Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
T E H K I K A T
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

T E H K I K A T

265
views

Published on

Method fo Solving a sudden case

Method fo Solving a sudden case


0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
265
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. TEHKIKAT (CASE STUDY)
    • “ DECISION MAKING”
    • PRESENTED BY:
    • Heman Srivastava, Abhishek Upadhyay, Mohd. Mazhar Khan, Sanjeev Kumar
    • MBA 3 RD
  • 2. FLOW OF CASE
    • Mr. Subhodh has promoted to manager of Engineering Department after working
    • 5 years as a engineer in a leading manufacturing company.
    • He was excellent as design engineer and developed three new products.
    • He update his knowledge as per external evironment change.
  • 3. Cont…..
    • Fortnightly vice president called a meeting
    • With Mr. Subodh to provide full prove plans for the big export order of a product design by him.
    • At a meeting Mr. Subodh was Feel hesitate in presenting the plan.
    • Mr. Subodh was coordinating with eng. Department since last 15 years but, as a manager he feels himself in presure and works for 12hrs a day.
  • 4. DEFINING THE PROBLEM (SCOPE)
    • 1: Basic problem confronted by Subodh.
    • 2: Is Manager or Engineer are Different ?
    • 3: Is management make the mistake in promoting Mr. Subodh ?
    • 4. How the performance of Mr. Subodh improved ?
  • 5. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS OF THE CASE 1: Basic problem confronted by Subodh . Justification:- Mr. Subodh having Technical Knowledge not mangerial competance skills. 2: Is Manager or Engineer are Different ? Justification:- Yes, Engineering involves Technology and hence, required knowledge of science but management required integration of science as well as art.
  • 6. Contd..…..
    • 3: Is management make the mistake in promoting Mr. Subodh ?
    • Justification :- Yes, Management has mistaken because He is an electrical engineer and doesn’t having any management skills so that he was unable to present the full proof plan.
  • 7. Contd……
    • 4. How the performance of Mr. Subodh improved ?
    • Justification :- Conducting the training programme is required to improve his performance as leader and manager.
  • 8. CONCLUSION For Instance, .We conclude that Mr. Subhodh is anQualitative and effective engineer as he worked as design Engineer Since last 5 years and achieved good knowledge about technical and Engineering experience by updating himself through Conference and workshops. He was Widely recognized as innovative contributor for the company. Hence, We Can say that he Should promoted to senior engineer and take proper utilization in research and development For industrial leadership to the Fruitful business.
  • 9. THANK YOU
  • 10. BEST OF LUCK TO ALL OTHER PARTICIPANTS