Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
Jussi Kangasharju: Results from Information Networking
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Jussi Kangasharju: Results from Information Networking

  • 380 views
Published

TIVIT Results and Business Forum …

TIVIT Results and Business Forum

12 April 2011

Jussi Kangasharju, HIIT

Published in Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
380
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Future Internet WP3: Results from Information Networking Jussi Kangasharju, University of Helsinki14.4.2011
  • 2. Tivit Future Internet Program 2008 - 2013 Vision: Future Internet = a mission critical backbone of global information societyMission: Enhance the Internet technology and ecology as a platform for innovation while providing strong governance over the use of the network resources and information 4 yr Strategic Research Agenda: www.futureinternet.fi WP 4 Testbed WP 1 WP 2 Routing Transport WP 3 WP 6 Information Security Networking WP 0 WP 5 Management Dissemination & cross-workPhase 2 Partners (6/2009 – 3/2011):CSC – IT Center for Science, Cybercube, F-Secure, Ericsson, Nokia, Nokia Siemens Networks,Stonesoft, TeliaSonera Finland, Aalto University, Universities of Helsinki, Jyväskylä and Turku,Tampere University of Technology, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tivit 14.4.2011 Tivit Future Internet Program 2
  • 3. Three Revolutions• First revolution: Connecting wires – Telephone network• Second revolution: Connecting hosts – Original Internet• Third revolution: Connecting information – Information-centric networking, a.k.a. information networking, a.k.a. data-oriented networking, …
  • 4. Observations• Most Internet use today is information-centric – Web, peer-to-peer, …• Original Internet not very good for that – Designed for a different purpose• Problematic for content providers and users• How to build an information-centric network?• What needs to be changed and how?
  • 5. Information Networking Vision• Global information dissemination architectureContent providers:- Commercial- Users Remember:- Other Information Benefits both Networking content providersContent consumers:- Humans AND users- Machines
  • 6. Key Challenges• Storage: – How should information be represented? – Encoding techniques, etc.• Dissemination: – How should content move around the network? – Caching, content distribution, etc.• Access: – How do users express what they want? – Naming, etc.
  • 7. Overall Approach• Long term research work• Focus mostly on papers, some prototypes – Over 40 papers published – Including at IEEE Infocom and IEEE PerCom• Topics explored: – P2P Video-on-Demand – BitTorrent streaming – P2PSIP and DHTs – Parallel content retrieval and authentication – Prototypes for information-centric networking – Floating content (see next slides)14.4.2011
  • 8. Floating Content• Ad-hoc local social network-style information sharing: Digital graffiti w/o servers and infrastructure• Leaves notes, comments, stories, etc. in places• Define reach (area of interest) and lifetime• Leverage delay-tolerant ad-hoc communication between mobile devices for information replication & acquisition
  • 9. Floating Content Example
  • 10. Floating Model Anchor zone r a Buffer zone
  • 11. Simulation Environment• ONE Simulator: 4500 x 3400m simulation area – Helsinki City Scenario – Restless nodes (tourists) • Moving around along shortest paths between points of interest • On foot, by car • Some trams following regular routes – 126, 252, 504 nodes – 10m, 50m radio range – r = a = 200m, 500m
  • 12. Some Conclusions• Simple, yet appealing geo cooperation model• Workable already for modestly dense scenarios – Simulations agree well with theoretical modeling• Some built-in DoS protection and garbage collection• API and content sharing applications to come• Probabilistic operation and user acceptance?
  • 13. Present & Future Work• Theoretical foundations about criticality criteria – Published at Infocom 2011• Second round of simulations completed – First round: 1 MS thesis + PerCom WiP 2010 – Second round: Full paper PerCom 2011• More extensive simulation studies – Impact of location fuzziness – More diverse mobility models – Varied offered loads, resource sharing• Implementation for Android in progress
  • 14. Thank You! Jussi.Kangasharju@cs.helsinki.fi14.4.2011