Demystifying P&T 2009
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Demystifying P&T 2009

on

  • 1,788 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,788
Views on SlideShare
1,561
Embed Views
227

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
10
Comments
0

2 Embeds 227

http://www.academic.umn.edu 210
http://academic.umn.edu 17

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Demystifying P&T 2009 Demystifying P&T 2009 Presentation Transcript

    • Demystifying the Promotion & Tenure Process
      Arlene Carney
      Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairs
      2009
    • What is tenure?
      Keystone for academic freedom
      Essential for safeguarding the right of free expression and for encouraging risk-taking inquiry at the frontiers of knowledge
      Faculty are free to teach, conduct research, and provide service without fear of reprisalPreamble Faculty Tenure policy
    • What is tenure?
      Tenure carries responsibility.
      Tenured faculty are accountable to the university for their responsibility for teaching, research, and service.Preamble Faculty Tenure policy
    • What is tenure?
      Indefinite employment at the University
      Job security
      Key personnel decision with long-term financial consequences
      Merit award
      Protection of academic freedom
    • Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure
      Initially adopted in 1945
      Last change was in June 2007
      Commonly called the Tenure Code
    • Criteria for Tenure
      Section 7.11 of the Faculty Tenure policy- general statement of criteria for the entire university
      Section 7.12 of the Faculty Tenure policy- refers to the department criteria for tenure and promotion in a unit
    • Section 7.11 of the FacultyTenure Policy (2001)
      Basis for awarding indefinite tenure:- “achievements of an individual have demonstrated the individual’spotential to continue to contribute significantly to the mission of the University and to its programs of teaching, research, and service”
    • Section 7.11 of the FacultyTenure Policy (2007)
      Basis for awarding indefinite tenure:the determination that each has established and is likely to continue to develop a distinguished record of academic achievement that is the foundation for a national or international reputation or both.
    • Section 7.11 of the FacultyTenure Policy (2007)
      Qualitative evaluation of scholarly research or other creative work, teaching, or service
      Primary emphasis on demonstrated scholarly or creative achievement and teaching effectiveness
      Service alone not sufficient
    • Section 7.11 of the FacultyTenure Policy (2007)
      Take into account when applicable- interdisciplinary work- public engagement- international activities & initiatives- attention to questions of diversity- technology transfer- other special kinds of professional activity
    • Section 7.11 of the FacultyTenure Policy (2007)
      Strong promise of achieving rank of professor
      Only modest service expected
    • Section 9.2 of the FacultyTenure Policy
      New section
      Promotion to professor
      Added substantially to already distinguished record
      Established national or international reputation
      Substantially more service expected
    • Section 7.12 of the FacultyTenure Policy
      Department statement of criteria for promotion and tenure
      Must be shown to new faculty according to the policy
      Should reflect the values of the faculty for promotions and conferral of indefinite tenure
    • 7.12 Statement
      Indices & standards used to evaluate whether a candidate has met or exceeded criteria of section 7.11
      Developed by the faculty of a unit
      Approved by the Dean and the Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost (SVPP)
    • 7.12 Statement
      All 7.12 Statements are being revised across the University.
      Approved by Provost’s office
      A number are approved and on the Provost’s websitehttp://www.academic.umn.edu/provost/faculty/tenure/7_12approved.html
    • Changes and You
      Faculty Tenure Policy Interpretation 6- probationary faculty can choose the 7.12 statement by which they will be evaluated (old or new)- have one year from time the new 7.12 is approved- each faculty member will sign an agreement about the form to be used
    • Changes and You
      Probationary faculty may also choose the 7.11 by which they will be evaluated in some circumstances.
      This depends upon the time of hire.
      Faculty beginning their appointment after June 7, 2007 must be evaluated with the 2007 7.11 Statement.
    • Procedures Document
      Second key document for tenure and promotion
      Procedures for Reviewing Candidates for Tenure and/or Promotion: Tenure-Track and Tenured Faculty (2007)
      Provides more detail about the annual review and tenure and promotion processes.
    • Procedures Document
      This document has the same weight as the Faculty Tenure policy.
      Sections 4 through 13 are most important for untenured faculty to read and understand.
    • Specific Criteria for Tenure
      Teaching
      Research
      Service
    • Teaching Effectiveness
      Evaluated in a variety of ways- student ratings- peer observation and evaluation- letters from students- teaching awards- curricular development- syllabi
    • Teaching Effectiveness
      New student ratings of teaching as of spring 2008.
      There will be recommendations for peer review of teaching from a faculty committee in fall 2008.
      There will also be recommendations for a format for presenting data from the student ratings of teaching.
    • Professional Distinction in Research, Scholarship, & Creative Work
      Peer-reviewed publications
      Books
      Scholarly presentations
      Evidence of impact (citation index)
      External funding from grants
      National and international venues for artistic work
    • Service
      Professional association/offices and committees
      Editorial boards of journals
      University committees
      Departmental committees
      External community service
      Faculty advisor
    • Your Tenure Case
      Probationary period – usually six years
      Stop and start the tenure clock (Section 5.5) for child birth or adoption, for caregiver responsibilities, for serious illness or injury on the part of the faculty member.
    • Section 5.5 of the FacultyTenure Policy
      Extension of probationary service is allowed for one year at the request of the probationary faculty:- on the occasion of the birth of that faculty member’s child or adoptive/foster placement of a child with that faculty member
    • Section 5.5 of the FacultyTenure Policy
      Extension of probationary service is allowed for one year at the request of the probationary faculty:- when the faculty member is a major caregiver for a family member who has an extended serious illness, injury, or debilitating condition (can use this no more than 2 times)
    • Section 5.5 of the FacultyTenure Policy
      Extension of probationary service is allowed for one year at the request of the probationary faculty:- when the faculty member has an extended serious illness, injury, or debilitating condition
    • Section 5.5 of the FacultyTenure Policy
      Extended the time window to make the request from 3 months to 12 months of the events giving rise to the claim
    • Stopping the Tenure Clock
      Form provided and available on line
      Goes from the department to the collegiate dean to the Provost’s office
      Available for both female and male faculty for all areas
      http://www.academic.umn.edu/provost/faculty/pdf/1626p_tenurefaculty.pdf
    • Your Tenure Case
      Annual review of probationary faculty
      Tenured faculty review your curriculum vitae and activity report
      Annual conference with chair or head
      Completion of Form 12
      Sent to Dean and the SVPP
    • Your Tenure Case
      Tenure decision may be made at any time.
      A decision to terminate the appointment can be made at anytime.
    • Department Level: Dossier
      Preparation of CV- should be absolutely clear- should be accurate & complete- should be easy to follow
    • Department Level: Dossier
      Preparation of the dossier should begin with the completion of the terminal degree and the beginning of the probationary period.
      Keep a record of all teaching, research, and service activities.
    • Dossier: Teaching
      Courses taught each semester and enrollment
      Grade distributions/course evaluations/peer evaluation
      Independent study courses
      Senior and master’s theses
      Ph.D. dissertations
    • Dossier: Research
      Maintain and update lists of articles, books, artistic projects, & other scholarly contributions
      Keep reprints
      List of articles or projects submitted and their progress
      List of scholarly presentations
      List of grants & outcomes
    • Dossier: Service
      Departmental
      College or all-university
      External committees
      Professional associations
    • Components of the Dossier
      Curriculum Vitae
      Teaching narrative
      Research narrative
      Service summary
      Sometimes all three together in a personal statement
      External letters
      Teaching evaluations
    • Components of the Dossier
      Copies of all Form 12’s (Annual Reviews) for probationary faculty
      Departmental evaluation
      Chair’s/Head’s evaluation
      Collegiate P & T Committee
      Letter from dean
    • Department Level: Dossier
      Research & teaching narratives- provide clear picture of yourself to any reader- think broadly- write clearly- avoid jargon
    • Department Level: Dossier
      Selection of external reviewers- number varies by department & college- selection by both candidate & the department
    • Department Level: Dossier
      Selection of external reviewers- distinguished scholars in the field- peer institutions- individuals who will write evaluative letters- given enough time- have sufficient materials to evaluate
    • Department Level: Dossier
      Selection of external reviewers
      Procedures say that the department should make the selection of external reviewers with the candidate
      Must have at least half and no fewer than 4 reviewers with no personal or professional interest in the candidate
    • Department Level: Dossier
      Best practices:- dossier “caseworker”- mentoring or synopsis committee
    • Department Level: Dossier
      Provide information to the “caseworker” of the dossier- journals & publishers- scholarly & creative venues- conferences
    • Department Level: Dossier
      Provide information to the “caseworker” of the dossier - accurate list of scheduled & unscheduled teaching- teaching evaluations- teaching materials
    • Department Level: Dossier
      Finished dossier should be:- clear to the college & university readers- complete according to instructions- provide an accurate picture of who you are
    • College level
      Each dean makes a recommendation to the provost about promotion and tenure.
      Colleges differ in their processes.
    • College level
      P & T committee- made up of tenured professors- across disciplines in the college- make a recommendation to the dean
    • College level
      Review of recommendations by the dean- may include input from associate deans- dossiers evaluated in light of the 7.12 statements & collegiate standards
    • All-University Committee
      HHH, CSOM, and Law School don’t have collegiate review committees.
      Their materials go to the All-University Committee.
    • Provost’s Office Review
      Each dossier is reviewed by the Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairs and one other Vice Provost/President.
      SVPP reviews array of cases with particular emphasis on cases with negative votes or variance in voting.
    • P & T Process and Timeline
      Prior spring/ solicit external summer reviews
      Aug.-Oct. Dossier Preparation
      Oct.-Nov. Departmental Review
      Dec. College P & T Committee
      Jan.-Feb. Deans forward materials to SVPP
    • P & T Process and Timeline
      Feb.- April Central administration review
      May Recommendation to the Board of Regents
    • Contact for Questions:
      Arlene CarneyVice Provost for Faculty and AcademicAffairs160C Morrill Hall626-9545carne005@umn.edu
    • Contact for Questions:
      Karen Zentner BacigAssociate to the Vice Provost forFaculty and Academic Affairs160C Morrill Hall612-624-5082kbacig@umn.edu