006 International Patent
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

006 International Patent

on

  • 318 views

ppt on patents, international, Europe, Japan, China, Korea

ppt on patents, international, Europe, Japan, China, Korea

Statistics

Views

Total Views
318
Views on SlideShare
318
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

006 International Patent 006 International Patent Presentation Transcript

  • International Patent Prosecution Todd L. Juneau
  • Patent Prosecution - PCT
  • Patent Cooperation Treaty  Main reasons for using PCT filings: Defer translation costs Obtain a search & opinion Reserve patent rights in 119 countries while evaluating potential market of inventive subject matter Accelerate and standardize prosecution in some countries Can file in Chinese, English, French, German, Japanese, Russian, Spanish to obtain a search Can claim benefit of a U.S. provisional (21 years) Obtain a publication of the invention
  • PCT Basics Chapter I – thru 20th month, Chapter II – thru 30/31st month  Demand previously required at 19 th month is no longer required for most countries  Unity of Invention is the standard – special technical feature
  • PCT Regional Phase  EPO European Patent Office  ARIPO African Regional IP Office  EAPO Eurasian Patent Office  OAPI PO Oceania Asia Pacific Patent Office
  • Patent Prosecution – EPO (year 2000) 2600 examiners, 100 Board of Appeal members 142,000 applications in 2000; 53,000 searches; 45,000 examinations; 2,300 oppositions; and 1,200 appeals  www.european-patent-office.org
  • Patent Prosecution - Europe Novelty, Inventive Step, Clarity, Industrial Use First to File Registration only, need to perfect in each member country 18 month publication Request examination within 6 months of publication Opposition at EPO Validity, Enforcement locally AT, BE, BG, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GR, HU, IE, IT, LI, LU, MC, NE, PT, RO, SK, SI, SE, CH, TR, UK Extensive search capabilities (SE, DK)
  • EPO grant Must request exam within 6 months after EPO search report published (extendible by 1 month)  Usually receive multiple office actions  Receive Rule 51(4) Request for Approval of Text; answer due within 4 months (extendible by 2 months) Upon receipt of approved text, 3 months to pay grant fees and provide translation of priority documents if necessary  EP patent effective upon publication in Eur.Pat. Bulletin  Opposition period for 9 months thereafter
  • Perfecting an EP grant into the contracting states  Translation of claims required within 3 months: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switz./Lch, United Kingdom  Translation of claims within 6 months: Ireland
  • EPO and the European Market Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech, Switzerland, Germany, Denmark, Estonia, Spain, Finland, France, The United Kingdom, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, The Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Sweden, and Turkey. Extension States: Albania, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia  Market Size: about 485 million people.
  • Patent Prosecution - Japan  First to file, absolute novelty  Publication at 18 months Examination must be requested within 3 years after filing (Y84,000 plus Y2000 per claim)  Patent term 20 years  Utility Model term 6 years  Opposition within 6 months after grant
  • Patent Prosecution - Australia  First to file, absolute novelty  Publication at 18 months  Examination - must be requested within 6 months after receiving notice to do so, usually within 1 or 2 years after filing  Standard Patents - Examined, opposition available, 20 year term, no online application  Innovation Patents - Not examined, less costly, opposable, 8 year term, can apply online, unenforceable in Court until examined  Opposition within 3 mos. of grant
  • Patent Prosecution - Brazil  18 month publication  Request examination within 36 months of earliest filing date Application examined for form, substance, and novelty  Third parties can file observations between publication and conclusion of examination  Limited search Room
  • Patent Prosecution - Canada  Novelty, unobviousness; limited exam  First to File Patent application open to public inspection 18 months from the earliest filing date Request examination within 5 years of earliest filing date Before a patent is granted a third party can file an opposition to the patent  Web-site search possible
  • Patent Prosecution - Mexico  18 month publication No request for examination is required; the application is examined after publication  Patent Office may accept examinations performed by foreign patent offices, or may request technical assistance from other national institutes  No public search capability
  • Patent Renewal FeesAnnuity or maintenance fees must be paid to avoid patent abandonment: U.S. maintenance fees due 4, 8, and 12 years after patent grant Europe annuity fees due every year starting 3 years after filing
  • Working RequirementsA patentee is sometimes required to “work” the invention once it is patentedIf the invention is not worked within a specified time period, the patentee must compulsory license the patent at a specified government royaltyA patent may not be used as the basis for a lawsuit if it is not worked
  • Triggers to Compulsory Licenses Germany-if it is “in the public interest”; very rare UK, Italy, Belgium-lack of sufficient use of the patent France, Spain, Austria-both in the public interest and lack of sufficient use U.S.-no compulsory license In general, not greatly used
  • UK filing vs. U.S. provisional  UK filing Inexpensive Can obtain a search within 6 months Can obtain a refund of amounts paid against the EPO filing  U.S. provisional Inexpensive Effective date under 102(e) both against prior art and against other applicants 21 year term
  • Thank Youtodd@juneaupartners.com
  • 21