Annual Giving and Development Services Partnerships - Presentation Transcript
Annual Giving and Development Services Partnerships “ Segmentation is a team effort” CASE VIII 2/19/2009 9:15 am
Preliminaries
Ask questions & make comments at any time during presentation, but be considerate of time.
Definitions
Segment : a grouping of prospects
Touch : all the various ways that an entity comes
into contact with our brand on a daily
basis.
Filter : a sequence of planned touches designed
to identify the most efficient way to reach
a segment
Take Aways Theory of partnerships Vs. The reality of most advancement offices Perception of development officers by advancement services professionals Perception of advancement services professionals by development officers Tips on how to work together & why you should constantly work on improving the relationship Why a partnership is needed to properly segment prospects
Take Aways
Why partner? Don’t we already do that?
Efficiency
Places ownership in the project for all involved
It clarifies issues (helps establish who does what)
Helps resolve conflicts and disputes (A respected partner is treated differently than a co-worker)
You can’t do it alone – “Even Batman had Robin”
The Challenge : Reorganize 15 independent Annual Fund programs into 1 centralized Annual Giving Office
The Challenge
Database considerations
How you use your data helps determine how your data is collected, maintained, and reported!
Every program feels that they “own” prospects
15 different ways of looking at one database
15 different ways of requesting data from the database
15 different sets of business rules on how the data is kept and reported
15 different ways of complaining about the database
Partners – Not Silos
Silos
Us vs. them
Minor things
Communication styles
Personalities
Working conditions
Major things
A fundraiser rarely understands what an advancement services professional does on a daily basis
An advancement services professional rarely understands what a development officer does on a daily basis
Silos Us vs. them What development officers wish advancement service professionals knew -That it takes forever to get the info I need -That I can’t get the info I need -That I don’t understand what they are saying (tech talk) -That I don’t feel like they understand what I’m saying -That they make mountains out of molehills (overcomplicate)
Silos Us vs. them What advancement services professionals wish development officers knew -How to use the system properly and put in the correct data -That it may sound simple, but one change can have a ripple effect -Talk to us first / Don’t expect things done after the fact -Patience -To ask questions / We can’t read minds
The Challenge
Building trust:
Asking the right questions to the right people
Being able to explain & ask “why” & “how”
To fundraisers and department heads
To Development Services professionals
To donors & volunteers
The Challenge
Building trust:
It simply isn’t enough to know exactly what you want & how you want it…..
YOU MUST BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN IT, AND EVERYTHING MUST BE MEASURABLE!
The Challenge
Building trust:
Don’t assume anything
Everyone has a right to know “why”
Why we do things a certain way
Why is this touch going out now
Why do we need this field in this report
Why can’t we do it the way we’ve always done it
Everyone has a right to know “how”
How are you using this data
How will you measure success
How are you communicating these results
How do you keep your sanity
The Challenge
Communicating with partners
Be honest
If you don’t know why—FIND OUT! FOLLOW UP! THEN FOLLOW UP AGAIN!
Be confident
If you are not confident in answering “Why”, they will not be confident in us
Remember change isn’t easy
There is always a ripple effect to every one thing that changes—discuss these in detail. It does make a difference in how individuals will approach the situation
A by-product of passion is defensiveness. DO NOT DOWNPLAY THE HARD WORK THAT EVERYONE HAS PUT IN OVER THE YEARS
Face time
Ask Why and How
The Challenge : Condense 15 independent Annual Fund programs into 1 centralized Annual Giving Office What does the segmentation look like?
Segmentation Touch Plan
Guiding Principles:
Reach the greatest number of prospects possible
Simplify
Contact prospects in a way that is most meaningful and
effective for them: “donor focused”
Use resources as efficiently (cost-effective) as possible
Reinforce key messages that will lay groundwork for
potential future giving
Make the donation process as easy as possible for the
donor
Create a habit of giving that will lead to increased loyalty
The Challenge
First steps:
Ask development officers:
“ If you had to segment AG prospects together, how would you do it?”
Total amount given, # of gifts, Consecutive giving, Constituency code, Age
Assumptions Vs. Measurable fields
Assumptions are not in the database and need specific business rules
to clarify. A measurable field already exists in the database.
Segmentation must use measurable fields
Segmentation
Basic Structure
Four main groupings
Loyal (gifts in last 3 consecutive FY)
Retention (gave last year)
Reacquisition (within last 5 yrs, but not last)
Acquisition (no gift history / no gifts within last 5 years)
Two subgroups (to identify affinity if possible)
Pure
Multi
Touch Plans/Calendar TARGETED MARKETING Variations Each segment receives one variation of the touch based on the specifics of that particular segment. For example: Loyal donor = 1 variation using variable data for subgroup Retention = 1 variation using variable data for subgroup Reacquisition = 1 variation using variable data for subgroup Acquisition = 1 variation
Touch Plans/Calendar 1 st Quarter: Sept/Oct 2 nd Quarter: Nov/Dec 3 rd Quarter: Feb/Mar 4 th Quarter: May/June Calendar Quarters Timing The calendar is broken into four “quarters” of two months each. Each segment will receive at least one touch during each quarter.
0 comments
Post a comment