May 2011 CHC academics and health
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,333
On Slideshare
1,263
From Embeds
70
Number of Embeds
2

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 70

http://healthoutreach.wordpress.com 68
https://healthoutreach.wordpress.com 2

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Health and Academics: Linked for SuccessHealth and Academics: Linked for Success Community Health Committee Meeting May 17th, 2011
  • 2. Washtenaw County Target Populations and Communities and Selected Health Outcomes, Behavior and Environmental Risk Factors – 2005 HIP Survey Data Adreanne Waller, MPH – Washtenaw County Public Health – updated 3/21/11 Jurisdiction  Target  Target  Target  Target  High Risk  High Risk  High Risk  High Risk  Wide Community Community Community Community Population Population Population Population Washtenaw  Western  Other  Less than  African  Ann Arbor Ypsilanti p <$35,000 , Unemployed p y County C t Washtenaw W ht Washtenaw W ht High School Hi h S h l American A iHealth Outcomes Overweight adults 50% 43% 53% 56% 57% 57% 69% 58% 66% Overweight children 10% 9% 14% 18% 4% 38% n/a 12% 27% Diabetes 9% 7% 10% 9% 8% 15% 26% 38% 23% Stroke 2% 1% 3% 1% 3% 3% 12% 7% 2% CHD 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 12% 7% 2% HBP 19% 14% 26% 26% 17% 22% 42% 40% 38%Physical Activity No physical activity for exercise 24% 17% 27% 24% 35% 24% 46% 25% 26% Screen time 8+ hours/day 10% 11% 5% 27% 6% 10% 9% 39% 28% Child never walks to school Child lk h l 86% 75% 86% 93% 100% 78% n/a / n/a / 87% Child screen time 3.5hrs or more 6% 8% 9% 4% 3% 28% n/a n/a 12% Disagree Walking areas in neighborhood 21% 12% 16% 38% 44% 17% 29% 21% 24%Disagree Feel safe walking in neighborhood 7% 5% 10% 4% 11% 9% 12% 26% 8% Zero short trips (<.5 miles) walked/week 63% 47% 56% 86% 93% 51% 80% 79% 51% Never use bicycle as transportation 57% 41% 57% 79% 75% 54% 77% 50% 64%Nutrition Adults Consume less than five servings  75% 67% 88% 81% 66% 84% 93% 79% 87% fruits&vegs/day Children consume less than five servings  87% 94% 78% 77% 98% 76% n/a n/a 77% fruits&vegs/day Fast food two or more times/week / 18% 14% 23% 38% 6% 22% 28% 37% 27% Child two or more servings soda/day 12% 7% 20% 5% 18% 14% n/a n/a 17% Child never breastfed 27% 19% 30% 27% 37% 53% n/a n/a 52% Food Insecure 5% 3% 7% 4% 5% 12% 13% 35% 24%Disagree Easy access to walking destinations  43% 35% 41% 54% 62% 29% 53% 43% 34% (usually food)Tobacco Currently Smoke 16% 10% 25% 20% 9% 30% 22% 21% 23%Alcohol Binge Drank Past Month 14% 10% 18% 22% 11% 77% 83% 85% 89%Social Support Always/Usually Sufficient Emotional  81% 80% 82% 79% 89% 77% 72% 64% 65% Support
  • 3. http://hip.ewashtenaw.org
  • 4. http://splash.mi-school.net/gvsucso/
  • 5. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED499412.pdf
  • 6. May CHC Table Talk May CHC Table Talk1.How can existing systems be better linked to support  . o ca e st g syste s be bette ed to suppo tyouth facing multiple challenges? 2.Which community organizations should “WAY” consider partnering 2 Whi h  it   i ti   h ld “WAY”  id   t i   with, and why? 3.Which community organizations should “RAHS” consider partnering  with, and why? 4. How does your organization support struggling young people? What  new ways could you imagine supporting them?