en

632 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
632
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Tempus support and promote the modernisation of the Higher Education sector in the Partner Countries and aim at establishing an area for cooperation in HE between EU and the partner countries, In line with the principles of Lisbon Strategy Modernisation of Education is the precondition for the achievement of the economic and social objectifs Education (and vocational training) have a central role in the European agenda for employ and growth as key factor for eccelency competitiveness and innovation. Bologna Establishment of an European AREA for HE three study cycles / new common degree system / recognition of degrees and study period abroad, etc. Restructuring of National Qualification Framework
  • Approach of the Tempus Programme is a bottom-up approach, in fact it is based on the procedure of Call for Proposals which means that the project proposals are presented by the future beneficiaries based on the general principles laid down in the Calls and they are evaluated, selected and then financed for implementation. Importance given to dissemination and exploitation of results to ensure sustainability and bigger impact on the process of modernisation of Higher Education (impact on teaching/learning processes; curriculum development/ upgrading Information Technologies/ staff mobility / promoting Bologna priciples, etc. COMPLEMENTARITY with Erasmus Mundus External Cooperation Window (Tempus is not a mobility programme) which has been created to facilitate large scale MOBILITY FLOWS between EU and PC
  • Liason with the National Authorities is ensured at the Commission level by the EC Delegations in PC, which are also systematically consulted on the projects to be selected (consultation: proposals on which Delegations give a negative opinion won’t be selected) NCP and NTO In the Framework of the Tempus IV Programme, National Experts on Higher Education have been appointed by the National Authorities of the Partner Countries to promote HE reforms in PC. Thematic Training Seminars are implemented (such as the Bologna Expert in Rome end of March 2009, involving a limited number of HEREs, possibly from all partner countries, to discuss in-depth and exchange views and practices on specialised topics of general interest for Tempus participants. Regional Training Seminars , focusing on specialised topics of regional interest and involving a limited number of participants from neighbouring countries.
  • JEP as a tool of promoting multilateral partnerships amongst higher education institutions . They can develop, modernise and disseminate new curricula, teaching methods or materials, boost a quality assurance culture, and modernise the management and governance of higher education institutions. SM with an impact at the national level . Structural Measures contribute to the development and reform of higher education institutions and systems in partner countries, to enhance their quality and relevance, and increase their convergence with EU developments. - Structural Measures provide advisory support for reform processes and HE strategic frameworks . Such projects tipically address issues linked to the Bologna process such as QUALITY ASSURANCE, ACCREDITATION SYSTEM, CREDIT SYSTEMS, RESTRUCTURING OF NATIONAL QUALIFICATION FRAMEWORKS in line with common European developments. - It includes the establishment of representative bodies or organisations
  • MINIMUM GRANT SIZE , not to be confused with the TOTAL BUDGET of a project. Project duration : MAX 3 years. Extension in exceptional and duly justified cases. Only once and no longer than 12 months.
  • Grant Applicants: institution applying for the grant, RESPONSIBLE for the administration of the grant (through their Legal Representative) and the coordination of the workprogramme (through the designated coordinator) Must be state recognised HE institutions and have adehered to the Erasmus University Charter (for EU institutions). Legally established by more than 5 years.
  • EXPLANATION concerning Associations of higher education institutions (“umbrella institutions”): An association will count as one legal entity/partner institution , meaning that the association/network will be treated as one partner from the country where the headquarters are based . Ineligible Institutions Legal entities which have managed a Tempus project in the past two years which has been terminated by the /Agency for non-compliance with the contractual rules and requirements may not apply for a grant. Natural persons may not apply for a grant. Partners for whom a mandate has not been submitted are not eligible for participation. Partners for whom the mandate does not fulfil the formal requirements of the model mandate are not eligible for participation. Please note that an ineligible partner may turn the whole partnership ineligible.
  • Themes are structured around the main components of the EU’s higher education modernisation agenda. CR - adapt/modernise existing or to develop new ( implementation ) during project lifetime; - Study programme with double/multiple or joint degree Recognition + accreditation GR - Modernise management capacity of universities or their organisations (i.e. students organisations) - Promote quality assurance (deveoping methodologies and criteria comparable between HE institutions / National standars) HE & S - Strenghten the role of HEI in society (contribution to lifelonglearning); links with labour market (promotion enterpreneurship, etc.)
  • Underline the role of the “Mandate” – to secure internal relations within the partnership (e.g. between the grant holder and each project partner) Mandates MUST be prepared in advanced, signature of co-beneficiaries should exist in original BEFORE the submission of the application. They should be sent in original, with a copy of the e-Form, by post, within the deadline defined in the Call for proposals.
  • Underline the role of the “Mandate” – to secure internal relations within the partnership (e.g. between the grant holder and each project partner) Mandates MUST be prepared in advanced, signature of co-beneficiaries should exist in original BEFORE the submission of the application. They should be sent in original, with a copy of the e-Form, by post, within the deadline defined in the Call for proposals.
  • Following the independent experts' advice, the evaluation of the dissemination activities included under the award criterion "Methodology" in the second call, will be assessed under the award criterion "Sustainability". The weighting of the award criteria has been updated to take into account the importance of the dissemination activities. The heading of the Award Criterion "Financial and operational capacity" could lead to confusion with the Selection Criterion "Financial and technical capacity". Therefore, in the third call it has been replaced by the Award Criterion "Quality of the partnership". A maximum of three project proposals per applicant institution/organisation will be recommended for funding.
  • More precisely, eForm phases: - “visual” version (not active fields) will be available on the web site in the second half of November Beta version ready for testing by external users – first decade of December Final version – before the winter break
  • en

    1. 1. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS
    2. 2. Outline of the presentation <ul><li>Part I: Basic features of the Tempus programme </li></ul><ul><li>Part II: Results of the second call for proposals </li></ul><ul><li>Part III: Third call for proposals/ Main novelties </li></ul><ul><li>Part IV: Tempus management by EACEA </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    3. 3. <ul><li>Part I </li></ul><ul><li>Basic features of the Tempus programme </li></ul>
    4. 4. BASIC FEATURES OF TEMPUS IV <ul><li>Objectives : </li></ul><ul><li>To support the modernisation of Higher Education in the target countries in the surrounding area, including Central Asia. </li></ul><ul><li>To establish an area of cooperation between the European Union (EU) and the partner countries. </li></ul><ul><li>To favour convergence with the European Area for Higher Education (Lisbon and Bologna). </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    5. 5. BASIC FEATURES (II) <ul><li>Approach: </li></ul><ul><li>Institutional cooperation </li></ul><ul><li>Bottom-up programme mainly implemented through calls for proposals seeking projects targeting reforms in higher education institutions and/or systems. </li></ul><ul><li>Strong involvement of national authorities. </li></ul><ul><li>Strong accent on dissemination, sustainability and exploitation of results . </li></ul><ul><li>Complements other EU mobility programmes (e.g. Erasmus Mundus II). </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    6. 6. BASIC FEATURES (III) <ul><li>Local Support : </li></ul><ul><li>National Contact Points (NCPs) in EU Member States </li></ul><ul><li>National Tempus Offices (NTOs) in Partner Countries (PCs) </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    7. 7. 3 TYPES OF ACTIONS <ul><li>Joint Projects: implemented at institutional level to reform curricula, improve university governance, create more links with society. </li></ul><ul><li>Structural Measures: implemented at national level for the development and reform of national higher education structures and systems in Partner Countries. </li></ul><ul><li>Accompanying Measures: dissemination and information activities (conferences, studies, exchange of good practices, National Tempus Offices, High Education Reform Experts, etc.) </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    8. 8. <ul><li>GRANT SIZE = € 500 000 to € 1 500 000 </li></ul><ul><li>For both Joint Projects and Structural Projects . Need to prove cost effectiveness! </li></ul><ul><li>Minimum grant size for national projects from Montenegro and Kosovo lowered to € 300,000. </li></ul><ul><li>Minimum co-financing : 10% </li></ul><ul><li>PROJECT DURATION = up to 36 months </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    9. 9. ELIGIBLE PARTNERSHIPS http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus National projects: (targeting 1 single partner country) Multi-country projects: (targeting more than 1 partner country) minimum of 6 HE institutions minimum of 7 HE institutions 3 from the involved Partner country 2 from each involved Partner country (minimum 2 PC) 3 from 3 different EU countries. 3 from 3 different EU countries
    10. 10. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS <ul><li>Joint Projects : </li></ul><ul><li>State-recognised public or private HE institutions (either in EU or PC) </li></ul><ul><li>Associations, organisations or networks of HE institutions </li></ul><ul><li>Structural Measures : </li></ul><ul><li>State-recognised public or private HE institutions (either in EU or PC) </li></ul><ul><li>Associations, organisations or networks of HE institutions </li></ul><ul><li>Rector/teacher/student organisations </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    11. 11. ELIGIBLE PARTNERS <ul><li>State-recognised public or private HE institutions (either in EU or PC) </li></ul><ul><li>Associations, organisations or networks of HE institutions </li></ul><ul><li>Rector/teacher/student organisations </li></ul><ul><li>Non-governmental organisations </li></ul><ul><li>Social partners and their training organisations </li></ul><ul><li>Private and public enterprises </li></ul><ul><li>Research institutions </li></ul><ul><li>Public administrations (Ministries, other national/regional/local administrations) BUT special conditions ( not funding except per diem and travel costs) </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    12. 12. NATIONAL AND REGIONAL PRIORITIES <ul><li>National projects (targeting 1 single partner country) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Focus on the national priorities set for the Partner Country. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Defined by the Ministries of Education in close consultation with the Commission Delegations. </li></ul></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    13. 13. NATIONAL AND REGIONAL PRIORITIES <ul><li>Multi-country projects </li></ul><ul><li>(targeting more than 1 partner country) </li></ul><ul><li>Will focus on the regional priorities common to all PC within a specific region. </li></ul><ul><li>Extracted from strategic documents of European Commission. </li></ul><ul><li>Can address a national priority which is common to all participating PCs. </li></ul><ul><li>Cross regional cooperation: Possible if the theme of the proposal is identified as a regional or national priority for all the participating PC. </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    14. 14. Example: National Priorities – Joint Projects
    15. 15. Example: Regional Priorities – Joint Projects http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    16. 16. Programme themes <ul><li>Themes structured around the main components of the EU modernisation agenda for higher education. </li></ul><ul><li>Joint projects: </li></ul><ul><li>Curriculum reform </li></ul><ul><li>Governance reform </li></ul><ul><li>Higher Education and Society </li></ul><ul><li>Structural measures </li></ul><ul><li>Governance reform </li></ul><ul><li>Higher Education and Society </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    17. 17. Programme themes <ul><li>Curricular reform </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Modernisation of curricula: ECTS, 3 cycles, recognition of degrees </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Governance reform </li></ul><ul><ul><li>University management and student services </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Introduction of quality assurance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Institutional and financial autonomy & accountability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Equal access to HE </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Development of international relations </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Higher Education and Society </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Training of non-university teachers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Development of partnerships with enterprises </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Knowledge triangle education/research/innovation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Training courses for public services (Min./ local auth.) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Development of lifelong learning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Qualifications frameworks </li></ul></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    18. 18. Priority given to project proposals that: <ul><li>Demonstrate a strong institutional and individual capacity building process. </li></ul><ul><li>Demonstrate a wide impact on higher education </li></ul><ul><li>institutions and systems. </li></ul><ul><li>Involve a representative number of higher education institutions from a partner country. </li></ul><ul><li>Involve non-academic consortium members. </li></ul><ul><li>Promote interregional cooperation activities. </li></ul><ul><li>Demonstrate that they actively involve students or their organisations. </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    19. 19. Part II Second call for proposals Overview on the selection process and the results http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    20. 20. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Main steps in the selection process <ul><li>Process monitored by a Selection Committee (EACEA, Commission) </li></ul><ul><li>Reception of project proposals: 28 April 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Eligibility check </li></ul><ul><li>Evaluation of proposals against award criteria by independent experts ( Each application assessed by two different experts) (peer review) </li></ul><ul><li>Consultation on the shortlisted proposals </li></ul><ul><ul><li>EC Delegations, NTOs and Ministries of Education in Partner </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>countries </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Award decision </li></ul>
    21. 21. Total number of applications received <ul><li>Increased interest … </li></ul><ul><ul><li>608 proposals submitted </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(15% more compared to 530 received in 2008) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>150 (25%) PC coordinator (grant-holder) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>(19% more compared to 126 received in 2008) </li></ul><ul><li>Average budget size: € 950.000 </li></ul><ul><li>Average consortium size: 10 partners </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    22. 22. Applications from EU MS & PC Institutions 2009 http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    23. 23. Breakdown of applications by target region 2009 2008
    24. 24. Breakdown of applications according to activity type
    25. 25. Subject areas addressed for curriculum reform
    26. 26. <ul><li>Most difficult criteria to assess </li></ul><ul><li>Relevance </li></ul><ul><li>Budget and cost effectiveness </li></ul><ul><li>Part of application best completed? </li></ul><ul><li>Logical Framework </li></ul><ul><li>Work plan </li></ul><ul><li>Needs analysis </li></ul><ul><li>Description of partner institutions </li></ul><ul><li>Project summary </li></ul><ul><li>Part of application worst completed? </li></ul><ul><li>Sustainability & dissemination </li></ul><ul><li>Outcome & activity tables </li></ul><ul><li>Quality control, monitoring and management </li></ul><ul><li>Budget </li></ul>Feedback from experts after assessment on award criteria – 2 nd Call
    27. 27. Selection progress
    28. 28. Overview of the selection progress on target regions   REGION Received applications Eligible proposals Above the 50% threshold Proposed for consultation Recommended for funding Western Balkans 127 107 83 58 24 Central Asia 36 33 23 17 5 Eastern European countries 148 120 90 52 12 Russian Federation 62 53 41 23 9 Southern Mediterranean countries 157 129 106 33 16 Multiregional 78 53 34 21 3 TOTAL 608 495 (81.41%) 377 (62%) 204 (33.55%) 69 (11.34%)
    29. 29. Western Balkans – National vs Multi-country Country participation in the selected projects Country figures cannot be added as several countries can be involved in the same project. Multi-regional projects are included in the multi-country category.  Country Nat MC Total JP SM Total 13 12 25 19 6 Albania 0 3 3 3 0 Bosnia 2 5 7 4 3 Croatia 2 4 6 5 1 FYROM 1 9 10 9 1 Kosovo 2 4 6 5 1 Montenegro 1 3 4 4 0 Serbia 5 8 13 11 2          
    30. 30. Southern Mediterranean countries - National vs Multi-country Country participation in the selected projects Country figures cannot be added as several countries can be involved in the same project. Multi-regional projects are included in the multi-country category.  *Out of which a project including an association of Arabic universities, pan-Arabic organisation based in Jordan and covering the other countries involved in the consortium. Country Nat MC Total JP SM Total 7 9 16 9 7 Algeria 1 5 6 4 2 Egypt 2 4 6 5 1 Israel 0 1 1 0 1 Jordan 0 4 * 4 * 3 1 * Lebanon 0 3 3 2 1 Morocco 1 6 7 4 3 occ Palestinian territory 1 1 2 0 2 Syria 2 0 2 1 1 Tunisia 0 6 6 4 2            
    31. 31. Central Asia- National vs Multi-country Country participation in the selected projects Country figures cannot be added as several countries can be involved in the same project. Multi-regional projects are included in the multi-country category.  Country Nat MC Total JP SM Total 2 5 7 5 2 Kazakhstan 0 3 3 3 0 Kyrgyzstan 0 3 3 3 0 Tajikistan 1 2 3 3 0 Turkmenistan 1 0 1 0 1 Uzbekistan 0 4 4 3 1            
    32. 32. Eastern European countries- National vs Multi-country Country participation in the selected projects Country figures cannot be added as several countries can be involved in the same project. Multi-regional projects are included in the multi-country category.  Country Nat MC Total JP SM Total 13 12 25 19 6 Armenia 0 3 3 2 1 Azerbaijan 0 2 2 2 0 Georgia 0 4 4 3 1 Belarus 0 4 4 3 1 Moldova 1 1 2 0 2 Russia (incl. Bilateral) 9 5 14 12 2 Ukraine 3 8 11 8 3            
    33. 33. Selection Results <ul><ul><li>Average budget size: € 815.000 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Average consortium size: 13 partners </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>9 partner country organisations in average/project </li></ul></ul>1 st Call 2 nd Call Proposals recommended for funding 76 69 Proposals having partner countries as coordinator 18 (23,6%) 15 (21%) Joint Projects 63 (82,8%) 50 (72,5%) Structural measures 13 (17,2%) 19 (27,5%) Multi-country projects 46 (60,5%) 34 (49%)
    34. 34. Part III Third Call for proposals Main novelties http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus
    35. 35. 1- Terminology and clarification of certain aspects: - New terminology: grantholder/beneficiary……..……...co-ordinator partners………………………………co-beneficiaries whole consortium…………………...beneficiaries - The term “Associated partners” no longer in use. (public administrations are partners as other participating institutions but they can only receive per diems and travel costs). http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Novelties under the 3rd Call for proposals
    36. 36. 2- Introduction of the « mandate » for partners - Signed between the co-ordinator and each of the co-beneficiaries. - Will be an annex to the Grant Agreement and has legal force . - Template provided by the Agency must be used. “ Each co-beneficiary grants power of attorney to the co-ordinator to act in his name and for his account and mandates the co-ordinator to take full legal responsibility for the implementation of the agreement.” http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Novelties under the 3rd Call for proposals
    37. 37. <ul><li>3- Eligible countries </li></ul><ul><li>- Croatia will not be eligible (only on a self-financing basis) </li></ul><ul><li>4- External experts </li></ul><ul><li>I ndividual external experts are not anymore part of the consortium. </li></ul><ul><li>Subcontracting procedure if an external expertise is needed. </li></ul><ul><li>5- Evaluation & Award </li></ul><ul><li>Criteria : slightly modified (e.g. Quality of the partnership; Dissemination and Sustainability – weighting adapted) </li></ul><ul><li>Procedure : a maximum of three project proposals per applicant institution/organisation will be recommended for funding. </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Novelties under the 3rd Call for proposals
    38. 38. 6- Financial conditions http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Novelties under the 3rd Call for proposals 2 nd call 3 rd call The grant will be calculated based on the total eligible direct costs (maximum 90%) The grant will be calculated based on the total eligible costs (maximum 90%) Co-financing of at least 10% of the eligible direct costs Co-financing of at least 10% of the total eligible costs Indirect costs: a flat-rate funding of maximum 7% of the eligible direct costs. Indirect costs: a fixed flat-rate funding of 7% of the eligible direct costs.
    39. 39. <ul><li>7- E-form and Submission </li></ul><ul><li>Applications will be submitted on-line using the eForm: should be published on the Tempus website in mid-December 2009 in English, French and German. </li></ul><ul><li>On-line submitted eForm (including mandatory annexes) is considered to be the unique reference document for the submission deadline. </li></ul><ul><li>Applicants are required to send a complete paper copy of the eForm by postal mail, including the supporting documents signed in original, by the submission deadline (date of postmark). </li></ul>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Novelties under the 3rd Call for proposals
    40. 40. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Indicative roadmap for selection process – 3rd Call for proposals Steps Date Publication of Third Tempus IV Call for Proposals End November 2009 Deadline for submission of applications 9 March 2010 Expert assessment March - end April 2010 Consultation of Ministries of Education in partner countries, EC Delegation and National Tempus offices June 2010 Award decision and Publication of results July 2010 Preparation and signature of grant agreements End July to September 2010 Start of eligibility period 15 October 2010
    41. 41. TEMPUS IV INDICATIVE BUDGET FOR PROJECT SELECTED UNDER 3 RD CALL: 53,8 € million http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Southern Mediterranean (ENPI South) € 20.4 million Eastern Europe/Caucasus (ENPI East) € 11.4 million Bilateral allocation for Russia (ENPI) € 3.6 million. Western Balkans (IPA) € 13.9 million Albania € 0.9; Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia € 1.5; Montenegro € 1.1; Serbia: € 6.3; Kosovo under UNSC Resolution 1244/99: € 2 Central Asia (DCI) € 4.5 million ( € 0,9 million indicative per country)
    42. 42. Part IV Tempus management by EACEA
    43. 43. Tempus Management by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) <ul><li>Since 1 April 2009 Tempus III and IV management has been transferred from Directorate-General for Education and Culture to the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. </li></ul><ul><li>Executive Agencies are established by the European Commission to implement and to manage programmes and projects. </li></ul><ul><li>They work under the supervision of the European Commission. </li></ul>
    44. 44. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) <ul><li>Fully operational since January 2006. </li></ul><ul><li>Management of European actions in the fields of: </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Education and training </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Citizenship </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Youth Audiovisual </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Culture </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Currently the largest Executive Agency, with around 400 staff in 2009. </li></ul>
    45. 45. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) Budget 2009: ~650 millions euros (2008: ~500)
    46. 46. Management of the Tempus programme Supervision by Commission Programme design and policy Calls for proposal Selection of proposals Contractualisation and funding Programme evaluation Current situation EACEA Before the transfer (ETF) Financial and content monitoring ETF – European Training Foundation European Commission A single interlocutor for whole project cycle More reactive More flexible EACEA
    47. 47. <ul><li>Under supervision of: </li></ul><ul><li>DG EuropeAid (for Southern and Eastern neighbouring area, Central Asia) and DG Enlargement (for Western Balkans) </li></ul><ul><li>DG External Relations and DG Education and Culture closely associated. </li></ul>Management of the Tempus programme
    48. 48. Additional Information
    49. 49. <ul><li>Establishment of a list of experts from EU and Partner countries to assist in the framework of the management of the Community programmes in the fields of education. </li></ul><ul><li>Call for expression of interest published by the Agency </li></ul><ul><li>(See Official Journal: C 2008-067 pp. 51-57) </li></ul><ul><li>e.g: qualitative evaluation of proposals received in response to Tempus calls for proposals </li></ul>Recruitment of experts for the evaluation of projects
    50. 50. <ul><li>Deadline for the submission of applications: 30 June 2013 </li></ul><ul><li>Update of the lists of eligible experts: twice a year </li></ul><ul><li>More information: </li></ul><ul><li>http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/about/call_experts/call_experts_2007_en.php </li></ul>Recruitment of experts for the evaluation of projects
    51. 51. More on: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus Thank you for your attention!

    ×