Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Credibility in online word-of-mouth
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.


Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Credibility in online word-of-mouth


Published on

Authors: Natalie Van Hemelen, Tim Smits, Peeter Verlegh. …

Authors: Natalie Van Hemelen, Tim Smits, Peeter Verlegh.

Paper presented at ICORIA 2013 (Zagreb, Croatia)

Please contact @timsmitstim for further information about the study.

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. Credibility in E-WOM How review perceptions impact their persuasiveness Natalie Van Hemelen (KULeuven), Tim Smits (KULeuven) & Peeter Verlegh (UVA) ICORIA 2013 (Zagreb, Croatia) Slideshare: timsmitstim
  • 2. Theoretical background: Introduction • e-WOM & online consumer reviews increasingly popular • Online consumer reviews o “Online recommendations about products, services, organizations or brands, based on consumers’ personal experiences” o E.g., Yelp
  • 3. Succes and impact of online review sites • People attach a lot of importance to the non-commercial opinion of social others (Fong & Burton, 2004) • Online reviews (often) perceived as impartial (Anderson 2012) People are less suspicious about their credibility o 72% trust online reviews as much as personal recommendations o 58% trust products that have positive online reviews Reviews have a strong persuasive impact on attitudes
  • 4. Predictors of a review’s effect • Both valence and credibility are straightforward and proven predictors of a review’s effect • Floh and collegeaus (2009): many researchers only take perceived valence into account (see also Sussan et al., 2006; Willemsen et al., 2012), neglecting variation in its perceived credibility • Review’s valence and credibilty cannot be assumed to be independent from each other... Current study: Combined persuasive impact of perceived valence and credibility
  • 5. Hypotheses (1) • Valence: Straightforward effect H1: Positive reviews (vs negative ones) will increase the attitude towards the product • Credibility: Moderated effect H2a: For positive reviews, higher credibility will increase the attitude towards the product H2b: For negative reviews, higher credibility will decrease the attitude towards the product
  • 6. Hypotheses (2) • But, valence is also likely to affect credibility... • Rationale: Negative information  Attention  Source questioning • H3: Positive reviews (vs negative ones) wil increase the review’s perceived credibility
  • 7. Moderated mediation model *Type 1 Model as outlined by Preacher, Rucker & Hayes (2007); Model 74 in Hayes (2012)
  • 8. Method (1) • Procedure & participants o Between subjects design with 2 conditions (positive vs negative review) o 89 Bachelor students of a Flemish University College • 62 men (69,7%), 27 women (30,1%) • Between 18 and 24 years old (M = 19,22; SD = 1,81) • Visit a restaurant regularly (M = 4,71, SD = 1,189) o Online study • Read one of the 2 reviews: valence manipulation • Attitude restaurant: 10 semantic differential items qualitative – not qualitative, creative – uncreative, attractive – unattractive,… (α = .953, M = 4.135, SD = 1.116) • Credibility review: 4 semantic differential items honest – dishonest, credible – incredible,…(α = .687, M = 3.862, SD = 1.645)
  • 9. Method (2) • Stimuli
  • 10. Results • Proposed model confirmed! *Bootstrapping Macro SPSS (model 74), Hayes et al. (5000 samples)
  • 11. Hypothesis 1 Valence review Attitude restaurant b = 1.511, p < .001
  • 12. Hypotheses 2a & 2b * p < .001
  • 13. Hypothesis 3
  • 14. Moderated mediation model b = 1.511* (b = -1.318*) *p < .001
  • 15. Take-home-message Valence and credibility jointly predict a review’s effect on product/service attitudes. Future research • In our study the findings only hold for one type of reviews o When reviews were phrased as rather high-level (“abstract”) appraisal, a similar but non-significant pattern emerged o In a follow-up study, we replicated the findings of this paper o In other follow-up studies we want to test whether the findings also hold for other types of reviews, products,... • Future research can further investigate why exactly negative reviews are perceived as less credible than positive ones
  • 16. Thank you for your attention!