• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Uk university technology transfer

on

  • 1,019 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,019
Views on SlideShare
1,019
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
15
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Uk university technology transfer Uk university technology transfer Presentation Transcript

    • UK University and Technology Transfer Michael Blakeney Queen Mary, University of London EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Outline • University technology transfer background – What and why? – Government policies and existing structure • Technology transfer – Protection (laws) + Exploitation (business) • Comparison of UK and US technology transfer • Trend and challenges EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • What is University Transfer Technology • Transfer the rights to use and commercialise intellectual properties resulting from university research to industry. • Vehicles – Sponsored/collaboration research – Consultancy – Intellectual Property protection – Licensing and spin-out companies – Graduate training & professional development EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Why Universities Transfer Technologies • University: – Enhance industrial collaboration and increase university research income – Applied research influence markets/products – Retain entrepreneurial faculty • Industrial communities – Access leading edge scientific research and enhance ability in R&D • Public at large – Benefit from innovation and influence local economy EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • UK University TT Background • Strong government support – Higher Education Innovation Fund (HEIF2: £187m) • Lambeth report • Knowledge & Technology Transfer Association • University Technology Transfer Offices – University subsidiary vs. Independent company – Activities: Invention Disclosure Negotiation and drafting License agreements Evaluation and Marketing Establishing spin-out company Patent Prosecution Royalty/Milestone Management EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Protection of Intellectual Property • IP ownership – Research Councils vest IP in universities – Industrial sponsors require IP ownership – Joint ownership is common – University IP policy • Staff: Employee invention, ownership belongs to university • Students? • IP subject matter – Patent, know-how, copyright, database right, design right EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Patenting • First-to-file vs First-to-invent – Avoid immature disclosure – Impact on academic publication • Patenting strategy: – UK national filing, proceed to PCT application – Costs roar after going to PCT national phase – Seeking exploitation within 30 months after initial filing – Potential problems? • Costs: – UK filing: 3-5K, PCT: 10-15K, PCT nationals: 15-25K EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Copyright • Copyright of software, database arising from research belongs University. • University waives the ownership of the copyright of research report, books, papers etc. in favour of the authors • Impact of E-learning EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Know-how/Trade Secret • Advantage for process invention: – Resultant product is not readily linked to the patented process • Disadvantage: identifiable? • Licensing agreement – Complex negotiation + lower royalty income • Spin-out: mixture of patent and KH is effective • Challenge: what if inventor leaves university? EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Commercial Research and Consultancy • Industrial collaborators pay university to carry out research or consultancy • IP ownership: – Company usually owns foreground IP – University owns background IP – Clear cut? • Value of the contract: direct cost + overhead (over 100%) • Further exploitation: – Unbalanced negotiation power – Licensing background IP to explore foreground IP EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Licensing vs. Spin-out Pros Cons Inventor Benefit Licensing •Avoid initial high R&D •Could be one-off Percentage of costs (exclusive) the licensing •Spread risks (royalty) •Under-performed incomes •High short-term incentive licensee Spin-out •Product development •Inherent risks Shareholding •Involving more •Medium-long return of the spin-out people/energy/money •Hard slog with no company •Really add value return EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Licensing (1) • Technology: Sold rather than bought – Patents are not granted – Speculative market value – Need significant product/application development • Grant of license – Patent, know-how, copyright of software etc. – Broad licensing rights with exclusivity, multiple field of use and wide territory to compensate potential high risks • Often combined with development agreement EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Licensing (2) • Considerations: – Upfront payment: cover sunk patent costs – Milestone payment – On-going royalty fee with minimum royalty targets – Equity of licensee company in place of royalty • Royalties: based on net sales – Depends on type of technology, stage of development, size of market, strength of patent and perceived risk • Examples: – university deals: 25:75 rule • Process(<1%), patented compound with significant market (8%), generally (3-6%) – BTG deals • Software (0-10%), Pharmaceuticals and health care (5-10%), telecommunication (10-15%) EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Licensing (3) • Improvements – Joint ownership? • Warranties and liabilities – Condition of patent, the results, compliance – Disclaimer • Performance Management – Best endeavour EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Spin-out • Technology – potential for sustainable high value – Large market – Strong competitive advantage – Protectable Intellectual property • Company - the vehicle to capture the value – Legal format: Limited liability – Professional management – Access to capital through equity investment – Access to market EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Sources for Seed Funds • Money from family and friends • Organic growth – revenue • Bank loan • University Challenge Fund (CLCUCSF) • Angels (rich individuals) • Commercial Fund (BT Brightstar, Gentech) • Venture Capitals (3i, TTP ventures) Increased risk! EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • How • IP assigned/licensed to the spin-out • Equity split between University and inventors (50:50) • Cash investment for equity sets company value • Business planning and professional management • Product development, marketing and sales • High risk, high return – potential to be worth £100m in 5 to 7 yrs, ROI: 30-50% • Exit: trade sale or IPO EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-
    • Comparison of UK and US technology transfer Per $1bn research UK universities US universities UK as % US Invention disclosure 440 399 110% Licenses signed in year 206 120 172% Licenses yielding income 202 280 72% Licensing income $12.1m $31.4m 39% Spin-outs created 50 15 333% • Wright, Binks, Vahora and Lockett, University Commercialisation Survey, 2002, Nottingham Business School, Unico and AURIL EC-ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Co-operation Programme (ECAP II) EC- Co-