SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 8
Download to read offline
Appellate Court Upholds
$1,250,000 Pain and
Suffering Verdict in
Wrist Injury Case
By John Hochfelder on March 31, 2013 Posted in
Wrist Injuries
On June 4, 2008 at about 11:30 p.m., Drucilla
Alfonso was crossing the intersection at 39th
Street and Third Avenue in Manhattan, in the
crosswalk, when she was struck by a left turning
city bus. The force of the impact spun her
around, causing her to fall to the ground.




 39th Street at Third Avenue in Manhattan
Alfonso, 52 years old, was taken by ambulance
to the local hospital where she was diagnosed
with a right (dominant) distal radius fracture (a
broken wrist) that was casted initially but
required open reduction internal fixation
surgery two weeks later.




        Bones of the Wrist and Hand
In her ensuing lawsuit, the bus driver was found
    fully at fault and a Manhattan jury awarded Ms.
    Alfonso pain and suffering damages in the sum
    of $1,250,000 ($450,000 past – three years,
    $800,000 future – 27 years).
    On appeal, the defendants challenged only
    the amount of the award, claiming it was
    excessive; however, the entire award has been
    affirmed in Alfonso v. Metropolitan Transit
    Authority (1st Dept. 2013).


    Here are the wrist injury details:
•   comminuted intra-articular fracture of the distal
    radial metaphysis with dorsal angulation of the
    distal fracture fragment
•   open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of wrist
    fracture with 11 screws drilled into and through
    the bones and insertion of a metal plate to
    anchor the screws
•   follow-up wrist treatment twice a week for three
    months
•   unable to return to work until 10 months after
    the accident
•   constant pain and diminished grip strength
Post-ORIF Surgery
•   Plaintiff also claimed other injuries caused by
    the accident:
•   right shoulder pain requiring there months of
    outpatient hospital treatment with permanent
    limitations of range of motion
•   aggravation of cervical herniated disc at C5-6

    The defendants urged that plaintiff made only a
    half-hearted attempt to link the herniation and
    shoulder claims to the accident trauma and
    that her case should stand or fall on the wrist
    injury and nothing more.

    The defendants argued, unsuccessfully, that the
    pain and suffering award of $1,250,000
    “exceeds by a factor of at least two an amount
    that qualifies as reasonable compensation.”
•   As to the wrist, they noted that plaintiff
    underwent only one surgery and would not
    need another, she ceased all medical
    treatment well over a year before trial and she
    was able to return to her job that included
    typing less than a year after the accident.
•   As to the shoulder, any pain or mild limitations
    were simply a byproduct of the wrist injury.
•   As to the neck, plaintiff made no allegations in
    her bill of particulars dated October 13, 2008;
    she first alleged this injury in her supplemental
    bill of particulars in November 2009. Also,
    plaintiff made no mention of neck pain in her
    testimony and her attorney made no mention
    of this injury in either his opening or closing
    statement.
•   The parties agreed with the appellate court
    that the decisions in three prior cases are
    relevant and instructive in determining the
    propriety of the amount of the pain and
    suffering award in this case.
All three involve distal radius fractures requiring
    one or more surgeries.
•   Diouf v. New York City Transit Authority (1st
    Dept. 2010) – $1,000,000 for 55 year old man
    with bilateral fractures (discussed by us
    previously, here)
•   Hayes v. Normandie LLC (1st Dept. 2003) –
    $985,000 for 57 year old man
•   Cabezas v. City of New York (1st Dept. 2003) –
    $900,000 for 50 year old man




                  POSTED BY ATTORNEY RENE G. GARCIA:

    For more information:- Some of our clients have
    suffered this kind of injuries due to a serious accident.
    The Garcia Law Firm, P.C. was able to successfully
    handle these types of cases. For a free consultation
    please call us at 1-866- SCAFFOLD or 212-725-1313.

           http://www.newyorkinjurycasesblog.com/

More Related Content

More from THE GARCIA LAW FIRM, P.C. (6)

Facial trauma
Facial traumaFacial trauma
Facial trauma
 
Spinal disc herniation
Spinal disc herniationSpinal disc herniation
Spinal disc herniation
 
New no fault regulations to take effect april 1
New no fault regulations to take effect april 1New no fault regulations to take effect april 1
New no fault regulations to take effect april 1
 
Traumatic brain injury
Traumatic brain injuryTraumatic brain injury
Traumatic brain injury
 
Overview of hand surgery
Overview of hand surgeryOverview of hand surgery
Overview of hand surgery
 
Occupational asthma
Occupational asthmaOccupational asthma
Occupational asthma
 

Appellate court upholds $1,250,000 pain and suffering

  • 1. Appellate Court Upholds $1,250,000 Pain and Suffering Verdict in Wrist Injury Case
  • 2. By John Hochfelder on March 31, 2013 Posted in Wrist Injuries On June 4, 2008 at about 11:30 p.m., Drucilla Alfonso was crossing the intersection at 39th Street and Third Avenue in Manhattan, in the crosswalk, when she was struck by a left turning city bus. The force of the impact spun her around, causing her to fall to the ground. 39th Street at Third Avenue in Manhattan
  • 3. Alfonso, 52 years old, was taken by ambulance to the local hospital where she was diagnosed with a right (dominant) distal radius fracture (a broken wrist) that was casted initially but required open reduction internal fixation surgery two weeks later. Bones of the Wrist and Hand
  • 4. In her ensuing lawsuit, the bus driver was found fully at fault and a Manhattan jury awarded Ms. Alfonso pain and suffering damages in the sum of $1,250,000 ($450,000 past – three years, $800,000 future – 27 years). On appeal, the defendants challenged only the amount of the award, claiming it was excessive; however, the entire award has been affirmed in Alfonso v. Metropolitan Transit Authority (1st Dept. 2013). Here are the wrist injury details: • comminuted intra-articular fracture of the distal radial metaphysis with dorsal angulation of the distal fracture fragment • open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of wrist fracture with 11 screws drilled into and through the bones and insertion of a metal plate to anchor the screws
  • 5. follow-up wrist treatment twice a week for three months • unable to return to work until 10 months after the accident • constant pain and diminished grip strength
  • 6. Post-ORIF Surgery • Plaintiff also claimed other injuries caused by the accident: • right shoulder pain requiring there months of outpatient hospital treatment with permanent limitations of range of motion • aggravation of cervical herniated disc at C5-6 The defendants urged that plaintiff made only a half-hearted attempt to link the herniation and shoulder claims to the accident trauma and that her case should stand or fall on the wrist injury and nothing more. The defendants argued, unsuccessfully, that the pain and suffering award of $1,250,000 “exceeds by a factor of at least two an amount that qualifies as reasonable compensation.”
  • 7. As to the wrist, they noted that plaintiff underwent only one surgery and would not need another, she ceased all medical treatment well over a year before trial and she was able to return to her job that included typing less than a year after the accident. • As to the shoulder, any pain or mild limitations were simply a byproduct of the wrist injury. • As to the neck, plaintiff made no allegations in her bill of particulars dated October 13, 2008; she first alleged this injury in her supplemental bill of particulars in November 2009. Also, plaintiff made no mention of neck pain in her testimony and her attorney made no mention of this injury in either his opening or closing statement. • The parties agreed with the appellate court that the decisions in three prior cases are relevant and instructive in determining the propriety of the amount of the pain and suffering award in this case.
  • 8. All three involve distal radius fractures requiring one or more surgeries. • Diouf v. New York City Transit Authority (1st Dept. 2010) – $1,000,000 for 55 year old man with bilateral fractures (discussed by us previously, here) • Hayes v. Normandie LLC (1st Dept. 2003) – $985,000 for 57 year old man • Cabezas v. City of New York (1st Dept. 2003) – $900,000 for 50 year old man POSTED BY ATTORNEY RENE G. GARCIA: For more information:- Some of our clients have suffered this kind of injuries due to a serious accident. The Garcia Law Firm, P.C. was able to successfully handle these types of cases. For a free consultation please call us at 1-866- SCAFFOLD or 212-725-1313. http://www.newyorkinjurycasesblog.com/