Annual Giving and Development Services Partnerships

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Annual Giving and Development Services Partnerships - Presentation Transcript

    1. Annual Giving and Development Services Partnerships “ Segmentation is a team effort” CASE VIII 2/19/2009 9:15 am
    2. Preliminaries
      • Ask questions & make comments at any time during presentation, but be considerate of time.
      • Definitions
      • Segment : a grouping of prospects
        • Touch : all the various ways that an entity comes
        • into contact with our brand on a daily
        • basis.
        • Filter : a sequence of planned touches designed
        • to identify the most efficient way to reach
        • a segment
    3. Take Aways Theory of partnerships Vs. The reality of most advancement offices Perception of development officers by advancement services professionals Perception of advancement services professionals by development officers Tips on how to work together & why you should constantly work on improving the relationship Why a partnership is needed to properly segment prospects
    4. Take Aways
      • Why partner? Don’t we already do that?
        • Efficiency
        • Places ownership in the project for all involved
        • It clarifies issues (helps establish who does what)
        • Helps resolve conflicts and disputes (A respected partner is treated differently than a co-worker)
        • You can’t do it alone – “Even Batman had Robin”
    5. The Challenge : Reorganize 15 independent Annual Fund programs into 1 centralized Annual Giving Office
    6. The Challenge
      • Database considerations
      • How you use your data helps determine how your data is collected, maintained, and reported!
        • Every program feels that they “own” prospects
          • 15 different ways of looking at one database
          • 15 different ways of requesting data from the database
          • 15 different sets of business rules on how the data is kept and reported
          • 15 different ways of complaining about the database
    7. Partners – Not Silos
    8. Silos
      • Us vs. them
        • Minor things
            • Communication styles
            • Personalities
            • Working conditions
        • Major things
            • A fundraiser rarely understands what an advancement services professional does on a daily basis
            • An advancement services professional rarely understands what a development officer does on a daily basis
    9. Silos Us vs. them What development officers wish advancement service professionals knew -That it takes forever to get the info I need -That I can’t get the info I need -That I don’t understand what they are saying (tech talk) -That I don’t feel like they understand what I’m saying -That they make mountains out of molehills (overcomplicate)
    10. Silos Us vs. them What advancement services professionals wish development officers knew -How to use the system properly and put in the correct data -That it may sound simple, but one change can have a ripple effect -Talk to us first / Don’t expect things done after the fact -Patience -To ask questions / We can’t read minds
    11. The Challenge
      • Building trust:
        • Asking the right questions to the right people
        • Being able to explain & ask “why” & “how”
            • To fundraisers and department heads
            • To Development Services professionals
            • To donors & volunteers
    12. The Challenge
      • Building trust:
        • It simply isn’t enough to know exactly what you want & how you want it…..
        • YOU MUST BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN IT, AND EVERYTHING MUST BE MEASURABLE!
    13. The Challenge
      • Building trust:
          • Don’t assume anything
          • Everyone has a right to know “why”
              • Why we do things a certain way
              • Why is this touch going out now
              • Why do we need this field in this report
              • Why can’t we do it the way we’ve always done it
          • Everyone has a right to know “how”
              • How are you using this data
              • How will you measure success
              • How are you communicating these results
              • How do you keep your sanity
    14. The Challenge
          • Communicating with partners
          • Be honest
            • If you don’t know why—FIND OUT! FOLLOW UP! THEN FOLLOW UP AGAIN!
          • Be confident
            • If you are not confident in answering “Why”, they will not be confident in us
          • Remember change isn’t easy
            • There is always a ripple effect to every one thing that changes—discuss these in detail. It does make a difference in how individuals will approach the situation
            • A by-product of passion is defensiveness. DO NOT DOWNPLAY THE HARD WORK THAT EVERYONE HAS PUT IN OVER THE YEARS
          • Face time
          • Ask Why and How
    15. The Challenge : Condense 15 independent Annual Fund programs into 1 centralized Annual Giving Office What does the segmentation look like?
    16. Segmentation Touch Plan
      • Guiding Principles:
        • Reach the greatest number of prospects possible
        • Simplify
        • Contact prospects in a way that is most meaningful and
      • effective for them: “donor focused”
        • Use resources as efficiently (cost-effective) as possible
        • Reinforce key messages that will lay groundwork for
      • potential future giving
        • Make the donation process as easy as possible for the
      • donor
        • Create a habit of giving that will lead to increased loyalty
    17. The Challenge
      • First steps:
        • Ask development officers:
        • “ If you had to segment AG prospects together, how would you do it?”
        • Ask development/advancement services professionals:
      • “ If you had to segment AG prospects together, how
      • would you do it?”
    18. The Challenge
      • Top 5 Answers:
      • Fundraisers
      • Program/department interests, Wealth indicators, Total amount given, Feelings toward institution, Relationship w/ institution
      • Development Services
      • Total amount given, # of gifts, Consecutive giving, Constituency code, Age
        • Assumptions Vs. Measurable fields
        • Assumptions are not in the database and need specific business rules
        • to clarify. A measurable field already exists in the database.
        • Segmentation must use measurable fields
    19. Segmentation
      • Basic Structure
        • Four main groupings
            • Loyal (gifts in last 3 consecutive FY)
            • Retention (gave last year)
            • Reacquisition (within last 5 yrs, but not last)
            • Acquisition (no gift history / no gifts within last 5 years)
        • Two subgroups (to identify affinity if possible)
            • Pure
            • Multi
    20. Touch Plans/Calendar TARGETED MARKETING Variations Each segment receives one variation of the touch based on the specifics of that particular segment. For example: Loyal donor = 1 variation using variable data for subgroup Retention = 1 variation using variable data for subgroup Reacquisition = 1 variation using variable data for subgroup Acquisition = 1 variation
    21. Touch Plans/Calendar 1 st Quarter: Sept/Oct 2 nd Quarter: Nov/Dec 3 rd Quarter: Feb/Mar 4 th Quarter: May/June Calendar Quarters Timing The calendar is broken into four “quarters” of two months each. Each segment will receive at least one touch during each quarter.
    22. Touch Plans/Calendar TARGETED MARKETING 1 st Q 2 nd Q 3 rd Q 4 th Q Touch/Variation   Loyal 1/16 2/19 2/19 1/16 6 / 70 Retention 1/16 2/19 2/19 1/16 6 / 70 Reacquisition 1/16 2/19 2/19 1/16 6 / 70 Acquisition 1/1 2/2 2/2 1/1 6 / 6   Total 4/33 8/59 8/59 4/33 = 24 / 216  
    23. QUESTIONS?
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + trobintrobin Nominate

    custom

    205 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Annual Giving and Development Services Partnerships more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 205
      • 196 on SlideShare
      • 9 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 9 views on http://depts.washington.edu

    more

    All embeds
    • 9 views on http://depts.washington.edu

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories