• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
송혜민 메인 Short term clinical efficacy of new meridol halitosis tooth & tongue gel in combination with a tongue cleaner to r
 

송혜민 메인 Short term clinical efficacy of new meridol halitosis tooth & tongue gel in combination with a tongue cleaner to r

on

  • 173 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
173
Views on SlideShare
170
Embed Views
3

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 3

http://cnupk3.dothome.co.kr 3

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    송혜민 메인 Short term clinical efficacy of new meridol halitosis tooth & tongue gel in combination with a tongue cleaner to r 송혜민 메인 Short term clinical efficacy of new meridol halitosis tooth & tongue gel in combination with a tongue cleaner to r Presentation Transcript

    • 2013. 5. 313조 발표자 : 36번 송혜민Short Term Clinical Efficacy of Newmeridol HALITOSIS tooth & tongue gel inCombination with a Tongue Cleaner toReduce Oral MalodorD. Wilhelm, A.Himmelmann, C.KrauseproDERM Institute for Applied DermatologicalResearch GmbH Schenefeld, Germany
    • • 87% 환자가 충치로 인해 구취를 겪고 있으며, 51%는 tongue coating, 17%는치은염, 15%는 치주염, 17%는 여러 복합요인이 있다.• 특히 혀의 뒷부분은 해부학적 구조에 의해 혐기성 세균의 서식처이다.• 혀의 배면에는 여러 종류의 papillae가 있고, filliform papillae는 구취의 주요 요인이다.•Tongue cleaner와 tooth and tongue gel을 이용하여, 구취를 줄일 수 있는지를gas chromatograph measure of VSCs를 이용하여 측정해 보았다.Introduction
    • • Study Design and Population1. single-center에서 (independent dermatological researchinstitute), examiner-blind, randomized, crossover superior design clinical study가 a seven-day wash-in and a seven-day wash-out period between treatments.2. 총 54 명의 구취 유발 구강 내 박테리아를 가진(organoleptic rating of 22, H2S [hydrogen sulphide] readings > 50 ppb, and CH3SH [methyl mercaptan]readings > 50 ppb) 비흡연 피실험자들(44 women, 10 men; average age 47.7years)로 구성. 44명의 피실험자들을 분석.3. Treatment A: no treatment (control)Treatment B: mechanical tongue cleaning with tongue cleanerTreatment C: meridol HALITOSIS tooth & tongue gel applied on tonguecleanerMaterials and Methods
    • • Wash-in and Wash-out Period• 최상의 구강 분석하기 위해서 baseline 측정을 위해 최소 일주일전에 피실험자들은 감독관의 지시를 받음.• 피실험자들은 standard fluoride toothpaste (1400 ppm F from sodiummonofluorophosphate)와 toothbrush를 받고 감독관들에게 일주일동안 하루에 두번 그리고 treatment 중간에 잇솔질을 하도록 지시받음.Materials and Methods• Test Materials. meridol HALITOSIS tooth & tongue gel: 1400 ppm Ffrom amine fluoride/stannous fluoride (ASF), 0.57o zinclactate, oral malodor counter actives. meridol HALITOSIS tonsue cleaner
    • • Application ModeMaterials and Methods
    • • Organoleptic Ratings (Ors)0 = Odor cannot be detected1 = Questionable malodor, barely detectable2 = Slight malodor, exceeds the threshold of malodorrecognition3 = Moderate malodor, that is definitely detected4 = Strong malodor5 = Very strong malodorMaterials and Methods• VSC Measurements Using a Gas Chromatograph
    • Materials and Methods• VSC Measurements Using a Gas ChromatographObjective measurementDetects VSC with appropriatemonitor; unableto differentiate individualsulphur compoundsHigher affinity to hydrogensulphide than dimethylsulphideSimple to perform but fails todetect oral malodour causedby non-sulphide components
    • • Organoleptic EvaluationResults
    • • VSC ConcentrationsResults
    • • 구취제거에는 기계적인 tongue cleansing은 비효율적이다.• 기계적인 tongue cleansing은 단기간의 구취제거에는 효과가 있음을 이전 연구들은 보여왔지만,• 이 연구결과는 meridol HALITOSIS tooth & tongue gel이 장기간의 구취제거에 효과적임을 보여주고 있다.• 혀 후방 cleansing이 구취제거뿐 아니라 구강 위생을 위해 중요함을 알아야 한다.Discussion
    • Referencesl. Delanghe G, Bollen C, van Steenberghe D, Feenstra L. Multidisciplinairerurnpak van halitosis. Ned Tjschrifr van Tandheelk 2008;105:314-7.2. Tonz-etich J. Production and origin of oral malodor. A review ofmechanisms and methods of analysis. J Perio&tntol 1977;48:13-20.3. De Boever EH, de Uzeda M, Loesche WJ. Relationship between volatilesulphur compounds, BANA-hydrolizing bacteria and gingival health inpatients with and without complaints of oral malodour. J Clin Dent1994,4:ll4-9.4. Bosy A, Kulkami GV, Rosenberg M, McCullmh CA. Relationship of oralmalodour to peri<xlontitis: evidence of independence in discretesubpopulation. J Perktdonnl 1994;65:31 46.5. Danser MM, Comez SM, van der Weijden CA. Tongue coating andtongue brushing: a literature review. lnl J Dent H1,g 2003;l:l5l-8.6. De Boever EH, Loesche WJ. The tongue microbiota and tongue sudacecheracteristics contribute to oral malodour. In: Bad Breath: AMultidisciltlinary- Appnach, van Steenberghe D, Rosenberg M, eds. l-euvenUniversity Press, pp. I I l-21,1996.