University of Missouri System Board of Curators Resources & Planning Committee: Accountability Measures
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

University of Missouri System Board of Curators Resources & Planning Committee: Accountability Measures

on

  • 1,785 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,785
Views on SlideShare
1,753
Embed Views
32

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

2 Embeds 32

http://www.umsystem.edu 31
http://umsystem.edu 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Cost ManagementE&E Operating Cost Reductions/Deferrals $18,088,498Competitive Contracting 8,095,983Energy Conservation 4,534,454Workforce Reduction 2,498,419Technology Initiatives 2,312,272Business Process Improvement 1,253,711Outsourcing 335,904Academic Program Consolidation 293,777Reduction of Service 200,500Total Cost Management $37,604,518Private Gifts/Endowments $12,246,082Internal Recoveries & Other 4,138,505Strategic Partnerships 1,241,437Grants 750,000Subtotal $18,376,024Hiring freeze 8,237,707Total Cost Avoidance $26,613,731net student fee revenue enrollment growth ($14,299,491) indirect cost recoveries ($5,396,070) entrepreneurial activities ($3,489,430) Revenue enhancement 86%79.0%, or $5,612,074, of the $7,118,729 in reallocations was targeted for salary increases, while the remaining 21.0%, or $1,506,655, was redirected to higher priority programs and services.
  • Benchmark: best in classInterrelationships among different measures/targetsCost-benefit consideration on some measuresIdentifying meaningful indicators that can be measured accurately

University of Missouri System Board of Curators Resources & Planning Committee: Accountability Measures University of Missouri System Board of Curators Resources & Planning Committee: Accountability Measures Presentation Transcript

  • Resources & Planning Committee
    President’s Accountability Measures
    August 20, 2009
    1
  • Strategic Directions
    A roadmap for strengthening and enhancing
    teaching and learning
    research and discovery
    service and engagement
    economic development
    the administrative functions that support these strategic themes
    Nine goals with detailed enabling strategies
    Aligned with campus strategic plans
    Report on campus and system office actions during 2009
    2
  • Efficiency & Effectiveness Report FY 2009
    Commitment to responsible stewardship of University assets and resources
    Cost management $ 37.6 million
    Cost avoidance $ 26.6
    Revenue enhancement $ 27.0
    Strategic reallocation $ 7.1
    Total Impact $ 98.3 million
    +Build America Bonds 40.0 million
    +Benefit changes 12.0 million
    3
  • University of Missouri
    Efficiency Measures
    FY2001-2009
    Funding/FTE Student
    FTE Enrollment
    11% Efficiency
    4
  • President’s Accountability Measures
    Background
    President’s initiative to promote transparency and accountability regarding the University’s overall performance
    “A Strategic Direction for the University System” outlined first draft of the measures (October 2008)
    5
  • President’s Accountability Measures
    Measures Aligned with Strategic Directions
    Five Themes
    Teaching & Learning
    Economic Development
    Research & Discovery
    Community Service & Engagement
    Developing & Managing Human, Financial & Physical Resources
    6
  • President’s Accountability Measures
    Principles of Identifying Measures
    Most meaningful measures under each theme
    Common data sources & definitions across campuses
    Externally-validated sources
    Comparator peer data availability
    Include measures from CBHE Coordinated Plan and from the Voluntary System of Accountability
    7
  • President’s Accountability Measures
    Process of Developing Measures
    Task Force began in August 2008
    Four campuses and UM System represented
    UM System IR maintained the official report template
    Report template & core measures finished March 2009
    Historical data, benchmarks, & comparator peer averages populated April 2009 & revised July/August 2009
    Campuses given option to add campus-specific measures
    Campus targets in August 2009
    8
  • President’s Accountability Measures
    Components of Notebook
    Guide to the President’s Accountability Measures
    Campus reports: historical data, benchmarks, comparator peer averages, targets, indicators, source
    Campus comparator peer groups
    Operational definitions and complete data sources
    9
  • President’s Accountability Measures
    Components of the Report
    Three years of historical data
    Indicator: green, yellow, red
    Campus three-year target
    Benchmark (best in class)
    Comparator peer average
    Source
    Voluntary System of Accountability or Coordinated Plan component
    Data definition/notes
    10
  • President’s Accountability Measures
    Next Step: Outside “audit” of measures
    Validity and reasonableness of measures, targets, benchmarks and peer comparisons
    Annual Process
    In collaboration with the campuses, UM System IR responsible for maintaining & updating report
    Annual update shared with Board of Curators at December meeting
    Considered dynamic document
    11