Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Asr.mentoring.02112011
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Asr.mentoring.02112011

504

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
504
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. A preliminary reportonAcademic Senate/Provost Retreat February 11-12, 2011 Promoting The Culture of Mentoring at USC <br />Sandeep Gupta<br />on behalf of the Executive Board of the Academic Senate<br />
  • 2.
  • 3. Background<br />Over 75 attendees<br />The Provost and many from her office<br />Academic Senate, entire EB and many members<br />Several schools administrators<br />Several from CET, CER, ALD, and this forum<br />
  • 4. Background<br />Four panels,<br />Faculty Mentoring Undergraduates<br />Faculty Mentoring Graduate Students &amp; Postdocs<br />Faculty Mentoring Faculty (Teaching &amp; Career Development)<br />Faculty Mentoring Faculty (Scholarship) <br />Format: Presentations -&gt; Breakouts -&gt; Reports from breakouts<br />
  • 5. A short report<br />
  • 6. Undergraduate students<br />Very wide range of needs<br />Academic and career development<br />Some overwhelmed; others insufficiently challenged<br />Intrinsic passion vs. external factors determine program choice<br />Mismatch between passion and capabilities<br />Personal: Psychological, financial, …<br />Pre-professional students face special challenges<br />Large numbers of students concentrated in a few programs<br />Typically enrolled in programs that are not in their target schools<br />
  • 7. Undergraduate students<br />In most schools<br />Student services staff is strong and builds relationships with each student<br />Mentoring much more than academic advising<br />Recognize strengths and weaknesses and help them succeed<br />Increase availability of faculty mentors<br />To improve academic guidance and/or letters of recommendations<br />To increase opportunities for involvement in research, scholarly, or creative projects<br />Also peer-mentoring programs<br />
  • 8. Graduate and post-doctoral scholars <br />Train doctoral students for a wide range of careers: professional, teaching, research, …<br />Provide opportunities to gain teaching experience<br />Provide transferrable skills: Problem solving, writing, quantitative and computing skills<br />Opportunities to network with professionals<br />Partnership between career center and schools<br />Alumni as professional mentors<br />
  • 9. Junior faculty<br />Objective: Career development<br />Especially research/scholarship/creative<br />Learning to translate passions into academic idiom<br />Learning to mentor graduate students<br />Learning to excel in teaching<br />By observing great teachers<br />By being observed and receiving constructive feedback<br />Modes: Senior to junior; peer-groups<br />
  • 10. Mid-career faculty<br />Objectives<br />Changing research focus<br />Beginning the transition from innovator to leader<br />Maintaining passion; updating research topic/areas or style<br />Greater emphasis on service (after being protected from excessive service in junior ranks)<br />
  • 11. Senior faculty<br />Objectives<br />Leadership development<br />Research, service, and administration<br />USC and global<br />Updating teaching: Curriculum and methods<br />Junior mentors for senior faculty?<br />
  • 12. Basic questions and challenges<br />Definition and purpose of mentoring?<br />Advocate, coach, well wisher, …?<br />Focus on mentee or USC?<br />Will asking for help considered a sign of weakness?<br />Infringement of academic freedom?<br />How intrusive?<br />
  • 13. Structural<br />Information <br />Unawareness of practices, programs, and resources<br />Do all senior faculty know the prevailing standards (e.g., at UCAPT)?<br />Matching mentors and mentees<br />Assignment, changes, self-selection<br />Single mentor or multiple<br />When: Offer letter, when they arrive at USC, …<br />Separation between mentor and mentee: authorship, collaboration, …<br />Changes with a mentee’s progression<br />
  • 14. Structural<br />Training programs/seminars<br />Best practices in teaching<br />Changing teaching<br />Changing students<br />Exploit emerging techniques and technology<br />Changing research<br />Practices in fields<br />Funding priorities<br />Train mentors: University rules and practices, effective mentoring approaches, inter-personal skills<br />
  • 15. Structural<br />Recognizing and rewarding mentoring<br />Course release<br />Financial incentive<br />AFR<br />Personal and professional satisfaction<br />Improve opportunities for casual conversations leading to mentoring, collaborations, …<br />Spaces<br />Culture<br />
  • 16. Structural<br />Problems of scale: Difficult to assign<br />individual faculty mentors to UG and masters students<br />individual senior researcher mentors to junior faculty<br />Develop multi-layered approaches<br />Programs for general issues, individual mentoring for specific ones<br />
  • 17. Undergraduate students<br />Develop a multi-layered program<br />Augment existing resources with a pool of faculty mentors<br />Identify particular issues at points of one-on-one interactions<br />Faculty and TAs who have one-on-one interactions<br />Student services staff<br />When appropriate, bring in a faculty mentor<br />
  • 18. Programs, policies, culture<br />
  • 19.
  • 20. Culture and policies<br />Emphasize and reward mentoring<br />Appreciation and awards<br />Explicit parts of annual reviews and UCAPT<br />Resources: Information exchange and experts<br />Promote interactions: Culture, spaces, …<br />
  • 21. Programs<br />Mentoring the complete undergraduate: A multi-layered mentoring program that<br />Involves staff, front-line faculty and TAs, faculty mentors, and professionals from the field, especially alumni<br />Spans academic advising, program placement optimization, involvement in projects and internships, networking and career advancement<br />Mentoring the complete graduate student<br />
  • 22. Programs<br />Training faculty mentors<br />General plus field-specific<br />For various career tracks and for various stages of career<br />Assign explicit responsibility for effective mentoring of faculty in all tracks<br />Mentoring programs that combine<br />General with specifically tailored for field and career track/stage<br />Group and individual<br />Formal as well as individual<br />

×