University Information System Standards - How to participate in and to improve current European Development - How to participate in and to improve current European Development Workshop prepared by Tore Hoel, Erlend Øverby, Scott Wilson and Simone Ravaioli http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/no/
Agenda
14:00 - 14:40
Short introduction (Tore Hoel)
On standards and standardisation
Who are doing standards
The MLO project (Erlend Øverby)
Doing standards the lightweight way (Scott Wilson)
14:40 - 15:20
Mapping the domain
15:20 - 17:00
The Industry perspective (Simone Ravaioli)
Discussion
Conclusions and ideas for further work (Scott Wilson)
Let’s start with the beginning the beginning
What are Standards – why bother? – why bother?
Tore Hoel Oslo University College
A Standard is...
... design references for products and processes
Mogens Kühn Pedersen -www.cbs.dk/ostea
Not only technical specifications
consensus on privacy
consensus on quality
documented best practices in Learning, Education and Training
In practice, standards could be consensus on any process!
Who are doing standards?
Standard Setting Bodies vs. Consortia
How Initiatives Relate - in theory Need for standards becoming accepted Formal Certified Standards Early Inter-company collaboration Consortia formed ‘ De Novo’ Specifications produced Specifications Implemented Standards bodies refine existing best practice +ve & -ve experience gained AICC ADLnet IEEE ISO IMS CEN/ISSS WS-LT CEN TC353
How Initiatives Relate - in reality AICC ADLnet IEEE LTSC ISO IMS ARIADNE CEN/ISSS WS-LT Dublin Core & early LO Metadata DIN BSI Japan PROMETEUS MoU LO Metadata SCORM LOM
How Initiatives Relate - in reality AICC ADLnet IEEE LTSC ISO IMS ARIADNE CEN/ISSS WS-LT Dublin Core & early LO Metadata DIN BSI Japan CEN TC 353 SCORM LOM MLR DCMI W3C MLR as EN
Consortia in HE
Terena
The Trans-European Research and Education Networking Association offers a forum to collaborate, innovate and share knowledge in order to foster the development of Internet technology, infrastructure and services to be used by the research and education community.
Internet2
a not-for-profit advanced networking consortium comprising more than 200 U.S. universities in cooperation with 70 leading corporations, 45 government agencies, laboratories and other institutions of higher learning as well as over 50 international partner organizations
Internet2
University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development (UCAID) Internet2 Middleware Architecture Committee, with working groups on
Directory
IPv6 (new Internet protocols to manage differentiated services on the Internet)
Quality of Service (also referred to as QOS)
Measurement (of network traffic and patterns of use)
Network Management
Routing
Topology
Security
Multicast
Network Storage
RS3G - Rome Student Systems and Standards Group - Rome Student Systems and Standards Group
The Bologna Process is mandating attention to exchange of student and curriculum data between Higher Education Institutions – RS3G is taking on the role of an influential reference point in this market.
CEN/TC 353 Information and Communication Technologies for Learning, Education and Training CEN/ISSS Workshop on Learning Technologies
Scope CEN Technical Committee 353
To produce standards in the field of information and communication technologies relating to learning, education and training . The European Standards ( EN ), Technical Specifications ( TS ) and Technical Reports ( TR ) that are developed will have a well-defined European scope. These may also include:
Guidelines for the implementation of international standards from a European perspective
mature CWAs converted into standards if appropriate
Europeanization of national standards
Current work items TC 353 work items TC 353
Curriculum Exchange Formats and vocabularies
European Learning Mobility Model
Adoption of ISO/IEC 19796-1 (LET Quality Management, Assurance and Metrics - part 1)
In pipeline
Metadata on Learning Opportunities
Adoption of ISO/IEC 24751 (Accessibility)
Standardisation Work Timeframe
As Standard should be available within a maximum of 36 months
+6M – Circulation of first working draft
+6M – Dispatch of Enquiry draft
+2,5M – Submission of Enquiry
+8M – Dispatch of Formal Vote draft
+3,5M – Submission of Formal Vote
+2M – Closure of Formal Vote
+1 M – Ratificaton
+2M – Definitive text available
CEN/ISSS WS-LT Objectives
Encourage participation in global initiatives
Create specifications , agreements, guidelines or recommendations where appropriate
Provide a forum for the development and implementation of requirements-driven Learning Technologies
Carefully examining and taking into account the various effects on learning and training technology standards
Current WS-LT Work Items
A Simple Publishing Interface for Learning Object Repositories
CEN & the Standards Adoption Lifecycle Source: Bill Olivier, Life Project, http://life.eun.org WSLT TC 353 CWA TR EN or TS
Consortia contributions to European standardisation
Consortia develops specifications for fast-tracking
Or, consortia participate in standards fora, e.g. CEN/ISSS WS-LT
Model the Domain
How do LT standards relate to educational practice? SJC, HOTBED Presentation, RSAMD, 16 July 2002. administration learning resources competencies registry/authority course delivery system student pedagogy tests & assessment activities dialogue teacher library library Original diagram by C. Duncan
Cross-Domain Service Factoring Service Factoring Jane Hunter and Matthew Dovey/The University of Queensland, Australia http://maenad.itee.uq.edu.au/wp5/# toc_2
Joint Information Systems Committee 06/24/2008 | XCRI Briefing | Slide Course Advertising Acquired/Required Competence Entry Requirements Entry Profiles Pathways Advice Portfolio Course Approval Evidence of Achievement Transcripts Personal Development Planning Learner Trails E-Admission Personal Statements Curriculum Management Course Modification E-Application Student Records Assessment Results References Applicant Feedback Learner Goals Admission Stats Course Search Course Details
0 comments
Post a comment