SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 21
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on
Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes
Mellitus: The Action to Control
Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes
(ACCORD) Lipid Trial
Henry C. Ginsberg, MD
College of Physicians & Surgeons , Columbia University, New York

For The ACCORD Study Group




                                                     3/14/10
◦   Consulting fees from Merck, Merck Schering Plough,
      Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Roche,
      Isis/Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and
      Regeneron/ SanofiAventis.

Dr. Ginsberg reports Merck, ISIS/Genzyme, Roche, and
  ◦ Grant support from receiving
      AstraZeneca.
  ◦
      Consulting fees from Merck, Merck Schering Plough,
      Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Roche,
      Isis/Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and
      Regeneron/ SanofiAventis.
  ◦   Grant support from Merck, ISIS/Genzyme, Roche, and
      AstraZeneca.




                                                 3/14/10
ACCORD Study Design

•
    Designed to independently test three medical strategies to reduce
    cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients
       •
           Lipid Trial question: whether combination therapy with a statin
           plus a fibrate would reduce cardiovascular disease compared to
           statin monotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high
           risk for cardiovascular disease.
•
    Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial conducted in
    77 clinical sites in the U.S. and Canada




                                                            3/14/10
ACCORD Study Design

•
    Overall ACCORD Glycemia Trial: 10,251 participants
       •
           Lipid Trial: 5,518 in Lipid Trial
            •
               2765 randomized to fenofibrate
            •
               2753 randomized to placebo
•
    Primary Outcome: First occurrence of a major cardiovascular event
    (nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death)
•
    87% power to detect a 20% reduction in event rate, assuming placebo
    rate of 2.4%/yr and 5.6 yrs follow-up in participants without events.




                                                          3/14/10
ACCORD Lipid Trial Eligibility
•
    Stable Type 2 Diabetes >3 months
•
    HbA1c 7.5% to 11%
•
    High risk of CVD events = clinical or subclinical disease or 2+
    risk factors
•
    Age (limited to <80 years after Vanguard)
     •
              ≥ 40 yrs with history of clinical CVD (secondary
       prevention)
     •
              ≥ 55 yrs otherwise
•
    Lipids
     •      60 < LDL-C < 180 mg/dl
     •      HDL-C < 55 mg/dl for women/Blacks; < 50 mg/dl
       otherwise
     •      Triglycerides < 750 mg/dl if on no therapy; < 400 mg/dl
       otherwise
•                                                    3/14/10
    No contraindication to either fenofibrate or simvastatin
ACCORD Lipid Protocol

   All participants on open-labeled simvastatin, 20 to 40 mg/day
    ◦ Simvastatin dose complied with lipid guidelines




   Patients randomized to double-blind placebo or fenofibrate, 54 to
    160mg/day
    ◦ Dosing based upon eGFR level




   Only blinded ACCORD trial

   Observed Follow-up: 4 to 8 years (mean 4.7 years)




                                                       3/14/10
Baseline Characteristics
Characteristic        Mean or %   Characteristic              Mean or %
Age (yrs)                62       Total Cholesterol (mg/dl)       175

Women %                  31       LDL-C (mg/dl)                   101
Race / Ethnicity                  HDL-C (mg/dl)                   38
  White %                68       Triglyceride (mg/dl)*           162
  Black %                15       Blood pressure (mm Hg)       134/74

  Hispanic %              7       Serum creatinine (mg/dl)        0.9

Secondary prevent %      37       Current smoking %               15

DM duration (yrs)*        9       On a statin %                   60
A1c (%) *                8.3      On another LLA %                 8
BMI (kg/m2)              32       On Insulin %                    33


                                                  * Median
                                                        3/14/10
Mean Total Cholesterol                                                                     Mean LDL-C
    200                                                                             120

    190                                                                             110

    180                                                                             100
                                                                      Feno                                                                                     Feno
    170                                                                              90
                                                                                                                                                               Placebo
m




                                                                      Placebo




                                                                                m
d
g




                                                                                d
                                                                                g
l
/




                                                                                l
                                                                                /
    160                                                                              80

    150                                                                              70

    140                                                                              60                                                                 Years Post-
                                                               Years Post-
          0     1      2      3      4      5      6     7     Randomization              0       1        2        3        4       5      6      7    Randomization

    N = 5483   5180   4988   4783   5250   3377   1668   491                        N = 5483      5180    4988     4783     5250    3377   1668   491




                           Mean HDL-C                                                                     Median Triglycerides
     42                                                                              170

     41                                                                              160

                                                                                     150
     40                                                               Feno                                                                                     Feno
                                                                                     140
                                                                      Placebo                                                                                  Placebo

                                                                                m
m




     39

                                                                                d
                                                                                g
d
g




                                                                                l
                                                                                /
l
/




                                                                                     130
     38
                                                                                     120

     37                                                        Years Post-            110
                                                                                                                                                        Years Post-
          0    1       2      3      4      5      6      7    Randomization                  0       1        2        3     4       5      6     7    Randomization

    N = 5483   5180   4988   4783   5250   3377   1668   491                         N = 5432      5180    4988     4783     5250   3377   1668   491




                                                                                                                                    3/14/10
Adverse Experiences During Follow-up

                                          Fenofibrate     Placebo
Adverse events (no. (%))                   (N=2765)      (N=2753)     P value

Out of the ordinary severe muscle
aches/pains:
                       regardless of CK   1110 (40.1%) 1115 (40.5%)    0.81
                      plus CK > 5 X ULN     7 (0.3%)     8 (0.3%)      0.79
                     plus CK > 10 X ULN     1 (0.04%)    2 (0.07%)     0.56

Any nonhypoglycemic SAE                    54 (2.0%)     43 (1.6%)     0.27
Any Myopathy/Myositis/
                                            4 (0.1%)     4 (0.1%)      1.00
Rhabdomyolysis SAE
Any Hepatitis SAE                           3 (0.1%)     0 (0.0%)      0.18
Any SAE attributed to lipid meds           27 (1.0%)     19 (0.7%)     0.24



                                                                3/14/10
Lab Measures During Follow-up

                                Fenofibrate    Placeb
Laboratory Measures (no. (%))    (N=2765)      o
                                              (N=2753)     P
                                                           value
ALT ever > 3X ULN                52           40             0.2
                                 (1.9%)       (1.5%)         1
ALT ever > 5X ULN                16            6             0.0
                                 (0.6%)        (0.2%)        3
CK ever > 5X ULN                 51           59             0.4
                                 (1.9%)       (2.2%)         3
CK ever > 10X ULN                10            9             0.8
                                 (0.4%)        (0.3%)        3




                                                         3/14/10
Lab Measures During Follow-up

                                          Fenofibrate     Placeb
Laboratory Measures (no. (%))              (N=2765)       o
                                                         (N=2753)       P
                                                                        value
ALT ever > 3X ULN                          52            40               0.2
                                           (1.9%)        (1.5%)           1
ALT ever > 5X ULN                          16             6               0.0
                                           (0.6%)         (0.2%)          3
CK ever > 5X ULN                           51            59               0.4
                                           (1.9%)        (2.2%)           3
CK ever > 10X ULN                          10             9               0.8
                                           (0.4%)         (0.3%)          3
Serum creatinine elevation
                                          235 (27.9%)   157 (18.7%)     <0.00
                                          698 (36.7%)   350 (18.5%)     1
                                                                        <0.00
                                                                        1
Post-randomization incidence of
microalbuminuria ( > 30 to < 300 mg/g*)   1050 (38.2%) 1137 (41.6%)      0.0
                                                                         1
Post-randomization incidence of
macroalbuminuria ( > 300 mg/g*)           289 (10.5%)   337 (12.3%)      0.0
                                                                         3


                                                                      3/14/10
Primary Outcome

                               Placeb
                              (N=275
                               o
                           N 3)       Rat
                           of
                          Even      (%/y
                                      e
Primary Outcome:          ts        r)
Major Fatal or
Nonfatal
Cardiovascular
                           3         2.
Event                      1         41
                           0




                                            3/14/10
Primary Outcome

                      Fenofibra           Placeb
                      te(N=276           (N=275
                                          o
                    N 5)       Rat    N 3)       Rat
                    of
                   Even      (%/y
                               e      of
                                     Even      (%/y
                                                 e
Primary Outcome:   ts        r)      ts        r)
Major Fatal or
Nonfatal
Cardiovascular
                    2         2.      3         2.
Event               9         24      1         41
                    1                 0




                                                       3/14/10
Primary Outcome

                      Fenofibra           Placeb
                      te(N=276           (N=275
                                          o
                    N 5)       Rat    N 3)       Rat
                    of
                   Even      (%/y
                               e      of
                                     Even      (%/y
                                                 e      HR (95%   P
Primary Outcome:   ts        r)      ts        r)       CI)       Value
Major Fatal or
Nonfatal
Cardiovascular
                    2         2.      3         2.         0.92    0.
Event               9         24      1         41     (0.79 -     32
                    1                 0                1.08)




                                                        3/14/10
Prespecified Secondary Outcomes
                         Fenofibrate         Placebo
                           (N=2765)         (N=2753)
                        N of     Rate     N of     Rate
                       Events   (%/yr)   Events   (%/yr)     HR (95% CI)        P Value
Outcome

Primary + Revasc +
                        641      5.35     667      5.64    0.94 (0.85-1.05)      0.30
hospitalized CHF

Major Coronary Event    332      2.58     353      2.79    0.92 (0.79-1.07)      0.26

Nonfatal MI             173      1.32     186      1.44    0.91 (0.74 - 1.12)    0.39

Total Stroke            51       0.38     48       0.36    1.05 (0.71 - 1.56)    0.80

Nonfatal Stroke         47       0.35     40       0.30    1.17 (0.76 - 1.78)    0.48

Total Mortality         203      1.47     221      1.61    0.91 (0.75 - 1.10)    0.33

Cardiovascular Death    99       0.72     114      0.83    0.86 (0.66 - 1.12)    0.26

Fatal/Nonfatal CHF      120      0.90     143      1.09    0.82 (0.65 - 1.05)    0.10




                                                                3/14/10
3/14/10
Primary Outcome By Treatment Group and Baseline Subgroups




                                             3/14/10
Primary Outcome By Treatment Group and Baseline Subgroups




                                             3/14/10
Comparison of ACCORD subgroup results with
      those from prior fibrate studies
      Trial           Primary Endpoint:   Lipid            Primary
      (Drug)          Entire Cohort       Subgroup         Endpoint:
                      (P-value)           Criterion        Subgroup


      HHS                                 TG > 200 mg/dl
      (Gemfibrozil)                       LDL-C/HDL-C
                        -34% (0.02)       > 5.0              -71%

      BIP                                 TG > 200 mg/dl
      (Bezafibrate)                                          -39.5%
                        -7.3% (0.24)

      FIELD                               TG > 204 mg/dl
      (Fenofibrate)                       HDL-C < 42
                        -11%    (0.16)    mg/dl              -27%


      ACCORD                              TG > 204 mg/dl
      (Fenofibrate)                       HDL-C < 34
                        -8%    (0.32)     mg/dl              -31%




                                                                3/14/10
Conclusion (1)

•
    ACCORD Lipid does not support use of the
    combination of fenofibrate and simvastatin compared
    to simvastatin alone to reduce CVD events in the
    majority of patients with T2DM who have HDL-C and
    TG levels that are close to the normal range




                                          3/14/10
Conclusion (2)

•
    Subgroup analyses suggesting heterogeneity in
    response to combination therapy by gender and by
    the presence of significant dyslipidemia require
    further investigation




                                          3/14/10

More Related Content

More from Trimed Media Group

Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)
Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)
Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)Trimed Media Group
 
Innovative technologies at ACC.15
Innovative technologies at ACC.15Innovative technologies at ACC.15
Innovative technologies at ACC.15Trimed Media Group
 
Imaging at ACC.15: Session Spotlight
Imaging at ACC.15: Session SpotlightImaging at ACC.15: Session Spotlight
Imaging at ACC.15: Session SpotlightTrimed Media Group
 
10 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.15
10 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.1510 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.15
10 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.15Trimed Media Group
 
6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit
6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit
6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuitTrimed Media Group
 
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf finalAos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf finalTrimed Media Group
 
Shorr and bria innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
Shorr and bria  innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...Shorr and bria  innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
Shorr and bria innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...Trimed Media Group
 
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care CoordinationKuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care CoordinationTrimed Media Group
 
Safran info sage & disruptive innovation
Safran  info sage & disruptive innovationSafran  info sage & disruptive innovation
Safran info sage & disruptive innovationTrimed Media Group
 
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis finalTrimed Media Group
 
Hamann big institution to community care
Hamann big institution to community careHamann big institution to community care
Hamann big institution to community careTrimed Media Group
 
Hongsermeier app store for health
Hongsermeier  app store for healthHongsermeier  app store for health
Hongsermeier app store for healthTrimed Media Group
 
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...Trimed Media Group
 
Crotty engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
Crotty  engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social mediaCrotty  engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
Crotty engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social mediaTrimed Media Group
 

More from Trimed Media Group (20)

HRS.15 Sessions to Attend
HRS.15 Sessions to AttendHRS.15 Sessions to Attend
HRS.15 Sessions to Attend
 
Himss cvb sessions
Himss cvb sessionsHimss cvb sessions
Himss cvb sessions
 
Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)
Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)
Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)
 
Innovative technologies at ACC.15
Innovative technologies at ACC.15Innovative technologies at ACC.15
Innovative technologies at ACC.15
 
Imaging at ACC.15: Session Spotlight
Imaging at ACC.15: Session SpotlightImaging at ACC.15: Session Spotlight
Imaging at ACC.15: Session Spotlight
 
10 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.15
10 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.1510 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.15
10 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.15
 
6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit
6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit
6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit
 
RSNA 2014
RSNA 2014RSNA 2014
RSNA 2014
 
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf finalAos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
 
Acep 10-15-13
Acep 10-15-13Acep 10-15-13
Acep 10-15-13
 
Shorr and bria innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
Shorr and bria  innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...Shorr and bria  innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
Shorr and bria innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
 
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care CoordinationKuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
 
Safran info sage & disruptive innovation
Safran  info sage & disruptive innovationSafran  info sage & disruptive innovation
Safran info sage & disruptive innovation
 
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
 
[Teich] amdis
[Teich] amdis[Teich] amdis
[Teich] amdis
 
Hamann big institution to community care
Hamann big institution to community careHamann big institution to community care
Hamann big institution to community care
 
Hongsermeier app store for health
Hongsermeier  app store for healthHongsermeier  app store for health
Hongsermeier app store for health
 
Mandl app store for health
Mandl  app store for healthMandl  app store for health
Mandl app store for health
 
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
 
Crotty engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
Crotty  engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social mediaCrotty  engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
Crotty engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
 

Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes

  • 1. Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid Trial Henry C. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons , Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group 3/14/10
  • 2. Consulting fees from Merck, Merck Schering Plough, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Roche, Isis/Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and Regeneron/ SanofiAventis. Dr. Ginsberg reports Merck, ISIS/Genzyme, Roche, and ◦ Grant support from receiving AstraZeneca. ◦ Consulting fees from Merck, Merck Schering Plough, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Roche, Isis/Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and Regeneron/ SanofiAventis. ◦ Grant support from Merck, ISIS/Genzyme, Roche, and AstraZeneca. 3/14/10
  • 3. ACCORD Study Design • Designed to independently test three medical strategies to reduce cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients • Lipid Trial question: whether combination therapy with a statin plus a fibrate would reduce cardiovascular disease compared to statin monotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high risk for cardiovascular disease. • Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial conducted in 77 clinical sites in the U.S. and Canada 3/14/10
  • 4. ACCORD Study Design • Overall ACCORD Glycemia Trial: 10,251 participants • Lipid Trial: 5,518 in Lipid Trial • 2765 randomized to fenofibrate • 2753 randomized to placebo • Primary Outcome: First occurrence of a major cardiovascular event (nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death) • 87% power to detect a 20% reduction in event rate, assuming placebo rate of 2.4%/yr and 5.6 yrs follow-up in participants without events. 3/14/10
  • 5. ACCORD Lipid Trial Eligibility • Stable Type 2 Diabetes >3 months • HbA1c 7.5% to 11% • High risk of CVD events = clinical or subclinical disease or 2+ risk factors • Age (limited to <80 years after Vanguard) • ≥ 40 yrs with history of clinical CVD (secondary prevention) • ≥ 55 yrs otherwise • Lipids • 60 < LDL-C < 180 mg/dl • HDL-C < 55 mg/dl for women/Blacks; < 50 mg/dl otherwise • Triglycerides < 750 mg/dl if on no therapy; < 400 mg/dl otherwise • 3/14/10 No contraindication to either fenofibrate or simvastatin
  • 6. ACCORD Lipid Protocol  All participants on open-labeled simvastatin, 20 to 40 mg/day ◦ Simvastatin dose complied with lipid guidelines  Patients randomized to double-blind placebo or fenofibrate, 54 to 160mg/day ◦ Dosing based upon eGFR level  Only blinded ACCORD trial  Observed Follow-up: 4 to 8 years (mean 4.7 years) 3/14/10
  • 7. Baseline Characteristics Characteristic Mean or % Characteristic Mean or % Age (yrs) 62 Total Cholesterol (mg/dl) 175 Women % 31 LDL-C (mg/dl) 101 Race / Ethnicity HDL-C (mg/dl) 38 White % 68 Triglyceride (mg/dl)* 162 Black % 15 Blood pressure (mm Hg) 134/74 Hispanic % 7 Serum creatinine (mg/dl) 0.9 Secondary prevent % 37 Current smoking % 15 DM duration (yrs)* 9 On a statin % 60 A1c (%) * 8.3 On another LLA % 8 BMI (kg/m2) 32 On Insulin % 33 * Median 3/14/10
  • 8. Mean Total Cholesterol Mean LDL-C 200 120 190 110 180 100 Feno Feno 170 90 Placebo m Placebo m d g d g l / l / 160 80 150 70 140 60 Years Post- Years Post- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Randomization 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Randomization N = 5483 5180 4988 4783 5250 3377 1668 491 N = 5483 5180 4988 4783 5250 3377 1668 491 Mean HDL-C Median Triglycerides 42 170 41 160 150 40 Feno Feno 140 Placebo Placebo m m 39 d g d g l / l / 130 38 120 37 Years Post- 110 Years Post- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Randomization 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Randomization N = 5483 5180 4988 4783 5250 3377 1668 491 N = 5432 5180 4988 4783 5250 3377 1668 491 3/14/10
  • 9. Adverse Experiences During Follow-up Fenofibrate Placebo Adverse events (no. (%)) (N=2765) (N=2753) P value Out of the ordinary severe muscle aches/pains: regardless of CK 1110 (40.1%) 1115 (40.5%) 0.81 plus CK > 5 X ULN 7 (0.3%) 8 (0.3%) 0.79 plus CK > 10 X ULN 1 (0.04%) 2 (0.07%) 0.56 Any nonhypoglycemic SAE 54 (2.0%) 43 (1.6%) 0.27 Any Myopathy/Myositis/ 4 (0.1%) 4 (0.1%) 1.00 Rhabdomyolysis SAE Any Hepatitis SAE 3 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0.18 Any SAE attributed to lipid meds 27 (1.0%) 19 (0.7%) 0.24 3/14/10
  • 10. Lab Measures During Follow-up Fenofibrate Placeb Laboratory Measures (no. (%)) (N=2765) o (N=2753) P value ALT ever > 3X ULN 52 40 0.2 (1.9%) (1.5%) 1 ALT ever > 5X ULN 16 6 0.0 (0.6%) (0.2%) 3 CK ever > 5X ULN 51 59 0.4 (1.9%) (2.2%) 3 CK ever > 10X ULN 10 9 0.8 (0.4%) (0.3%) 3 3/14/10
  • 11. Lab Measures During Follow-up Fenofibrate Placeb Laboratory Measures (no. (%)) (N=2765) o (N=2753) P value ALT ever > 3X ULN 52 40 0.2 (1.9%) (1.5%) 1 ALT ever > 5X ULN 16 6 0.0 (0.6%) (0.2%) 3 CK ever > 5X ULN 51 59 0.4 (1.9%) (2.2%) 3 CK ever > 10X ULN 10 9 0.8 (0.4%) (0.3%) 3 Serum creatinine elevation 235 (27.9%) 157 (18.7%) <0.00 698 (36.7%) 350 (18.5%) 1 <0.00 1 Post-randomization incidence of microalbuminuria ( > 30 to < 300 mg/g*) 1050 (38.2%) 1137 (41.6%) 0.0 1 Post-randomization incidence of macroalbuminuria ( > 300 mg/g*) 289 (10.5%) 337 (12.3%) 0.0 3 3/14/10
  • 12. Primary Outcome Placeb (N=275 o N 3) Rat of Even (%/y e Primary Outcome: ts r) Major Fatal or Nonfatal Cardiovascular 3 2. Event 1 41 0 3/14/10
  • 13. Primary Outcome Fenofibra Placeb te(N=276 (N=275 o N 5) Rat N 3) Rat of Even (%/y e of Even (%/y e Primary Outcome: ts r) ts r) Major Fatal or Nonfatal Cardiovascular 2 2. 3 2. Event 9 24 1 41 1 0 3/14/10
  • 14. Primary Outcome Fenofibra Placeb te(N=276 (N=275 o N 5) Rat N 3) Rat of Even (%/y e of Even (%/y e HR (95% P Primary Outcome: ts r) ts r) CI) Value Major Fatal or Nonfatal Cardiovascular 2 2. 3 2. 0.92 0. Event 9 24 1 41 (0.79 - 32 1 0 1.08) 3/14/10
  • 15. Prespecified Secondary Outcomes Fenofibrate Placebo (N=2765) (N=2753) N of Rate N of Rate Events (%/yr) Events (%/yr) HR (95% CI) P Value Outcome Primary + Revasc + 641 5.35 667 5.64 0.94 (0.85-1.05) 0.30 hospitalized CHF Major Coronary Event 332 2.58 353 2.79 0.92 (0.79-1.07) 0.26 Nonfatal MI 173 1.32 186 1.44 0.91 (0.74 - 1.12) 0.39 Total Stroke 51 0.38 48 0.36 1.05 (0.71 - 1.56) 0.80 Nonfatal Stroke 47 0.35 40 0.30 1.17 (0.76 - 1.78) 0.48 Total Mortality 203 1.47 221 1.61 0.91 (0.75 - 1.10) 0.33 Cardiovascular Death 99 0.72 114 0.83 0.86 (0.66 - 1.12) 0.26 Fatal/Nonfatal CHF 120 0.90 143 1.09 0.82 (0.65 - 1.05) 0.10 3/14/10
  • 17. Primary Outcome By Treatment Group and Baseline Subgroups 3/14/10
  • 18. Primary Outcome By Treatment Group and Baseline Subgroups 3/14/10
  • 19. Comparison of ACCORD subgroup results with those from prior fibrate studies Trial Primary Endpoint: Lipid Primary (Drug) Entire Cohort Subgroup Endpoint: (P-value) Criterion Subgroup HHS TG > 200 mg/dl (Gemfibrozil) LDL-C/HDL-C -34% (0.02) > 5.0 -71% BIP TG > 200 mg/dl (Bezafibrate) -39.5% -7.3% (0.24) FIELD TG > 204 mg/dl (Fenofibrate) HDL-C < 42 -11% (0.16) mg/dl -27% ACCORD TG > 204 mg/dl (Fenofibrate) HDL-C < 34 -8% (0.32) mg/dl -31% 3/14/10
  • 20. Conclusion (1) • ACCORD Lipid does not support use of the combination of fenofibrate and simvastatin compared to simvastatin alone to reduce CVD events in the majority of patients with T2DM who have HDL-C and TG levels that are close to the normal range 3/14/10
  • 21. Conclusion (2) • Subgroup analyses suggesting heterogeneity in response to combination therapy by gender and by the presence of significant dyslipidemia require further investigation 3/14/10