Investor Accreditation Un-American?
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Investor Accreditation Un-American?






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 1 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Investor Accreditation Un-American? Investor Accreditation Un-American? Document Transcript

  • Accredited Investor status Un-American? By Tom Tierney The Dodd Bill has recently brought attention to the arbitrary “accredited investor” status that must be attained to invest in early stage (“startup”) companies. Arbitrary, you say? Well take the following two individual hypothetical examples: Individual A: 28 year old college Individual B: 28 year old that is still graduate, obtained bachelor, masters and attending college after 10 years. Has had problems focusing on studies, Dd in computer science. Worked in PhD startup company in engineering and spends more time on partying than currently has net worth of $750K through studying. Uncle passed away and he stock options from employer. No has inherited $7.5M for a total net mortgage, no debt and helps friends with worth of $7.5M. their startups. Pop quiz: which individual meets the current “accredited investor” guidelines for investing in early stage companies? If you guessed “Individual A”, you have failed the quiz! Currently, an American must have a net worth of $1M or income of $250K to obtain “accredited investor” status. I’m sure the original authors of this idea had good intentions: maybe they thought net worth equated to investor sophistication or might protect investors? As we’ve seen during the financial crisis of 2008-2009, “net worth” isn’t “net common sense”. The same sophisticates that created what Warren Buffet termed “financial weapons of mass destruction” were mostly “accredited investors”. As someone who’s been involved in “angel” or early stage investing for 10 years, I can categorically state that net worth doesn’t make a great angel investor, I would like to see more “Individual A’s” than “Individual B’s”. Why not have individuals make the decision to participate in early stage investing without the imposition of arbitrary government guidelines? Why not let individuals decide where to invest money they earned? Any American can start a business, why can’t any American invest in one? I’d much rather see these rules removed and a simple disclosure used for early stage investing:“The undersigned recognizes and accepts the following risk with this investment: 1) Most early stage investments fail; 2) Early stage investors typically lose most, if not all, of their individual company investments; 3) Early stage investors should only invest money they are willing to lose; 4) Sometimes an early stage investment is successful and returns a multiple of invested capital to cover other losses.” This disclosure is the four legged stool of early stage investing: it’s a scary position for any investor, but America has been built on investors willing to take a seat on this stool. Accreditation does not make this stool sturdier, and I argue, may well weaken it. Tom Tierney lives in Encinitas, CA and is a member of Tech Coast Angels (, an early stage business investing organization - a network of business angel investors.