Late Registration:    Bane or BenefitWhat the Research Says                Patrick Tompkins, JTCC             New Horizons...
   Propose definitions of late registration (LR)Participants will…                        Discuss the teleology of late ...
Context   O’Banion (2012)    › LR “wreaks havoc on the ability of colleges     to achieve the goals of the emerging     c...
   Access                               FTEs                  Benefit      ChoiceTeleology of LR                       ...
ContextColleges are eliminating LR, includingMiami-Dade CC, Rio Salado College,Sinclair CC, Valencia College Benwards     ...
Taxonomy of the Literature Review                 (Cooper & Hedges, 2009)Characteristic   ApproachFoci             Researc...
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria   Quantitative and/or        26 + 2 =    qualitative   Dissertations, articles,    publicly...
Brainstorm LR Definitions               Goals                     › Concise                     › Measureable            ...
LR definitions   1 week before           After the 8th day of    classes?                 classes? On or after         ...
Study Designs  Population        Unit of Analysis    Time FramesMostly CC’s         Student (N=20)     Semester(N=21)     ...
Analytic Methods    Significance testing vs. Raw    numbers / percentages    T-test, chi-square, ANOVA,    multiple regres...
11 Studies*                          LR for every class                                                                  ...
Which Courses?
Who?Number of studies finding demographicassociations        Male    Race/      Part-   Older Low HS               Ethnici...
ReasonsMost Common                                                        Other Schedule conflicts:                      ...
Positive Motivators   Family encouragement / career goals   Consultations with faculty and advisors   “Individual backg...
Negative: 2 studies                   LR Course Grade                                                                    ...
   Positive: 2 studiesHow Well? Success Rate*                          LR Course        No Sig.: 1 study                ...
How Well? Withdrawal/Attrition LR Course Rate       All Course Rate      100% of coursesNegative: Keck,       Negative: 4 ...
What do you conclude?                Tama Leaver
Warrant for these claims?O’Banion (2012)       Roueche (2011)› LR “wreaks havoc on › “There is a lot of  the ability of   ...
What have researchers concluded?Policy recommendations, number of studies*  Ban LR    Maybe                 Ban LR        ...
Warranted Actions1)   Conduct research on local level, and on     specific courses, subpopulations, etc.2)   Employ robust...
Images from flickr   brewbooks, xerophyllum tenax (Beargrass),    (Teleology slide)   Benwards, Teleology, (Context slid...
Sources   Angelo, D. T. (1990). The relationship between late registration and student persistence and    achievement. Co...
Sources   Keck, K. (2007). Community college retention: The role of late registration policies. (Doctoral    dissertation...
Sources   Schmidt, M. M. (2004). An examination of the variables associated with student completion at Clovis    Communit...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Lr bane benefit nhc 2013 ver 3

368

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
368
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Lr bane benefit nhc 2013 ver 3

  1. 1. Late Registration: Bane or BenefitWhat the Research Says Patrick Tompkins, JTCC New Horizons Conference Roanoke, VA April 4, 2013
  2. 2.  Propose definitions of late registration (LR)Participants will…  Discuss the teleology of late registration  Review the purpose of the presentation and the taxonomy of the literature review  Evaluate the evidence and suggest policy implications What is the incidence of LR?Research Questions   Who registers late and why?  How well do LR perform (grades, class completion, withdrawal)?  What conclusions have researchers proffered?
  3. 3. Context O’Banion (2012) › LR “wreaks havoc on the ability of colleges to achieve the goals of the emerging completion agenda”…evidence is “overwhelming” (pp. 26, 28) Roueche (2011) › “There is a lot of data showing that students who enroll late have three times the dropout or three times the failure rate” of OTR. (The SOURCE, 2011, p. 6)
  4. 4.  Access  FTEs Benefit  ChoiceTeleology of LR  Responsiveness  Flexibility brewbooks  Chaos  Costs Lost first day of class Bane   Student success: grades, retention, awards/transfer  Ethics
  5. 5. ContextColleges are eliminating LR, includingMiami-Dade CC, Rio Salado College,Sinclair CC, Valencia College Benwards What about your college?
  6. 6. Taxonomy of the Literature Review (Cooper & Hedges, 2009)Characteristic ApproachFoci Research methods; findingsGoals Integration; identification of central issuesPerspective Neutral representationCoverage ExhaustiveOrganization ConceptualAudience General scholars, policy makers, practitioners
  7. 7. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Quantitative and/or 26 + 2 = qualitative Dissertations, articles, publicly available presentations and reports Studies of patterns, attitudes, and/or Leo Reynolds performance
  8. 8. Brainstorm LR Definitions  Goals › Concise › Measureable › Precise hiromy › Valid › Universal
  9. 9. LR definitions 1 week before  After the 8th day of classes? classes? On or after  After first class semester start meeting (N=3) date (N=12) LR for all classes  LR for single classes (N=19) (N=9)
  10. 10. Study Designs Population Unit of Analysis Time FramesMostly CC’s Student (N=20) Semester(N=21) Course YearSize: from 6 to260,000 enrollment Longitudinal › General or (N=6) specific 7 and 14 year N/A (N=2) retrospectivesUnequalsample sizesSmall subgroups tmorkemo
  11. 11. Analytic Methods Significance testing vs. Raw numbers / percentages T-test, chi-square, ANOVA, multiple regression, logistic regression Course grade vs. GPA Rate of LR course completion vs. rate of all course completion
  12. 12. 11 Studies* LR for every class  In generalFrequency of Occurrence National data:  Range: 4-17% 11% of students for at least one class (Center,  Mean: 8.3% 2012) Most do not  4 studies continually LR LR for any class (Mendiola- Perez, 2004)  Range: 3-27%  Mean: 14.4% * Excludes Zottos’ (2005) extreme value of 54%.
  13. 13. Which Courses?
  14. 14. Who?Number of studies finding demographicassociations Male Race/ Part- Older Low HS Ethnicity time GPAYes 9 7 7 5 3No 5 4 1 6 N/A
  15. 15. ReasonsMost Common Other Schedule conflicts:  Advising problems 46%  Instructor problems  Class too hard Paperwork  Procrastination Medical  Late decision to go to Finances college  Recent relocation Employment  Class cancellations Transportation  Personal convenience: Life 4% (Belcher & Patterson, 1990; Chilton, 1964; Keck, 2007; Morris, 1986; Parks, 1974)
  16. 16. Positive Motivators Family encouragement / career goals Consultations with faculty and advisors “Individual background and determination to complete” Avoid online courses / courses with weak background Avoid LR if possible “A viable and critical option”(emphasis added) Satisfied with decision (Keck, 2007, pp. 126, 132)
  17. 17. Negative: 2 studies LR Course Grade  › Greater effect for upper collegiate rank, and largeHow Well? Grades classes  No Sig.: 2 studies  Negative: 4 studies; Mixed: 7 studies SGPA/CGPA  Demographics removed or diminished effects  Worse for returning students? For freshman?  More likely 4.0 GPA & more likely 0.0 GPA  No effect for class switches; > class adds increased GPA; > class drops lowered GPA
  18. 18.  Positive: 2 studiesHow Well? Success Rate* LR Course  No Sig.: 1 study  Negative: 1 study  Negative: 5 studies  Weak: 2 studies All Courses  No Sig: 2 studies  No sig. for new students; negative for continuing students  Weak negative effect, but also more likely to complete 100% of courses  Other variations by demographics *Set at “C” level by some, “D” level by others.
  19. 19. How Well? Withdrawal/Attrition LR Course Rate All Course Rate 100% of coursesNegative: Keck, Negative: 4 Negative:2007 studies Parks, 1974Large classes only:Safer 2009 No sig.: 2 studies No sig.: Chilton, 1964Restrictiveattendance policyonly: Diekhoff, Slight: 2 studies1992 Mixed:DevelopmentalENG only: Sova, Mendiola-1986 Perez, 2004
  20. 20. What do you conclude? Tama Leaver
  21. 21. Warrant for these claims?O’Banion (2012) Roueche (2011)› LR “wreaks havoc on › “There is a lot of the ability of data showing that colleges to achieve students who enroll the goals of the late have three emerging times the dropout or completion three times the agenda”…evidence failure rate” of OTR. is “overwhelming” (The SOURCE, 2011, p. 6) (pp. 26, 28)
  22. 22. What have researchers concluded?Policy recommendations, number of studies* Ban LR Maybe Ban LR No Modify None/Unclear Ban LR for Change / Policies Some Keep LR 2 4 3 5 17 6 Researchers may have made recommendations that fell into more than one category. Each recommendation was counted separately.
  23. 23. Warranted Actions1) Conduct research on local level, and on specific courses, subpopulations, etc.2) Employ robust research methods3) Create early registration culture4) Develop rolling schedules/late start courses5) Target support for LR students6) Tailor LR policies as/where needed7) Study effect of banning LR on access, enrollment, revenues, and student success
  24. 24. Images from flickr brewbooks, xerophyllum tenax (Beargrass), (Teleology slide) Benwards, Teleology, (Context slide) Leo Reynolds, Bingo Number 28, (Inclusion/exclusion slide) hiromy, Using chopsticks, (LR definitions slide) tmorkemo, Sammenligning av tommestokker, (Study designs slide) inju, Statistics for the Utterly Confused (Analytic methods slide) Tama Leaver, Warhold Thinker by Macbook, (What do you conclude slide)
  25. 25. Sources Angelo, D. T. (1990). The relationship between late registration and student persistence and achievement. College and University, 65(4), 316-27. (EJ413486) Belcher, M. J., & Patterson, C. (1990). Who are late registrants and what will they do when faced with a late registration fee? Miami-Dade Community College, Office of Institutional Research. ERIC document. (ED328324) Bryant, D., Danley, J. Fleming, S, & Somers, P. (1996). “The dog ate it” and other reasons why students delay registration. College and University, 71(4), 2-8. Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2012). A matter of degrees: Promising practices for community college student success (A first look). Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin, Community College Leadership Program. Chilton, B. S. (1964). The relationship between certain factors of late and regular registrants. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 6410743) Cooper, H., & Hedges, L.V. (2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (eds.). The handbook of research synthesis (2nd ed., pp. 1-16). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Cornille, K. T. (2009). The impact of late registration on academic success and persistence of students at a community and technical college. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (UMI No. 3419827) Diekhoff, G. M. (1992). Late registrants: At risk in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 49-50. Dunn, H. & Mays, A. (2004, January 5). Better for the change. Community College Week, 16(11), 4-5. Hale, J. M. (2007). The impact of timing of registration on student learning outcomes at three rural community colleges. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (UMI No. 3338098) Hiller, D. (2005). Late registrants: They are prepared and they do come back if successful. Retrieved from Northwestern Michigan College Institutional Research, Organizational Intelligence, Research and Analyses website: https://www.nmc.edu/ir/intell/analysis Johnston, G. H. (2006). Date of enrollment as a predictor of success and persistence. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research (AIR), Chicago, IL, May 14-18, 2006. ERIC document. ED493834
  26. 26. Sources Keck, K. (2007). Community college retention: The role of late registration policies. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (UMI No. 3275960). Mannan, G., & Preusz, G. C. (1976). University late registrants and related academic problems. College Student Journal, 10(4), 375-379. McWaine, W. L. (2012). Late registration and African American males academic performance in a suburban community college system. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (UMI No. 3502713) Mendiola-Perez, C. L. (2004). The effects of early, regular, and late registration on academic success and retention of community college students. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (UMI No. 3124331) Moore, C, & Shulock, N. (2007). Beyond the open door: Increasing student success in the California Community Colleges. Sacramento: California State University. Morris, E. W. (1986). A study of changes of registration by adding and dropping classes. College and University, 61(4), 327-37. Neighbors, J. E. G. (1996). The impact of early, regular, and late registration on students at three Texas colleges. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (AAT 9724620) O’Banion, T. (2012). Late registration: May it rest in peace. Community College Journal, 83(1), 26-31. Retrieved from http://www.ccjournal-digital.com/ccjournal/20120809#pg2 Parks, K. M. (1974). An investigation of selected variables in regard to regular and late college registration (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (UMI No. 7501596) Perkins, M. E. (2002). Late registration policy and implications for student success at a single community college (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3070413) Peterson, B. B. (1986). Institutional research: A follow-up study on the late applicant and the late registrant at Honolulu Community College. A leaders for the 80s project. ERIC document. (ED272254) Rio Salado College. (2013). Class schedule. Retrieved from http://www.riosalado.edu/schedule/Pages/default.aspx Safer, A. M. (2009). The effect of late registration for college classes. College Student Journal, 43(4), 1380-1388. (EJ872354)
  27. 27. Sources Schmidt, M. M. (2004). An examination of the variables associated with student completion at Clovis Community College. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (UMI No. 3129906) Sinclair Community College. [2005]. Paradigm shift to emphasize student success: Eliminating late registration after classes start. Retrieved from the Sinclair Community College Office of the Senior Vice President website: http://www.sinclair.edu/about/administrative/vpss/pub/paradigm_shift.pdf Smith, A. B., Street, M. A., & Olivarez, A. (2002). Early, regular, and late registration and community college student success: A case study. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 26(3), 261- 273. doi: 10.1080/106689202317245455 Sova, A. D. (1986). A study of the success rate of late admits in freshman English at the two-year college. (Working Paper 2-86). Binghamton, NY: The Institute for Community College Research, Broome Community College. ERIC document. (ED275370) Stein, J. B., (1984). Should late enrolling new students be registered for classes? ERIC document. (ED243537) Street, M. A. (2000). The effects of early, regular, and late registration on student success in community colleges. (Doctoral dissertation.) Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 9976965) Summers, M. D. (2000). Enrollment and registration behaviors as predictors of academic outcomes for full-time students in a rural community college (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 9971199). The SOURCE on college issues, trends & strategies. (2011). Eight important questions for eleven community college leaders: An exploration of community college issues, trends & strategies. Retrieved from Western Governor’s University: http://www.wgu.edu/wgu/8_questions_report_intro Tincher-Ladner, L. (2006). A review of registration participants of Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College. Retrieved from http://www.mgccc.edu/factbook/reports/late_registration.pdf Weiss, D. (1999). Forces that influence late-admitted students. Community College Review, 27(2), 26-50. Wetstein, M., Nguyen, A. & Hays, B. (2008) Early vs. late enrollers: Does enrollment procrastination affect academic success? San Joaquin Delta College, Office of Planning, Research, & Institutional Effectiveness, Topical Reports and Research, Enrollment and Student Success. Retrieved from http://www.deltacollege.edu/div/planning/documents/2008EarlyRegistrationStudentSuccess.pdf Zottos, G. (2005). The impact of late registration on academic outcomes of urban community college students. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. (UMI No. 3180484)
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×