Superheros and a Leprechaun, with Flare: A case study in breaking down silos

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Superheros and a Leprechaun, with Flare: A case study in breaking down silos - Presentation Transcript

    1. Superheros and a leprechaun, with Flare: A case study in breaking down silos
    2. Key Pointes
      • Moving documentation from RoboHelp to Flare
      • Key: Buy-in and cooperation from the team
      • The process for how we made the transition
    3. Your questions
      • Please let me know if you have any questions.
      • My contact info will be at the end.
      • The slide info will be at the end.
    4. Who I Am
      • Usability Consultant
      • Self-employed
      • Company is Key Pointe Usability Consulting.
      • Started as tech writer and moved into usability
    5. Who Is Meridian
      • Software Company based in California with an office here in Vancouver
      • Makes Construction Project Management Software
      • How I came upon the job is a long story, but I’ll make it short.
    6. Joe, Irish, Doc manager Theresa, consultant Marcy, writer Contract writer Brian, CTO Viktor, Design Jay Support 3 Johns
    7. Product 1: Proliance
      • 4 RH projects with 2000 help topics for Proliance with 400 duplicated topics
      • 10 bulletins, 10 white papers, installation manual, upgrade manual in Word
      • Readmes in FrontPage
      • Technical Library for Developers in Notepad
      • 1000 kb items in Pivotal 1999 (no XML)
    8. Product 2: Prolog
      • 2500 help topics in Prolog with about 600 duplicated topics
      • 8 online help systems RoboHelp
      • 50 technical bulletins in Word
      • Readmes, Installation guides, Upgrade guides in FrontPage
      • 3000 knowledge base items in Pivotal database from 1999 (no XML capabilities)
    9. Help Situation
      • RH had problems with big projects
      • No Version Control
      • No technical writers on staff
      • Things had reached critical mass
    10. Things They Wanted
      • To fix things up, bring them up to date
      • To hire a writer
      • Coordinate with Support Services (in California)
    11. Coordinating with Support
      • Too many resources meant customers couldn’t find information.
      • Information was out of date.
      • Support needed to drive more people to the finding information on the website, away from emails and phone calls.
    12.  
    13.  
    14.  
    15. Helping Support
      • Documentation was important to Support, so why not integrate with them more?
      • New SupportLink WebHelp proposed
      • Support Manager buys in!
    16. Tool evaluation requirements
      • Technical documentation oriented
      • Import from RH and Word
      • Something like RH, but have much better content reuse options
    17. Choosing Flare
      • Offered the most options in terms of functionality
      • Worked most easily with RH
      • Lower cost
      • Lower perceived learning curve
    18. Business case
      • Reviewed why we should move from to Flare.
      • Written for the V.P of R&D
    19.  
    20. Project plan
      • Iteration 1 and 2 reviewed:
        • Purpose
        • Objectives
        • Scope
        • Resources
        • Timeline
        • Effort Estimate
    21.  
    22.  
    23. Project estimate
      • Gave an estimate for when the project could be accomplished with two writers vs three writers.
    24. Writer Writer Writer
    25. Presentation to R&D
      • People were curious
      • Something fresh was happening for a stagnant department
    26.  
    27.  
    28.  
    29.  
    30. Implementing
        • Decided to change both products at the same time, but slightly delayed the second product so I could train the technical writer to do:
          • Information model
          • Content audit
          • Detailed reuse model
    31. Information model
      • The information model gave a high level overview of the deliverables we would create.
      • This was more for people outside the department who wanted to know what we were doing, and easy way to see content reuse.
    32.  
    33. Content audit
      • The content audit was much more in depth and looked at all the documentation and where it was duplicated.
    34. Detailed reuse model
      • The detailed reuse model showed on a topic-by-topic basis where the content would be reused and in which deliverables.
    35.  
    36. Keeping in Touch
      • We were also in contact with:
      • Support Services
      • Marketing
      • R&D
    37. SupportLink mockups
      • Done in Visio
      • We asked for CSS support and graphic design support
      • Acted as a proof of concept
    38.  
    39. Design Help with Flare skin
      • The graphic designer made it look pretty
      • And was concerned about usability and “Web 2.0”
      • Yay!
    40.  
    41. Importing KB Items
      • Worked with Support to figure out the knowledge base process.
      • Items up to date
      • Not duplicated
    42. Technical Library
      • CTO needs a Technical Library
      • “ I want the ‘MSDN look and feel’.”
      • I’ve seen the MSDN and it’s not that attractive, so I asked him what he meant
      • It was clear:
      • Documentation suffered from a lack of understanding in R&D.
      • Support relied on the documentation to be accurate and concise, but it wasn’t.
      • Rarely do we measure technical support efficiency in terms of useful documentation because we’re not familiar with the connection.
      • This transition was large for everyone: move from multiple sources, lots of browsing, to searching in one place for the necessary information.
        • In early releases, some Support staff panicked when information was missing.
        • To succeed, to show our flexibility and willingness, we had to be accommodating and understanding.
      • By reaching out from documentation, we were able to start a team effort and build understanding.
      • 90% of people bought in
      • Without the enthusiasm and excitement, the project would not have gone as well.
      • (Link to WebSite unavailable)
    43. Info
      • Theresa Putkey
      • [email_address]
      • www.keypointe.ca

    + Theresa PutkeyTheresa Putkey, 2 years ago

    custom

    2343 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Reviews a company's move from RoboHelp to Flare and more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 2343
      • 2343 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories