Ac810 p web

403
-1

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
403
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Ac810 p web

  1. 1. AC810P -New P10 Grade p. 1 Extremely High Wear Resistance for Continuous Cutting For Steel TurningFeb 10, 2013
  2. 2. AC810P -New P10 Grade p. 2 AC810P Feature of AC810P ■Longer Tool Life 400 1.5 times longer than AC700G ■Higher ProductivityCutting Speed   (m/min)   High speed and high efficiency AC820P ■Excellent Toughness     300 More than 2 times longer than AC700G AC700G ■Eco-Friendly Performance   Good performance in dry cutting 200 AC2000 AC830P 100 AC3000 Heavy Continuous Interrupted InterruptedFeb 10, 2013
  3. 3. Features of AC810P p. 3 Technologies High strength, New Alumina Coating 6.0μm thick Al2O3 layer Enabled higher strength and adhesion between Alumina and3.5μm super FF coating Increase in crater wear resistance and toughness 10.0μm Super FF coat7.5μm increased TiCN thickness Super FF® Coating Enabled higher hardness and adhesion AC700G AC810P Increase in wear resistance AC810P improved flank wear and peeling resistanceresistance by thickening TiCN Layer Distinguishable used cutting edge Easily distinguishable used cuttingFeb 10, 2013 edge by allover shiny gold color !!
  4. 4. Wear resistance Cutting Performances of AC810P p. 4 Material: 4135 Cutting condition: 886 SFM, 0.018 IPR, 0.059 inch, dry (Vc=270m/min, f=0.45mm/rev, ap=1.5mm, dry) Insert: CNMG432 Toolholder: PCLNR2525-43 EGU AC700G 0.40 After 4 min 0.35 EGU AC810P EGU AC700G Competitor A Flank Wear Vb (mm) 0.30 Competitor S 0.25 EGU AC810P 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cutting Time (min) AC810P shows good wear resistanceFeb 10, 2013
  5. 5. Toughness Cutting Performances of AC810P p. 5 Material: 4135- interrupted Cutting condition: 1083-1148 SFM, 0.0075-0.0087 IPR, 0.059 inch, wet (Vc=330~350m/min, f=0.19~0.22mm/rev, ap=1.5mm, wet) Insert: CNMG432 Toolholder: PCLNR2525-43 4778 5000 Good Excellent Toughness! 4000 Number of Impact 2625 3000 AC810P shows good toughness 2000 1411 1000 0 EGU EGU Competitor AC810P AC700G A (P10)Feb 10, 2013
  6. 6. Cutting example 1 AC810P Field Test Result p. 6 Workpiece: Joint Material: 1053 Cutting condition: 820 SFM, 0.0059-0.014 IPR, 0.059 inch, dry (Vc=250m/min, f=0.15~0,35mm/rev., ap=1.5mm, dry) Insert: DNMG443 Competitor A after 60 pcs EGE AC810P   EGE AC810P after 60 pcs after 90 pcs Crater wear, Less flank wear Better tool life, 1.5 times flank wear Good stability of cutting edge, no chipping !Feb 10, 2013
  7. 7. Cutting example 2 AC810P Field Test Result p. 7 Workpiece: Ring Material: 52100 Cutting condition: 919 SFM, 0.0039-0.020 IPR, 0.012 inch, wet (Vc=280m/min, f=0.1~0.5mm/rev., ap=0.3mm, Wet) Insert: WNMG433 Competitor B after 125 pcs ESE AC810P after 165 pcs Big flank wear, Minor flank wear after crater wear 30% higher tool lifeFeb 10, 2013
  8. 8. Cutting example 2 AC810P Field Test Result p. 8 Workpiece: Hub Material: 1045 Cutting condition: 820 SFM, 0.016 IPR, 0.059 inch, wet (Vc=250m/min, f=0.4mm/rev., ap=1.5mm, Wet) Insert: WNMG433 Competitor C after 100 pcs EGU AC810P EGU AC810P after 100 pcs after 150 pcs Big flank wear, Minor flank wear and stable cutting peeling of edge after 50% higher tool life coatingFeb 10, 2013

×