“ The Impact of the Bush Presidency ON Public Opinion: Partisanship and Polarization” Kathleen A. Frankovic Evaluating the...
OVERVIEW <ul><li>Presentation will examine: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Polarization between parties and partisans in the 21 st ...
WHY EXPECT POLARIZATION? <ul><li>We often assume there has been polarization in the last decade, whether elite or general ...
MOMENTS OF INCREASED PARTISANSHIP <ul><li>1990’s: Thomas nomination, Clinton impeachment, rise of talk radio </li></ul><ul...
MEASURES OF POLARIZATION <ul><li>During the Bush Presidency, polls  increasingly came under attack </li></ul><ul><ul><li>P...
Partisan Criticism: NOT NEW   <ul><li>“ The whole scheme is one of fraud and debauchery, and may be taken as the first ste...
 
PARTISAN POLARIZATION IS MAINLY ABOUT LEARNING <ul><li>Americans have learned how they are supposed to respond in election...
DID THE BUSH PRESIDENCY INCREASE POLARIZATION? IS POLARIZATION STILL INCREASING?
Polarization: PARTISANSHIP IN ELECTIONS Number of States Outperforming Either Party’s National Average by More than 5 Poin...
Evidence: CHANGES IN PARTY-LINE VOTING 1992-2008 WITHIN-PARTY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOTE FOR OWN PARTY AND OPPOSING PARTY PRE...
PARTISANSHIP AND VOTING:  3-CANDIDATE RACE 1992 Difference =  63 Difference =  67 REP-DEM % DEM–REP % REPERCENTAGING WITHO...
PARTISANSHIP AND VOTING: 2-CANDIDATE RACE 2004 Difference =  87 Difference =  78 REP%-DEM % DEM%–REP %
PARTISANSHIP AND VOTING: 2-CANDIDATE RACE 2008 Difference =  79 Difference =  81 REP%-DEM % DEM%–REP %
Polarization: APPROVAL SOURCE: Pew Research Center
Polarization: APPROVAL
Polarization: PARTISANS LEARNED WHAT TO SAY IN POLLS <ul><li>6/92 GHW Bush   34% APPROVAL RATING </li></ul><ul><li>Republi...
OPINION STRUCTURE: Party and Ideology <ul><li>HAS PARTISAN DISTRIBUTION CHANGED? </li></ul><ul><li>  Republican Democrat <...
OPINION STRUCTURE: Party and Ideology <ul><li>HAVE PARTISANS BECOME MORE IDEOLOGICAL? </li></ul><ul><li>REPUBLICANS:   LIB...
OPINION STRUCTURE: Party and Ideology <ul><li>HAVE PARTISANS BECOME MORE IDEOLOGICAL? </li></ul><ul><li>DEMOCRATS:  LIBERA...
OPINION STRUCTURE: Party and Ideology <ul><li>IDEOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY ROSE WITH INCREASING NUMBERS  </li></ul><ul><li>Repu...
PERCEPTIONS OF POLARIZATION <ul><li>PARTY RATINGS  </li></ul><ul><li>NOT FAVORABLE – FAVORABLE </li></ul><ul><li>6/2001 6/...
PERCEPTIONS OF POLARIZATION <ul><li>DO MEMBERS OF THE OTHER PARTY  SHARE YOUR  NON -POLITICAL VALUES? </li></ul><ul><li>Ye...
SOURCES OF POLARIZATION <ul><li>WHEN DID THE CHANGES EMERGE? </li></ul><ul><li>The Clinton impeachment brought some polari...
Polarization: APPROVAL <ul><li>PARTISANSHIP CONTINUES EVEN IN HISTORICALLY LESS PARTISAN AREAS </li></ul><ul><li>  FOREIGN...
Polarization: OTHER ISSUES <ul><li>Was U.S. military action against Iraq the right thing to do?  </li></ul><ul><li>  1991 ...
Polarization: NATIONAL SECURITY <ul><li>WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH GUANTANAMO? </li></ul><ul><li>6/09 Rep   Dem </li></ul><u...
Polarization: JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS <ul><li>SHOULD THOMAS BE CONFIRMED? </li></ul><ul><li>  Yes  No  Not Sure </li></ul><ul...
Polarization: JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS <ul><li>SHOULD … BE CONFIRMED?  </li></ul><ul><li>First Impressions </li></ul><ul><li> ...
TODAY’S ENVIRONMENT <ul><li>Americans have learned what they are supposed to believe </li></ul><ul><li>While party distrib...
THE IMPACT OF POLITICAL ATTACKS ON POLLS   <ul><li>The political nature of the attacks reduces  belief in polls’ “precisio...
THE IMPACT OF THE BUSH PRESIDENCY <ul><li>Overall, there has been little change in either party distribution or ideologica...
THE IMPACT OF THE BUSH PRESIDENCY <ul><li>Increased polarization and partisan attacks increase the scrutiny of polls – pro...
“ The Impact of the Bush Presidency ON Public Opinion: Partisanship and Polarization” Kathleen A. Frankovic Evaluating the...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Frankovic, Kathleen; “The Impact of the Bush Presidency ON Public Opinion: Partisanship and Polarization”

743 views

Published on

“The Impact of the Bush Presidency ON Public Opinion: Partisanship and Polarization”

Kathleen A. Frankovic
Evaluating the George W. Bush Presidency
UH-Hilo July 29-31, 2009

Published in: News & Politics
1 Comment
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Bush is passe. Why not do the sanme research on the Dictator ObAMA? i AM NOT A REPUBLICAN BUT YOU ARE DEFINITELY A TOTALIST DEMOCRAT!
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
743
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
6
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
15
Comments
1
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • 35%
  • 35%
  • 35%
  • Frankovic, Kathleen; “The Impact of the Bush Presidency ON Public Opinion: Partisanship and Polarization”

    1. 1. “ The Impact of the Bush Presidency ON Public Opinion: Partisanship and Polarization” Kathleen A. Frankovic Evaluating the George W. Bush Presidency UH-Hilo July 29-31, 2009
    2. 2. OVERVIEW <ul><li>Presentation will examine: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Polarization between parties and partisans in the 21 st century </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Changes in the structure of opinion and voting </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The major questions: 1) whether these changes are directly attributable to the Bush Presidency or are part of longer-term developments in American society, and 2) whether they continue </li></ul>
    3. 3. WHY EXPECT POLARIZATION? <ul><li>We often assume there has been polarization in the last decade, whether elite or general public </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Changes in media environment: 24-hour news cycles, assumption that news outlets are not objective, point-counterpoint debate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Accusations of bias in the media comes from both sides (though in the last 20 years mostly from the right) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The 2004 electoral strategies </li></ul></ul>
    4. 4. MOMENTS OF INCREASED PARTISANSHIP <ul><li>1990’s: Thomas nomination, Clinton impeachment, rise of talk radio </li></ul><ul><li>Disputed 2000 election </li></ul><ul><li>Development of more sophisticated partisan spin apparatus </li></ul><ul><li>2004 election focus on mobilizing the “base” </li></ul>
    5. 5. MEASURES OF POLARIZATION <ul><li>During the Bush Presidency, polls increasingly came under attack </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Polls have always been attacked by those who disagree but… </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The criticism increased during the 1998 Clinton impeachment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>It may even have been exacerbated by exit poll concerns and criticisms in the 2000 and 2004 elections </li></ul></ul>
    6. 6. Partisan Criticism: NOT NEW <ul><li>“ The whole scheme is one of fraud and debauchery, and may be taken as the first step to do away with popular elections under the law, and place the molding of public opinion in the hands of millionaires and corporations.” </li></ul><ul><li>-- Chicago Democratic Party, 1896 </li></ul>
    7. 8. PARTISAN POLARIZATION IS MAINLY ABOUT LEARNING <ul><li>Americans have learned how they are supposed to respond in elections and to pollsters </li></ul><ul><li>They have also learned how to respond to information that challenges their expectations </li></ul><ul><li>The media environment encourages rapid response as the 24-hour news cycle requires point-counterpoint behavior and political figures supply it </li></ul>
    8. 9. DID THE BUSH PRESIDENCY INCREASE POLARIZATION? IS POLARIZATION STILL INCREASING?
    9. 10. Polarization: PARTISANSHIP IN ELECTIONS Number of States Outperforming Either Party’s National Average by More than 5 Points 1984 17 2008 31
    10. 11. Evidence: CHANGES IN PARTY-LINE VOTING 1992-2008 WITHIN-PARTY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOTE FOR OWN PARTY AND OPPOSING PARTY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES (CBS NEWS Exit Polls)
    11. 12. PARTISANSHIP AND VOTING: 3-CANDIDATE RACE 1992 Difference = 63 Difference = 67 REP-DEM % DEM–REP % REPERCENTAGING WITHOUT PEROT, POLARIZATION STILL REMAINS BELOW LEVEL IN LATER ELECTIONS
    12. 13. PARTISANSHIP AND VOTING: 2-CANDIDATE RACE 2004 Difference = 87 Difference = 78 REP%-DEM % DEM%–REP %
    13. 14. PARTISANSHIP AND VOTING: 2-CANDIDATE RACE 2008 Difference = 79 Difference = 81 REP%-DEM % DEM%–REP %
    14. 15. Polarization: APPROVAL SOURCE: Pew Research Center
    15. 16. Polarization: APPROVAL
    16. 17. Polarization: PARTISANS LEARNED WHAT TO SAY IN POLLS <ul><li>6/92 GHW Bush 34% APPROVAL RATING </li></ul><ul><li>Republicans 55% </li></ul><ul><li>Democrats 18% </li></ul><ul><li>REP-DEM APPROVAL: 37 pts. </li></ul><ul><li>3/06 GW Bush 34% APPROVAL RATING </li></ul><ul><li>Republicans 74% </li></ul><ul><li>Democrats 6% </li></ul><ul><li>REP-DEM APPROVAL: 68 pts. </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    17. 18. OPINION STRUCTURE: Party and Ideology <ul><li>HAS PARTISAN DISTRIBUTION CHANGED? </li></ul><ul><li> Republican Democrat </li></ul><ul><li>1/2001 23% 35 +12 </li></ul><ul><li>1/2005 31% 34 + 3 </li></ul><ul><li>12/2005 28% 32 + 4 </li></ul><ul><li>1/2007 25% 36 +11 </li></ul><ul><li>4/2009 21% 38 +17 </li></ul><ul><li>7/2009 23% 35 +12 </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    18. 19. OPINION STRUCTURE: Party and Ideology <ul><li>HAVE PARTISANS BECOME MORE IDEOLOGICAL? </li></ul><ul><li>REPUBLICANS: LIBERAL CONSERVATIVE </li></ul><ul><li>1/2001 13% 47 +34 </li></ul><ul><li>1/2005 5% 59 +54 </li></ul><ul><li>12/2005 5% 60 +55 </li></ul><ul><li>1/2007 6% 53 +47 </li></ul><ul><li>4/2009 9% 51 +42 </li></ul><ul><li>7/2009 7% 53 +45 </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    19. 20. OPINION STRUCTURE: Party and Ideology <ul><li>HAVE PARTISANS BECOME MORE IDEOLOGICAL? </li></ul><ul><li>DEMOCRATS: LIBERAL CONSERVATIVE </li></ul><ul><li>1/2001 31% 22 - 9 </li></ul><ul><li>1/2005 34% 19 -15 </li></ul><ul><li>12/2005 31% 16 -15 </li></ul><ul><li>1/2007 40% 17 -23 </li></ul><ul><li>4/2009 40% 16 -24 </li></ul><ul><li>7/2009 32% 19 -13 </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    20. 21. OPINION STRUCTURE: Party and Ideology <ul><li>IDEOLOGICAL CONSISTENCY ROSE WITH INCREASING NUMBERS </li></ul><ul><li>Republicans became more ideological in the Bush first term (post-9/11) </li></ul><ul><li>Democrats became more ideological as they increased in numbers in the second Bush Administration (post-Schiavo and post-Katrina) </li></ul>
    21. 22. PERCEPTIONS OF POLARIZATION <ul><li>PARTY RATINGS </li></ul><ul><li>NOT FAVORABLE – FAVORABLE </li></ul><ul><li>6/2001 6/2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Republicans’ Views </li></ul><ul><li>of Democrats 40 56 </li></ul><ul><li>Democrats’ Views </li></ul><ul><li>of Republicans 57 77 </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    22. 23. PERCEPTIONS OF POLARIZATION <ul><li>DO MEMBERS OF THE OTHER PARTY SHARE YOUR NON -POLITICAL VALUES? </li></ul><ul><li>Yes No </li></ul><ul><li>Republicans on Democrats </li></ul><ul><li>7/2005 56% 40 </li></ul><ul><li>3/2007 43% 53 </li></ul><ul><li>Democrats on Republicans </li></ul><ul><li>7/2005 47% 49 </li></ul><ul><li>3/2007 46% 51 </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    23. 24. SOURCES OF POLARIZATION <ul><li>WHEN DID THE CHANGES EMERGE? </li></ul><ul><li>The Clinton impeachment brought some polarization, though there was less division in traditionally non-political areas </li></ul><ul><li>HOW DO THE CHANGES DEVELOP? </li></ul><ul><li>New areas of partisanship – beyond traditional areas of party differences (economics, social issues) -- as public learns the expected poll responses </li></ul>
    24. 25. Polarization: APPROVAL <ul><li>PARTISANSHIP CONTINUES EVEN IN HISTORICALLY LESS PARTISAN AREAS </li></ul><ul><li> FOREIGN POLICY APPROVAL </li></ul><ul><li> TOTAL REP. DEM </li></ul><ul><li>Clinton 5/99 55% 41% 79% +38 </li></ul><ul><li>Bush 6/01 47% 73% 28% -45 </li></ul><ul><li>Bush 1/05 42% 78% 15% -63 </li></ul><ul><li>Obama 6/09 53% 26% 78% -52 </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    25. 26. Polarization: OTHER ISSUES <ul><li>Was U.S. military action against Iraq the right thing to do? </li></ul><ul><li> 1991 2003 2006 </li></ul><ul><li>Total YES 70% 69% 41% </li></ul><ul><li>Republicans 84% 87% 71% </li></ul><ul><li>Democrats 59% 50% 20% </li></ul><ul><li>PARTY DIFFERENCE 25 37 51 </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    26. 27. Polarization: NATIONAL SECURITY <ul><li>WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH GUANTANAMO? </li></ul><ul><li>6/09 Rep Dem </li></ul><ul><li>Continue to operate 60% 29% </li></ul><ul><li>Close 26 60 </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    27. 28. Polarization: JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS <ul><li>SHOULD THOMAS BE CONFIRMED? </li></ul><ul><li> Yes No Not Sure </li></ul><ul><li>Before Hearings </li></ul><ul><li> Republicans 32% 6 58 </li></ul><ul><li> Democrats 19% 14 61 </li></ul><ul><li>After Hearings </li></ul><ul><li> Republicans 77% 18 6 </li></ul><ul><li> Democrats 46 42 11 </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    28. 29. Polarization: JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS <ul><li>SHOULD … BE CONFIRMED? </li></ul><ul><li>First Impressions </li></ul><ul><li> Yes No Not Sure </li></ul><ul><li>Roberts (8/05) </li></ul><ul><li> Republicans 46% 4 46 </li></ul><ul><li> Democrats 13% 16 67 </li></ul><ul><li>Sotomayor (6/09) </li></ul><ul><li> Republicans 17% 22 56 </li></ul><ul><li> Democrats 56% 2 40 </li></ul>CBS News/NY Times Polls
    29. 30. TODAY’S ENVIRONMENT <ul><li>Americans have learned what they are supposed to believe </li></ul><ul><li>While party distribution has changed little, party divisions have increased </li></ul><ul><li>Partisan polarization is high, giving rise to the notion of a culture war and reaffirming the prevalence of the Red State/Blue State concept </li></ul><ul><li>Other divisions reinforce party differences: religion and religiosity, race, urbanity </li></ul><ul><li>Consequently, when partisans are on the same side it becomes news </li></ul>
    30. 31. THE IMPACT OF POLITICAL ATTACKS ON POLLS <ul><li>The political nature of the attacks reduces belief in polls’ “precision” </li></ul><ul><li>Attacks are magnified by the “echo chamber” of news shows and internet blogs -- from BOTH sides – and matter more in intense campaigns with polarization between the parties </li></ul><ul><li>BUT… EVEN PARTISAN ATTACKERS OFTEN RAISE IMPORTANT METHODOLOGICAL QUESTIONS: WEIGHTING, QUESTION WORDING, INTERVIEWER BIAS </li></ul>
    31. 32. THE IMPACT OF THE BUSH PRESIDENCY <ul><li>Overall, there has been little change in either party distribution or ideological composition </li></ul><ul><li>Some items continue to show long-term partisan divisions, while others suggest easing of party differences </li></ul><ul><li>Partisans are now educated on their expected reactions on nearly all subjects </li></ul>
    32. 33. THE IMPACT OF THE BUSH PRESIDENCY <ul><li>Increased polarization and partisan attacks increase the scrutiny of polls – probably a good thing, even when the criticism is unfair or wrong. </li></ul><ul><li>So… the long-term effect of the Bush Presidency on public opinion may not be known for a while </li></ul>
    33. 34. “ The Impact of the Bush Presidency ON Public Opinion: Partisanship and Polarization” Kathleen A. Frankovic Evaluating the George W. Bush Presidency UH-Hilo July 29-31, 2009

    ×