• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Kaizen Thinking Vs Kaikaku Thinking
 

Kaizen Thinking Vs Kaikaku Thinking

on

  • 235 views

KAIZEN vs KAIKAKU thinking

KAIZEN vs KAIKAKU thinking

Statistics

Views

Total Views
235
Views on SlideShare
226
Embed Views
9

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0

1 Embed 9

http://www.linkedin.com 9

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Kaizen Thinking Vs Kaikaku Thinking Kaizen Thinking Vs Kaikaku Thinking Presentation Transcript

    • A Picture of the thinking required for KAIKAKU Contrast and Compare KAIZEN thinking to KAIKAKU thinking VS Kaizen Thinking Kaikaku Thinking Incremental Change <> Tortoise Velocity Step Change <> Rocket Velocity A Picture of the thinking required for KAIKAKU Contrast and Compare KAIZEN thinking to KAIKAKU thinking PDCA SDCA from Honorable Imai Masaaki PDCA and SDCA Systematic KAIZEN Improvement Pathway Created by: Todd McCann (from Gemba KAIZEN Masaaki PDCA and SDCA Step Change KAIKAKU Pathway Created by: Todd McCann (from Gemba KAIZEN Masaaki Imai) Imai) The Natural Progression of Improvement by applying Systematic Thinking Date: 3-15-2009 Rev: 3 The Natural Progression of Improvement by applying Systematic Thinking Date: 3-15-2009 Rev: 3 (Plan – Do – Check – Act with Standardize – Do – Check – Act) (Plan – Do – Check – Act with Standardize – Do – Check – Act) Measure Measure Unit 1 July 08 MWt 8 hr avg. Unit 1 July 08 MWt 8 hr avg. LSL USL 3458 A P LSL Target Process Data 3456.5 * LSL USL 3458 Within Overall LSL Target Process Data 3456.5 * Within Overall Potential (Within) C apability Act Plan P Potential (Within) Capability USL 3457.5 KAIZEN USL 3457.5 A Cp 1.09 Sample Mean 3456.77 Cp 1.09 C PL 0.59 Sample Mean 3456.77 Sample N 693 C PL 0.59 StDev(Within) 0.152393 C PU 1.59 Sample N 693 StDev(O verall) 0.354484 C pk 0.59 StDev (Within) 0.152393 C PU 1.59 C Cpk 1.09 StDev (O v erall) 0.354484 C pk 0.59 Ov erall Capability C C pk 1.09 Act C Pp 0.47 Plan O v erall C apability D PPL 0.26 PPU 0.68 Ppk 0.26 Pp 0.47 C pm * PPL 0.26 PPU 0.68 Ppk 0.26 3456.0 3456.4 3456.8 3457.2 3457.6 3458.0 3458.4 C pm * Observ ed Performance PPM < LSL 225108.23 PPM > USL PPM Total 1443.00 226551.23 Exp. Within Performance PPM < LSL 37235.72 PPM > USL PPM Total 0.88 37236.60 Exp. O verall Performance PPM < LSL 221596.02 PPM > USL 19978.92 PPM Total 241574.93 C D 3456.0 3456.4 3456.8 3457.2 3457.6 3458.0 3458.4 Check Do Check Do O bserv ed Performance PPM < LSL PPM > USL 225108.23 1443.00 Exp. Within Performance PPM < LSL PPM > USL 37235.72 0.88 Exp. O v erall Performance PPM < LSL PPM > USL 221596.02 19978.92 Measure PPM Total 226551.23 PPM Total 37236.60 PPM Total 241574.93KAIZEN Improvements Unit 1 July 08 MWt 8 hr avg. A P KAIKAKU Improvement LSL USL 3458 Process Data Within LSL 3456.5 Overall Target * Potential (Within) Capability Act USL 3457.5 Sample Mean 3456.77 Cp C PL 1.09 0.59 Plan KAIZEN Sample N 693 StDev(Within) 0.152393 C PU 1.59 StDev(O verall) 0.354484 C pk 0.59 C Cpk 1.09 Ov erall Capability Pp 0.47 P PPL 0.26 PPU 0.68 3456.0 3456.4 3456.8 3457.2 3457.6 3458.0 3458.4 Ppk C pm 0.26 * C D A Observ ed Performance Exp. Within Performance Exp. O verall Performance Check Do KAIZEN PPM < LSL 225108.23 PPM < LSL 37235.72 PPM < LSL 221596.02 Act PPM > USL 1443.00 PPM > USL 0.88 PPM > USL 19978.92 PPM Total 226551.23 PPM Total 37236.60 PPM Total 241574.93 Plan VS Measure A S Act Standardize C D P S Unit 1 July 08 MWt 8 hr avg. LSL Process Data 3456.5 LSL USL 3458 Within Overall A Check Do A Target USL Sample Mean Sample N * 3457.5 3456.77 693 Potential (Within) Capability Cp C PL 1.09 0.59 Act Plan C D StDev(Within) 0.152393 StDev(O verall) 0.354484 C PU 1.59 C pk C Cpk 1.09 0.59 Ov erall Capability Pp PPL 0.47 0.26 Check Do Act Standardize PPU Ppk C pm 0.68 0.26 * C D KAIZEN Check 3456.0 3456.4 3456.8 3457.2 3457.6 3458.0 3458.4 Observ ed Performance PPM < LSL 225108.23 PPM > USL PPM Total 1443.00 226551.23 Exp. Within Performance PPM < LSL 37235.72 PPM > USL PPM Total 0.88 37236.60 Exp. O verall Performance PPM < LSL 221596.02 PPM > USL 19978.92 PPM Total 241574.93 Do C D A S Check Do Act Standardize Measure C D Measure Unit 1 July 08 MWt 8 hr avg. Check Do LSL USL 3458 Process Data Within LSL Target 3456.5 * Overall Unit 1 July 08 MWt 8 hr avg. USL 3457.5 Potential (Within) Capability Sample Mean 3456.77 Cp 1.09 Sample N 693 C PL 0.59 C PU 1.59 3458 P StDev(Within) 0.152393 C pk 0.59 LSL USL A StDev(O verall) 0.354484 C Cpk 1.09 Process Data Within Ov erall Capability LSL 3456.5 Overall Pp 0.47 PPL 0.26 Target * PPU 0.68 USL 3457.5 Potential (Within) C apability Ppk 0.26 Cp 1.09 C pm * Act Plan Sample Mean Sample N 3456.77 693 C PL 0.59 S StDev (Within) 0.152393 C PU 1.59 A REFORM with KAIKAKU StDev (O v erall) 0.354484 C pk 0.59 3456.0 3456.4 3456.8 3457.2 3457.6 3458.0 3458.4 C C pk 1.09 Observ ed Performance Exp. Within Performance Exp. O verall Performance PPM < LSL 225108.23 PPM < LSL 37235.72 PPM < LSL 221596.02 O v erall C apability PPM > USL 1443.00 PPM > USL 0.88 PPM > USL 19978.92 PPM Total 226551.23 PPM Total 37236.60 PPM Total 241574.93 Pp 0.47 C D KAIZEN Act Standardize PPL PPU Ppk C pm 0.26 0.68 0.26 * Check Do C D 3456.0 3456.4 3456.8 3457.2 3457.6 3458.0 3458.4 Difficulty Increases O bserv ed Performance Exp. Within Performance Exp. O v erall Performance PPM < LSL 225108.23 PPM < LSL 37235.72 PPM < LSL 221596.02 PPM > USL 1443.00 PPM > USL 0.88 PPM > USL 19978.92 Check Do PPM Total 226551.23 PPM Total 37236.60 PPM Total 241574.93 “Smaller” GAP Harder Change “Small” GAP A S Hard Change Act Standardize A S Act Standardize C D Check Do “Large” GAP C D Easy Change Check Do TIME TIME