Are we serious in stlucia
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Are we serious in stlucia

on

  • 278 views

Met Office in Martinique disputes Saint Lucia's Meteorological explanations

Met Office in Martinique disputes Saint Lucia's Meteorological explanations

Statistics

Views

Total Views
278
Views on SlideShare
241
Embed Views
37

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

4 Embeds 37

http://unitedpac.blogspot.com 33
http://unitedpac.blogspot.ca 2
http://unitedpac.blogspot.no 1
http://unitedpac.blogspot.co.uk 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Are we serious in stlucia Are we serious in stlucia Document Transcript

  •     ***ARE WE SERIOUS IN ST. LUCIA?*** I don't even know where to start. I remember as a young boy in my teens hearing about the three B's principle: Bullshit Baffles Brains. I am so confused right now, like most St. Lucians, about anything which comes from NEMO or the MET Office. Tonight we hear the French authorities deny that their radar was ever out of service! The french official went on further to say that it appears the St. Lucia MET office was using the PUBLIC website to their weather service and not the official source for agencies. He stated that during the time of the weather conditions in question the public accessed website was offline because their ISP (internet service provider) in Martinique experienced an outage. What this suggests is that the MET office has been passing on information to the St. Lucian public as well as NEMO from a source which is freely available to the public. Apparently nobody over there had any backup plans to secure weather information from any other source and that they did not access that information from the 'official' source at all. If this procedure had been setup correctly and officially (apparently) there would not have been a lapse in weather data, and there a lack of information with which to warn the people of St. Lucia in a timely manner. The excuse, tonight, by the gentle man from the MET office is more baloney involving smoke and mirrors. He claims that the weather report did state that thunderstorms had been forecast and that people were advised to be alert in flood prone areas. Messieur, this is a warning which is given almost every time thunderstorms are expected. This announcement does not convey any urgency or impending danger. During a hurricane low lying areas are prone to flooding just as well as any period of prolonged rainfall. What needs to be done is for them to report the number of inches expected. This would, in my opinion, give a more accurate depiction of the expected precipitation.
  • And if as they say they use the radar in Martinique, which is most likely Doppler radar, then they should know that this kind of radar is actually designed to indicate the expected amount of precipitation. Maybe they did not get that important bit of information because they used the public website rather than the official MET office in Martinique.