Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
622 Final Deliverable
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

622 Final Deliverable

  • 249 views
Published

 

Published in Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
249
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Flickr Organizr Andrea Wiggins, Timothy Mills, Matt Rubinstein, Min Hu, David Lee
  • 2. Organizr Overview
  • 3. Personas and Scenarios Laura Artist, 34 years old New User Sara Physics Ph.D. student, 26 years old Intermediate User John Carpenter, 46 years old Expert User
  • 4. Summary of Findings
    • Overall Flickr usability is very good
    • Flickr is on an iterative release cycle
      • (it’s constantly being changed… for the better)
    • Some issues identified
      • Visibility
      • Labeling
      • Consistency
  • 5. Usability testing: Overall Findings
  • 6. Post Questionnaire Responses Batch Organizr Other – changing representative photo for sets Very easy Participant 4 Batch Organizr – “needs prompt to save changes because save button isn’t obvious” Other – “missing out on little options” Not too hard Participant 3 Batch Organizr – difficulty selecting subsets of current selection Sets Very easy “except last task” Participant 2 Other – small size of text, basic tasks require practice Groups Not too hard Participant 1 Aspect of Organizr they “Don’t Like” Hardest Aspect of Organizr to Use Ease of Task Performance
  • 7. Evaluation Methods
    • User testing
      • 4 subjects, 5 tasks
    • Survey
      • 107 respondents
    • Heuristic Evaluation
      • 10 heuristics with 5 reviewers
    • Comparative Analysis
      • 9 physical and digital competing systems
    • Vocabulary / Visual analysis
  • 8. Visibility
    • Findings: Clear batch, Findr filter feature, save button, date selector are examples of many functions are underutilized because they are not clearly visible
    • Evidence: User testing, heuristic evaluation
    • Recommendations: Trying other layouts that place functions in better locations. Need more
    pop-out
  • 9.  
  • 10. Labeling
    • Findings: Some of the labeling is inconsistent.
      • “ Add to set” sometimes creates a new set
      • Organizr vs Organizer vs Organize
    • Evidence: Survey responses, Interviews, Heuristic Evaluation, User Testing, and Vocabulary Analysis
    • Recommendations: Card sorting to determine optimal vocabulary
  • 11. Consistency
    • Findings: Good usability principles make for poor usability… sometimes. Its easy to select multiple things into the finder, but when you want to drag them out , it’s one at a time. Same thing is true when you’re working with groups.
    • Evidence: User Testing, GTN, and Heuristics
    • Recommendations: Interaction consistency vs labeling consistency.
  • 12. Questions?