Theralase's white paper 04 10-11 pdf final
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Theralase's white paper 04 10-11 pdf final

on

  • 918 views

Theralase Technologies Inc. founded in 1995, designs, develops, manufactures and markets patented, superpulsed laser technology utilized in biostimulation and biodestruction applications. The ...

Theralase Technologies Inc. founded in 1995, designs, develops, manufactures and markets patented, superpulsed laser technology utilized in biostimulation and biodestruction applications. The technology is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic pain, neural muscular-skeletal conditions and wound care. When combined with its patented, light-sensitive Photo Dynamic Compounds, Theralase laser technology is able to specifically target and destroy cancers, bacteria, viruses as well as microbial pathogens associated with food contamination

Statistics

Views

Total Views
918
Views on SlideShare
918
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Theralase's white paper 04 10-11 pdf final Document Transcript

  • 1. UNDERSTANDING THE MECHANISMSOF LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY (LLLT) (White Paper) Arkady Mandel, MD, Ph.D., D.Sc. Roger Dumoulin-White, P. Eng. Lothar Lilge, Ph.D. 2011
  • 2. Glossary SYMBOL TERM DEFINITION Mitochondrial Difference in voltage between the interior and exterior of the ΔΨmt membrane potential mitochondrial membrane. Total irradiation ∆ttot Total period of light exposure time Effective attenuation Characterizes how easily a material or medium can be μeff penetrated by a beam of light. coefficient Reduced scattering Coefficient incorporating both the scattering coefficient µs and μs the anisotropy coefficient g. coefficient Transfer of energy from an electromagnetic field to a material Absorption Absorption or to a molecular entity. Adenosine Nucleotide derived from ATP with the liberation of energy that ADP is then used in the performance of chemical work. diphosphate Collection of statistical models, and their associated procedures, in which the observed variance in a particular ANOVA Analysis-of-variance variable is partitioned into components attributable to different sources of variation. Nucleotide found in the mitochondria of all plant and animal Adenosine cells. It is the major source of energy for cellular reactions, this ATP energy being released during its conversion to ADP. Formula: triphosphate C10H16N5O13P3. Quantified by the difference in integrated area under theBiphasic dose Biphasic dose curve, whereby efficacy is corelated against dosage at depth Correlates with the characteristics of the wavelength and theBiphasic dose Biphasic dose amount of energy absorbed by chromophore or response response photoacceptor. At tissue depth versus perceived efficacy. Ca2+ ions present at nanomolar levels in the cytosol ofCa2+calcium Calcium mammalian cells, and act in a number of signal transduction pathways as second messengers. An arrangement of atoms capable of absorbing light in theChromophore Chromophores visible and invisible spectrum And converting this light energy s to chemical energy. Idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel. Patients with CTS experience numbness, tingling, or burning Carpal tunnel CTS sensations in the thumb and fingers, particularly the index, syndrome middle fingers, and radial half of the ring fingers which are innervated by the median nerve. CW Continuous wave Electromagnetic wave of constant amplitude and frequency. Colored, heme-containing proteins that transfer electronsCytochrome Cytochrome during cellular respiration and photosynthesis activated by light energy Proportion of time during which a component, device, or DC Duty cycle system is operated Versus the total time of operation i.e. % on % cycle Radiant energy, Q, incident from all upward directions on a Energy density or (E/a) act small sphere divided by the cross-sectional area of that radiant exposure sphere. SI unit is J m–2. 1
  • 3. SYMBOL TERM DEFINITION Food and Drug A US federal agency responsible ensuring safety standards in FDA Administration the food drug and cosmetics industries At a given point in space, the radiant energy, Q, incident on a Fluence Fluence small sphere from all directions divided by the cross-sectional area of that sphere. SI unit is J m–2. Total radiant power, P, incident from all directions onto aFluence rate Fluence rate small sphere divided by the cross-sectional area of that sphere. SI unit is W m–2. Anisotropy of Used to characterize luminescence (fluorescence, g phosphorescence) polarization resulting from photoselection. biological tissue Respiratory protein formed during physiological respiration HB Deoxy-hemoglobin when oxygen binds to the heme component of the protein hemoglobin in red blood cells. (i.e. arterial blood) Respiratory protein: hemoglobin without the bound oxygen HBO2 Oxy-hemoglobin (see Deoxy-hemoglobin). (i.e. venous blood) HeNe Helium Neon Helium Neon laser source Emitting red laser light at 632.8 nm Light power density Threshold at which a physiological effect begins to be I0 produced. threshold Indiom Gallium This laser has a wavelength in the region of approximately InGaAI Aarsenide based 905 nm and pulse duration in the 100 to200 nanoseconds can laser source be achieved. A colorless poisonous gas NO formed by oxidation of nitrogen or ammonia that is present in the atmosphere and also in Inducible nitric iNO mammals where it is synthesized from arginine and oxygen oxide and acts as a vasodilator and as a mediator of cell-to-cell communication. Inducible nitric Enzymes that catalyze the production of nitric oxide from L- iNOS arginine. oxide synthase Radiant power, P, of all points under consideration divided by the area of the element. SI unit is W m–2. wavelengthsIrradiance Power density incident from all upward directions on a small element of surface Stimulation power Istim Power density used to stimulate therapeutic effects densities Light Amplification by Stimulated Source of ultraviolet, visible, or infrared radiation. All lasers Emission of Radiation contain an energized substance that can increase the intensity LASER Acronym of Light of radiation passing through it. The radiation emitted is Activation by coherent except for superradiance emission. Stimulated Emission Better Definition of Radiation Light Emitting A semiconductor diode that converts applied voltage to new- LEDs coherent light Diodes Drug-free, non-invasive and safe (FDA recognised) clinical Low Level Light LLLT application of light to a patient to promote tissue Therapy regeneration, reduce inflammation and relieve pain Molar (gram M Concentration of a substance per volume of a solution molecule/litre) 2
  • 4. SYMBOL TERM DEFINITION Microwave A device or object that emits coherent microwave radiation Amplification by MASER produced by the natural oscillations of atoms or molecules Stimulated Emission between energy levels of Radiation Maximum Highest power or energy density (in W/cm2 or J/cm2) of a MPE Permissible light source that is considered safe. For eyes and for laser Exposure exposure Nicotinamide Compound that aids in the Transfer of electrons to carriers NADH adenine dinucleotide that function in Oxidative phosphorylation. Nuclear factor kappa B (NF[kappa]B) has been implicated in Nuclear factor Nf-kB gene regulation related to cell proliferation, apoptosis, kappa B adhesion, immune, and inflammatory cellular responses Drug-free, non-invasive and safe (FDA recognised) clinical application of light to a patient to promote tissue regeneration, reduce inflammation and relieve pain in the NILLLT Near-infrared LLLT region of 700 nm to 950 nm of the electromagnetic spectra. Note: 2500 is far infrared to mid Region of the electromagnetic spectrum extending from about NIR Near Infrared 700 nm to 950 nm. Non-metallic element, it combines with other elements, for O2₂ Oxygen molecule combustion and aerobic respiration. Family of purinergic receptors, G protein-coupled receptors P2 (Y and X) Purinergic receptors stimulated by nucleotides such as ATP, ADP, UTP, UDP and UDP-glucose. Time, during the first transition, that the pulse amplitude reaches a specified fraction (level) of its final amplitude, and PD Pulse duration (b) the time the pulse amplitude drops, on the last transition, to the same level Chemical reaction caused by absorption of ultraviolet, visible,Photochemical Photochemical or infrared radiation (infrared.) Effect produced by photoexcitation resulting partially orPhotothermal Photothermal totally in the production of heat. Photoexcitation and subsequent events, which lead from onePhotophysical Photophysical state to another state of a molecular entity, through radiation and radiationless transitions. No chemical change results. Transmission of light during selected pre-determined short PW Pulsed wave time intervals. Quantum Discrete values that a spatially confined system or particle can Quantum energy take in a quantum mechanical system. energy redox redox Relating to reduction oxidation cycle of a mammalian cell Gain (reduction) or loss (oxidation) of electrons by an atom or Reduction Reduction molecule, as occurs when hydrogen is added to a molecule or oxygen is removed. 3
  • 5. SYMBOL TERM DEFINITION Rabbit small clot RSCEM embolic stroke Rabbit in vivo model used to demonstrate NILLLT efficacy. model The dispersion of a beam of particles or of radiation into a Scattering Scattering range of directions as a result of physical interactions. Spatial The existence of a correlation between the phases of waves at Spatial coherence coherence points separated in space at a given time. TENS Transcutaneous Use of electric current produced by a device to stimulate theAdd temporal Electrical Nerve nerves for temporary relief of pain by increasing the noise coherence level of nerves Stimulation definition 4
  • 6. UNDERSTANDING THE MECHANISMS OF LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY (LLLT)Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) is a rapidly growing modality used in rehabilitation andphysical therapy. A number of safe and beneficial therapeutic effects of LLLT have beenreported in numerous clinical conditions; however, despite many reports of positivefindings from experiments conducted in-vitro, in animal models and in randomizedcontrolled clinical trials worldwide, the use of this scientifically grounded, non-invasive,anti-inflammatory and regulatory modality has yet to find mainstream adoption by medicaldoctors. The aim of this review is six fold:1) introduce the unfamiliar reader, with some medical background, to the contemporaryconcept of LLLT and its pathophysiological significance,2) review the role of the mitochondrial pathway in the mechanisms of LLLT,3)provide necessary practical guidance based on personal scientific and clinical experience,4) assist manufacturers in their research and development,5) help health care practitioners choose and use an adequate light therapy device6) outline the prospects of LLLT as an avenue to treat chronic inflammation and pain and toaid in an effective clinical practice.THE STATE OF THE ARTLow Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) is the drug-free, non-invasive and safe (FDA recognised)clinical application of light (usually produced by a low to mid power coherent lasers ornon-coherent light emitting diodes (LEDs) in the range of 1mW – 500mW) to a patient topromote tissue regeneration, reduce inflammation and relieve pain. The light is typically ofnarrow spectral range (1 to 40 nm bandwidth) in the visible (red) 600 to 700 nm or nearinfrared (NIR) spectrum (700nm to 950nm), achieving an average power density(irradiance) between .001 to 5 w/cm².Light irradiation is typically applied onto the affected area (the areas where the treatmentis needed) or pain projected area or suggested acupuncture points for a few seconds toseveral minutes, daily, or multiple times per week, for a treatment period of up to 8 to 10weeks depending on chronicity. Thus in treatment frequency and duration LLLT does notdiffer from other modalities, such as thermal heating blankets⁽¹⁾, electrostimulation⁽²⁾ orultrasound⁽³⁾; however, as we shall see dramatically different in cellular mechanism andefficacy.LLLT is not considered an ablative or destructive procedure on the tissue or cellular leveland employs biomodulation via photophysical and potential photochemical mechanisms,comparable to photosynthesis in plants; whereby, the absorbed light is able to initiate acascade of molecular and functional regulatory changes.The reason why the technique is generally referred to as Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)is that the optimal level of energy density delivered to the tissues is low when compared toother forms of laser therapy such as the densities required for ablation, cutting, andthermally coagulating tissue. In general, the power densities used for LLLT are lower thanthose needed to produce heating of tissue (i.e. less than 500 mWcm-2, depending on 5
  • 7. wavelength and tissue type), and the total energy delivered to the treated area iscommonly below 1J cm- ². A common reference is the “Guidelines for Skin Exposure to LaserLight” in the International Standards Manual (IEC-825) which considers exposure below200mW cm-2 as a safe exposure (4) in the visible range, escalating to approximately 500mw/cm² in the near infrared range.The use of low levels of visible or near infrared light (LLLT) (5), for reduction ofinflammation, elimination of pain (6), healing of wounds, repair to nerves injuries and (7)prevention of tissue damage by reducing cellular apoptosis (for example, due to ischemiaand reperfusion injury), has been known for fifty years since shortly after the invention oflasers in the early 60s.Despite many reports of positive findings from experiments conducted in-vitro, in-vivo(animal and human models) and in randomized controlled clinical trials, the mechanisms ofaction of LLLT in biological tissue remains not fully elucidated. This likely is due to twomain reasons: firstly the complexity in interpretation of scientific and clinical datagenerated in different labs and clinical settings and secondly variability in the use of lightsources (medical devices) and treatment protocols utilized including, illuminationparameters (such as: wavelength, fluence, power density, pulse structure, etc.) and thetreatment schedule. These factors lead to many machinations of factors that make side toside comparisons difficult.As a result, the original field of Low Level Laser (coherent-monochromatic light) Therapy(LLLT) or Low Level Light Therapy (LLLT) subject has now expanded to includephotobiomodulation and photobiostimulation using non-laser (non-coherent light)instruments.These variation in light sources utilized have led to an increase in the number of negativestudies and created some controversy despite the overwhelming number of positiveclinical results⁽¹⁾. It is noteworthy that many studies have been conducted without properscientific methodology, as all the characteristics of the light emitted by lasers or LEDs mustbe specified if a paper is to be useful. A requirement for a good phototherapy study, usinglow intensity radiation in the visible or near-infrared region, whether from a laser, an LED,or a filtered incandescent lamp is to specify everything about the light source, i.e.,wavelength(s), power, dose, area of exposure, time, etc. There are numerous publishedexperimental and clinical studies that were conducted with good scientific methodology,but unfortunately they did not describe the light source⁽⁸⁾; therefore, these studies cannotbe repeated or extended by another author. Such publications are useless for progressingthe field of science of LLLT.In recent years, major advances have been made in understanding the mechanisms thatoperate at the cellular and tissue levels during LLLT. Mitochondria are thought to be themain site for the initial effects of light. The discovery and universal acceptance of thisphenomenon is of particular significance to Laser manufactures, because bothmitochondria membrane lipids and the large mitochondrion transmembrane proteincomplex (cytochrome c oxidase) have absorption spectra and action spectra peaks in thered and near infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum matching the emissionspectra of the 660 nm and 905 nm, dual wavelengths of Theralase’s LLLT devices. Thus a 6
  • 8. photochemical activation of pathways involving these transmembrane protein complexesas well as potential subcellular photothermal effects is possible (6).New discoveries in the last decade significantly altered our view on mitochondria. They areno longer viewed as energy-making cellular compartments but rather individual cells-within-the-cell. In particular, it has been suggested that many important cellularmechanisms involving specific enzymes and ion channels, such as nitric oxide synthase(NOS), ATP-dependent K+ (KATP) channels, and poly-(APD-ribose) polymerase (PARP), havea distinct, mitochondrial variant. For example, the intriguing possibility that mitochondriaare significant sources of nitric oxide (NO) via a unique mitochondrial NOS variant hasattracted intense interest among research groups because of the potential for NO to affectfunctioning of the electron transport chain (8)It has been shown that LLLT mediated effect may employ inducible nitric oxide synthase(iNOS) to potentially activate production of nitric oxide (NO) in mitochondria (6). Thediscovery of this phenomenon supports a concept that NO and its derivatives (reactivenitrogen species) have multiple effects on mitochondria that may impact a cell’s physiologyand the cell’s cycle (7).It was shown that inducible in mitochondria nitric oxide (iNO) inhibits mitochondrialrespiration via: (A) an acute and reversible inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase by NO incompetition with O2, and (B) irreversible inhibition of multiple sites by reactive nitrogenspecies. iNO stimulates reactive oxygen and nitrogen species production frommitochondria via respiratory inhibition, reaction with ubiquinol and reaction with O2 in themitochondrial membranes.(9) Oxidants/free radicals may also confer physiologicalfunctions and cellular signalling processes (10) due to iNO.According to Brown et al., mitochondria may produce and consume NO and NO stimulatesmitochondrial biogenesis, apparently via upregulation of nucleotides like ATP andtranscriptional factors like nuclear factor kappa B (Nf-kB) (9).Therefore, it can be suggested that the super pulsed 905nm LLLT-induced NO canreprogram cellular function, mainly via oxidative stress and changes of mitochondrialtemperature gradient due to process known as selective photothermolysis andconsequently initiate a cascade of local and systemic therapeutic signalling (6).These signal transduction pathways in turn may lead to increased cell activation and traffic,modulation of regulatory cytokines, growth factors and inflammatory mediators, andexpression of protective (anti-apoptotic) proteins (11; 12).The results of these molecular and cellular changes in animals and patients integrate suchbenefits as increased: healing in chronic wounds, improvements in sports injuries andcarpal tunnel syndrome, pain reduction in arthritis and neuropathies, amelioration ofdamage after heart attacks, stroke, nerve injury and alleviation of chronic inflammationand toxicity (13).The LLLT-induced NO may explain 1) generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS),induction of transcription factors and increased ATP production (in cells) 2) modulation of 7
  • 9. immune responses, reduction and prevention of apoptosis, regulation of circulation andangiogenesis (in tissues), and suppression of local and systemic inflammation and pain.LLLT-induced ROS, iNO and ATP mediated signalling cascades are well documented in thepeer-reviewed literature (14;15;16;17;18).More evidence now suggests that LLLT is a rapidly growing modality used in physicaltherapy, chiropractic and sport medicine and increasingly entering mainstream medicine.A full spectrum of potential clinical targets that can be successfully treated by LLLT iscontinuing to grow and at this point is not exhausted. LLLT is used to increase woundhealing and tissue regeneration, to relieve pain and inflammation, to prevent tissue deathand to mitigate degeneration in many neurological indications. We believe that furtheradvances in elucidation of the LLLT’s mechanisms will lead to greater acceptance of LLLTas the therapy of choice in the established market segments and additionally as a first lineor adjuvant therapy in other serious medical applications, currently not being consideredtypical indications.A SHORT HISTORY OF LLLTLight therapy is one of the oldest therapeutic methods used by humans; (historically assolar therapy by the Egyptians, Aztecs, Greeks and Romans and later as non-ionising UVBphototherapy of lupus vulgaris for which Niels Ryberg Finsen won the Nobel Prize forPhysiology in 1903 (14; 15).The majority of the authors agreed that the era of LLLT starts in 1967, a few years afterGordon Gould coined the acronym LASER (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission ofRadiation) and described the essential elements for constructing a laser (1957) and 3 yearsafter the Nobel Prize for Physics (1964) was given to Nikolay Gennadiyevich Basov,Aleksandr Mikhailovich Prokhorov and Charles Hard Townes for the invention of theMASER (microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) and the laser (16).The year 1967 is important in the history of LLLT because of the ground breakingpublication by Endre Mester and his colleagues (from Semmelweis University, Budapest,Hungary). The authors uniquely demonstrated the therapeutic benefit of monochromaticvisible light and commenced the therapeutic laser field of science.The investigators original expectation was to test if laser radiation might cause cancer inmice. Mice were shaved and divided into control and treatment groups. The treatmentgroup received the light treatment with a low powered ruby laser (694 nm) while thecontrol group did not. The treated animals did not develop any malignancies and thetreatment was safe; however, the authors made a surprising observation about more rapiddorsal hair regrowth in the treated group than the untreated group (17). Remarkably, thesame study data can be considered as the first disclosure of potential safety and efficacy ofLLLT, particularly attributed to LLLT’s biostimulation abilities. 8
  • 10. Since then, medical treatment with coherent light sources (lasers) or noncoherent light(LEDs) has passed through its experimental stage and is firmly rooted in clinical andscientific documentation. Currently, low level laser (or laser therapy LLLT), also known as“cold laser”, “soft laser”, “biostimulation” or “photobiomodulation” is recognised by theFDA and practiced as part of physical therapy in many parts of the world (18).LLLT is showing promise in the treatment of a wide variety of medical conditions and hasbeen proven to be clinically safe and beneficial therapeutically in many tissues and organs(Figure 1).Figure 1. The diagram below represents the difference in depth of penetration betweentherapeutic lasers.Currently, the knowledge of LLLT mechanisms continues to expand. Physicians are nowaware of LLLT’s potential to induce cellular and tissue effects through; for example,accelerated ATP production and molecular signalling and that LLLT can be very effective inthe treatment of various serious clinical disorders.In clinical use, however, it is often difficult to predict patient response to LLLT. It appearsthat several key features, such as: the LLLT parameters and the treatment regimen(including, irradiance [mW cm-2], radiant exposure [J cm-2], treatment regime (includingthe treatment mode, pulsed vs. CW, and the treatment schedule), light attenuation [cm-2] inthe tissues, etc.), cellular pathophysiological status (including, reduction=oxidation (redoxstate), a disease localisation (depth under the surface [mm]) tissue characteristics(including the tissue scattering parameters), the character and the level of inflammatoryprocess and variability of physiological and clinical conditions in patients, can play acentral role in determining sensitivity (and hence clinical efficacy) to LLLT and may help toexplain intra-individual variability in patient responsiveness to the conducted therapy. 9
  • 11. Various cellular responses to visible and infrared radiation have been studied for decadesin the context of molecular mechanisms of low level non-coherent (non-laser) light andlaser phototherapy (19; 20; 21; 22).It is generally accepted that the mitochondria are the initial site of light action inmammalian cells, and cytochrome c oxidase (the terminal enzyme of the mitochondrialrespiratory chain) is one of the key responsible molecules (23) particular due to its broadabsorption in the visible red and NIR spectrum.THE KEY MITOCHONDRIAL MECHANISMS OF LLLTIt is believed that in mammalian organisms the mitochondrial changes taking place areplaying the essential role in the mechanisms of LLLT and, according to Hamblin andcolleagues (2010), the response of cells to light is determined by the mitochondrialnumber, their activity and membrane potential (24).Mitochondria are the energy-transducing organelles of eukaryotic cells in which fuels thatdrive cellular metabolism (i.e., carbohydrates and fats) are converted into adenosinetriphosphate (ATP) through the electron transport chain and the oxidativephosphorylation system (the “respiratory chain”, Figure 2(29; 30).Mitochondria are also involved in calcium buffering and the regulation of apoptosis (25).They arose as intracellular symbionts in the evolutionary past, and can be traced to theprokaryote α-proteobacterium (26). There are hundreds to thousands of mitochondria percell (27), somewhat dependent on the energy requirement of the individual cell.Structurally, mitochondria have four compartments: the outer membrane, the innermembrane, the intermembrane space, and the matrix (the region inside the innermembrane, see Figure 2, (30; 33; 34).The respiratory chain is located on the inner mitochondrial membrane. It consists of fivemultimeric protein complexes: reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)dehydrogenase-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I), succinate dehydrogenase-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex II), ubiquinone-cytochrome c oxidoreductase(complex III), cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV), and ATP synthase (complex V). Inaddition, the respiratory chain requires 2 small electron carriers, ubiquinone andcytochrome c.Energy generation via ATP synthesis involves two coordinated processes: 1) electrons(hydrogen ions derived from NADH and reduced flavin adenine dinucleotide) aretransported along the complexes to molecular oxygen, resulting in the production of water;and 2) simultaneously, protons (hydrogen ions) are pumped across the mitochondrialinner membrane (from the matrix to the intermembrane space) by complexes I, III, and IV.ATP is generated by the influx of these protons back into the mitochondrial matrix throughcomplex V (ATP synthase (27)) . 10
  • 12. Figure 2. Mitochondria and Mitochondrial respiratory chainKaru et al. (2004) proposed that biological effects of visible and near-IR light, inmammalian cells, are initiated via the mitochondrial signalling pathway ⁽³⁵⁾. The authorsalso suggested that the rredox absorbance recorded in the spectral range close to 600–900nm changes in living cells (28).These observations are of particular interest because a growing number of recent scientificreports and observations are providing more support to the concept that the functions ofmitochondria go beyond the generation of ATP and the regulation of energy metabolism(29).It has been shown that mitochondria are playing a major role as an integrator of intrinsicand extrinsic cellular signals, which can affect the health and survival of the cell; as well as,may play an essential role in the cell-to-cell communication signalling mechanisms (30).ATP binding to the extracellular surface of P2Y-purinergic receptors, allows release ofcytosolic Ca2+calcium, initiates regulatory gene expression and induces a cascade ofintracellular molecular signalling (31).Both Ca2+ uptake and efflux from mitochondria consume the mitochondrial membranepotential (ΔΨmt); and, in this way modify the mitochondrial activity (and therefore the ATPsynthesis), which can be regulated by LLLT.From a clinician’s point of view (for selection of the most effective parameters andappropriate LLLT’s medical devices) this scientific data provides a new practical guidelineand assistance towards a better understanding of the biomolecular mechanisms of LLLT.Recent reports have demonstrated that ATP is a critical signalling molecule that allowscells and tissues throughout the body to communicate with one another (32). 11
  • 13. This new aspect of ATP as an intercellular signalling molecule allows broadening of theunderstanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of LLLT, and hence providesgrounds for optimisation of LLLT efficacy. It has been shown that neurons and other cellsmay release ATP into muscle, gut, and bladder tissue as a messenger molecule. The specificreceptors (a family of P2, purinergic receptors) for ATP signalling were found andidentified (31; 32).ATP activation of P2 receptors (subtypes P2X and P2Y) can produce various biologicaleffects. A recent publication by Anders et al. (2008), demonstrated that P2Y2 and P2Y11receptors were expressed in near-IR light irradiated normal human neural progenitor cellsin vitro (33). These observations support the notion that the irradiation of cells with near-IRlight in the interval close to 905 nm could be functioning as a surrogate for growth factors.Recent reviews indicate that laboratories worldwide are now racing to turn the data aboutATP as a neurotransmitter into therapies (31).As a neurotransmitter, ATP is directly involved in brain function, sensory reception, andthe neuron system control of muscles and organs. When released by neuronal and non-neuronal cells, it often triggers protective responses, such as bone building and cellproliferation (17; 39).The LLLT-induced ATP’s signalling mechanism also is believed to be involved in its useduring pain therapy (29); it is needless to say that chronic and neuropathic pains are the firstdisorders treated successfully with LLLT many decades ago.The role of ATP as a signalling molecule provides a new basis for explaining the versatilityof LLLT effects (34).Numerous reports indicate that light could regulate gene expression via mitochondrialmechanisms. For example, Hu et al., (2007) have shown that mitochondria play a centralrole in cellular homeostasis, and their homeostatic center is the mitochondrial membranepotential ( mt). The assessment of the mt in cells conducted by the authors indicatedthat A2058 cells treated with dosages higher than 0.5 J cm-2 He-Ne laser irradiation at 633nm exhibited a marked increase in mt. They also found upregulation of cytochrome coxidase activity, increased phosphorylation of Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and later,activated activator protein-1 (AP-1), which led to increased cell proliferation (35).Mitochondrial membrane potential may play a role in response of cells to light therapy.Huang et al. (2004) used tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester to compare the mitochondriaof six different cell types. They found that the mean mt differed significantly between celltypes, but that the cell area or size also differed, and that a more accurate comparison wasto calculate the integrated mt over the cell cross sectional area. Although fibroblasts hada high measured value of mean mt, when integrated over the whole cell the value wasactually the lowest of the cell types tested because fibroblasts had a much greater surfacearea (36). 12
  • 14. Neuronal cells had higher mean mt values in the cell bodies compared to the growthcones. Further work is necessary to determine if mean mt or mean mt per cell areacorrelated with measures of cellular response to light. However, there is more supportiveevidence that cell types with greater overall mitochondrial activity (for instance corticalneurons and cardiomyocytes) do in fact respond well to light. The presented observationsmay suggest that cells with a high level of mitochondrial activity (or high mt) may have ahigher response to light than cells with low mitochondrial activity (37).The majority of authors agree that mitochondria are the key cellular targets, able to initiateLLLT induced biologic events, leading to: upregulation of ATP production, induction ofvarious transcription factors and modulation of pro and anti-inflammatory geneexpression. These effects in turn may lead to cell biostimulation, modulation of the levels ofvarious inflammatory mediators (such as cytokines), release of the growth factors, as wellas, increase in tissue oxygenation and reparation. The results of these biologicalinteractions in animals and humans include such therapeutic effects as: acceleration inhealing of chronic wounds, improvements in sport injuries, reduction of inflammation andpain in arthritis and neuropathies, amelioration of toxicity and tissue damage afterinfectious diseases and heart attacks, and restoration of vascular and neuronal damage (38).THE ROLE OF THE 905 nm NIR COHERENT (LASER) LIGHT IN LLLTAn alternative explanation for LLLT effects (particularly in the near-IR wavelength region)on cells and mitochondria does not rely on specific photon absorption by proteins and/orenzymes and their defined absorption bands leading to photochemistry, but relies more onspecific photon absorption leading to localized photothermal effects, confined to sensitivestructures, such as lipids through non-specific photon absorption. The quantum energy ofphotons at 905 nm is only ~1.3 eV and hence insufficient to achieve an electronic excitationin most biomolecules, including cytochrome c oxidase, making a vibrational or thermalactivation of these target molecules more likely at this wavelength.Since the total energy per photon delivered is small the resulting rise in average tissuetemperature would be insignificant if this energy was evenly distributed over the wholecell. However in the case of coherent laser light the energy is not evenly distributed, butforms a speckle pattern at any given instance in time. When a surface is illuminated by alight wave, according to diffraction theory, each point on an illuminated surface acts as asource of secondary spherical waves. Laser speckle is formed by interference (eitherconstructive or destructive) of waves that have been scattered from each point on theilluminated surface. If the surface is rough enough to create path length differencesexceeding one wavelength, giving rise to phase changes greater than 2 , the amplitude, andhence the intensity, of the resultant light varies randomly, from 0 to twice the averageintensity. As tissue is not static these speckle pattern are varying over time and after lessthan 1/100th of a second the temporal average of the intensity is again established acrossthe tissue.If light of low coherence (i.e. made up of many wavelengths moving out of phase) is used, aspeckle pattern will not normally be observed, because the speckle patterns produced by 13
  • 15. individual wavelengths have different dimensions and will normally cancel one anotherout. The "size" of the speckles is a function of the wavelength of the light, the surface area ofthe laser beam that illuminates the first surface, and the distance between this surface andthe plane where the speckle pattern is formed. In tissue, the diameter of the speckles is ofthe order of the wavelength of light i.e. about 1 micron and thus comparable to the size ofthe mitochondria.While continuous wave light sources speckle pattern are averaged temporally as statedabove they do not do so if the light pulse is shorter than the speckle relaxation time.Thus the hypothesis is that laser speckles produce by super pulsed laser sources canproduce micro-thermal gradients due to inhomogeneous energy absorption that canstimulate or otherwise alter the metabolism within mitochondria (39).This hypothesis would explain reports that some LLLT effects in cells and tissues are morepronounced when coherent pulsed laser light is used than comparable non-coherent lightfrom LED or filtered lamp sources that is of similar wavelength range although notmonochromatic (40). For these micro-thermal gradients to be effective the pulse repetitionrate needs to be slow enough to allow a complete relaxation of these gradients (for micronsized ‘hot spots’ this relaxation time is in the millisecond range) prior to the generation of anovel speckle pattern generated micro-thermal pattern.Lilge, et al., (2009) used near-IR light at 905 nm (Theralase Inc.) and a high peak power of50W cm-2, suggested a role of localized thermal activation (or selective photothermolysis)within mitochondria in the mechanisms of superpulsed 905nm LLLT (5;48;49).The authors suggest that selective photothermolysis occurs if photon absorption within atarget structure is much higher than in the surrounding tissue, but the pulse duration isshort compared to the thermal relaxation time of the target structure. Two hundred-nanosecond pulses of 905 nm laser light, used by the investigators, exceed the thermalrelaxation time of structures smaller than 200 nm. Hence, according to the authors, the cellmembrane (20 nm) would radiate too much energy to the surrounding area not thethermal energy and thus not achieving elevated temperatures, hence presenting anunlikely target structure.Huttmann and colleagues (1999) suggested that the inverse of the repetition rate of 1/10kHz or 100 microseconds needs to be equivalent to at least several thermal relaxationtimes of the target structure, permitting their cooling between pulses to avoidaccumulation of heat, which would finally exceed the Arrhenius damage integral (41).Therefore, the target structure would be required to be smaller than 3 to 5 µm, but largerthan 200 nm.Mitochondria membranes have high amount of lipids with peak absorbance at 900 to930nm, close to the superpulsed 905 nm wavelength used. Their inherent size (ahydrophilic headgroup <, 1.0 nm; and a hydrophobic core of the bilayer is typically 3.0-4.0 nm thick,) and the possibility for lipids to be the main absorber make mitochondrialipid structures the most apparent targets for near-IR-induced selective photothermolysis 14
  • 16. (6). Note these micro-thermal gradients and selective photothermolysis effects exist onlyfor superpulsed light sources.LLLT exhibits diverse effects on pathophysiologic processes according to varyingwavelengths and wave modes. It is could be suggested that the LLLT biomechanismsinduced by 905 nm near infrared light, particularly upregulation by the nitric oxidepathway following the 905 nm wave in the super pulsed mode, are not the same whencompared to visible light.Several additional scientific studies suggest that mitochondria are accountable for thecellular response to LLLT. Passarella et al., (1984) reported that LLLT affect both transportand enzymatic processes in cells by acting on the cell’s mitochondria and increasing theATP synthesis via oxidative phosphorylation (42).Taken together, this clinical and scientific data strongly indicate the essential role of near-IR laser light in the biomechanisms of LLLT healing. It can also be concluded that localtransient heating of particular cellular micro regions with a size characteristic ofmitochondria based chromophores is possible and this effect may contribute to the efficacyof LLLT. The local transient rise in temperature may cause structural (conformational)changes of near-IR light absorbing molecules and trigger secondary biochemical and otherbiomolecular activity such as activation or inhibition of enzymes and gene expression. Theopportunity of local transient heating of absorbing chromophores, which is offered by the905 nm superpulsed technology, takes medical applications of modern LLLT to entirelynew levels and clinical significance when whole anatomical tissues are irradiated duringpatient treatment.THE ROLE OF THE 660 nm COHERENT (LASER) RED LIGHT IN LLLTIn addition to the near-infrared light at superpulsed 905 nm wavelengths, the most highlyLLLT technologies encompasses biomechanisms mediated by coherent visible red light at660 nm wavelength or approximately 1.9 eV per photon.The most recent, well defined, in-vivo data suggests the presence of biological mechanismsmediated by 660 nm laser light. Studying the effect of LLLT on inflammatory pain, theauthors have shown that Low-Level Laser phototherapy [InGaAIP visible laser diode (660nm) with a radiant exposure of 2.5 J cm-2] was proven to be an effective analgesic, whilenon-coherent LED light did not show a similar effect (22). Similar to the 905 nm specklepattern exists a comparable time albeit at smaller dimensions for 660 nm red laser light.Increased RNA and protein synthesis was demonstrated after HeNe laser (632.8 nm)treatment at 5 J cm-2 (43).In 1994, Pastore et al (2004), found increased activity of cytochrome c oxidase and anincrease in polarographically measured oxygen uptake after 2 J cm-2 of HeNe (633 nm)irradiation. As a major stimulation in the proton pumping activity, an increase of about 15
  • 17. 55% in the H+/e- ratio was found in illuminated mitochondria indicating a role of themitochondrial changes in the mechanisms of red laser light based therapy (44).W. Yu et al., 1997, used 660 nm laser at a power density of 10 mW cm-1 and showedincreased oxygen consumption following (0.6 J cm-2 and 1.2 J cm-2) radiance exposure,increased phosphate potential, and energy charge (at 1.8 J cm-2 and 2.4 J cm-2) andenhanced activities of NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase, ubiquinol: ferricytochrome coxidoreductase and ferrocytochrome c : oxygen oxidoreductase (between 0.6 J cm-2, and4.8 J cm-2) (45).Originally, Gordon and Surrey (1960) found that cells exposure to light of 660 nm showedenhanced ATP synthesis and may alter the phosphorylative capacity in mitochondria upondirect exposure of the organelles in this red wavelength diapason. (46; 47)In 2005, these original observations were confirmed by Amat et al., (48), and very recently(2011) by Alghamdi and colleagues (49).Yu et al., (1997) studied whether oxidative metabolism and electron chain enzymes in livermitochondria can be modulated by 660 nm wavelength photoirradiation. The oxygenconsumption, phosphate potential, and energy charge of liver mitochondria weredetermined following photoirradiation (45).It is generally believed that mitochondria are the primary affected organelle in mammaliantissue irradiated with laser light at 660 nm and/or 905 nm(59; 60) albeit, possibly differentmechanisms exist ranging from direct photochemical to photothermal initiated effects.This assumption led to the development of the highest efficacy advanced LLLT systemsthat, as described in detail below, encompass potent and complementary bioregulatorymechanisms of 660 nm (red) laser light and 905 nm (near infrared) superpulsed laser lightat a particular therapeutic mode of administration.There is certainly more than one reaction involved in the primary mechanisms of LLLT.There are no grounds to believe that only one of these processes occurs when a tissue isirradiated. An important question for the future research is which one of these reactions isresponsible for a certain wavelength effect. However, experimental data clearly supportuse of 660 nm visible red laser light and 905 nm superpulsed NIR laser light based on theirrole in modulation of redox mitochondrial function, changes in properties of terminalenzymes and cellular signalling that might be critical steps in bioregulatory mechanisms ofLLLT.THE OPTICAL AND THERAPEUTIC WINDOWS OF LLLTIt should be noted that both absorption coefficients (µa) and scattering (us) coefficients oflight in tissue are wavelength dependent in any given tissue. The light scattering is muchmore pronounced in the blue region of the visible spectrum than in the red and nearinfrared spectrum (50). 16
  • 18. Attenuation of light in deep biological tissue depends on the effective attenuationcoefficient 46 ( ) [1/mm], which is defined by equation 1: = 3 + ′ Equation 1where ′ is the reduced scattering coefficient defined by equation 2: ′ = 1 − g cm − 1 Equation 2where smaller g is the anisotropy of biological tissue, which has a representative value of0.9 in most biological tissues.The effective attenuation coefficient is the dominant factor for determining lightattenuation at depth where ≫ and it can be regarded as the distance when thespatial coherence or collimation of the light is completely lost.The data suggests that, particularly in living tissues, red light penetrates deeper than bluelight, and the penetration of infrared light is deeper than red light. In addition, water intissues begins to absorb significantly at wavelengths greater than 960 nm, whereaswavelengths below 600nm are strongly absorbed by the haemoglobins (oxy HB, and deoxyHBO2) in the blood.Therefore, although light at violet blue, green, yellow, and orange, wavelengths may havevarious effects on cells growing in optically transparent culture medium, the use of LLLT inanimals and patients almost exclusively involves light in the range above 600 nm andbelow 950 nm with the maximum effective “optical window” ranging from 650 nm to 930nm (Figure 3)Within the optical window of light transmission it is important to consider also the changein quantum energy per photon that is dropping from ~ 1.8 eV at 660 nm to ~ 1.2 eV at 950nm respectively. While quantum energy above 1.5 eV can result in electronic activation ofbiomolecules and thus initiate direct photochemical events, this is not the case at lowerquantum energies, and activation energies below 1.5 eV cannot result in directphotochemistry. Therefore, the change in quantum energy per photon is a very importantcharacteristic that may augment the LLLT clinical efficacy (51). 17
  • 19. Figure 3. The LLLT therapeutic window, based on data taken from (52)The efficacy of LLLT is directly dependent on the instrument used, because the therapeuticwindow of LLLT is virtually mirrored by the optical window (the light absorption and thelight action spectra) in mammalian tissues. Figure 4 includes the location of photacceptorsand chromophores of mammalian tissues.Figure 4. Principal photoacceptors and chromophores of mammalian tissuesMoreover, animal experiments and clinical studies all tend to indicate that the efficacy ofLLLT is power density or irradiance [W cm-2] dependent. LLLT delivered at low doses mayproduce no or very little effect (because the minimum threshold for excitation ofphotoacceptor-induced signalling has not been met) and delivered at much higher 18
  • 20. (excessive) or bioinhibitory radiant exposures may not promote the achievement ofdesirable therapeutic outcomes and can be detrimental to the of the patient’s health status.It becomes clear that the therapeutic effect of LLLT depends on a set of at least fourparameters, besides the wavelength of the light: a light power density threshold [W cm-2], the beam cross section A [cm2], the total irradiation time ∆ttot, and the energy density orradiant exposure act [J cm-2] required for activation of any given photoacceptor or groupthereof.Hence, the medical device parameters are interrelated according to the LLLT equation 3 = ∆ Equation 3where power densities necessary for stimulation I stim have to surpass the thresholdirradiance I0 (53; 54) .According to Sommer et al., (2001) (54) the majority of the published results with a negativeoutcome stem from ignoring the importance of the relation: ≥ Equation 4 Light power densities lower than the threshold values I0 obviously do not producetherapeutic effects, even under a prolongation of the irradiation time ∆ttot. The effectiverange of in equation 3 is given by the particular Arndt-Schultz curve similar to thatsuggested by Sommer and colleagues (54). Although equation 3 is physically surprisinglysimple, the biological implications are by no means trivial. Biologically, the parameters and I stim are clearly independent from each other, an important consideration atleast for the medical applications of photobiological effects with the use of lasers (includingincoherent light sources) at low energy density levels (54) .BIPHASIC DOSE RESPONSE IN LOW LEVEL LIGHT THERAPYOne of the key factors that affect the efficacy of LLLT is a biphasic dose response thatdirectly correlates with the characteristics of the wavelength and the amount of energyabsorbed by a chromophore or a photoacceptor which of the function of the light energydensity (the radiant exposure or light fluence measured below the surface).The important role of a biphasic response has been demonstrated by a number of studies incell culture (55), animal models (21) and in clinical studies (56).It has generally been observed that an optimal light irradiance and radiance exposureexists for any particular application, and irradiances lower than this optimum value, ormore significantly, larger than the optimum value will have a diminished therapeuticoutcome. Therefore for high doses of light (a common disadvantage of Class IV Lasers usedas a therapeutic means that are able to produce an excessive amount of heat and /or 19
  • 21. generate an overwhelming level of power density deposited into the tissue) a negativeoutcome may even result (56), known as bioinhibition.In connection with the versatility of LLLT effects, and because of the probable existence of anon-linear, biphasic power density response, as mentioned above, choosing the correctLLLT medical device (in terms of irradiation parameters, such as: wavelength, irradiance,pulse structure, coherence, polarisation and dose characteristics) for any specific medicalcondition is mandatory to achieve clinically efficacious results.In addition, there has been some confusion in the literature about the delivered fluencewhen the light spot is small. For example, according to Hamblin and colleagues, if 5 Joulesof light is given to a spot of 5 mm2 the fluence is 100 Jcm-2 which is nominally the samefluence as 100 Jcm-2 delivered to 10 cm2, but the total energy delivered in the latter case is200 times greater, due to the requisite increase in surface area.Overall the concept of power density loses meaning rapidly when approaching smallirradiation spot sizes. In general, the light distribution in tissue is equal for any spot sizediameter smaller than 0.5 mm, the inverse of the average reduced scattering coefficient µ’sreported for tissues in the visible and near infra red spectral range (57).For light wavelengths greater than 650 nm, in most tissues and particularly in skin beamsurface area should be considered when the light spot approaches a diameter of ~ 2-3 mmas the angular spread of the emitted light from the diodes could double this beam surfacearea prior to reaching the tissue surface. In particular when laser diodes are clustered closetogether their beam surface areas overlap combining the individual fluence rate profilesinto a single profile within the first few mm of depth into the tissue; hence, determining theeffective area a can be more complex than first imagined .Evidence suggests that both energy density (radiant exposure) and power density(irradiance) are key biological parameters for the effectiveness of laser therapy, and theymay both operate within specific thresholds (i.e., : a lower and an upper threshold for bothparameters between which LLLT is effective, and outside of which LLLT is too weak [that isone of the common therapeutic disadvantages for the light sources with power levels ofless than 5 mW (i.e., many Class I-II and IIIa light devices)] to have any effect or that intenseenergy densities is one of the common therapeutic disadvantages for the light sources withenergy density levels greater than 10 Jcm-2 (i.e.,: Class IV light devices) that the therapeuticeffect is inhibited or can be in fact adverse to the subject. (see figure 5) (54). 20
  • 22. Figure 5. Biphasic dose response, based on data taken from (54).According to Hamblin and colleagues (2009), biphasic dose response can be representedby the difference in integrated area under the curve of time tracking wound size in woundstreated with LLLT compared to no treatment controls, with a clear maximum seen at 2 Jcm-2, and a high dose of 50 Jcm-2 demonstrating a worsening of the wound healing time curve(36). In general, radiant exposures of red or NIR light as low as 3 or 5 J cm-2 will be beneficialin-vivo, but a large dose such as 50 or 100 Jcm-2 will lose the beneficial effect and mostlikely will become detrimental.Therefore, the question is no longer whether light has clinical and safety efficacy, but ratherhow energy from therapeutic low energy light devices (lasers or LEDs) is generated andwhat are the most optimal light parameters for different applications of these lightsources.LLLT, as all other forms of therapeutic modalities regulated by the FDA has its active“ingredients” or irradiation parameters and therapeutic doses.Energy (J) or energy density (J cm-2) is often used as an important descriptor of LLLT dose,but this neglects the fact that energy or energy density has two components, power orpower density and time as given by the formula = ∗ Equation 5It has also been demonstrated that there is not necessarily reciprocity between power andtime; in that, if the power doubled and the time is halved then the same energy is deliveredbut a different biological response is often observed. Let’s explore this phenomenon. 21
  • 23. LLLT is best described as two separate sets of parameters; a. The medicine (in LLLT terms -irradiation parameters) such as peak power, average power drive technology and wavelength b. The dose (in LLLT terms of time [s] for a given irradiance [W cm-2])Table 1 lists the key parameters that define the active ingredients and Table 2 defines thedose ingredients of LLLT.TABLE 1Parameters involved in determining the LLLT effect [Table 1 and 2 are taken from (56)] IRRADIATION PARAMETERS (The irradiation parameters)Irradiation Unit ofParameter measurement CommentWavelength nm Light is composed of electromagnetic energy, which travels in discrete packets that also have wavelike properties. Wavelength is measured in nanometers [nm] and is visible to the human eye in the 400–700 nm range.Irradiance W cm-2 Often called X Intensity, or Power Density and is calculated as X Irradiance = Power [W]/Beam surface Area [cm2]Pulse Peak Power [W] If the beam is pulsed then the peak Power should bestructure Pulse freq [Hz] converted to Average Power and calculated as follows: Pulse Width [s] Average Power [W] = Peak Power [W] × pulse width Duty cycle [%] [s] × pulse frequency [Hz]Coherence Coherence length Coherent light produces laser speckles, which have depends on been postulated to play a role in the spectral bandwidth photobiomodulation interaction with cells and subcellular organelles.Polarisation Linear polarized or Polarized light may have different effects than circular polarized otherwise identical non-polarized light (or even 90- degree rotated polarized light). However, it is known that polarized light is rapidly scrambled in highly scattering media such as tissue (probably in the first few hundred μm). 22
  • 24. TABLE 2Parameters involved in determining the LLLT “dose” IRRADIATION TIME OR ENERGY DELIVERED (The Dose)Irradiation Unit ofParameter measurement CommentEnergy J Calculated as: Energy [J] = Power [W] x time [s] This(Joules) combines medicine and dose into a single expression and ignores Irradiance. Using Joules as an expression of dose is potentially unreliable as it assumes reciprocity (the inverse relationship between power and time,). which is not necessarily the caseEnergy J cm-2 A common expression of LLLT “dose” is Energy DensityDensity This expression of dose again mixes medicine and dose into a single expression and is potentially unreliable as it assumes a reciprocity relationship between irradiance and time.Irradiation s In our view the safest way to record and prescribe LLLT isTime to define the four parameters of the medicine (see table 1) and then define the irradiation time as “dose”.Treatment Hours, days or The effects of different treatment interval areinterval weeks underexplored at this time though there is sufficient evidence to suggest that this is an important parameter⁽⁵⁶⁾. 23
  • 25. THE IMPORTANCE OF PULSING IN LLLT (PULSE vs. CW)The efficacy of LLLT has been confirmed by several hundred randomized, double-blinded,placebo-controlled clinical trials, and this therapeutic method has been approved by theFDA, Health Canada and CE and numerous other health regulatory agencies from dozens ofcountries worldwide (58).Hence, the question is no longer whether LLLT has clinical effects but rather what are thepertinent light parameters required to achieve the desired clinical effect for a particularclinical indication.Both pulsed (PW) and continuous wave (CW) modes are available in LLLT devices, whichoffer medical practitioners a wide range of therapeutic options, allowing them to exploitphotochemical effects versus photothermal or molecular biochemical effects. One interesting observation is the favourable effect of 905 nm need to explain superpulsedmode (SP) in pulse mode versus continuous wave mode (905 nm LLLT in SP mode is ableto activate iNOS transcription and translation, in an acute inflammation model,demonstrating the existence of a different mechanisms of action and is dependent on thepulse duration, duty cycle and frequency of the delivered photons.In continuous wave applications, photons interact on an individual basis with the tissuechromophores initiating a photochemical light-tissue interaction Super pulsed and pulsedsources however must execute an additional non-photochemical interaction forbiostimulation to take place.A number of well designed clinical studies have reported similar results indicating agreater efficacy of LLLT achieved with SP versus PW versus CW mode. For examplesequentially pulsed optical energy was reported to be more efficacious than CW mode instimulating collagen production in a suction blister model (59) . Several other studies havealso obtained a similar pattern of results.In a wound healing study, Kymplova et al., (60)used a large number of women (n=2,436) toelucidate the effects of phototherapy on wound repair following surgical episiotomies (oneof the most common surgical procedures in women). A pulsed laser, used in the study,emitted light (wavelength of 670 nm, power 20 mW and an energy density of 2 J cm-2) atvarious frequencies (10, 25, and 50 Hz) (the authors did not specified the pulse durationand duty cycle), and, according to the authors, promoted wound repair and healing moreeffectively than a CW light source (60) delivering a similar radiant exposure.In a recent study by Brondon and colleagues (61), the photo-irradiation outcomes, followingdelivery of 670 nm (10 mW cm-2, 5 J cm-2) light through a 0.025% melanin filter viacontinuous illumination or pulsed delivery at frequencies of 100 and 600 Hz, wereexamined. Pulsing had a significantly greater stimulatory effect on cell proliferation andoxidative burst as compared to the continuous photoradiation group (61). 24
  • 26. Taken together, these findings underline the importance of pulsing parameters in LLLT andhow critical the implementation of optimal pulse duty cycle and peak power is to achievemaximal stimulation of photobioregulatory effects in targeted tissues.Indeed, pulsing frequency (pulse repetition rate and pulse duration) appears to hold suchdifferential effects, as suggested by studies using different in vitro and in vivo models (62).These observations have been confirmed by Barolet D, et al., (2010). The authors haveshown that certain pulsing frequencies appear to be more efficacious than others intriggering desired biological outcomes (63).The scientific evidence continues to demonstrate that pulsed light does have biological andclinical effects that are different from those of continuous wave light. Several studiesrevealed that LLLT in a PW mode of operation is substantially better able to penetratethrough the melanin and other skin barriers, supporting the hypotheses that pulsing isbeneficial in reaching deep target tissue and organs.In 2009, Lapchak P.A and Taboada L.D. reported that transcranial near infrared lasertherapy (NILLLT) improves behavioural outcome following embolic strokes in embolizedrabbits and clinical rating scores in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. It was proposed that mitochondrial energy production may underlie this therapeuticresponse to the near-infrared LLLT (NILLLT). The authors evaluated the effect of NILLLTon cortical ATP content using the rabbit small clot embolic stroke model (RSCEM), themodel originally used to demonstrate NILLLT efficacy. In addition, the authors comparedthe effect of CW and PW illumination on ATP production in the brain tissue.Five minutes following embolization, rabbits were exposed to 2 min of NILLLT using an808 nm laser source, which was driven to output 262.5mW cm-2 either CW, or PW using 2ms pulses at 100Hz. Three hours after embolization, the cerebral cortex was excised andprocessed for the measurement of ATP content using a standard luciferin-luciferase assay.NILLLT-treated rabbits were directly compared to sham-treated embolized rabbits andnaïve control rabbits. Embolization decreased cortical ATP content in the ischemic cortexby 45% compared to naive rabbits, a decrease that was attenuated by CW NILLLT whichresulted in a 41% increase in cortical ATP content. However, this net tissue content of ATPincrease was not statistically different from either the sham-treated embolized controlgroup or the naive control group (p= 0.1357 and 0.0826, respectively).The results of the NILLLT in PW mode were much more compelling.Following PW NILLLT, which delivered 35 times higher peak fluence rate than CW, theauthors reported a 221% (p=0.0001) increase in cortical ATP content, compared to thesham embolized group and naive control rabbits (p= 0.0028).The data undeniably demonstrates the benefit and the advantageous effect of pulsing inLLLT and is providing a new insight into the molecular mechanisms associated with theLLLT clinical efficacy (64). 25
  • 27. In addition, as indicated above in association with equation 3, I stim the energy density, E/a(Jcm⁻²) and the fluence rate (Wcm⁻²) are important parameters. While light delivery eitheras PW or CW may not impact the energy density attainable at a given depth throughout thetherapy session, the power density can be increased depending on the laser duty cycle andthus I stim can become larger than I₀ at greater depth.The attainable depth of the LLLT bioregulation increase is based on the duty cycle of thelaser or the ratio of the light pulsed duration over dark period. Sinusoidal modulated lightsources typically have only a duty cycle of 0.5 and hence an e⁻⁰⁵ depth advantage of only 2,whereas the duty cycle of a 200 nsec pulse at 10Khz is 0.005 and the depth advantage canbe 200 to attain the same fluence rate.The overall body of literature on the subject has strongly indicated that clinicalpractitioners must not underestimate the importance of energy rate and pulse structurewhen using different LLLT sources. Therefore it is imperative that clinical and scientificresearchers provide an explanation of how does pulsed LLLT differ from the CW LLLT onthe biomolecular level, how these biomolecular changes are important for beneficialclinical outcomes of LLLT and what pulse parameters are critical for photobioregulation.They should also specifically determine what is the ideal pulse repetition rate or frequencyto be used, as the pulse rate may also have effects on the LLLT’s mediated biologicalresponses.THE CONCEPT OF SUPER PULSINGBoth continuous wave (CW) and continuous wave light sources that are turned on and off(pulsed light sources) cannot compare with the depth of penetration of photonic energydelivered from super pulsed lasers.Traditionally, cold lasers deliver photonic energy from diodes that range in power from5mW to 500mW per diode; otherwise known as Class 3B laser devices. 200mW/cm2 is thehighest level of irradiance allowed in the visible for a continuous wave laser (MaximumPermissible Exposure or MPE), because any greater power would result in excessive heatthat could compromise the safety and the efficacy of the Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)treatment. However, Super Pulsed Laser can safely deliver optical energy from diodes thatrange in power from 10,000 mW to 50,000 mW peak power per diode.This is paramount because the probability for a photon absorption event to occur largelydepends on the photon density or fluence rate and the photon absorption cross section ofthe molecule where the former may be influenced by the pulse repetition rate and the peakpower. In superficial tissue, where the photon density is high, it is easy to reach thenecessary power density thresholds without the benefits of a super pulsed laser, in factcontinuous wave lasers, pulsed lasers or even LEDs can be utilized. However, in deep tissuewhere the photon density is extremely low, the probability of photon absorption fromindividual pulsed laser speckles is extremely rare thus the probability of reaching thenecessary power density thresholds, I₀, is not possible for continuous wave lasers, pulsedlasers or LEDs. However, superpulsed laser sources, through their intense pulses of lightcan still overcome I₀ and photochemically activate molecules at much deeper tissue depths, 26
  • 28. d. This effect may also explain why head-to-head comparisons between lasers and LEDs indeep tissue seem to be in favour of lasers and superpulsed lasers in particular (65).Super pulsing allows for deeper penetration than an equivalent light source of the samewavelength that is not super pulsed but has the same average output power. This isprimarily because short pulses can lead to a temporally higher concentration of excitedchromophores at greater depth which in turn can impact the biochemistry at the cellularlevel; whereas, the period between pulses promotes optimization of thermal relaxationtime of the target structure. This relaxation time, permits cooling between pulses to avoidaccumulation of heat and to avoid detrimental effects, as well as to enhance thephotochemical and photophysical light tissue reactions, leading to superior observanttherapeutic outcomes, such as: a reduction in inflammation, elimination of pain andaccelerated tissue healing.Theralase’s superpulsed infrared laser light (905 nm) is Health Canada, FDA and CE Markcertified and is in use in over 20 countries around the world. The super pulsed laser has thedistinction of being one of the fastest in the world - delivering pulses at 200 billionths of asecond, producing average powers of 100mW and peak powers up to 50,000 mW perdiode. The result is a higher concentration of light power, or photons density, exceeding I₀deeper into the target tissue, without the risk of burning the tissue.While CW and standard pulsed lasers are limited to less than 1-2 cm tissue depth fortherapeutic efficient penetration, superpulsed infrared laser technology is able to showtherapeutic efficacy at up to 10 cm into tissue and affect deeper target structures such as:bones, tendons, ligaments and cartilage.In our clinical and scientific experience, 905 nm super pulsed technology has been provento be more effective than 905 nm laser light treatment administered in a continuous wavemode (6).PULSE PARAMETERS AND LIGHT SOURCESIt should be noted that in contemporary clinical practice the main emphasis has been madeon true pulses and not medical instruments that utilise a sinusoidal modulation of the lightpower.There are five parameters (see Figure 5) that could be specified for pulsed light sources.The pulse width or pulse duration or “ON time” and the pulse Interval or “OFF time” aremeasured in seconds. Pulse repetition rate or frequency is measured in Hz. The peak powerand average power are measured in Watts. 27
  • 29. Figure 5: Conceptual diagram comparing the structure of CW with pulsed light of variouspulse durations, based on data taken from (58).A critical factor that determines the amount of light energy delivered is the duty cycle DC.Duty cycle is the proportion of time during which a component, device, or system isoperated.The duty cycle (DC) is a unit less fractional number or %.Duty cycle can also be expressed as the ratio of the duration of the event to the total period. = Equation 6Where: is the duration that the function is active Τ is the period of the function.Pulse duration (PD), pulse repetition rate (F), and duty cycle (DC) are all related by thesimple equation: = ∗ (Hz) (seconds) Equation 7Peak power or power density is a measure of light intensity during the pulse duration, andrelated to the average power (measured in Watts) by: Average power = Peak power* w ∗ Equation 8Alternatively, 28
  • 30. Average power Peak power = save size text Equation 9In all cases, it is necessary to specify any two out of three of: PD, F, and DC, and either thepeak or average power for the pulse parameters to be fully defined (66).TYPES OF PULSED LIGHT SOURCESFive major types of pulsed lasers (or other light sources) are commonly utilized: 1) Q-switched, 2) Gain-switched, 3) Mode-locked, 4) Superpulsed, and 5) Chopped or gated.Each utilizes a different mechanism to generate light in a pulsed as opposed to continuousmanner, and vary in terms of pulse repetition rates, energies, and durations. However thefirst three classes of pulsed lasers mentioned above are in general not used for LLLT;instead super pulsed (a ‘‘true’’ pulsed laser) or gated lasers are mainly used. Moreover, thechopped or gated light sources cannot compress available power into very short pulses,and hence are inefficient in converting electrical power into LLLT’s optical power for veryhigher power densities.SUPERPULSING OR A “TRUE” PULSED LLLT APPROACHThe concept of super-pulsing was originally developed for the carbon dioxide laser used inhigh power tissue ablative procedures.The idea was conceived that by generating relatively short pulses (few milliseconds) withinthe laser media more atoms can be excited than normally allowed in CW mode where heatdissipation constraints limit the maximum amounts of energy that can be stored in thelasing media. With the original carbon dioxide superpulsed lasers, the short pulses wouldconfine the thermal energy in the tissue (by making the pulse duration less than thethermal diffusion time) reducing collateral thermal damage to normal tissue (67).The type of laser that particularly benefited from superpulsing is the Gallium- AluminumArsenide (GaAlAs) and (InGaAs) indium gallium arsenide diode laser.This GaAlAs laser has a wavelength in the region of 904 to nm and pulse duration as shortas 100 to 200 nanoseconds can be achieved.Another semiconductor laser amenable to super pulsing is the Indium-Gallium-Arsenide(InGaAs) diode laser. It emits light at a similar wavelength (905nm) as the GaAlAs diodelaser, producing very brief pulses (100 to 200 nanoseconds) of high frequencies (in therange of kilohertz). These pulses are of very high peak powers (1–50 W) and an averagepower of 650mW to 150 mW.Theoretically, superpulsed GaAlAs and InGaAs lasers allow I₀ to be exceeded at greaterdepth without the unwelcome effects of CW (such as thermal injury), as well as allowing for 29
  • 31. shorter treatment times, and, hence, offer advantageous dose delivery and clinical benefitswithout the undesirable adverse effects, such as including tissue damage or unfavourablebiphasic effects.Superpulsed lasers produce very powerful, pulsed peak power in the Watt range, but theduration of the peak is typically only 100 to 200 nanoseconds. A GaAlAs laser presenting apeak power of 10 W typically has an average output of 20 mW due to its very low dutycycle.The other major class of pulsed light sources used in LLLT are not true pulsed lasers, butsimply CW lasers (usually diode lasers) that have a pulsed power supply generated by alaser driver containing an often sinusoidal pulse generator. This technology is described as‘‘chopped’’ or ‘‘gated’’ or “pseudo”. It is also equally feasible to use pulse generatortechnology to pulse LEDs or LED arrays (68) albeit the ability to produce 100s of nsec pulseshas not been demonstrated.THE BIOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF “TRUE” PULSING IN LLLTA “true’ pulsed or superpulsed light offers numerous potential benefits. Because there are‘‘quench periods’’ (pulse OFF times) following the pulse ON times true, pulsed lasers orsuperpulsed lasers generate less tissue heating. In instances where it is desirable to deliverlight to deeper tissues increased powers are needed to provide adequate power density atthe target tissue, so I stim > I o . This increased power can cause a transient tissue heating,particularly at specific biological targets (as discussed above in the mitochondrialmechanisms of LLLT) and in this instance pulsed light could be very important. WhereasCW or PW-generated by not “true” pulsed lasers (including ‘‘chopped’’ or ‘‘gated’’ or“pseudo” technology), particularly emitted by non-coherent (non laser light sources),causes an undesirable increase in temperature of the intervening and target tissues ororgan.Moreover, a “true” pulsed light that is used in LLLT has been shown to cause no measurablechange in the temperature of the irradiated area for the same delivered energy density asother non-pulsed therapeutic light sources (58).In 2006, Ilic S., et al., found that pulsed light (peak power densities of 750mWcm-2)administered for 120 seconds produced no neurological or tissue damage, whereas anequal power density delivered by CW (for the same number of seconds) caused markedneurological deficits (69).Aside from safety advantages true, pulsed or superpulsed light might simply be moreeffective than CW. The ‘‘quench period’’ (pulse OFF times) reduces tissue heating; thereby,allowing the use of potentially much higher peak power densities than those that could besafely used in CW. The higher power densities can change the reaction balances in favour ofa positive signalling effect or through the creation of thermal microgradients changing theanalyte exchange across cellular and subcellular membranes. For example, when CWpower densities at the skin use equal or higher than 2 Wcm-2, doubling the CW powerdensity would only marginally increase the treatment depth while potentially significantly 30
  • 32. increasing the risk of thermal damage; in contrast, peak powers of equal or higher than 5Wcm-2 pulsed using appropriate ON and OFF times might produce little, or no tissueheating. The higher pulsed peak powers can avoid tissue heating problems and improve thefluence rate at deep tissues, achieving greater treatment depths and hence better, overalltherapeutic efficacy (40; 63).There may be other biological reasons for the improved efficacy of pulsed light (PW) overCW. According to Hashmi J.T., et al., the majority of the pulsed light sources used for LLLThave frequencies in the 2.5–10,000 Hz range and pulse durations are commonly in therange of a few millisecond. This observation suggests that if there is a biologicalexplanation of the improved effects of pulsed light it is either due to some fundamentalfrequency that exists in biological systems in the range of tens to hundreds of Hz, oralternatively due to some biological process that has a time scale of a few milliseconds (58) .Indeed, the possibility of resonance occurring between the frequency of the light pulsesand the neuronal electromagnetic frequency may in some way explain a number of thebeneficial results with LLLT using true pulsed light (70).In addition, there are several lines of evidence that ion channels are involved in thesubcellular effects of LLLT, playing the critical role in the intercellular signalling induced intissues by LLLT (71).Some channels permit the passage of ions based solely on whether their charge is ofpositive (cationic) or negative (anionic) while others are selective for specific species ofion, such as sodium or potassium. These ions move through the channel pore single filenearly as quickly as the ions move through free fluid. In some ion channels, passagethrough the pore is governed by a ‘‘gate,’’ which may be opened or closed by chemical orelectrical signals, temperature, or mechanical force, depending on the variety of channel.Ion channels are especially prominent components of the nervous system.Voltage activated ion channels underlie the nerve impulse while transmitted, activated orligand gated channels mediate conduction across the synapses. There is a large body ofliterature on the kinetics of various classes of ion channels but in broad summary it can beclaimed that the time scale or kinetics for opening and closing of ion channels is of theorder of a few milliseconds.For instance, there are several reports indicating that the diverse types of ion channelreceptors have kinetics with timescales that are comparable with the superpulsingtechnology (72; 73), as well potassium and calcium ion channels in the mitochondria and thesarcolemma may be involved in the cellular response to LLLT (74; 75)Several authors have also suggested that there is the possibility that one cellularmechanism of action of LLLT is the photodissociation of nitric oxide from a protein bindingsite (heme or copper center) such as those found in cytochrome c oxidase. If this processoccurs it is likely that the NO would rebind to the same site even in the presence ofcontinuous light. Therefore if the light was pulsed multiple photodissociation events couldoccur, while in CW mode the number of dissociations may be much smaller (58). 31
  • 33. THE LIGHT PENETRATION DEPTHThe most important parameter that governs the depth of penetration of laser light intotissue is wavelength. When light at a specific wavelength interacts with particular tissue, itis either absorbed or scattered in various proportions depending on the optical propertiesof the tissue. The tissue characteristics are important for LLLT and all other forms ofphototherapy and medical laser applications, in order to understand the interactionmechanisms between light and tissue. Knowledge concerning light transport in tissue andhence the composition of tissue is essential for proper light dosimetry. In general, both theabsorption (µa)and scattering (µs)coefficients of living tissues are higher at lowerwavelengths, so near-infrared light (up to about 950 nm) penetrates more deeply thatvisible and UV light. It is often claimed that pulsed lasers penetrate more deeply into tissuethan CW lasers with the same average power density (76).For example, if the depth of tissue at which the intensity of the 905 WM CW laser isreduced to 10% is 1cm, and the power density (irradiance) is 100mW cm-2, the fluence rateremaining at 1 cm below the skin surface is 10mWcm-2 and at 2 cm deep is only 1mWcm-2 .Let’s assume that a certain threshold power density (minimum number of photons per unitarea per unit time) at the target tissue that is necessary to induce a biological effect is10mW cm-2. Therefore, the effective penetration depth at CW will be 1 cm.Now, suppose that the laser is pulsed with a 10 millisecond pulse duration at a frequency of1Hz (DC = 1 Hz x 0.010 s = 0.010) and the average power is the same (100mWcm-2 ) .The peak power and peak power densities are now 100 times higher (peak power =average power (DC = average power x 100). Therefore with a peak power density of10Wcm-2 at the skin surface, the tissue depth at which this peak power density isattenuated to the threshold level (I₀) of 10mWcm-2 is now 3 cm rather than 1 cm in CWmode.But what we have to consider is that the laser is only on for 1% of the time so the totalfluence delivered to the 3-cm depth in pulsed mode is 100 times less than that delivered to1-cm depth in CW mode. However it would be possible to increase the illumination time bya factor of 100 to reach the supposed threshold of fluence as well as the threshold of powerat the 3-cm depth. In reality the increase in effective penetration depth obtained withpulsed or super pulsed lasers is more modest than simple calculations might suggest (dueto non-linear distribution of photons).Many applications of LLLT may require deep penetration of the light energy, such as deeptreated conditions like: lower back, neck, and hip joint pain and inflammation. Therefore, ifthe power densities need to be greater than a few mWcm-2 and are required to be deliveredsafely to target tissues > 5 cm below the skin surface, the effective treatment can only beachieved by using superpulsed lasers (58). 32
  • 34. The data indicates that pulsing and particularly superpulsing play an important role inLLLT especially for clinical applications where deep tissue penetration is required.THE USE OF COMBINED LASERS (CW + PW) IN LLLTScientific and clinical data suggest that a relatively high fluence (the light energy densitydelivered to the target tissue) is necessary to attenuate pain, whereas a lower fluencedecreases inflammation. If this is indeed the case, for a number of clinical conditions,including musculoskeletal applications, achieving higher doses at the level of the targettissue may not be ideal.It has also been postulated that successful LLLT treatments of arthritic joints bring benefitnot by reaching the deep target tissue directly but by inhibiting superficial nociceptors. Inother words, the therapy brings relief primarily by attenuating pain perception, as opposedto reduction of deep tissue inflammation (58).It becomes evident that the use of a prescribed dose at the tissue surface is insufficient toreach a desired target dose at depth, as the tissue thickness to the target differs betweenpatients, as do the tissue attenuation coefficients which are based on tissue compositions.Hence, new technology is being developed to, optimise these variables and develop asmart) technology that enables the determination of the power density, Istim and the fluenceat the target tissue’s depth.These scientific reports, as well as, observations on the complementary biological actionsof the far-red and near-infrared irradiation have led to the beginning of the research anddevelopment of a unique class of platform technologies that combine (CW + PW and SP)LLLT approaches; and after FDA and other health regulatory agencies approvals in Canada,Europe, Latin America and in Asia, to a successful commercialization of the new andeffective phototherapeutic medical devices.The latest medical device technology in the field employs visible red (CW) and nearinfrared super pulse (SP) proprietary technology to comprise a unique and clinicallyvalidated array of multiple probe lasers. As a result of this synchronising therapeuticapproach, benefits offered by this new technology includes: 1) delivery of a well-defined,particular dose of coherent photon energy per treatment given to a patient and 2)implementation of cooperative stimulation of the proximal and distal therapeuticmechanisms, in tissues, to induce bioregulatory responses that mitigate inflammation andpain, as well as, the ability to accelerate the healing in the disease in affected areas andassist in maintaining remission, particularly through ₍₃₎delivering energy at Istim > Io to therequired depth.Up until now, in the peer-reviewed literature, there has been remarkably little informationavailable about any laser technology that encompasses these concepts. 33
  • 35. In Gigo-Benato’s study, CW or PW stand alone was compared to combined laser. In short,the combined laser was found to be more effective in stimulating nerve regeneration, thaneither CW or PW alone (77).The two other studies used a combined laser (CW and PW) to administer laseracupuncture, along with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), to patientswith symptoms of pain. Naeser et al., administered this ‘‘triple therapy’’ to patientssuffering from carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) (78).Eleven patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms of CTS were selected to participate in thetrial. All participants were previously treated by various methods, but had failed to respondto standard medical or surgical treatment regimens. Subjects were divided into two groups,one of which received sham irradiation and the other received a combined treatment ofLLLT (CW and PW) and TENS. As compared to controls, the treated group experiencedstatistically significant improvement and remained stable for 1to 3 years.The results of this study indicate the therapeutic advances of combined LLLT in thetreatment of CTS.Ceccherelli et al., (1989) administered laser acupuncture to patients suffering frommyofascial pain (79).In this double blinded placebo controlled trial, patients received either the same ‘‘tripletherapy’’ as in the Naeser et al. study (CW, PW, and TENS) or sham irradiation, every otherday over the course of 24 days. Results were encouraging, with the treatment groupexperiencing a significant improvement in symptoms, both immediately after the treatmentregimen and at a 3-month follow up visit. In both preceding studies, the combined regimenof CW, PW, and TENS was compared to untreated controls, and found to be effective (78).However, neither study compared CW and PW or administered CW, PW, or TENSindividually.Therefore, it is impossible to determine whether stand alone the combination of CW andPW light would have produced similar results, or if the used combined LLLT regimen alongwith TENS was more effective.As described above, the therapeutic optical windows (660 nm and 905 nm) utilised by Thelatest LLLT technologies are correspond to the absorption and the action spectra opticalwindows of the key mitochondria chromophores, such as cytochrome c oxidase and cellularmembrane lipids. Moreover, it is apparent that 660 nm and 905 nm light have an impact onthe mitochondrial chromophores via independent mechanisms and hence the combinationof 660 nm and 905 nm light is considered highly probable to have an additive biologiceffect compared to individual wavelengths. This biologic effect is amplified to achieve theeffective therapeutic outcomes via implementation of the latest LLLT technologycooperative CW and PW stimulation system that target the proximal and distal therapeuticmechanisms, in tissues, to induce bioregulatory responses that effectively modulate localand systemic pathologic manifestations in the LLLT treated patients. 34
  • 36. The clinical results are in support of the preclinical data indicating the efficacy of this latestfrom of LLLT to mitigate the disease progression and to provide significant relief of thesymptoms and health status improvements in chronically ill patients.The recent reported, data of a randomized, blinded and placebo controlled pivotal clinicalstudy,(reference) that resulted in FDA approval of the Theralase’s LLLT technology,demonstrated that this latest LLLT technology provides significant clinical symptoms reliefand a quality of life improvement in patients with osteoarthritis and untreated injuries tomuscles, ligaments and tendons that were enrolled into the study based on the PhiladelphiaPanel Classification, 2001 (80). All patient data for the VAS parameters were analyzed by theanalysis-of-variance (ANOVA) and, in addition, the VAS parameters were analyzed by theRepeated Measures techniques.The data was statistically analyzed to determine the differences and/or whether asignificant difference existed between the laser and placebo (sham) treatment on ahomogeneous population, and it revealed that the tested LLLT had a statistically significantefficacy compared to placebo and greatly improved the pain level by reducing the VASscores by 52.9% at the 12th visit (p= 0.05) and 54.5% at the 30 day (p= 0.01) follow upevaluation.In conclusion, the overall data confirms the theoretical assumption about the dualmechanisms in bioregulatory actions of this latest LLLT technology, demonstrating that thecomplementary, 660 nm (CW) and 905 nm (PW), synchronising therapeutic effect isachieved via direct photochemical and photophysical cellular events initiated bycooperative stimulation of injured tissues (an abnormal or a pathology projected site) bywell-defined doses of coherent light energy.Considering the multifactorial etiopathogenesis of the majority diseases, it is likely that theefficacy of LLLT is determent by optimal sets of therapeutic wavelengths, which should beoptimised based on the optical properties of treated tissues and regiments of light deliverytargeting particular chromophores at specific tissue depth.Bibliography1. Comparison of four noninvasive rewarming methods for mild hypothermia. Daanen, H.A. and Van deLinde, FJ. 12, s.l. : Aviat Space Environ Med, 1992, Vol. 63, pp. 1070-1076. 35
  • 37. 2. Transcutaneous electrostimulation for osteoarthritis of the knee. Rutjes, AW, et al. 4, Oct 2009,Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Vol. 7.3. Tennis elbow. Clinical Evidence. Bisset, L, Coombes, B and Vicenzino, B. [Online] june 27, 2011. [Cited:June 27, 2009.] http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ceweb/index.jsp.4. Safety of Lase Products users guide .s.l. Commission, International Electrotechnical. : IECInternational Electrotechnical Commission, 2004. TR 60825-14.5. Low power laser treatment in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Tascioglu, F, et al. 17-18, May 1, 2004,Swiss Med Wkly, Vol. 134, pp. 254-258.6. In vivo effects of low level laser therapy on inducible nitric oxide synthase. Moriyama Y, Nguyen J,Akens M, Moriyama EH, Lilge L. 3, March 2009, Lasers Surg Med, Vol. 41, pp. 227-231.7. Photodissociation of cytochrome c oxidase-nitric oxide complexes. Gorren AC, Van Gelder BF, WeverR. 1988, Ann N Y Acad Sci, Vol. 550, pp. 139-149.8. Mitochondrial nitric oxide synthase: current concepts and controversies. Lacza Z, Pankotai E, BusijaDW. 14, Jan 2009, Front Biosci, Vol. 1, pp. 4436-4443.9. Nitric oxide and mitochondria. GC., Brown. 12, Jan 2007, Front Biosci, Vol. 1, pp. 1024-1033.10. Redox signaling (cross-talk) from and to mitochondria involves mitochondrial pores and reactiveoxygen species. A, Daiber. 6-7, Jul 2010, Biochim Biophys Acta, Vol. 1797, pp. 897-906.11. Novel effects of nitric oxide. Davis KL, Martin E, Turko IV, Murad F. 2001, Annu Rev PharmacolToxicol, Vol. 41, pp. 203-236.12. Nitric oxide prevents axonal degeneration by inducing HIF-1-dependent expression of erythropoietin.Keswani SC, Bosch-Marcé M, Reed N, Fischer A, Semenza GL, Höke A. 12, Mar 2011, Proc Natl Acad Sci,Vol. 108, pp. 4986-4990.13. Cellular Cromophores and Signaling in Low Level Light Therapy. T, Hamblin M.R. and Demidova –Rice. [ed.] SPIE. 2011. Vol. 6428, pp. 642802-1.14. A new light on Niels Finsen, a century after his Nobel Prize. R, Roelandts. 3, Jun 2005, PhotodermatolPhotoimmunol Photomed, Vol. 21, pp. 115-117.15. The history of phototherapy: something new under the sun? R, Roelandts. 2002, Acad Dermatol, Vol.46, pp. 926-930.16. The 50th anniversary of the laser; World Patent Information. Trainer, Matthew. 4, 2010, Vol. 32, pp.326-330.17. Effect of laser on hair growth of mice. Mester, E. and Szende, B., and Tota. Kiserl Orvostud, Vol. 19,pp. 628–631. 36
  • 38. 18. Introduction to experimental and clinical studies using low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT). MR,Hamblin. 6, Aug 2010, Lasers Surg Med, Vol. 42, pp. 447-449.19. Is the coherence of low-intensity laser light essential for its effect on biological objects? Lobko VV,Karu TI, Letokhov VS. 2, Mar-Apr 1985, Biofizika, Vol. 30, pp. 366-371.20. Effects of low-intensity polarized visible laser radiation on skin burns: a light microscopy study.Ribeiro MS, Da Silva Dde F, De Araújo CE, De Oliveira SF, Pelegrini CM, Zorn TM, Zezell DM, J Clin. 1,Feb 2004, Laser Med Surg, Vol. 22, pp. 59-66.21. Low-level light stimulates excisional wound healing in mice. Demidova-Rice TN, Salomatina EV,Yaroslavsky AN, Herman IM, Hamblin MR. 9, Oct 2007, Lasers Surg Med, Vol. 39, pp. 706-715.22. Influence of naloxone and methysergide on the analgesic effects of low-level laser in an experimentalpain model. Peres e Serra A, Ashmawi HA. 3, May-Jun 2010, Rev Bras Anestesiol, Vol. 60, pp. 302-310.23. Cellular effects of low power laser therapy can be mediated by nitric oxide. Karu TI, Pyatibrat LV,Afanasyeva NI. 4, Apr 2005, Lasers Surg Med, Vol. 36, pp. 307-314.24. Comparison of cellular responses induced by low level light in different cell types. Hamblin, MichaelR., et al. [ed.] SPIE. 2010. Vol. 7552. 75520A.25. The role of mitochondria in apoptosis. D.-W., Jeong S.-Y. and Seol. 1, 2008, Journal of Biochemistryand Molecular Biology, Vol. 41, pp. 11-12.26. Evolutionary biology: essence of mitochondria. Martin, K. Henze and W. 6963, 2003, Nature, Vol.426, pp. 127–128.27. The mitochondrial genome: structure, transcription, translation and replication. Taanman, J.-W. 2,1999, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Vol. 1410, pp. 103–123.28. Changes in absorbance of monolayer of living cells induced by laser radiation at 633, 670, and 820nm. Karu, T. I., N. I. Afanasyeva, S. F. Kolyakov, L. V. Pyatibrat and L. Welser. [ed.] IEEE. 2001. Select.Topics Quantum Electron. pp. 982–988.29. Mitochondrial-nuclear communications. Ryan, M. T., and Hoogenraad, N. J. 2007, Mitochondrial-nuclear communications, Vol. 76, pp. 701-722.30. Mitochondria: more than just a powerhouse. McBride HM, Neuspiel M,Wasiak S. 14, Jul 25, 2006,Curr. Biol, Vol. 16, pp. R551-60.31. The double life of ATP. Khakh, B.S., and Burnstock, G. 6, Dec 2009, Sci. Am, Vol. 301, pp. 84–92.32. Purines and sensory nerves. Burnstock, G. 2009, Exp. Pharmacol, Vol. 194, pp. 332–392.33. Light supports neurone outgrowth of human neural progenitor cells in vitro: the role of P2Y receptors.Anders, J.J., Romanczyk, T.B., Ilev, I.K. [ed.] IEEE. 2008. Select. Topics Quant. Electr. Vol. 14, pp. 118–125. 37
  • 39. 34. Mitochondrial mechanisms of photobiomodulation in context of new data about multiple roles ofATP. T, Karu. 2, 2010, Photomed Laser Surg, Vol. 28, pp. 159-160.35. Helium-neon laser irradiation stimulates cell proliferation through photostimulatory effects inmitochondria. Hu WP, Wang JJ, Yu CL, Lan CC, Chen GS, Yu HS. 8, Aug 2007, Invest Dermatol, Vol. 127,pp. 2048-2057.36. Mitochondrial heterogeneity within and between different cell types. Huang, H. M., Fowler, C.,Zhang, H., and Gibson, G. E. 2004, Neurochem Res, Vol. 29, pp. 651-658.37. Comparison of cellular responses induced by low level light in different cell types. Ying-Ying Huang,Aaron C.-H. Chen, Sulbha K. Sharma, Qiuhe Wu, Michael R. Hamblin. [ed.] SPIE. 2010. Vols. 75520A-1.38. Nucleotide receptors as targets in the pharmacological enhancement of dermal wound healing.Gendaszewska-Darmach E, Kucharska M. Apr 26, 2011 , Purinergic Signal , Vol. Epub ahead of print.39. Comparison of cellular responses induced by low level light in different cell types. Ying-Ying Huang,Aaron C-H Chen, Sulbha K Sharma, Qiuhe Wu, Michael R Hamblin. s.l. : SPIE, 2010. Vols. 7552 75520A-1.40. The importance of the coherency. Hode, L. 2005, Photomed Laser Surg, Vol. 23, pp. 431-434.41. On the possibility of high-precision photothermal microeffects and the measurement of fast thermaldenaturation of proteins. Huttmann G, Birngruber R. [ed.] IEEE. 1999. Sel Top Quant Electr . Vol. 5, pp.954–962.42. Increase of proton electrochemical potential and ATP synthesis in rat liver mitochondria irradiated invitro by helium-neon laser. S. Passarella, E. Casamassima, S. Molinari, D. Pastore, E. Quagliariello, I.M.Catalano and A. Cingolani. 1984, FEBS Lett, Vol. 175, pp. 95-99.43. Increase in RNA and protein synthesis by mitochondria irradiated with helium-neon laser. M. Greco,G. Guida, E. Perlino, E. Marra and E. Quagliariello. 1989, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, Vol. 163, pp.1428-34.44. Increase in <--H+/e- ratio of the cytochrome c oxidase reaction in mitochondria irradiated withhelium-neon laser. Pastore D, Greco M, Petragallo VA, Passarella S. 4, Oct 1994, Biochem Mol Biol Int,Vol. 34, pp. 817-826.45. Photomodulation of oxidative metabolism and electron chain enzymes in rat liver mitochondria. W.Yu, J.O. Naim, M. McGowan, K. Ippolito and R.J. Lanzafame. 1997, Photochem Photobiol, Vol. 66, pp.866-71.46. Red and far-red action on oxidative phosphorylation. GORDON SA, SURREY K. Apr 1960, Radiat Res,Vol. 12, pp. 325-339.47. Influence of Light on Phosphate Metabolism in Lettuce Seed: Spectral Response Red, Far-RedInteraction. Surrey K, Gordon SA. 3, May 1962, Plant Physiol, Vol. 37, pp. 327-332. 38
  • 40. 48. Modification of the intrinsic fluorescence and the biochemical behavior of ATP after irradiation withvisible and near-infrared laser light. Amat A, Rigau J, Waynant RW, Ilev IK, Tomas J, Anders JJ. 1, Oct 3,2005, Photochem Photobiol, Vol. 81, pp. 26-32.49. Low-level laser therapy: a useful technique for enhancing the proliferation of various cultured cells.Alghamdi KM, Kumar A, Moussa NA. Jan 2011, Lasers Med Sci, Vol. 28.50. Primary and secondary mechanisms of action of visible to near-IR radiation on cells. T, Karu. 1, Mar1999, Photochem Photobiol, Vol. 49, pp. 1-17.51. quantum yield map for synthetic eumelanin. Nighswander-Rempel SP, Riesz J, Gilmore J, MeredithP. A. 123, Nov 2005, Chem Phys, Vol. 15, p. 194901.52. The Oregon Medical Laser Center spectral database.Center, Oregon Medical Laser. Oregon MedicalLaser Center. [Online] 2011. [Cited: June 26, 2011.]http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/hemoglobin/summary.html .53. Fibroblasts proliferation and light—a non linear interaction. Lubart, R., Friedmann, H., Peled, I., andGrossman, N. 1993, Lasers Surg. Med, Vol. 9, p. 143.54. Biostimulatory windows in low-intensity laser activation: lasers, scanners, and NASAs light-emittingdiode array system. Sommer AP, Pinheiro AL, Mester AR, Franke RP, Whelan HT. 1, Feb 2001, Clin LaserMed Surg, Vol. 19, pp. 29-33.55. Low-intensity near-infrared laser radiation-induced changes of acetylcholinesterase activity of humanerythrocytes. Kujawa J, Zavodnik L, Zavodnik I, Bryszewska M. 6, Dec 2003, J Clin Laser Med Surg, Vol.21, pp. 351-355.56. Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy. Huang YY, Chen AC, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. 4, Sep1, 2009, Dose Response, Vol. 7, pp. 358-383.57. Optical - Thermal Response of Laser Irradiated tissue. WF, Cheong. [ed.] Welch AJ and Gemert MJC.s.l. : Plenum Press, 1995, Appendix to Chapter 8, pp. 275-303.58. Effect of pulsing in low-level light therapy. Hashmi JT, Huang YY, Sharma SK, Kurup DB, De TaboadaL, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. 6, Aug 2010, Lasers Surg Med, Vol. 42, pp. 450-466.59. The importance of pulsing illumination parameters in LLLT. D., Barolet. [ed.] SPIE. 2011. Vols. 755203-1-8.60. Contribution of phototherapy to the treatment of episiotomies. Kymplova J, Navratil L, Knizek J. 1,2003, Clin Laser Med Surg, Vol. 21, pp. 35–39.61. Pulsing influences photoradiation outcomes in cell culture. Brondon P., Stadler I., Lanzafame R.J. 3,2009, Lasers Surg. Med, Vol. 41, pp. 222-226. 39
  • 41. 62. Regulation of Skin Collagen Metabolism In Vitro Using a Pulsed 660 nm LED Light Source: ClinicalCorrelation with a Single-Blinded Study. Barolet D., Roberge C.J., Auger F.A., Boucher A., Germain L. 12,2009, Invest. Dermatol, Vol. 129, pp. 2751-2759.63. Importance of pulsing illumination parameters in low-level-light therapy. Barolet D, Duplay P,Jacomy H, Auclair M. 4, Jul 2010, Biomed Opt, Vol. 15.64. Transcranial near infrared laser treatment (NILT) increases cortical adenosine-5-triphosphate (ATP)content following embolic strokes in rabbits. Lapchak PA, De Taboada L. Jan 8, 2010, Brain Res, Vol.1306, pp. 100-105.65. The importance of the coherency. L, Hode. 4, Aug 2005, Photomed Laser Surg, Vol. 23, pp. 431-434.66. Effect of pulsing in low-level light therapy. Hashmi JT, Huang YY, Sharma SK, Kurup DB, De TaboadaL, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. 6, Aug 2010, Lasers Surg Med, Vol. 42, pp. 450-466.67. Improving the therapeutic window of retinal photocoagulation by spatial and. Sramek C, Leung LS,Leng T, Brown J, Paulus YM, Schuele G, Palanker D. 2, Feb 2011, Biomed Opt, Vol. 16.68. Design and testing of low intensity laser biostimulator. Valchinov ES, Pallikarakis NE. 1, 2005,Biomed Eng Online, Vol. 4, p. 5.69. Effects of power densities, continuous and pulse frequencies, and number of sessions of low-levellaser therapy on intact rat brain. Ilic S, Leichliter S, Streeter J, Oron A, DeTaboada L, Oron U. 4, 2006,Photomed Laser Surg , Vol. 24, pp. 458–466.70. The wave packet: An action potential for the 21st century. WJ, Freeman. 1, Integr Neurosci, Vol. 2,pp. 3-30.71. Low pulse energy Nd:YAG laser irradiation exerts a. Chellini F, Sassoli C, Nosi D, Deledda C, Tonelli P,Zecchi-Orlandini S,. 6, Aug 2010, Lasers Surg Med, Vol. 42, pp. 527-539.72. Kinetics of Mg2þ unblock of NMDA receptors: Implications for spiketiming dependent synapticplasticity. Kampa BM, Clements J, Jonas P, Stuart GJ. 2004, Physiol, Vol. 556, pp. 337–345.73. History-dependent multipletime- scale dynamics in a single-neuron model. Gilboa G, Chen R, BrennerN. 28, 2005, Neurosci, Vol. 25, pp. 6479–6489.74. 830nm laser irradiation induces varicosity formation, reduces mitochondrial membrane potential andblocks fast axonal flow in small and medium diameter rat dorsal root ganglion neurons: Implications forthe analgesic effects of 830nm laser. Chow RT, David MA, Armati PJ. 1, 2007, Peripher Nerv Syst, Vol.12, pp. 28-39.75. Mitochondrial signaling in mammalian cells activated by red and near-IR radiation. Karu, TI. 5, Sep-Oct 2008, Photochem Photobiol, Vol. 84, pp. 1091-1099.76. Estimation of the optimal wavelengths for laser-induced wound healing. Ankri R, Lubart R,Taitelbaum H. 8, Oct 2010, Lasers Surg Med, Vol. 42, pp. 760-764. 40
  • 42. 77. Effects of 660 and 780 nm low-level laser therapy on neuromuscular recovery after crush injury in ratsciatic nerve. Gigo-Benato D, Russo TL, Tanaka EH, Assis L, Salvini TF, Parizotto NA. 9, Nov 2010, LasersSurg Med, Vol. 42, pp. 673-682.78. Carpal tunnel syndrome pain treated with low-level laser and microamperes transcutaneous electricnerve stimulation: A controlled study. Naeser MA, Hahn KA, Lieberman BE, Branco KF. 7, 2002, ArchPhys Med Rehabil , Vol. 83, pp. 978–988.79. Diode laser in cervical myofascial pain: A double blind study versus placebo. Ceccherelli F, Altafini L,Lo Castro G, Avila A, Ambrosio F, Giron GP. 4, 1989, Clin J Pain, Vol. 5, pp. 301–304.80. Philadelphia Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Selected RehabilitationInterventions for Knee Pain. The Philadelphia Panel. 2001, Physical Therapy, Vol. 81, pp. 1675-1700.81. Low-intensity light therapy: exploring the role of redox mechanisms. Tafur J, Mills PJ. 4, Aug 2008,Photomed Laser Surg, Vol. 26, pp. 323-328.82. —. Tafur J, Mills PJ. 4, Aug 2008, Photomed Laser Surg, Vol. 26.83. Biophoton detection and low-intensity light therapy: a potential clinical partnership. Tafur J, VanWijk EP, Van Wijk R, Mills PJ. 1, Feb 2010, Photomed Laser Surg, Vol. 28, pp. 23-30.84. Therapeutic photobiomodulation: nitric oxide and a novel function of mitochondrial cytochrome coxidase. Poyton RO, Ball KA. 57, feb 2011, Discov Med, Vol. 11, pp. 154-159.85. Mitochondrial respiratorychain diseases. Schon, S. DiMauro and E. A. 26, 2003, The New EnglandJournal of Medicine, Vol. 348, pp. 2656–2668.86. Proteomics of mitochondrial inner and outer membranes. Distler AM, Kerner J, Hoppel CL. 19, Oct2008, Proteomics, Vol. 8, pp. 4066-4082.87. A novel mitochondrial signaling pathway activated by visible-to-near infrared radiation. PhotochemPhotobiol. Karu TI, Pyatibrat LV, Afanasyeva NI. 2, Sep-Oct 2004, Vol. 80, pp. 366-372.88. Light supports neurone outgrowth of human neural progenitor cells in vitro: the role of P2Y receptors.Anders, J.J., Romanczyk, T.B., Ilev, I.K., et al. [ed.] IEEE. Select. Topics Quant Electr. Vol. 14, pp. 118–125.89. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation.Anderson RR, Parrish JA. 198, Science.90. —. Anderson RR, Parrish JA. 220, Apr 29, 1983, Science, Vol. 29, pp. 524-527.91. Mechanisms of Low Level Light Therapy. T.N, Hamblin M.R and Demidova. [ed.] SPIE. 2006. Vol.614001. 41
  • 43. 92. 660 AsGaAl Laser to Alleviate Pain Caused by Cryosurgical Treatment of Oral Leukoplakia: APreliminary Study. Ribeiro AS, de Aguiar MC, do Carmo MA, de Abreu MH, Silva TA, Mesquita RA. 5,May 2011, Photomed Laser Surg, Vol. 29, pp. 345-350.93. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) acts as cAMP-elevating agent in acute respiratory distress syndrome.de Lima FM, Moreira LM, Villaverde AB, Albertini R, Castro-Faria-Neto HC, Aimbire F. 3, May 2011,Lasers Med Sci, Vol. 26, pp. 389-400.94. Laser photobiostimulation of wound healing: defining a dose response for splinted wounds in diabeticmice. Chung TY, Peplow PV, Baxter GD. 9, Nov 210, Lasers Surg Med, Vol. 42, pp. 656-664.95. The prevention of induced oral mucositis with low-level laser therapy in bone marrow transplantationpatients: a randomized clinical trial. Silva GB, Mendonça EF, Bariani C, Antunes HS, Silva MA. 1, Jan2011, Photomed Laser Surg, Vol. 29, pp. 27-31.96. Influence of laser photobiomodulation on collagen IV during skeletal muscle tissue remodeling afterinjury in rats. Baptista J, Martins MD, Pavesi VC, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KP, Pinto Júnior Ddos S,Ferrari RA. 1, Jan 2011, Photomed Laser Surg, Vol. 29, pp. 11-17.97. Effects of low-level laser therapy on collagen expression and neutrophil infiltrate in 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis in hamsters. Lopes NN, Plapler H, Lalla RV, Chavantes MC, Yoshimura EM, daSilva MA, Alves MT. 6, Aug 2010, Lasers Surg Med, Vol. 42, pp. 546-552.98. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) attenuates RhoA mRNA expression in the rat bronchi smooth muscleexposed to tumor necrosis factor-alpha. de Lima FM, Bjordal JM, Albertini R, Santos FV, Aimbire F. 5,Sep 2010, Lasers Med Sci, Vol. 25, pp. 661-668.99. Influence of ingaalp laser (660nm) on the healing of skin wounds in diabetic rats. Carvalho Pde T,Silva IS, Reis FA, Perreira DM, Aydos RD. 1, Feb 2010, Acta Cir Bras, Vol. 25, pp. 71-79.100. The effect of low-level laser irradiation (In-Ga-Al-AsP – 660 nm) on melanoma in vitro and in vivo.Frigo L, Luppi JS, Favero GM, Maria DA, Penna SC, Bjordal JM, Bensadoun RJ,Lopes-Martins RA. 9, Nov2009, BMC Cancer, Vol. 20, p. 404.101. Laser photobiomodulation of wound healing in diabetic and non-diabetic mice: effects in splintedand unsplinted wounds. Chung TY, Peplow PV, Baxter GD. 9, Apr 2010, Photomed Laser Surg, Vol. 20,pp. 251-261.102. Low-level laser therapy for acute neck pain with radiculopathy: a double-blind placebo-controlledrandomized study. Konstantinovic LM, Cutovic MR, Milovanovic AN, Jovic SJ, Dragin AS, Letic MDj,Miler VM. 8, Aug 2010, Pain Med, Vol. 11, pp. 1169-1178. 42
  • 44. 102-29 Gervais Drive, Toronto, Ontario, M3C 1Y9 Canada tel 416.447.8455 toll free 1.866.843.5273 fax 416.447.3020 www.theralase.com Copyright Theralase Inc. 2011