling
strategic controlling
 
4. External Environ.ppt
4. External Environ.ppt4. External Environ.ppt
4. External Environ.ppt
 
Michael porter pedro francisco medina marín
Michael porter pedro francisco medina marínMichael porter pedro francisco medina marín
Michael porter pedro francisco medina marín
 
New microsoft office word document
New microsoft office word documentNew microsoft office word document
New microsoft office word document
 
Porter 5 Forces
Porter 5 ForcesPorter 5 Forces
Porter 5 Forces
 
Porters five model
Porters five modelPorters five model
Porters five model
 
Porter-HBR.pdf
Porter-HBR.pdfPorter-HBR.pdf
Porter-HBR.pdf
 
Stm porters 5 Force model
Stm porters 5 Force modelStm porters 5 Force model
Stm porters 5 Force model
 
Porter’s 5 Forces Model- a brief overview
Porter’s 5 Forces Model- a brief overviewPorter’s 5 Forces Model- a brief overview
Porter’s 5 Forces Model- a brief overview
 
Five forces industry analysis
Five forces industry analysisFive forces industry analysis
Five forces industry analysis
 

More from MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. (10)

Analytical crm and social crm
Analytical crm and social crmAnalytical crm and social crm
Analytical crm and social crm
 
Bhopal gas tragedy
Bhopal gas tragedyBhopal gas tragedy
Bhopal gas tragedy
 
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF NOVARTIS INDIA
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF NOVARTIS INDIAFINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF NOVARTIS INDIA
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF NOVARTIS INDIA
 
Marketing 3.0
Marketing 3.0Marketing 3.0
Marketing 3.0
 
Pharma trends in bric economies
Pharma trends in bric economiesPharma trends in bric economies
Pharma trends in bric economies
 
Korea entry strategy (biocon)
Korea entry strategy (biocon)Korea entry strategy (biocon)
Korea entry strategy (biocon)
 
Korea entry strategy (biocon) Hypothetical
Korea entry strategy (biocon) HypotheticalKorea entry strategy (biocon) Hypothetical
Korea entry strategy (biocon) Hypothetical
 
Zydus
ZydusZydus
Zydus
 
Vipul Patil P.Marketing Assignment
Vipul Patil P.Marketing AssignmentVipul Patil P.Marketing Assignment
Vipul Patil P.Marketing Assignment
 
pharma report 2020 vipul patil
pharma report 2020 vipul patilpharma report 2020 vipul patil
pharma report 2020 vipul patil
 

Porter Five Forces Review Assignment

  • 1. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL Michael Eugene Porter (born May 23, 1947)[ is the Bishop William Lawrence University Professor at Harvard Business School. He is a leading authority on company strategy and the competitiveness of nations and regions. Michael Porter’s work is recognized in many governments, corporations and academic circles globally. He chairs Harvard Business School's program dedicated for newlyappointed CEOs of very large corporations. WORK UNDER REVIEW:  Porter, M.E. (1979) "How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy", Harvard Business Review, March/April 1979.  Porter, M.E. (2008) "The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy", Harvard Business Review, January 2008, pp. 79- 93.Porter’sfiveforces”haveshapedagenerationofacademicresearchandbusinesspractice. Porterherereaffirms,up-dates,andextends theclassicwork.Healsoaddressescommonmisunderstandings,providespracticalguidance forusersoftheframework, andoffersadeeper viewofitsimplicationsforstrategy today. REVIEWED BY: NAME : VIPUL PATIL COURSE : PHARMATECH AND HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (MPHARM+MBA) DEPARTMENT: PHARM ANALYSIS ROLL NO : 20 YEAR : FIRST YEAR INTRODUCTION The Five Forces model of Porter is an outside-in business unit strategy tool that is used to make an analysis of the attractiveness (value...) of an industry structure. It captures the key elements of industry competition. 1. Threat of new entrants 2. Bargaining power of suppliers 3. Bargaining power of Buyers 4. Threat of substitute products 5. Intense rivalry among existing players 1|P a g e
  • 2. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL  As differentfromoneanotherasindustriesmight appearon thesurface,the underlyingdrivers ofprofitability arethe same. Buttounderstandindustrycompetitionandprofitability.  Ineach ofthecases, one must analyze theindustry’s underlyingstructureintermsofthe fiveforces.  Understandingthe competitiveforces,andtheirunderlyingcauses,revealstherootsofanindustry’s currentprofitabilitywhileprovidingaframeworkforanticipating and influencingcompetition(and profitability) overtime. We will consider each parameter in details: (1)THREAT ON NEW ENTRANTS:  New entrants bring new capacity.  Have desire for market share.:  Can bring in heavy cash flows and shake up competition.Eg.Pepsi,Microsoft.  it can put cap on profitability.  Incumbents hold down prices or boost investments to deter new entrants.  Brings reaction from incumbents. BARRIERS OF ENTRY: Supply side economies of scale: larger volume enjoys lower cost eg.intel. Demand side benefits of scale:buyer patronize the company products.(networking effects) Customer switching cost: larger the swiching cost harder it will be for entrants to gain customer. Capital requirement:large capital investment can deter new entrantsif particular capital requirement is unrecoverable likehigher to finance expenditure likeadvertisin and R&D. 2|P a g e
  • 3. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL Incumbency advantages independent of sizes: incumbents have quality advantages over new entrants like propriety technology, best raw material sources, established brand entities and cumulative experience. Allin turn contribute to efficiency. Unequal access to distribution channels: wholesalers and retailers so committed to incumbent that new entrant have to bypass distribution or create his own. Restrictive government policy: government can encourage new entrants through subsidies or hinder them by imposing ban or licensing requirements. Expected retaliation:public statement from incumbent’s reaction to new entrant can act as barrier. (2)POWER OF SUPPLIER:  Powerful suppliers capture more value for themselves by charging higher prices, limiting quality or services and shift costs towards industry participants.  They squeeze out profitability of industry.Eg.supplier of labor. SUPPLIER GROUP IS POWERFUL IF: Supplier is more concentrated than industry:egMicrosoft’s monopoly in operating systems. Supplier group doesn’t rely on industry for its revenues: supplier serving much industry will try to extract profit from all sides but will reasonable discount if one is large volume buyer. Switching costs: If switching cost from buyer is high then it is difficult to play supplier against one another. Supplier which offers differentiated product: There is no substitute for suppliers product pharmaceutical companies over hospitals and pilots union. Forward integration threat: When industry participantsmake too much profit. (3)POWER OF BUYER:  Powerful buyer is flipside of powerful supplier by forcing down prices, demanding better quality or more services.  They play industry participants against one another.  They are powerful if they have negotiating leverage.  They their clout to pressure price reductions. Buyer has negotiating leverage if 3|P a g e
  • 4. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL i. Few buyer &large relative purchase wrt single vendor:eg.bulk chemicals ii. Standardized products or undifferentiated: then buyer play against one another. iii. Switching costs: if less buyers change vendors. iv. Backward integration threatenPepsi threaten to make bottles. v. Intermediate buyer: when they can influence end customer purchasing decision. Buyer group is price sensitive if: i. Product has significant fraction in costs structure: Then buyer bargain hard &shop around. ii. The buyer group earns low profits: BUYER UNDER PRESSURE TO TRIM COSTS. iii. Qualityofbuyerislittleaffectedby products or services: If quality is affected by industry then buyer is not price sensitive. iv. Buyer is price insensitive if: 1. If product or services pay many times over by improving performance. 2. If product is more undifferentiated. (4)THREAT OF NEW SUBSTITUTE:  A substitute per- forms the same or a similar function as an industry’s product by a different means E.g.-mail is a substitute for express mail.  Substitutes are always present, but they are easy to overlook because they may appear to be very different from the industry’s product. When the threat of substitutes is high, industry profitability suffers.  They also reduce the bonanza an industry can reap in good times.eg In emerging economies, for example, the surge in demand for wired telephone lines has been capped as many consumers opt to make a mobile tele- phone their first and only phone line. The threat of a substitute is high if: 1. The better the relative value of the substitute, the tighter is the lid on an industry’s profit potential eg.skype has overcome long distance calling being in expensive. 2. The buyer’s cost of switching to the substitute is low. Switching from a proprietary, branded drug to a generic drug usually involves minimal costs, 3. technological changes or competitive discontinuities in seemingly unrelated businesses can have major impacts on industry profitability eg. Improvements in plastic materials, for example, allowed them to substitute for steel in many automobile components. 4|P a g e
  • 5. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL (5)RIVALRYAMONGEXISTINGCOMPETITORS: Rivalry exists in form of including  pricediscounting,  newproductintroductions,  advertisingcampaigns,and  Serviceimprovements. Degree of rivalry depends on intensitywith which they compete &basison which they compete Itheintensityofrivalryamgreatestif: 1. Numerous competitors both in size and power. 2. Slow growth precipitates fight. 3. Exit barriers arehigh. 4. Rivalry is high if goals go beyond economic performance of industry.eg state owned company have goals of employment and prestige.als clashes of personality and ego. 5. Firms cannot read each other’s signals. Rivalry also affects basis of competition. Dimensions whether rivals converge on same dimension or different. PRICE DIMENSION: Destructive to profitability of industry and transfer profit to customers. Diverts attention of customers towards product features and service. Pricecompetition ismostliabletooccurif: 1. Productsidentical &fewswitchingcostsforbuyers. 2. Fixedcostsarehighandmarginal costsare low. 3. Large capacity expansion. 4. Product is perishable OTHER DIMENSION(NON-PRICE RIVALRY ): On product features, supportservices, deliverytime,orbrandimage, Features: o no erosion of profitability. o Improves customer value. o Support higher prices. o Improve value over substitute or raise barrier for new entrant. o POSITIVE SUM COMPETITION. o HIGHER AVERAGE profitability 5|P a g e
  • 6. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL o Expand industry. Thus nature of competition is towards positive direction. Limitation on rivalry : Factors not considered IN PORTER FIVE FORCES are o TOO MANY “ME TOO”:every one wants too be in rat race every one wants too devlop same product this factor should be kept in mind wrt rivalry. o SUDDEN CHANGE IN MACRO ENVIORNMENT:cannot be ignored bcoz any change in enviornment can cause all competition among rival TOO BLEED TO DEATH. Eg any hike in crude prices will cause airlines with very bad impact on profitability like kingfisher airlines. o LACK OF BUSSINESS MATURITY:Many rivals can lessen impact of competition by forming allainces and mergers among themselves which we refer as bussiness maturity. FACTORS,NOT FORCES: 1. INDUSTRY GROWTH RATE: fast growth promises more opportunities but narrow focus can cause bad strategy development. 2. TECHNOLOGY &INNOVATION: also acts to make industry attractive or in attractive 3. GOVERNMENT:can support industry eg.patent barrier orconversely by favouring unions & bankruptcy rules. 4. COMPLEMENTARY PRODUCT &SERVICES: combination add to the product value. ADVANTAGES OF PORTER FIVE FORCES: i. The value of Porters model is more that it enables managers to think about the current situation of their industry in a structured, easy-to-understand way as a starting point for further analysis. ii. It helps company to know average profitability of its industry and how it is changing over time. iii. They provide baseline for sizing up companies strengths and weaknesses iv. It tells us where company stands versus buyers,suppliers,entrants,rivals and substitutes. v. It helps in understanding industry structure towards fruitful possibilities for strategic action like  Positioning company.  Shaping industry structure.  Expanding profit pool defining industry. 6|P a g e
  • 7. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL LIMITATION OF PORTER FIVE FORCES: i. The model is best applicable for analysis of simple market structures, analysis of all five forces gets very difficult in complex industries with multiple interrelations, product groups, by- products and segments. ii. Narrow focus on particular segments of such industries, however, bears the risk of missing important elements. iii. The model assumes relatively static market structures. in today’s dynamic markets. Technological breakthroughs and dynamic market entrants from start-ups or other industries may completely change business models, entry barriers and relationships along the supply chain within short times. iv. Inside-out strategy is ignored (core competence) v. It does not cope with synergies and interdependencies within the portfolio of large corporations (parenting advantage) vi. The environments which are characterized by rapid, systemic and radical change require more flexible, dynamic or emergent approaches to strategy formulation (disruptive innovation) vii. Sometimes it may be possible to create completely new markets instead of selecting from existing ones (blue ocean strategy) 7|P a g e
  • 8. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL APPLICABILITY: 1. PHARMA INDUSTRY: 8|P a g e
  • 9. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL RETAILING INDUSTRY 9|P a g e
  • 10. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL AVIATION INDUSTRY THE END 10 | P a g e
  • 11. MARKETING MANAGMENT (Assignment no.1) Review On Porter Five Forces That Shapes Strategy ROLLNO. 20 VIPUL PATIL 11 | P a g e