• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Child Abuse And Neglect
 

Child Abuse And Neglect

on

  • 2,186 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,186
Views on SlideShare
2,186
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
43
Comments
1

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel

11 of 1 previous next

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
  • thanks for your psentations
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Child Abuse And Neglect Child Abuse And Neglect Presentation Transcript

    • Child Abuse and Neglect
      • Researchers: Nick McRee, Mary E. Haskett, Jason C. Allaire, Shawn Kreig, Kendra C. Hart, Takeo Fujiwara, Makiko Okuyama, Mari Kasahara, and Ayako Nakamura
      • Reviewed by: Nasim Ameri, Rose Yejha, and Angelique Noel
      • October 14, 2008
      • Psyc 308 UMBC
    • Abstract
    • Intro- Blended Households
      • Issue: abused and neglected children and the types of families they live in.
      • Homes with the child, mother and boyfriend were expected to have more reports. (Companion parents)
      • A child getting hit a belt from parent is usually the primary thought for abuse.
      • Neglected children
    • Intro cont’d
      • Goal: Study variation of abuse in non-related parent figures
      • Importance: inform researcher and readers of where most child abuse is taking place and in what types of families.
      • hypothesized that adopted parents will show lower evidence of abuse in comparison to stepparents.
    • Forms of neglect
    • Method Blended Households
      • Large sample of runaway/homeless youth
      • Info on health and human services
      • Collected demographic, problems w/youth and family structure
      • Evidence of sexual/physical abuse and victimization risk
      • Calculate abuse risk
      • Grouped by type of parent
    • Results – Blended Households Female 56.1% Non-Hispanic White 65% No mothers 8% No father figure 33% In program reason unspecified 48% Contemplating run away 7% Homeless 9% Runaways 35% Status Percentage
    • Results 1 Sexual abuse
      • Households that had non-related parents was a sign of higher risk for sexual abuse to the youth.
      • One natural parent and a relative had low evidence or risk.
      • Natural parent/adopted parent = 1.2% more cases.
      • Natural/Stepparent = 3.6% more cases.
      • Natural/Cohabiting = 12.1%fewer cases.
    • Results 1 physical abuse
      • Adopted parents = 13.7% fewer cases
      • Stepparents = 0.8% fewer cases
      • Natural/cohabiting parent = 5.0% more
    • Intro- Munchausen
      • Munchausen syndrome
      • Objective of research
      • UK and US vs. Japan
      • Doctors consultations
    • Intro cont’d
      • The researchers hypothesized that due to the health system in Japan the characteristics of victims and perpetrators of MSBP could be effected.
    • Method- Munchausen
      • Top 11 doctors in child abuse, Japan
      • Reported cases
      • Questionnaire
      • Variables of victims
        • Sex, age, duration of abuse, developmental disorder, family structure, medical background
      • Type of MSBP and symptoms
    • Results- Munchausen
      • Most of the victims were males.
      • More than half the victims were 4yrs
      • Most of the perpetrators were biological mothers
      • More than half the perpetrators had mental disorders
      • Most cases were confirmed by seperating parent and child
      • 70% of victims didn’t get an education opportunity
      • Often the child is found dead.
    • Intro- Ethnicity
      • Correlation between physical abuse and problems with aggression/behavior
      • Social factors
      • Physical discipline is correlated with aggression and behavior in the European American children.
    • Intro cont’d
      • Physical discipline and adjustment problems, show a weak relationship in African American children. There aren’t many reports on aggression bad behavior.
      • Focus of study: predictors of social adjustment for abused and non-abused children
    • Intro - Ethnicity
      • No difference on the bases of ethnicity for physical abuse.
      • There is a difference in ethnicity when it comes to physical discipline.
    • Intro- Ethnicity (Parenting)
      • Children with warm and responsive parents show empathy and cooperation, they are looked in a positive way by their peers and are involved in less activities demonstrating mal behavior.
      • Spanking a child will increase the behavior when the parents have low emotional support
      • Spanking will decrease behavior when parents have high emotional support
    • Method- Ethnicity
      • 78 children w/ reported physical abuse/ abusive parents
      • 75 non abused children w/ one parent
      • Abusive parents were from CPS through a letter
      • Other group of parents were informed through flyers each was screened
        • Phone interview, administration, CPS review
    • Method- Ethnicity
      • Parent/child interaction was observed
      • Six month after a questionnaire was sent out to the teacher
      • $75 for participants
    • Results-Ethnicity
      • Sensitivity of the parent was a main factor in determining aggression.
      • There was a connection between abuse and ethnicity
      • Abused and non-abused African American children had no difference in aggressive behavior
    • Results Ethnicity
      • Abused European children showed more signs of aggression than non-abused
      • Non-abused African American children were more aggressive in comparison to non-abused European American children
    • Discussion
      • The purpose of these studies were to compile different ideas that may be linked to child abuse and neglect. It was hypothesized that family structure, ethnicity, and culture play a role in child maltreatment. The hypotheses in these three studies were proven to be true. In the family structure study, researchers observed that abuse risks were higher in households with non-related parents. In the ethnicity study, there was definite connection found between abuse and ethnicity. In the culture study, researchers observed that perpetrators of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy didn’t necessarily have to have a medical background in a country that provides universal medical care such as Japan. These finding are important for understanding underlying causes for child abuse so precautions can be made where possible. Since there are many different kinds of family structures, ethnicities, and cultures, these studies couldn’t possibly obtain statistics from every single one, therefore there were some limitations in these studies.
    • Food for thought
    • References
      • Fujiwara, T., Okuyama, M., Kasahara, M., Nakamura, A. (2008). Characteristics of hospital-based munchausen syndrome by proxy in japan. Child Abuse and Neglect The International Journal, 32 503-509.
      • Haskett, M. E., Allaire, J. C., Kreig, S., Hart, K. C. (2008). Protective and vulnerability factors for physically abused children: Effects of ethnicity and parenting context. Child Abuse and Neglect The International Journal, 32 567-576.
      • McRee, N. (2008). Child abuse in blended households: Reports from runaway and homeless youth. Child Abuse and Neglect The International Journal, 32 449-453.
      • Miller-Perrin, C., Perrin, R.D., (2006). Child maltreatment. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.