• Like
AECT 2012 Intersubjectivity in Online Discussion: Design, Facilitation, Evaluation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

AECT 2012 Intersubjectivity in Online Discussion: Design, Facilitation, Evaluation


Presentation at 2012 AECT conference in session on Intersubjectivity

Presentation at 2012 AECT conference in session on Intersubjectivity

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. 11/5/12   Intersubjectivity Online: Design, Facilitation, and Evaluation Vanessa Dennen Florida State University vdennen@fsu.edu slideshare.net/vanessadennen meme.coe.fsu.edu/vanessaOnline Discussion Cycle Design Facilitation Evaluation 1  
  • 2. 11/5/12  Elements Contributing toIntersubjectivity Attention Power Objectives Intersubjectivity Interest TimeDesign Issues›  What is communicated to students about performance expectations?›  How do prompts scaffold performance expectations?›  What should be included in prompts? ›  Number of messages? ›  Content of messages? ›  Timing of messages? ›  Interaction between message partners? 2  
  • 3. 11/5/12  Intersubjectivity and Design›  Course designers (instructors?) set the design›  Students must accept and adopt it›  PROBLEM: ›  Students execute at the checklist levelFacilitation IssuesCourse Why are Discussionyou here? Exchange What is required? Why are these What are you other What is the What am I replying? saying? people outcome? here? 3  
  • 4. 11/5/12  Course Level Facilitation›  Need agreement on ›  Why students are in the course ›  What will be learned ›  How it will be learnedDiscussion Level Facilitation›  Need agreement on: ›  What will be discussed ›  The outcomes of the discussion ›  Who may contribute›  Instructor-student agreement›  Peer agreement 4  
  • 5. 11/5/12  Message Posting vs Discussion›  A collection of messages that respond to an assignment ≠ intersubjectivity›  Topically threaded messages ≠ intersubjectivity›  Intersubjectivity is reliant on discursive interchange working toward a goal or goalsOwnership, Complexity, andDifferent Media›  Discussion Boards: ›  Instructor as owner ›  Respond to instructor, respond to peers›  Blogs ›  Blogger as owner ›  Encourages essays with responses›  Twitter ›  Fragmented ownership and responses ›  Short messages impact complexity of thought 5  
  • 6. 11/5/12  Exchange Level Facilitation›  Micro-levelexamination of the discussion›  Look at positioning and acceptance or negotiation of position ›  Discursive interactions ›  Performance of expertiseFacilitation Goals›  Encourage: ›  Responsivediscourse ›  Shared goals ›  Group identity›  Helpin position negotiation›  Work toward an outcome ›  Perhaps group, perhaps related individual outcomes 6  
  • 7. 11/5/12  Evaluation›  Were outcomes reached? ›  Whose outcomes?›  Sources of data ›  Archived discussions ›  Logfiles ›  Need something more … ›  Focus group? ›  Interviews?Closing Thought:An Instructional Cycle Evaluation of Design Design Assessment of outcomes Participation Facilitation 7