Basel-2

1,115 views
922 views

Published on

Published in: Economy & Finance, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,115
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
7
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
68
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Basel-2

  1. 1. By V.Chaitanya Lakshmi
  2. 2.  Refers to banking supervision Accords (recommendations on banking laws and regulations), Basel I and Basel II issued by the Basel Committee on Banking supervision(BCBS)  Called the Basel Accords as the BCBS maintains its secretariat at the Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland
  3. 3.  Basel Committee not a formal regulatory authority, but has great influence over supervising authorities in many countries.  In 1988, for recognizing the emergence of larger more global financial services companies, the Committee introduced Basel Capital Accord (Basel I) to strengthen soundness and stability of international banking system by requiring higher capital ratios.  Basel Committee on Banking Supervision established in 1974 to provide a forum for banking supervisory matters.
  4. 4. • • • Under capital requirements rules, credit institutions like banks must at all times maintain minimum financial capital, to cover the risks Aim - to ensure financial soundness of such institutions, maintain customer confidence in the solvency of the institutions, ensure stability of financial system at large, and protect depositors against losses After extensive communication with banks and industry groups, the revised framework, Basel II issued in 2004
  5. 5.  The second of the Basel Accords.  Purpose is to create an international standard that banking regulators can use when creating regulations about capital banks to be put aside to guard against financial and operational risks  An international standard can help protect the international financial system from possible problems should a major bank or a series of banks collapse.  Basel II attempts to accomplish this by setting up rigorous risk and capital management requirements to ensure that a bank holds capital reserves appropriate to the risk the bank exposes itself to through lending and investment practices.  Greater the risk greater the amount of capital bank needs to hold to safeguard its solvency and overall economic stability.
  6. 6.    Ensuring that capital allocation is more risk sensitive Separating operational risk from credit risk, and quantifying both Attempting to align economic and regulatory capital more closely to reduce scope for regulatory arbitrage
  7. 7.  Basel I Accord succeeded in raising total level of equity capital in the system.  However, it also pushed unintended consequences. Since it does not differentiate risks very well, it perversely encouraged risk seeking. All loans given to corporate borrowers were subject to the same capital requirement, without taking into account ability of the counterparties to repay. It ignored credit rating, credit history, risk management and corporate governance structure of all corporate borrowers. All were treated as private corporations. It also promoted loan securitization that led to the unwinding in the subprime market.   
  8. 8. • Basel II much more risk sensitive, as it is aligning capital requirements to risks of loss. Better risk management in a bank means bank may be able to allocate less regulatory capital • The objective of Basel II is to modernise existing capital requirements framework to make it more comprehensive and risk sensitive • The Basel II framework therefore designed to be more sensitive to the real risks that firms face than Basel I • Apart from looking at financial figures, it also considers operational risks, such as risk of systems breaking down or people doing the wrong things, and also market risk.
  9. 9. 3 Pillars of Basel II Framework • Pillar 1 sets out the minimum capital requirements firms will be required to meet to cover credit, market and operational risk • Pillar 2 sets out a new supervisory review process. Requires financial institutions to have their own internal processes to assess their overall capital adequacy in relation to their risk profile • Pillar 3 cements Pillars 1 and 2 and is designed to improve market discipline by requiring firms to publish certain details of their risks, capital and risk management as to how senior management and the Board assess and will manage the institution's risks.
  10. 10. FIRST PILLAR     deals with maintenance of regulatory capital calculated for three major components of risk that a bank facescredit risk, operational risk, and market risk The credit risk component can be calculated in three different ways of varying degree of sophistication, namely standardized approach, foundation IRB and advanced IRB For operational risk, there are three different approaches - basic indicator approach or BIA, standardized approach or TSA, and the internal measurement approach For market risk the preferred approach is VAR i.e. value at risk
  11. 11. Pillar 1 : Minimum capital requirements Institution's total regulatory capital must be at least 8% (ratio same as in Basel I) of its risk the amount of capital 8% Total risk - weighted assets weighted assets are based on measures of THREE RISKS
  12. 12. CREDIT RISK : The risk of loss arising from outright default due to inability or unwillingness of the customer or counter party to meet commitments in relation to lending, trading, settlement and other financial transaction of the customer or counter party to meet commitments MARKET RISK : The possibility of loss caused by changes in the market variables such as interest rate, foreign exchange rate, equity price and commodity price
  13. 13. OPERATIONAL RISK : Operational risk is risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. It includes legal risk, such as exposure to fines, penalties and private settlements. It does not, however, include strategic or reputational risk.
  14. 14. SECOND PILLAR deals with the regulatory response to the first pillar  provides a framework for dealing with all the other risks a bank may face, such as systemic risk, pension risk, concentrated risk, strategic risk, reputational risk, liquidity risk and legal risk  gives banks a power to review their risk management system  Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) is the result of Pillar II of Basel II accords 
  15. 15.    aims to complement the minimum capital requirements and supervisory review process by developing a set of disclosure requirements which will allow the market participants to gauge the capital adequacy of an institution allow market discipline to operate by requiring institutions to disclose details on the scope of application, capital, risk exposures, risk assessment processes and the capital adequacy of the institution It must be consistent with how the senior management including the board assess and manage the risks of the institution
  16. 16.  Basel II Framework lays down a more comprehensive measure and minimum standard for capital adequacy Seeks to improve on existing rules by aligning regulatory capital requirements more closely to underlying risks that banks face.  In addition, it intends to promote a more forward-looking approach to capital supervision, that encourages banks to identify the present and future risks, and develop or improve their ability to manage them.  Hence intended to be more flexible and better able to evolve with advances in markets and risk management practices.  Basel II Accord attempts to fix glaring problems with the original accord. It does this by more accurately defining risk, but at the cost of considerable rule complexity 

×