The Legal Aspects of Cyberspace

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    The Legal Aspects of Cyberspace - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Legal Aspects of Cyberspace
      • Presented by:
            • William Cook
            • Wildman Harrold Allen & Dixon
      InfraGard Super Conference May 15, 2003
    2. Bill Cook
        • V-P, Chicago InfraGard
        • Former Head of US DOJ Computer Crime Task Force; Counter-Espionage Coordinator and Counter-Terrorist Coordinator; DOJ FEMA Coordinator (Chicago)
        • Professor of Internet & Web law at U. of Illinois and Supercomputer Center
        • Lecturer at Purdue, John Marshall, Harvard, Yale & ITT
        • Partner, Wildman Harrold
        • 90 trials
        • Intellectual property, Internet & Web law
        • Panel Counsel, AIG
        • NRC & NSF Committee on Critical Infrastructure Protection and the Law
        • Member of Ill. A.G. E-Commerce Commission
    3. Cyber Investigations
    4. February 7, 2003
      • NASA servers hacked hours after Columbia was lost
      • 19 charged in identity theft that netted $7 million in tax refunds
      • Alleged student hacker indicted in Massachusetts
      • Names of AIDS, STD sufferers found on state surplus PC
      • Korean group may sue Microsoft over Slammer virus
      • NetEase sued for copyright infringement
      • Feds pull suspicious .gov site
      • Suspects arrested for TK worm; up to £5.5 million in damages
      • Lawsuit filed over missing confidential information from Canadian data management company
    5. January 31, 2003
      • Slammer worm hobbles Internet; hits Continental Airlines, Bank of America
      • Hacker steals personal information on 1,450 University of Kansas students
      • Denial of service attack forces DALnet to shutdown
      • Hacker insurance market boosted by cyberattacks
      • eBay sued for alleged online slander
      • Easyinternet cafe guilty of copyright infringement
      • Personal data pirated from Russian phone files
      • Music industry site hacked again
      • FAA warns: more attacks coming
    6. Institutional intrusion response based on
      • Damage done
      • Exposure created
      • minus
      • Perceived PR exposure
    7. Institutional response based on
      • Damages from
        • Lost IP
        • Lost private information
        • Fraud on the e-commerce site
        • System shut down
      • Compliance with regulations
      • Concern about litigation
    8. Lost intellectual property
    9. Loss of intellectual property: Disgruntled employees
      • 85 to 90 % of all computer incidents are caused by insiders
        • employees
        • consultants
        • business partners
      • Most difficult to detect
      • Most expensive to correct
      • Highly vulnerable to weak institution policies
    10. Victim computer Web based access Industrial Espionage Consultant Former employee CFAA, T/S Laws & Trespass
    11. Near North v. Cheley
      • Currently pending
      • Former employees that established Website intranet security for company
      • Periodic remote access
      • Major access through Web intranet
      • $645,000 to resecure network
      • Third party employer issues
        • negligent hiring
        • negligent supervision
        • negligent retention
      CFAA, UASC, Fid. Duties &Trespass
    12.  
    13.  
    14.  
    15. Poor security dooms proprietary claim Weigh Systems v. Scales 3/7/02
      • Former employer sues competing former employer for trade secret theft
      • Took customer lists, vendor lists, pricing information, software, marketing info
      • Ruling for former employee
        • Info on Internet
        • No confidentiality agreements
        • Passwords sometimes
        • Hardcopies of protected data available
        • Default passwords
        • Passwords shared with customers
    16. Ford Motor Co. v. Lane , Mich. Fed. Ct. 1999 Information theft as “free speech”
      • Old rule: thief and accomplish not immunized under 1st Amendment
      • New concern: Trade secrets from employees hostile Website
      • Proprietary markings
      • Extortion attempt
      • Prior restraint precludes stopping Website disclosure
      • First Amendment over trade secrets
      • Court crafts unrecorded copyright remedy
    17. Victim Website Trusted 3rd Party Network System Copyrights: Scraper / robot search CFAA, UASC, Copyright &Trespass
    18. Lost private information
    19.  
    20. Compromise of private information: BIA Indian trust fund case 12/5/2001 to date
      • Website & Internet shutdown due to inadequate security
      • Failure to comply with federal security regulations
      • Privacy of records threatened (but not realized)
      • Court ordered penetration tests
      • Contempt of Court proceedings
    21. Stollenwack v. TriWest (Ariz. D.C. 1/30/2003)
      • Federal class action lawsuit
      • 562,000 military personnel, retirees & family files stolen from defense contractor
      • Allege negligence, breach of contract and violation of Privacy Act
      • Damages not specific
    22. Clients of Merchant Law Group v. ISM Canada Feb. 3, 2003
      • Class action lawsuit
      • Hard drive with 180,000 customers Ids lost by ISM Canada on January 16
      • Alleges violation of customer privacy and negligence in securing confidential information and notifying the public about the lost disk.
      • The customers "have suffered significant loss and damages including personal injury and injury to their economic interests"
      • The Saskatchewan government is considering its own lawsuit against ISM.
    23. Compromise e-commerce site
    24. Compromised e-commerce site
      • Fake Websites
        • ID theft
      • Fake online payment systems (PayPal)
      • TM violation
    25. Damage recovery
    26. Damage recovery
      • Loss of intellectual property
      • Investigation costs
      • Remediation costs
      • System updating
      • Costs of outside forensic consultant
      • Downtime related costs
        • Rental on unused network systems
        • Under employed employees
      • Pecuniary damages, legal fees, court costs in certain cases (CFAA, UASC, Copyright)
    27. Damage broader picture
      • Vendor & customer actual loss
      • Vendor & customer resulting loss (lost accounts)
      • Downstream damage on other systems
        • Resulting litigation
    28. System shutdown
    29. Victim network E-mail & spam attacks: Hamadi CFAA & Trespass
    30. Victim computer Trusted 3rd Party Network System Smurf attack CFAA, Trespass, Contract claims & Tort claims
    31. Hacker Masters Bots (Zombie ) Victim System Contract & Tort Liability Here ? DDoS attack 2/2000 DOS attacks- Estimated Damages: $1.2B CFAA, Trespass, Contract claims & Tort claims
    32. Concern about regulations
    33. The National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace February 2003
      • Large enterprises are encouraged to evaluate the security of their networks that impact the security of the Nation’s critical infrastructure. Such evaluations might include: (1) conducting audits to ensure effectiveness and use of best practices; (2) developing continuity plans which consider offsite staff and equipment; and (3) participating in industry wide information sharing and best practices dissemination.
      Actions and Recommendations 3-4
    34. Concern about regulatory compliance
      • ECPA (1986)
      • CFAA (1986 & 1996)
      • EEA (1996)
      • HIPAA (1996)
      • PPA
      • COPPA (1999)
      • GLB (2000)
      • DMCA (2000)
      • FCRA
      • GPEA
      • E-SIGN (2000)
      • ADA
      • OCC 7/2001 & 5/2000
      • EU DPA (1998)
        • Commerce “Safe Harbor”
      • State privacy laws
      • Calif. Cyber-disclosure law (7/03)
    35. Concern about litigation
    36. Not responding to changing threat: Apex Global v. Cyberpromotions
      • AGIS contracted to be ISP for CyberPromotions
      • Knew cyber was a spammer
      • Cyber adds T-1 lines to handle traffic
      • 30 day termination provision
      • 9/26/97 massive “ping” attack
      • AGIS terminates cyber immediately
      • Court ruling
    37. The need for security standards
      • Times and appropriate security change
      • AGIS only attempted to use screening program and removed cyber
      • AGIS did not hire a security expert or attempt to install a router
      • Other ISP’s were able to mitigate retaliatory attacks by pingers - why not you?
      • Cyberpromotions v. Apex Global Information Services
    38. Information Security Legal Audit
      • Objective & subjective risk assessment
      • Compliance evaluation
        • ID regulations and relevant case law
        • IP property protection
        • Record retention
        • Privacy requirements
        • Investigations including e-mail monitoring
        • Cryptographic controls
        • Collection of evidence
    39. Information Security Legal Audit, con’t
      • Third party access controls and contracts
      • Outsourcing contracts, includes Websites hosting, design, maintenance and electronic commerce requirements
      • Licensing agreements
    40. Planning: proactive
    41. Planning best practices 1
      • Create a comprehensive set of security policies.
      • Take a security inventory.
        • determine what you need to protect based on it’s worth to your organization
        • what you need to protect it against
      • Build an enforcement history
      • Separate internal systems and networks by business function and secure each from each other
      • Maintain a vigilant watch over threats, attack profiles, and countermeasures
    42. Planning best practices 2
      • Monitor all perimeter and critical business systems for attacks and security anomalies.
      • Trust but verify; conduct periodic independent security reviews of key vendors, customers, part-time employee security standards.
      • Court provable:
        • Network control policy
        • E-mail control & monitoring policy
        • Hiring, supervising & discharge policies
        • Privacy protection standards
        • Regulatory compliance
    43. Planning best practices 3
      • Counter the insider threat
        • access controls
        • segregation of duties
        • effective policy enforcement
      • Consider Website practices re:
        • Contracts for content and security (privacy)
        • Reviewing posted materials
        • Insure that privacy statements follow practices
        • Don’t overstate privacy
      • Determine what you will do with an “event”
        • Prepare to recover damages and losses
    44. Planning: incident response
    45. Best practices after it happens.
      • Meet with incident response team
      • Identify the problem(s) specifically
        • Inside or outside issue
        • ID the system
      • Determine if still underway or if vulnerability still exists
      • Formulate an investigative plan
        • preserve evidence, harvest data, analyze data, strategic searches, disk imaging & forensics
      • Consider the need for outside help
      • Consider the benefits of Attorney-Client protection
      • Identify elements of proof required
      • Get “buy in” from highest level
    46. Best practices after it happens
      • Preserve current evidence
        • Determine applicable company policies
        • Log files and audit trails
        • Interview critical personnel
        • Encrypted internal investigation
        • Chat rooms & BBS
        • Court ordered disclosures
      • Proactive
        • Determine & narrow investigative focus
        • Keystroke monitoring
        • Continue & monitor vulnerability
        • Honey pot
        • Assumed name e-mail to violator
    47. Best practices if an insider
      • Define privacy expectations
      • Obtain passwords
      • Decrypt files
      • When to interview
      • Locate chat rooms & BBS
      • Obtain laptop
      • Obtain “office computer” at home
      • Work fast, work very very fast
      • Know the scope of computer forensics
        • corporate systems
        • private e-mail content on network
        • private e-mail content on system files
      • Counter-claim lawsuits by employees and former employees for illegal monitoring
      • Proof of “reasonable grounds” at each step
      • Penetration testing or not
      • Data sharing with other companies versus anti-trust guidelines
      Prepare to defend yourself
    48. What do you do with the initial investigation?
      • Three avenues
        • Eat the loss
        • Criminal referral
        • Civil litigation
    49. Self examination before decision
      • Due diligence standard of security met
      • Appropriate network, NDA and employee agreements and policies in place
      • Clean skirts
      • Website disclosures
      • Examine Website access
      • Examine company initiatives
      • Privacy rules complications
    50. Criminal referral: good news
      • Savings on civil litigation costs
      • Sends a message
      • Potential search warrant - immediate seizure
      • Wiretap/datatap
      • Law enforcement investigation
      • Grand jury subpoena
      • Trial subpoena
      • Professional investigators: FBI, USSS or local law enforcement
    51. Criminal referral: bad news
      • May request “open system” (honey pot)
      • Law enforcement backlog
      • Prosecutor’s backlog
      • Employee downtime
      • Loss of control
      • No “no publicity” guarantee
      • Complexity adds time
      • Prosecution inclination to add victims if an outside attack
      • Declination due to available civil remedy
    52. Civil litigation: good news
      • Immediate action
        • TRO
        • Injunction
        • Recovery of property
      • Control retained
      • Recovery of property through injunction
      • Attorney-Client privilege covers inquiry
      • Sophisticated forensic services for hire
      • Real time response
    53. Civil litigation: bad news
      • Attorney’s fees billed hourly or with flat rate
      • Discovery tedious
    54. Contact information
      • William J. Cook
      • Freeborn & Peters, Suite 3000
      • 311 S. Wacker Dr.
      • Chicago, Il. 60601
      • 312-360-6340
      • 312-360-6575
      • [email_address]
    55. What do you do with the investigation?
      • Three avenues
        • Eat the loss (90% found breaches, 34% reported to FBI)
        • Criminal referral
        • Civil litigation
    56. Conducting the investigation.
      • Meet with incident response team
      • Identify the problem(s) specifically
        • Inside or outside issue
      • Determine if still underway or if vulnerability still exists
      • Formulate an investigative plan
      • Consider the need for outside help
      • Consider the benefits of Attorney-Client protection
      • Get “buy in” from highest level
    57. Formulate investigative plan.
      • Preserve current evidence
        • Log files and audit trails
        • Interview critical personnel
      • Proactive
        • Determine & narrow investigative focus
        • Keystroke monitoring
        • Continue and monitor vulnerability
        • Honey pot
        • Assumed name e-mail to violator
      • Prepare to defend yourself & your actions
    58. If an insider.
      • Begin documenting investigation
      • Determine company policies that apply
      • Determine applicable state law
      • Determine privacy expectation / search office space
      • Monitor outgoing and incoming e-mail
      • Look for ftp transmissions
      • Keystroke monitoring
    59. If an insider.
      • Obtain passwords
      • Decrypt files
      • When to interview
      • Locate chat rooms & BBS
      • Obtain laptop
      • Obtain “office computer” at home
    60. How do you decide what to do with investigation?
      • Damage done*
      • Potential loss of business relationships*
      • Potential for embarrassment
      • Nature of offender
        • Insider
        • Competitor
        • Hacker
      • Potential for repeated attacks
      • Strength of case
      • Lack of defenses
    61. How do you decide?
      • Downstream liability / 3rd party liability
        • DDOS
        • Virus
        • Loss of 3rd parties software or licensed info
        • EEA exposure created by employee
      • Dirty skirts
      • Statutory reporting requirements
      • O & D Liability issues
      • Public relations problem
      • Good corporate citizen
    62. Definition of “damage or loss” will depend on nature of violation.
      • CFAA
      • ECPA
      • EEA / trade secret theft
      • RICO
      • Access device fraud
      • Copyright infringement
      • TM infringement
      • Defamation
      • Statutory violation
    63. e-Compliance (Alphabet Soup)
      • ECPA (1986)
      • CFAA (1986 & 1996)
      • EEA (1996)
      • HIPAA (1996)
      • PPA
      • COPPA (1999)
      • GLB (2000)
        • FTC
        • OCC
        • SEC
      • DMCA (2000)
      • CDA (1998)
      • FCRA
      • EU DPA (1998)
      • Commerce “Safe Harbor” (1999)
      • GPEA
      • E-SIGN (2000)
      • ADA
      • OCC 7/2001
    64. Damage & Loss Calculations
    65. Damage done “or loss suffered” CFAA
      • Looking for $5,000 total
      • Downstream damage done (exposure created)
      • Cost of consultant and legal fees
      • Loss from Sysop time changing passwords
      • Loss from employee time reading unsolicited e-mail
      • Marketing expenses to recover reputation
    66. Damage done “or loss suffered” EEA &/or State Trade Secret claims
      • Research & development value of T/S
      • Book value of information
      • License value of T/S
      • Value to competitor
      • Broader impact on company (bet the farm technology?)
    67. Poor security dooms proprietary claim Weigh Systems v. Scales 3/7/02
      • Former employer sues competing former employer for trade secret theft
      • Took customer lists, vendor lists, pricing information, software, marketing info
      • Ruling for former employee
        • Info on Internet
        • No confidentiality agreements
        • Passwords sometimes
        • Hardcopies of protected data available
        • Default passwords
        • Passwords shared with customers
    68. Absence of a security standard: Apex v. Cyberpromotions
      • AGIS contracted to be ISP for CyberPromotions
      • 9/26/97 massive “ping” attack
      • AGIS terminates cyber immediately
      • Court sets standard; determines
        • Times and appropriate security change
        • Other ISP’s were able to intercept pingers
        • Why not you?
      • Competitors as witnesses
    69. What do you do with the investigation?
      • Three avenues
        • Eat the loss
        • Criminal referral
        • Civil litigation
    70. Criminal referral: good news
      • Savings on civil litigation costs
      • Sends a message
      • Potential search warrant - immediate seizure
      • Wiretap/datatap
      • Law enforcement investigation
      • Grand jury subpoena
      • Trial subpoena
      • Professional investigators: FBI, USSS or local law enforcement
    71. Criminal referral: bad news
      • May request “open system” (honey pot)
      • Law enforcement backlog
      • Prosecutor’s backlog
      • Employee downtime
      • Loss of control
      • No “no publicity” guarantee
      • Complexity adds time
      • Prosecution inclination to add victims if an outside attack
      • Declination due to available civil remedy
    72. Civil litigation
    73. Civil litigation: good news
      • Immediate action
        • TRO
        • Injunction
        • Recovery of property
      • Control retained
      • Recovery of property through injunction
      • Attorney-Client privilege covers inquiry
      • Sophisticated investigative services
      • Real time response
    74. Civil litigation: bad news
      • Attorney’s fees billed hourly or with flat rate
      • Consultant fees
      • Discovery tedious
      • Option to stop
    75. Self examination before decision
      • Due diligence standard of security met
      • Appropriate network, NDA and employee agreements and policies in place
      • Clean skirts
      • Website disclosures
      • Examine Website access
      • Examine company initiatives
      • Privacy rules complications
    76. Website practices & the CFAA
      • Prohibits unauthorized access of a computer, either by someone acting knowingly, or exceeding authorized access that was already granted
    77. The new CFAA, Linking Practices & Trespass to Websites:
      • Trespass by deep linking to Website - Ticketmaster
      • Trespass by degrading use of another’s Website - eBay
      • Trespass via e-mail - CompuServe (spam) & Hamidi (incoming e-mail to employees)
      Risk of loss: E-commerce Liability Exposures
      • New hires & their former company’s information
        • EEA
      • Chat rooms
      • Employee only Websites
      • Discharged employees
      hiring & firing
    78. the insider
      • Old rule: thief and accomplish not immunized under 1st Amendment
      • New concern: Trade secrets from employees hostile Website
      • Proprietary markings
      • Extortion attempt
      • Prior restraint precludes stopping Website disclosure
      • First Amendment over trade secrets
      • Court crafts unrecorded copyright remedy
      • Ford Motor Co. v. Lane , Mich. Fed. Ct. 1999
      • Counter-claim lawsuits by employees and former employees for illegal monitoring
      • Proof of “reasonable grounds” at each step
      • Penetration testing or not
      • Data sharing with other companies versus anti-trust guidelines
      I nternal investigator liability
    79. Cyber Security & Liability Practice
      • Cyber liability risk exposure evaluated based upon security standard ISO/IE 17799, including regulatory and privacy compliance
      • Incident response counseling
      • Internal investigations
      • HR policy evaluations
      • E-commerce & Website liability exposure
      • Civil litigation
      • Law enforcement presentation
    80. Contact information
      • William J. Cook
      • Wildman Harrold Allen & Dixon
      • 225 W. Wacker Dr.
      • Chicago, Il. 60606-1229
      • 312-201-2399
      • 312-360-2555 F
      • [email_address]

    + timmcguinnesstimmcguinness, 4 years ago

    custom

    1138 views, 1 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    The Legal Aspects of Cyberspace

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1138
      • 1136 on SlideShare
      • 2 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 2 views on https://elearn.apsu.edu

    more

    All embeds
    • 2 views on https://elearn.apsu.edu

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories