Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Thompson tchobanian ni_li)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Thompson tchobanian ni_li)

506
views

Published on

hj

hj

Published in: Technology, Business

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
506
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
41
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Improving A PID Controller Using Fuzzy Logic Andrew Thompson Ni Li Ara Tchobanian Professor: Riadh Habash TA: Hanliu Chen
  • 2. Problem
    • Although PID controllers are able to provide adequate control for simple systems, they are unable to compensate for disturbances.
    • We will use Fuzzy Logic controllers to improve the PID controllers ability to handle disturbances.
  • 3. Hypothesis
    • We feel like all the designs for the fuzzy compensator will be an improvement upon the PID controller and will have greater ability to deal with disturbances.
  • 4. IEEE Papers
  • 5. Group Contribution
    • Andrew Thompson:
      • Research and development of Fuzzy precompensator design and rules
      • Research and development of PID Controller
    • Ni Li:
      • Research and development of various Fuzzy logic compensator (PD, PI) designs and rules
    • Ara Tchobanian:
      • Research and modeling of DC motor
      • Research and development of PID Controller
  • 6. Procedure
    • We first needed to decide upon a system which we could control using a PID controller as well as be able to introduce a disturbance.
    • We chose to model a basic DC motor.
  • 7. DC Motor
    • We used the following values for the model of the DC Motor
    • moment of inertia of the rotor
    • J = 0.01 kg.m 2 /s 2
    • damping ratio of the mechanical system b = 0.1 Nms
    • electromotive force constant K = 0.01 Nm/Amp
    • electric resistance R = 1 ohm
    • electric inductance L = 0.5 H
    • input V: Source Voltage
    • output Θ’: Speed of motor
  • 8. DC Motor Model
  • 9. Step 2
    • We next had to design a PID controller to control the speed of the motor.
  • 10. PID Controller
    • We wanted the PID controller to satisfy the following criteria:
      • Settling time less than 2 seconds
      • Overshoot less than 5%
      • Steady-state error less than 1%
    • By using trial and error, and examining the step response we obtained the following gains:
    • Kp = 100, Ki = 200, Kd = 10
  • 11. PID Model
  • 12. Step 3
    • The final step in the development of our controllers was to design various forms Fuzzy logic compensators in order to improve the performance of the PID controller and to allow it to account for the disturbance.
    • We designed three types of Fuzzy logic Compensators
      • Fuzzy PI
      • Fuzzy PD
      • Fuzzy Precompensated
  • 13. Fuzzy logic Introduction Fuzzy logic is a problem-solving control system methodology that lends itself to implementation in systems ranging from simple, small, embedded micro-controllers to large, networked, multi-channel PC or workstation-based data acquisition and control systems. It can be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of both. Inputs Rules Output
  • 14. Fuzzy Precompensated PID Membership Functions, and Fuzzy Rule Sets
  • 15. Surface and Rule Sets
  • 16. Fuzzy Precompensated PID Model
  • 17. Fuzzy logic Equation for the fuzzy PI
    • Kp*X + Ki*Y = Z
    The output for the fuzzy Y example input for Ki The gain for Ki X example input for Kp The gain for Kp
  • 18. Membership functions for the PI component.
    • (a) Input membership functions.
    • (b) Output membership functions.
    L A) B) Optical High Low
  • 19. Fuzzy Logic Rules for the PI
    • The P is Low and I is Low then output is –R
    • The P is Low and I is Optimal then output is –(R+S)/2
    • The P is Low and I is High then output is -S
    • The P is Optimal and I is Low then output is (–R+S)/2
    • The P is Optimal and I is Optimal then output is 0
    • The P is Optimal and I is High then output is (R-S)/2
    • The P is High and I is Low then output is S
    • The P is High and I is optimal then output is (R+S)/2
    • The P is High and I is High then output is R
    Where R=L 1 *K i +L 2 *K p S=L 2 *K p +L 1 *K i
  • 20. Linear Fuzzy PI Control Table Surface Viewer R (R+S)/2 S High ( P ) (R-S)/2 0 -(R-S)/2 Optimal ( P ) -S -(R+S)/2 -R Low ( P ) High ( D ) Optimal ( D ) Low ( D) Output
  • 21. Fuzzy PI Model
  • 22. Fuzzy PD Membership Functions
  • 23. Fuzzy PD Model
  • 24. Simulation Results Step Response PID Fuzzy Precompensated FuzzyPI Fuzzy PD
  • 25. Simulation Results Step Response with sine disturbance PID Fuzzy Precompensated FuzzyPI Fuzzy PD
  • 26. Simulation Results Step Response with Gaussian Noise disturbance PID Fuzzy Precompensated FuzzyPI Fuzzy PD
  • 27. Simulation Results Sine Input PID Fuzzy Precompensated FuzzyPI Fuzzy PD
  • 28. Simulation Results Sine Input with sine disturbance PID Fuzzy Precompensated FuzzyPI Fuzzy PD
  • 29. Simulation Results Sine Response with Gaussian Noise disturbance PID Fuzzy Precompensated FuzzyPI Fuzzy PD