The F Word - Evaluation.

407 views
342 views

Published on

Evaluation made exciting, interesting and simple.

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
407
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
16
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

The F Word - Evaluation.

  1. 1. The f Word Naomi Jones Angela Paine Amanda Prosser Natalie Low Stephen M K St h McKay
  2. 2. What difference do we make? Evaluating v and v projects
  3. 3. Overview • Who are we? • Why bother with evaluation? • Wh t diff What difference do you d make? • How do we all go about proving it?
  4. 4. Who we are • A consortium of four organisations • U d t ki Undertaking an independent i d d t evaluation for v • Working with v over the next two years • Using a variety of evaluation methods • Constantly feeding back findings y g g • Shaping the future development of v
  5. 5. Turn to the person on your right and introduce yourself and say two words to sum up your view of evaluation f l ti
  6. 6. Why bother with evaluation? • For accountability and learning • Evidence funders - what difference their money makes y • Evidence for trustee - strategic decision making • Evidence for volunteers - what difference their time makes • Attracting new volunteers – what they will get out of it • Organisational learning - what works; what can b iimproved h t be d
  7. 7. Less about about…
  8. 8. More about about…
  9. 9. What does it all mean? • Outputs: The countable direct products of a countable, project or organisation’s activities (e.g. number of training courses delivered) • Outcomes: Changes, benefits, learning or other g , , g effects that happen as a result of your project (e.g. increased skills and confidence among service users) • Impact: Effect of a project at a higher or broader level in the longer term after a range of outcomes has been achieved (e.g. reduce poverty) • Monitoring: Collecting information on a project or an activity to help report on a project. Needs to be planned and managed. • Evaluation: Using monitoring and other g g iinformation to make judgments about effectiveness f ti t k j d t b t ff ti of a project and to make changes and improvements (adapted from Charities Evaluation Service, 2007, Your Project and its Outcomes, CES: London)
  10. 10. Overall aim What you ultimately hope to Impact achieve. Should be brief and focused. Specific aims Outcomes The changes you hope to achieve as a result of your work Use words like ‘improve’, ‘increase’, ‘reduce’, ‘develop’ Outputs O t t Activities The activities you undertake and the services you offer to bring these changes about Inputs Inputs Inputs Inputs Adapted from Charities Evaluation Planning Triangle
  11. 11. What difference does your project make? • Your project will make a difference to lots of different people: – Volunteers – Service users – Your organisation as a whole Your organisation as a whole – The community in which you work
  12. 12. What difference does y your p j project make? • It will make a difference in a number of ways: • Things [aka ‘physical capital’]: – The things produced by volunteering  • Number of training courses delivered or people Number of training courses delivered or people  mentored – Need to consider not just quantity but also quality • People [ [aka ‘human capital’] ] – Personal development  • Changes in levels of confidence, self‐esteem,  wellbeing – Gaining new skills or enhancing existing ones • Soft skills – e.g. team work, communication, inter‐ personal • Hard skills – e.g. IT skills, construction, horticulture
  13. 13. • Money [aka ‘economic capital’]: economic capital ]: – The monetary value of volunteering and its  outcomes on all stakeholders, e.g. value of  training received, changes in employability,  training received changes in employability value of work done by volunteers • Relationships [ [aka ‘social capital’]: ] – Relationships, networks, bonds of trust  between people and reciprocity  between people and reciprocity • Attitudes [aka ‘cultural capital’]: [ p ] – Shared sense of cultural and religious identity – Awareness and understanding of other peoples  cultures
  14. 14. How do we go about proving it? • You can collect evidence to evaluate your project in a number of ways: – Monitoring information – Surveys of volunteers or staff members – Focus groups of volunteers or service users – Interviews with service users and key  stakeholders – Photograph projects before, during and after – Video diaries by volunteers or service users
  15. 15. How do we go about proving it? • You don’t have to do it all yourself: – The evaluation website will include guidance  – You can get others involved: volunteers or students from  a local university might be able to help a local university might be able to help – You could make use of the questions within IVR’s  Volunteering Impact Assessment Toolkit
  16. 16. Case study: Children’s Hospice Assoc. • Volunteers trained to undertake interviews and surveys y • Volunteers reported positive experience: – 84% had built friendships and networks  – But, 18% felt their skills weren’t being utilised But, 18% felt their skills weren t being utilised • Staff valued the role of volunteers: – 83% felt volunteers helped create open and diverse culture – But 18% felt they were over reliant on volunteers But, 18% felt they were over reliant on volunteers • Families reported a significant impact of volunteers: – 73% said volunteers led to new friendships and networks – But some concerns about vetting and role appropriateness But, some concerns about vetting and role appropriateness • Recommendations were built into a new strategy: – Reviewing how volunteer skills are utilised to full effect – Raising awareness of the role and volunteer status of the board Raising awareness of the role and volunteer status of the board – Exploring the possibility of extending volunteer roles  – Developing a leaflet for families about volunteers
  17. 17. On your table work to complete the planning and evaluation triangle g
  18. 18. How will we go about evaluating v? g • Analysing national data from the Citizenship Survey • Analysing monitoring data collected by v • Speaking to key national stakeholders • Undertaking a survey of young people • D i Doing telephone iinterviews with grant t l h t i ith t recipients • Undertaking a series of case studies
  19. 19. How can you get involved? • Answer our phone calls and surveys! • Become a case study • Participate in pilot initiatives • Provide good quality monitoring information • Visit our website – Launching in July Launching in July – Housed on vinspired.com/evaluation – Purpose is to: • Share any insights we’re picking up Share any insights we re picking up • Enable you to share experiences and best practice • Enable you to feed into evaluation • Provide guidance on self evaluation d d lf l

×