AADE letter opposing AB 1893

  • 505 views
Uploaded on

 

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
505
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. April 15, 2014 The Honorable Richard Pan Chairman, Assembly Committee on Health State Capitol, Room 6005 P.O. Box 942849 Sacramento, CA 95249-0009 RE: AB 1893 Oppose Unless Amended Dear Chairman Pan: We are writing on behalf of the American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) to express significant concerns and opposition unless amended to AB 1893. The legislation mandates patients with diabetes and other chronic diseases who use medical sharps (e.g., needles, syringes, lancets and other medical sharps) purchase a sharps container whenever purchasing one of these items. The bill envisions an unworkable framework within the existing healthcare system, creates a punitive approach for people with diabetes and other chronic diseases whenever purchasing medical supplies, the fact sheets and supporting materials authored by the bill sponsors and the California Product Stewardship Council lack truth, and the bill does not adequately meet the needs of the California constituency impacted by the aforementioned diseases. The AADE is a multidisciplinary association dedicated to empowering healthcare professionals with the knowledge and skills to deliver exceptional diabetes education, management and support. We advocate on behalf of diabetes educators and the patients they serve. We also work to ensure the professional growth of our members and promote widespread recognition of the benefits of diabetes education. We believe that AB 1893 places an unnecessary burden on people with diabetes in California. The language presented by the bill authors and the California Product Stewardship Council, the organization sponsoring the legislation, is lacking in scientific basis or fact. In a time when we are trying to improve the healthcare system we believe it is irresponsible, unwarranted and slanderous of the authors and the California Product Stewardship to present legislation that is based on anecdotal information and to paint those with diabetes and other chronic conditions as negligent. Our organization fully believes people with diabetes and others with chronic conditions are the ones most likely to remain responsible when it comes to disposing sharps. By comparison, there is ample evidence those who use IV drugs are much less likely to dispose of syringes in the correct manner. Quite frankly, when it comes to containing potential HIV and hepatitis transmission, this is the very population waste handlers want to ensure correctly dispose of sharps. Yet, this legislation does nothing to reach the IV drug using population when it comes to furthering syringe disposal messaging and processes. Further complicating matters with AB 1893 is the fact it mandates the purchase of one disposal option by patients over several cheaper sharp containment and destruction options available and cleared by the FDA, EPA, state and local health authorities and leading national groups like the American Diabetes Association. These disposal options include the use of empty bleach bottles, empty detergent bottles and needle clippers which make syringes inert. The bill unfortunately mandates only those with chronic diseases do something and that something is to spend more to care for themselves even when cheaper options are available.
  • 2. The legislation also creates a sizable conflict with existing health insurance reimbursement when it is available and exacerbates problems with Medi-Cal and Medicare coverage. Several large employers today reimburse for sharps disposal systems making this legislation redundant when coverage exists. When it comes to Medi-Cal and Medicare the programs today do not cover disposal programs and California cannot place a purchase mandate on the patient or a drug or sharps manufacturer due to federal reimbursement law. The state today though can enact a law requiring the Medi-Cal program to cover sharps disposal items including disposal containers. We strongly believe additional data is necessary on the impact of sharps in the waste stream and respectfully ask that the bill is looked at to ensure responsible and meaningful language considered by the committee going forward focuses on this need. Thank you, in closing, for your time and consideration of our remarks. AB 1893 is a provision which we cannot support unless several provisions harmful to the interests of people with diabetes are dropped and the legislation is significantly amended. Further, the language utilized to promote this legislation at the expense of people with diabetes is completely unjustified and calls for a correction of the record and retraction by those authoring the documents. Sincerely, Joan Bardsley. President, American Association of Diabetes Educators cc: Asm. Matt Stone Asm. Susan Talamantes Eggman Committee Staff bcc: Charles MacFarlane, Chief Executive Officer, AADE Martha Rinker, Chief Advocacy Officer, AADE James Specker, Director State Advocacy, AADE