Assessing an adaptive, profile-based PubMed search tool

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    4 Favorites

    Assessing an adaptive, profile-based PubMed search tool - Presentation Transcript

    1. Assessing an adaptive, profile-based PubMed search tool Marisa Conte meese@umich.edu NLM Associate Fellow University of Michigan Health Sciences Libraries
    2. MiSearch  Adaptive biomedical literature search tool  Utilizes implicit relevance feedback  Builds statistical profile to predict which results will be most relevant to user
    3. Objective  To compare the performance of a locally- developed third-party PubMed search tool to PubMed in terms of user satisfaction, search success and efficiency
    4. Collaboration
    5. Methodology  N = 11 librarians (12 recruited)  Tasks derived from mediated search files  Each subject completed 2 tasks with each search tool  Each task completed by 3 subjects with each search tool  Pre-training conducted by tool developer
    6. Data collection  Web-based surveys  Demographic survey  Task-specific survey  PubMed search histories  MiSearch data logfiles
    7. Sample questions  In patients with diabetes mellitus, does increasing hemoglobin A1c reduce the risk of amputation and kidney failure?  What are the attitudes, beliefs and socio- cultural factors that influence cervical cancer screening in the US? What about specifically among immigrant groups? And I’m only interested in research from 1990 – present.
    8. Limitations  Convenience sample  Unclear survey questions  Study tasks too complicated  Problems with data collection
    9. Sample results – Query 2 Average satisfaction MiSearch PubMed Search activity 1 1.7 Tool 1.3 1.7 Speed 1.3 1.7 Accuracy 1.3 2 Completeness 1.7 2 1 = low
    10. Overall satisfaction with searches 60 50 % responses 40 30 PubMed 20 Misearch 10 0 High Fair Low User satisfaction
    11. Overall satisfaction with tools 70 60 % responses 50 40 30 PubMed 20 MiSearch 10 0 High Fair Low User satisfaction
    12. Suggestions  Improve database response time  Add more filters  Add a “reset” function  Make search details more transparent
    13. Next steps  Librarians suggested changes which:  were easy to implement  dramatically improved the tool’s functionality  First usability test – helped establish formal usability protocols and heuristics  New roles for librarians
    14. New roles for librarians  Usability experts  Heuristic evaluation of tools  Portal development  Formal usability studies  Weblog analyses  Education, promotion, dissemination  Research collaborations
    15. Resources  MiSearch: http://misearch.ncibi.org/  NCIBI: https://portal.ncibi.org/gateway/  States, D.J., Ade, A.S., Wright, Z.C., Bookvich, A.V. & Athey, B.D. (2008) Misearch Adaptive PubMed Search Tool. Bioinformatics. PMID 18326507
    16. Acknowledgments  Jean Song, Nirit Glazer, Barbara Mirel, David States  Librarians from UM’s Health Sciences and Shapiro Science Libraries  National Center for Integrative Biomedical Informatics (NIH grant #U54DA021519)  National Library of Medicine This research was supported in part by an appointment to the NLM Associate Fellowship Program sponsored by the National Library of Medicine and administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.

    + University of Michigan Health Sciences LibrariesUniversity of Michigan Health Sciences Libraries, 2 years ago

    custom

    918 views, 4 favs, 5 embeds more stats

    Presentation at MLA annual conference on MiSearch, more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 918
      • 861 on SlideShare
      • 57 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 4
    • Downloads 5
    Most viewed embeds
    • 47 views on http://davidrothman.net
    • 4 views on http://www.nephrohus.org
    • 3 views on http://www.davidrothman.net
    • 2 views on http://referenciarcm.wordpress.com
    • 1 views on file://

    more

    All embeds
    • 47 views on http://davidrothman.net
    • 4 views on http://www.nephrohus.org
    • 3 views on http://www.davidrothman.net
    • 2 views on http://referenciarcm.wordpress.com
    • 1 views on file://

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories