Accessibility of Mobile Services

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    36 individuals participated with the following disabilityvisually impaired – 69.4% motor or physical impairments – 28.6%Hearing impairment – 13.9% Dyslexia – 8.3%

    The penetration of Nokia handsets among questionnaire respondents was 24% higher than Nokia’s world penetration, with particularly high popularity (76% penetration) amongst those who reported visual impairment.

    97.2% used calling occasionally or more often91.7% used SMS occasionally or more often51.7% used the internet occasionally or on most days, with no one using it every day

    1 Favorite

    Accessibility of Mobile Services - Presentation Transcript

    1. Accessibility of Mobile Services
      VeronikaJermolina, AbilityNet11:30–12:10 P02-C
    2. Introduction
      VeronikaJermolina (Accessibility and Usability Consultant at AbilityNet)
      Presenting research project “Accessibility of Mobile Devices” carried out in 2008
      Research conducted at City University London (supervised by Dr. P. Zaphiris) & AbilityNet
      David Banes can’t be here today  hence the title of the presentation slightly changed
    3. Presentation Outline
      • Accessibility and the reasons for accessible design
      • Why “mobile services”
      • How data was gathered
      • Findings
      • Conclusions & further work
      • Thanks & your questions
      • (Bibliography)
      • (User quotations)
    4. The Carrot & Stick of Accessibility
      Carrots
      Penetration of mobile phones in Western Europe 112% and 121% in the UK (Informa Telecoms & Media 2007; ITU 2008)
      14-20% of the UK population estimate to have a disability (DOH, 2001)
      Estimated annual spending power is £50bn in the UK (DRC, 2005)
      Repercussions on non-disabled and world-wide populations (Kurniawan & Zaphiris, 2007)
      The Stick
      Disability Discrimination Act
    5. Web Accessibility
      Web Accessibility (Henry & Duffy 2005)
      The Web can be accessible if multiple components work together
      If one component fails, there can be workarounds
      But this makes more likely for accessibility to be overlooked
    6. Mobile Service Stakeholders
      Handset manufacturer –handsets and software to run the phone
      Mobile network provider – network coverage, calling, SMS, internet browsing; decides on applications to be bundled with its firmware
      Content or service provider –applications for bundling with firmware and for download
      Assistive technology provider – allows disabled users to access all the features of a mobile phone
      End user – uses the service for its purpose.
      Stakeholders need to work together to provide accessible service
    7. Research MethodsQuestionnaire / User Testing
    8. Questionnaire
      Disseminated through the Web
      Mean age was 38 years old
      Contract – 58.3%
      PAYG – 36.1%
    9. Percentage of Respondents by Impairment Type
    10. Usability Testing
      Mean age was 41.5 years
      8 people
      Visually impaired – 5
      Dyslexia – 2
      Motor – 1
      Hearing – 1
      Learning – 1
      6 people had Nokia N95
    11. Findings
    12. Overview of Findings
      • What people like about their mobiles
      • Market share and penetration of mobile manufacturers
      • ATs used
      • Choosing, Buying, and Changing a handset
      • Mobile internet use and barriers
      • Other inaccessible Apps
      • A brief note on the iPhone
    13. The Good Stuff: Size, Access, Functionality
    14. Market Share
      World penetration rates – 40% Nokia, 15% Samsung, 9% Motorola, 9% LG Electronics, 8% Sony Ericsson
      Apple iPhone penetration not in the top 5 at the time of research (IDC, 2008)
    15. Market Share vs. Respondent Share
    16. Assistive Technology
      The use of AT and customisation was significantly lower between mobile device users when compared to PC users
    17. Choosing a Handset
      Opinion of the community (contacts, friends, AT suppliers)
      My Talks provider would let me know if “anything nice has come out”
      “I had a brief trial of the Nokia N95 handset in the shop, but was not convinced until a colleague showed the text resizing feature”
      Compatibility with Talks
      Brand loyalty & historical factors
      “I’m a Nokia fan”
      “Someone mentioned that Vodafone were giving away a bunch of Talks licences on Nokia handsets”
      No way to try out competing products
      “Someone would have let me know” if anything better [than Talks on Nokia] came out
    18. Choosing a Handset (cont)
      “My choice of mobile phone is driven by my passion for technology and the latest features available”
      “I think next time I’ll buy a phone that matches my RSI and not my outfit”
    19. Changing a Handset
      “Just grief”
      Licence fees for ATs
      Backing up and Restoring content is problematic
      Nokia’s PC Suite inaccessible - “one big graphic”
    20. Buying a handset
      Awareness of accessibility needs and features among shop staff is very low making seeking advice in shops discouraging
      “ People in the shops are confusing and distracting. I once got into a Vodafone shop to get some assistance with my handset but a member of staff told me that I should change my phone because it was “rubbish”. He tried to sell me a new contract. My disability is not obvious...”
      No “try before you buy” option leaves no way to successfully verify if a handset would suit their access needs or not
      Installing a screen reader is the pre-requisite for exploring handsets in the VI group
    21. Mobile Internet Use
      • Very low mobile internet take-up among respondents
      Non-disabled mobile internet use
      UK population = 61.4m (Statistics.gov 2008)
      Mobile penetration at 121% = 74.3m handsets
      Yet, only about 17m mobile internet users (MDA, 2008)
    22. Mobile Internet barriers
      Cost
      Surprise charges discourage people from using it
      Formatting
      Clicking every link is a lottery – it can be 1MB (costing you £3 on some PAYG plans)
    23. Mobile Internet barriers (cont)
      Complicated pay plans
      Inaccessible mobile provider sites
      Use of jargon – “web’n’walk day pass on U-fix and pay as you go” (T-mobile)
      “Unlimited” defined in highly inaccessible “Terms and conditions”
      Complex technology
      Choosing the access point
      “It’s back to the payment thing –
      Oh no! I don’t really know how
      to get out of here”
    24. Other software currently inaccessible
      Camera
      Inaccessible due to the lack of clearly labelled control
      GPS and Maps
      Nokia Maps completely inaccessible to the screen readers
      • Nokia Maps were difficult to use and counter-intuitive for sighted participants
      • “I don’t really know if I’m being charged for accessing the Maps. It’s not a nice feeling”
      • The users preferred the working commercial alternatives, such as Wayfinder Access & Trekker Maestro (costly!)
      • “Wayfinder’s brilliant! They listen to their customers. I like giving directions to taxi drivers, the ones who don’t have GPS”
    25. iPhone
      The incidence of iPhone amongst the survey respondents was zero
      Caused an initial positive reaction amongst some participants
      “I was in the States and went to an Apple shop to find out about what accessibility features there were. None, I was told”
      Was completely inaccessible to the blind participants
      Upset by the complete disregard for accessibility
      “An expensive brick”
      Was poorly accessible to the RSI participant due to cold metal panel and small fonts.
      The web page zoom feature was helpful to the partially sighted participant
      New 3GS accessibility features need testing with real users
    26. Can you trust this research?
      Statistically significant results were not one of the objectives of the project
      Therefore representativeness and generalisability cannot be guaranteed
      We should try to study and accommodate diverse user needs without the need for statistically significant results
    27. Conclusions
    28. Conclusions
      Holistic approach to mobile services
      We might see it firmware, software, customer services, provider websites, price plans, access points, high street shops
      … BUT to the user it’s all the same (in)accessible service
      Nokia are ahead of the competition amongst the visually impaired
      There are fewer ATs(or awareness?) for mobiles compared to PCs
      Community and loyalty define the buying choice
      Changing a phone is challenging
      Testing in shops is difficult
      The mobile internet is currently inaccessible
      Camera & Video and Maps & GPS are difficult to use or inaccessible
      iPhoneintroduced accessibility features 2 years after first release
    29. Some Ideas for Further Work
      Test for accessibility – content, applications, and other important parts of the mobile service, such as the mobile operators’ websites
      Provide fair “try before you buy” opportunities
      Use user-centred design and reach out to users with relevant information about products and services (e.g. “other people bought this phone”)
      Provide the facility to personalise text size and background colours
    30. Special Thanks
      • Participants, especially Andre Louis
      • Kath Moonan & Caleb Tang (AbilityNet)
      • Nigel Lewis (AbilityNet) and Dr. Panayiotis Zaphiris (City University London)
      Join Us for Accessibility 2.0 Conference on 22nd September
      • Topics: Mobile, Understanding Deafness, Graphic Design, Silverlight …
      • Speakers from: Yahoo!, BBC, Opera, Microsoft …
      • http://www.abilitynet.org.uk/accessibility2/
      Contact
      • veronika.jermolina@abilitynet.org.uk
      • Twitter @welikethis
    31. Bibliography
      DDA 1995 (c.50) [online] http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/ukpga_19950050_en_4#pt3-pb1-l1g19
      Department of Health (2001) Survey Health for England [online] http://www.archive2.official-documents.co.uk/document/deps/doh/survey01/disa/disa01.htm
      Henry S.L., (2008) Essential Components of Web Accessibility [online] http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/components.php
      IDC (2008) IDC – Press Release [online] (Updated 31 July 2008) http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS21369208
      Informa (2007) Western European Subscriptions By Country. Mobile Communications Europe [online] 466 (Updated 15 April 2008) http://www.informatm.com/pdf/Mar-2007/29/mce442_032007.pdf
      International Telecommunications Union (2008) Worldwide mobile cellular subscribers to reach 4 billion mark late 2008 [online] (Updated 25 September 2008) http://www.itu.int/newsroom/press_releases/2008/29.html
      Kurniawan , S., Zaphiris, P. (2007) Advances in Universal Web Design and Evaluation [e-book] Chapter 1, Web Accessibility and the Needs of Users with Disabilities, Aspasia Dellaporta, Cimex Media Ltd., UK http://books.google.co.uk
      Mobile Data Association (2008) Latest WAP Figures [online] http://www.text.it/mediacentre/wap_figures.cfm
    32. User Quotations
      I used to use my phone as a modem. Then I received a bill for £30 for using it. I didn’t know that I could do it cheaper.
      T9... If it could remember your preferred option would be nice. Sometimes it forgets. And it drives me crazy!
      I can’t take photographs, I can’t do video.
      I want to take a photo of my friend’s baby. He smells so lovely!
      Just because I can’t see doesn’t mean I wouldn’t want to take a picture or a video to share with my family. I’m going on a cruise next month…
      The [mobile] internet is rubbish! It’s about confidence, so I stopped trying
      Wayfinder’s brilliant! They listen to their customers. I like giving directions to taxi drivers, the ones who don’t have GPS.
      The GPS with Nokia Maps doesn’t work. Seriously, I don’t know a single person for whom it works.
      Does your condition affect your choice of mobile phone? No! [laughs] Being addicted to technology affects my choice!
      I don’t really know if I’m being charged for accessing the Maps. It’s not a nice feeling.
      I’d like it to blend in
      It’s the iPhone! It’s quite cold. That might put me off immediately, using it outside;
      [iPhone] I don’t have big hands, but those keys are very small.
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Veronika JermolinaVeronika Jermolina Nominate

    custom

    615 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    This presentation is based on the research carried more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 615
      • 615 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 20
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories