Ibus2302 Kastelle 2009

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Ibus2302 Kastelle 2009 - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Evolution of the International Trade Network Tim Kastelle IBUS2302 – 5 June 2009
    2. Question • Globalisation has changed everything, right?
    3. A transformation, or a change in degree? Exports/GDP 1820-2001 0.200 0.180 0.160 0.140 0.120 0.100 Exports/GDP 0.080 0.060 0.040 0.020 Source: Maddison, 1997, 2001, 2003 0.000 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Year
    4. What is Network Analysis • Analytical tool for measuring network structure consisting of actors (people, firms, etc.) and the connections between them (social, financial exchange, technical collaboration, etc.) • Draws from Social Network Analysis (sociology, psychology) and Complex Network Analysis (physics, economics) • Theoretical justification in evolutionary economics
    5. Data Set • IMF Trade data, every 10 years from 1938-98, and 2003 (8 sets) • Calculate significant trade relations to build adjacency matrix • If there is a significant trade flow from country A to country B, a 1 is recorded, otherwise the value is 0
    6. 1938 Network
    7. 1968 Network
    8. 1998 Network
    9. Convergence?
    10. Or divergence?
    11. Degree Distribution • The degree of a node is the number of edges that connect to it. An important characteristic of most graphs is the mean degree k, the average number of connections per node. The degree distribution of a graph is the measure of degree frequencies, in other words, it is a count of how many nodes have degree = k for each possible value of k.
    12. Degree = 9 Average degree = 254/256 = 1.0
    13. The Degree of a Node Roughly Correlates with GDP 1000 100 log Imports ($US billion) 10 1 0.1 1 10 100 1000 0.1 0.01 log In Degree Consequently, the degree distributions of the network should be able to tell us whether GDP is converging or not
    14. Frequency 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Degree (k) In Degree Histogram 95 10 0 10 5 11 0 11 5 histogram… 12 0 12 5 13 0 13 5 14 0 14 5 The degree distribution 15 0 15 5 16 0 16 5
    15. …is Converted to a Cumulative Distribution Function 1938 In Degree Distribution 1 1 10 100 0.1 Cumulative Distribution Cumulative Distribution 0.01 0.001 Log Degree
    16. Expected Changes 2003 Random Graph Data 1 1 10 100 1000 0.1 Cumulative Distribution Normal Distribution x^-1 x^-0.5 0.01 Economic convergence will lead to a normal degree distribution, while divergence will lead to a power law distribution 0.001 Log Degree
    17. Actual Distributions 1 1 10 100 1000 Cumulative distribution - Pc(k) 0.1 1938 1948 1958 1968 1978 1988 1998 2003 0.01 0.001 Degree - k
    18. Results • All of the CDFs are best described by a log- normal distribution with a power law tail • The only change is that the curve has shifted to the right as the size of the network has increased over time • This suggests that the reason that neither convergence nor divergence has gained overwhelming empirical support is that neither is actually happening
    19. However, it is actually a James Dean network: Calm on the outside….
    20. …but seething underneath the surface • Even though the overall network structure has been stable, we know that the roles of individual countries within the network have changed over time • For example, China, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan have become much more highly connected, while countries such as Portugal and Argentina have become less connected
    21. Rank Clock Data – In Degree Country 1938 1948 1958 1968 1978 1988 1998 2003 United States 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 United Kingdom 2 2 2 1 4 4 4 4 Germany 3 8 1 2 1 3 2 2 France 4 3 5 5 3 2 3 3 Netherlands 5 4 4 4 6 7 6 6 Belgium 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 10 Italy 7 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 Japan 8 21 8 7 7 6 9 9 Sweden 9 7 9 12 11 13 23 25 Argentina 10 17 23 34 47 59 61 96 Norway 11 18 21 17 28 28 38 41 South Africa 12 14 14 20 52 55 34 34 Poland 13 18 15 16 17 34 21 19 India 14 10 11 22 23 21 18 14
    22. Rank Clock - International Trade Network 1938-2003 1938 100 90 80 1948 70 60 50 40 30 20 2003 1958 10 0 1998 1968 1988 1978
    23. Rank Shift Dynamics 1938-2003 1938 100 90 80 1948 70 Singapore 60 United States 50 Argentina 40 Ireland 30 China - Mainland 2003 20 1958 10 0 1998 1968 1988 1978
    24. Conclusions • The overall structure is stable • Changes at the country level reflect the impact of policy – and these are quite substantial
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Tim KastelleTim Kastelle Nominate

    custom

    170 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    A short talk that I gave to an undergrad internatio more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 170
      • 170 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories