Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
Statutory Interpretation 2
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.


Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Statutory Interpretation 2



Published in Technology , Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads


Total Views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Statutory Interpretation 2
  • 2. Objectives
    To understand how difficult it is to write an Act of Parliament without causing confusion
    To understand how the 3 rules of interpretation were created
    To understand what is meant by a presumption
  • 3. Starter
    What happened in these stories?
    Jailed killers allowed to sleep at home
    “I’m in a spot of bother”
  • 4. Presentations
    Watch the presentations and make your own notes on any areas you are unsure of.
  • 5. Create an Act
    In your group create an Act based on one of the following:
    Stop any form of animal cruelty
    Everyone must trade their car in for an electric car
    All food that children are given must be healthy
    When you go on holiday you must know about the culture
  • 6. Create an Act
    Swap your Act with another group.
    Highlight any problems which may occur from the Act you now have.
    Why would there be problems?
    How could these be rectified?
  • 7. The 3 rules
    “Purposive approach”
  • 8. Literal
    Giving words their plain, ordinary, dictionary meaning.
    Pinner v Everett (1969)
    Lord Reid referred to “the natural and ordinary meaning of that word or phrase in its context”
    The rule developed in the 19th century in response to the fact that Parliament rather than the monarch was now the sovereign body in the UK
  • 9. Literal
    Inland Revenue Commissioners v Ayrshire Employers Mutual Insurance Association Ltd (1946)
    Viscount Simmonds made it clear, even though the language used by Parliament failed to achieve its apparent purpose, “I must decline to insert words which might succeed where the draftsman failed”
  • 10. Literal
    Magor and St Mellons RDC v Newport Corporation (1952)
    Viscount Simmonds argued that for judges to change the wording of statutes would be a “naked usurpation of the legislative function”
  • 11. Literal
    Duport Steels Ltd v Sirs (1980)
    Lord Diplock said that “where the meaning of statutory words is clear and unambiguous, it is not for the judges to invent fancied ambiguities as an excuse for failing to give effect to its plain meaning because they themselves consider the consequences of doing so would be inexpedient, or even unjust or immoral”
  • 12. Literal
    Northman v London Borough of Barnet (1978)
    Although Lord Denning said “the literal method is now completely out of date”, the literal rule is still used by judges.
  • 13. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Literal Rule
  • 14. Activity
    Give a one sentence definition of the literal rule
    Explain the facts of two cases that illustrate it
    Identify what you think are the two strongest arguments in favour of the literal rule and the two strongest against.
  • 15. Golden
    The golden rule is a modification of the literal rule and says that judges should use the literal rule unless it would produce an absurd result.
    Lord Blackburn explained it in River Wear Commissioners v Adamson (1877): as “giving the words their ordinary signification, unless when so applied they produce an absurdity or inconvenience so great” as to convince the court that it could not have been Parliament’s intention to give the words their ordinary meaning.
  • 16. Golden
    There are two views on how far the rule should be used: the narrow application and the wider application.
    Narrow Application of the rule:
    Proposed by Lord Reid in Jones v DPP (1962), if a word is ambiguous the judge may choose between possible meanings of the word in order to avoid an absurd outcome.
  • 17. Golden
    R v Allen (1872)
    Section 57 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 stated that:
    “Whosoever being married shall marry any other person during the life of the former husband or wife ... shall be guilty of bigamy”
    It was impossible for a person already married to “marry” someone else – they might go through a marriage ceremony, but would not actually be married.
    Using the literal rule would make the statute useless. The courts there held that “shall marry” should be interpreted to mean “shall go though a marriage ceremony”
  • 18. Golden
    Wider application of the rule:
    Where there is only one meaning, but this would lead to an absurd or repugnant situation, which for policy reasons would be unacceptable.
    Re Sigsworth (1935)
    Under the Administration of Estates Act 1925, the property of a person who died without making a will would pass to his or her next of kin.
    In this case, Sigsworth had murdered his mother.
  • 19. Golden
    Adler v George (1964)
    S.3 of the Official Secrets Act 1920 made it an offence to be found “in the vicinity of a prohibited place”.
    The accused was arrested in the inside the prohibited place; therefore, he argued he could not be convicted.
    It was clearly both repugnant and absurd that the offence could be committed by causing an obstruction in the vicinity of a prohibited place but not within the place itself.
  • 20. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Golden Rule
  • 21. Activity
    Explain the narrow explanation of the golden rule
    Name a case and explain how it fits the definition
    Explain the wider application of the golden rule
    Name a case and explain how it fits the definition
    Identify two advantages of the golden rule
  • 22. Plenary
    Summarise this lesson in 5 sentences
    Now reduce to 5 words
    Now to 1 word