Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
May 2011 CHC academics and health
May 2011 CHC academics and health
May 2011 CHC academics and health
May 2011 CHC academics and health
May 2011 CHC academics and health
May 2011 CHC academics and health
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

May 2011 CHC academics and health

951

Published on

The Washtenaw County Health Improvement's presentation on the link between Academics and Health.

The Washtenaw County Health Improvement's presentation on the link between Academics and Health.

Published in: Health & Medicine, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
951
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Health and Academics: Linked for SuccessHealth and Academics: Linked for Success Community Health Committee Meeting May 17th, 2011
  • 2. Washtenaw County Target Populations and Communities and Selected Health Outcomes, Behavior and Environmental Risk Factors – 2005 HIP Survey Data Adreanne Waller, MPH – Washtenaw County Public Health – updated 3/21/11 Jurisdiction  Target  Target  Target  Target  High Risk  High Risk  High Risk  High Risk  Wide Community Community Community Community Population Population Population Population Washtenaw  Western  Other  Less than  African  Ann Arbor Ypsilanti p <$35,000 , Unemployed p y County C t Washtenaw W ht Washtenaw W ht High School Hi h S h l American A iHealth Outcomes Overweight adults 50% 43% 53% 56% 57% 57% 69% 58% 66% Overweight children 10% 9% 14% 18% 4% 38% n/a 12% 27% Diabetes 9% 7% 10% 9% 8% 15% 26% 38% 23% Stroke 2% 1% 3% 1% 3% 3% 12% 7% 2% CHD 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 12% 7% 2% HBP 19% 14% 26% 26% 17% 22% 42% 40% 38%Physical Activity No physical activity for exercise 24% 17% 27% 24% 35% 24% 46% 25% 26% Screen time 8+ hours/day 10% 11% 5% 27% 6% 10% 9% 39% 28% Child never walks to school Child lk h l 86% 75% 86% 93% 100% 78% n/a / n/a / 87% Child screen time 3.5hrs or more 6% 8% 9% 4% 3% 28% n/a n/a 12% Disagree Walking areas in neighborhood 21% 12% 16% 38% 44% 17% 29% 21% 24%Disagree Feel safe walking in neighborhood 7% 5% 10% 4% 11% 9% 12% 26% 8% Zero short trips (<.5 miles) walked/week 63% 47% 56% 86% 93% 51% 80% 79% 51% Never use bicycle as transportation 57% 41% 57% 79% 75% 54% 77% 50% 64%Nutrition Adults Consume less than five servings  75% 67% 88% 81% 66% 84% 93% 79% 87% fruits&vegs/day Children consume less than five servings  87% 94% 78% 77% 98% 76% n/a n/a 77% fruits&vegs/day Fast food two or more times/week / 18% 14% 23% 38% 6% 22% 28% 37% 27% Child two or more servings soda/day 12% 7% 20% 5% 18% 14% n/a n/a 17% Child never breastfed 27% 19% 30% 27% 37% 53% n/a n/a 52% Food Insecure 5% 3% 7% 4% 5% 12% 13% 35% 24%Disagree Easy access to walking destinations  43% 35% 41% 54% 62% 29% 53% 43% 34% (usually food)Tobacco Currently Smoke 16% 10% 25% 20% 9% 30% 22% 21% 23%Alcohol Binge Drank Past Month 14% 10% 18% 22% 11% 77% 83% 85% 89%Social Support Always/Usually Sufficient Emotional  81% 80% 82% 79% 89% 77% 72% 64% 65% Support
  • 3. http://hip.ewashtenaw.org
  • 4. http://splash.mi-school.net/gvsucso/
  • 5. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED499412.pdf
  • 6. May CHC Table Talk May CHC Table Talk1.How can existing systems be better linked to support  . o ca e st g syste s be bette ed to suppo tyouth facing multiple challenges? 2.Which community organizations should “WAY” consider partnering 2 Whi h  it   i ti   h ld “WAY”  id   t i   with, and why? 3.Which community organizations should “RAHS” consider partnering  with, and why? 4. How does your organization support struggling young people? What  new ways could you imagine supporting them?

×