Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
The rauhauser emails
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.


Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

The rauhauser emails



  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. June 29, 2011from neal rauhauser nrauhauser@gmail.comto Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:28 PMsubject Researching Weiner stalking, not interested in youJennifer,So, I am researching the Weiner stalking, I have a short list of people I know were involved, afew more that I think were involved, and I might spend another month or three watching andgathering info. Youre not on my list at all. I do like Ginger Lee, Meagan Broussard, Mike Stack,and I think I know where to find the person who posed as Dan Wolfe.I see this tiresome Stranahan fellow bothering you, and maybe this Patterico creature would liketo get into the act, too. Sorry to hear youre facing this - they pulled something similar toWeinergate with me last fall, but Im not a big fish like Weiner so it didnt go anywhere. But thatswhy I take this stuff so seriously.Maybe youve been told things that would help me solve the puzzle. Feel free to whisper in myear if thats the case, either from this one or anonymously - my email is quite public. If youresick of it all and just want it to stop I can understand that, too ...Neal RauhauserPasted from <> Jun 29, 2011 Page 1
  • 2. October 31, 2011From: Qritiq <>To: mscart2000@yahoo.comSent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:46 PMSubject: nealHi Mike -Neal keeps telling me that he is not the one that is gunning for you. He says the people who are againstyou are women youve tangled with on the internet in the past.In an email to me he said: Youve got my email, youve got a path to Mike. Have him drop me a note. All I can do is give him an email for an FBI Intelligence Analyst I like ...His email is From: Mike Stack <> To: Qritiq <> Sent: Mon, Oct 31, 2011 5:29 pm Subject: Re: neal Tell him no dice. Tell him Lulz. Oct 31, 2011 Page 2
  • 3. November 23, 2011----- Forwarded Message -----From: Ron Brynaert <>To: "" <>Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 1:30 PMSubject: Fw: Dang! Another zinger about Seth Allen!!i dont think i have any of his pages saved...From: Gaped Crusader <>To:;; nwoisevil@yahoo.comSent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 4:36 PMSubject: Dang! Another zinger about Seth Allen!! On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Ron Brynaert <> wrote: And youre trolling me, too? Why? and bullshit i read your posts and recognize your language..its definitely you, neal Nov 23, 2011 Page 3
  • 4. November 23, 2011 (b)From: Gaped Crusader <>To: Ron Brynaert <>;; struth40@yahoo.comSent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 7:08 PMSubject: Re: Dang! Another zinger about Seth Allen!! Nah, dude, Im just trolling Seth over there - hes a real moron who cant keep his mouth shut. And Im trolling Patterico. And Mandy Nagy. And Aaron Barr. And Thomas Ryan. And that th3j35t3r faggot. And anyone else I can think of. Its just how I role.From: Gaped Crusader <>To: Ron Brynaert <>;; nwoisevil@yahoo.comSent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 10:43 AMSubject: Re: Dang! Another zinger about Seth Allen!! Oh, except for the ones that are Darrah. On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Ron Brynaert <> wrote: If this isnt neal then please fix all your blog posts so it doesnt falsely portray me as being on Team Neal Rauhauser out to get Patterico...which is a complete distortion of five months of work that youre liberally drawing from.... Nov 23, 2011-b Page 4
  • 5. November 24, 2011From: Gaped Crusader <>Date: November 24, 2011 11:20:57 AM ESTTo: mscart2000@yahoo.comSubject: The Great Mike Stack follower purgeMike, We see youre making an attempt to tidy up - only following 200? And just 1,100 of those preciousfollowers left? Keep hunting, we still see you :-) Oh, and we keep good records, see who you interactwith, so get all your associates to go private and kick out most of their contacts, too. We mean, attemptthis, and learn that its futile. Once youre done with that, go to a friends house then download and burn a copy of a CD bootableoperating system. Go home, rip the hard drive out of your machine, and get used to working in a safeenvironment. Might as well switch ISP while youre at it, and really make a clean break. In fact, maybe you ought to just go back to porn? Youve got ZAPEM out there, insulting and menacingevery anon she sees, and she can stop now, because the attention she was craving has arrived. Like the blogspot? Picking up on the writing styles of the contributors? Wonder why it popped up justas ZAPEM starting making new acquaintances? Mmmm targeting info mmmm. No! Wait! Its justinvestigative journalism, our bad, please forgive. GC Nov 24, 2011 Page 5
  • 6. November 26, 2011On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Gaped Crusader <> wrote: Lane, If you get tired of Patterico whinging but you dont want to call him yourself you can just makearrangements and then hand the duty off to us. There are a couple of women tracking this situation whocould do a passable job of posing as you, right down to presenting your phone number on his caller ID.They stick around because they really despise Mike Stack & Sean Tompkins, but theyre up for other funif its in the general vicinity. Hell, we might as well make a group thing out of it - invite the people on the cc: line and have a nice,honest discussion about pornography, and sexual addiction, and obsessive/compulsive stalkingbehavior, and lame entrapment attempts, and phone number spoofing, and computer intrusion, andmail/wire/IRS fraud, and phone taps, and probation violations. It could turn into a real party. Im gettingwet just thinking about it. Let us know your mind on this matter. Sooner or later someone reading Google Alerts for Kamala Harrisor Steve Cooley will notice, then the lulz will begin, unless this email and the follow up phone calls gettheir attention first. -GC & Co., LLPLeapin Lizard Practice, of course ... Nov 26, 2011-a Page 6
  • 7. November 26, 2011 (b)From: Gaped Crusader <>Date: Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:11 PMSubject: Re: Lane Lipton/Deputy D.A. John Patrick Frey phone callTo: Liberty Chick <>Cc:,Oh, Mandy, youre so cute when you whine about getting a little of your own medicine.File a lawsuit.Get the IP address used to access this account. Attempt to get enough information from the VPN provider to find the domestic IP address behind this. Cross your fingers the source IP address actually adds up to the person you want to find, as opposed toa coffee shop or a carelessly configured AP owned by a neighbor. Finally nail down what you think is the source, 15 day clock starts on subpoena to reveal their name. Ut oh, endless evidence that will quickly convince a judge to toss your subpoena request. Try another approach, call the FBI!! Oh, wait, close associates going around attempting to intimidate a bunch of Anonymous accounts?Long history of cyberstalking conduct from those around you? Whoa ... no interest at all. Free speech is a marvel, isnt it? When some group is annoying enough, and they stay with it longenough, eventually some virulent counter to their behavior comes along and theres just nothing to bedone about it. Nov 26, 2011-b Page 7
  • 8. November 26, 2011 (c)On Nov 26, 2011, at 9:42 PM, Gaped Crusader <> wrote: Mike, So, six months on, youre saying that stalking a U.S. Congressman and helping to fabricate teenage sexting contacts has turned out to be a really bad idea? It is a little different than those scared girls trying to get out of porn that you used to stalk, right? The whole "I was an innocent victim of Dan Wole" schtick would be more believable if it werent for half a dozen of them whove come forward to describe their experiences with you. The initial process of following and harassing Congressman Weiner was probably a familiar, comfortable thing for you. The follow on, where you learn that a man who can raise $1.3M from individual contributors has a lot of people who will come looking for anyone who harms him, thats quite a bit different, eh? James OKeefe, having burned his own ability to do things, has been pushing the idea that others should engage in the sort of fabrication he did.Youve been taken for the first of a new wave of that sort of conduct, and youre being made an example for any other potential imitators. You did not expect us. Thats understandable. Yet here we are, and these things will continue until we reach the desired conclusion. -GC On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Michael Stack <> wrote: And please remove me from your list . This and your other email to me were unsolicited and harassing Nov 26, 2011-c Page 8
  • 9. November 26, 2012 (d)From: Gaped Crusader <>To: Michael Stack <>Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:16 PMSubject: Re: Lane Lipton/Deputy D.A. John Patrick Frey phone callWho?On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Michael Stack <> wrote:NealBe a man and give me a buzzAnd block your number like Id expect you to. Nov 26, 2011-d Page 9
  • 10. November 26, 2012 (e)On Nov 26, 2011, at 9:52 PM, Gaped Crusader <> wrote: Anthony Weiner probably said much the same thing at one point, eh? Between you and me, the only real solution to situations like this is to delete every bit of online presence you have and just disappear for a year or so. Many of us have this experience early on in our careers and those who are sloppy or aggressive get to start over more than once. I had to disappear in 1994, 1998 and again in 2005. The things that are important to you, and how you conduct yourself are simply too noticeable. You probably wont be able to go back into porn or continue doing anything political - youre a permanent lightning rod in those spaces. Those women hate you, theyre pushing information on you to guys like me, and everyone around Breitbart is just as radioactive as you right now. Maybe its a message from the great beyond - get off pr0n, go to sex addicts anonymous meetings and clean yourself up? On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Michael Stack <> wrote: Do you not understand to stop emailing? Nov 26, 2012-e Page 10
  • 11. November 26, 2011 (f)From: Gaped Crusader <>To: Michael Stack <>Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:11 PMSubject: Re: Lane Lipton/Deputy D.A. John Patrick Frey phone call So block this account, or just ignore it when you get something. Meanwhile, the Gaped Crusader blog, run by a bunch of enormous assholes, will continue its sacred,fulfilling work.On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Michael Stack <> wrote:Ive asked you to stop emailing ne Nov 26, 2011-f Page 11
  • 12. November 26, 2012 (g)From: Gaped Crusader <>To: Michael Stack <>Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 10:15 PMSubject: Re: Lane Lipton/Deputy D.A. John Patrick Frey phone call A puzzling response for someone who doesnt want any more email. Doesnt Yahoo give you somefiltering ability? If I didnt want to read you any more it would take two minutes to permanently banishyou. On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Michael Stack <> wrote: Too late. Nov 26, 2012-g Page 12
  • 13. December 16, 2011From: neal rauhauser <>To: mscart2000@yahoo.comSent: Friday, December 16, 2011 8:25 PMSubject: Cease & DesistMike, Your efforts on CryingWolfe are laughable and will pretty quickly result in a defamation suit. You arenot particularly bright, you mimic things I do without the benefit of my life experience or access to alawyer, you have no idea where I work or what I really do, and all youre accomplishing is setting yourselfup for the same experiences Seth Allen is having. Knock it off. 202-642-1717Attachment: Mike-Stack-CD.pdf Dec 16, 2011-a Page 13
  • 14. December 16, 2011 (b)Attachment: Mike-Stack-CD.pdfMike Stack30 Mallard Court,Three Bridges, NJ08887Mscart200@yahoo.comMr Stack,I am writing you regarding your defamation of me on yourCryingWolfe blog.Specifically:• I have no involvement in PornWikileaks and in fact had noconnection to pornography at all until I began receivinginformation on your history of cyberstalking from severalwomen who have left the industry.• The Chicago phone number you insinuate is mine, 773-449-5041, is a cruiser promotion telemarketer, which you could havedetermined with a simple Google search.• I am not the owner of the @AnonyOps Twitter account, I do notemploy the person behind it, nor do I know their name.Mentioning my name alongside a Congressman’s name will indeedgenerate a Google Alerts for their staff, but your involvement inwhat happened to Congressman Weiner is already widely known.All this accomplishes is positioning me to further school you inminding your own business.Your statements about me rise to the level of defamation and couldwell result in legal action if they continue.Neal Rauhauser Dec 16, 2011-b Page 14
  • 15. December 17, 2011From: neal rauhauser <>To: mscart2000@yahoo.comSent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:08 PMSubject: FYI DMCA takedown notice for private photosMike, I filed a complaint with Wordpress over your use of my private image. Do not post my personalimages. 202-642-1717 Dec 17, 2011 Page 15
  • 16. December 30, 2012From: gapedcrusader <>To:;; Ron Brynaert <>;Michael Stack <>Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 12:41 AMSubject: You guys are SO getting press coverageThis is really funny, keep going until some reporters notice!!! Dec 30, 2011 Page 16
  • 17. December 31, 2011From: Liberty Chick <>To: Mike Stack <>Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 6:55 PMSubject: Fwd: Lane Lipton/Deputy D.A. John Patrick Frey phone callBut you can use the rest if you want to for anything.---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Liberty Chick <>Date: Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:50 PMSubject: Re: Lane Lipton/Deputy D.A. John Patrick Frey phone callTo: Gaped Crusader <>Oh, I see, the "protectors of free speech" are targeting me simply because of the location on which Iexercise my free speech. How quaint.Well, seeing as how youve indicated that facts dont matter, only perception does, and warned me that"the world is going to act on that basis," then I guess were done here.PS - do you have any idea how ridiculous all that sounds? Zetas? Cartel? Anons? Right, Im *just* theperson everyone should fear and come after. Get a grip. Seriously man.Lucky for you I have a sense of humor. Dec 31, 2011-a Page 17
  • 18. December 31, 2011 (b)On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Gaped Crusader <> wrote: Seriously, **what the fuck** are you talking about? Whatever you think it is Ive done, take it to the police. File criminal charges. Then I get to present my evidence that I did NOTHING, NONE OF THE THINGS you accuse me of Did you read the blog? ZAPEM ran around trying to intimidate various Anonymous accounts, ThomasRyan tries to get the Zetas cartel to attack Barrett Brown, hes associated with Aaron Barr, public enemy#1 for anons, and then jester gets involved. And youre right in the middle of it all. Facts dont matter,thats the perception of the situation, and the world is going to act on that basis. Id say Im flattered, but really Im just always befuddled by your snuff tin conspiracies. I wrote an article last October. It somehow was coincidentally timed with something that you apparently deemed important - Ive yet to understand what. So Kimberlin sues a blogger I never knew, never used as a source (if youd read my article, youd see, there is no "source"). The blogger contacts me months later because he thinks he might be being sued and wants to know if I am too - wants to know who my lawyer is if I am. I wasnt being sued, so I gave him some suggestions and he went away. Months later, I see you guys harassing him for no reason about Weinergate, so I start to try and figure out why. In the process, I got to know Seth a little better, and I talk to him from time to time. I never realized any of that was a crime? Seriously, I honestly dont get what the fuck you lunatics think is going on here. Has it ever occurred to you that the people youre harassing have done none of the things youre fantasizing in your head? You dont get to practice vigilante justice, society doesnt work that way. You need evidence. Youll never have that because what you think Ive done just simply isnt true. Its just NOT. And I have plenty of evidence to prove that its not. You mean evidence like James OKeefe produced for ACORN? Or NPR? Youre not really in a position tocomplain, given whom you associate with, you do realize this, right? So please, turn what you have into the police. Because at this point, I would welcome it - any chance for intelligent human beings to hear my side of the story. Since you never once have ever, ever asked to hear my side. Never. Not once. Nobody with a badge gives a shit about any of this. Its nearly impossible to untangle who does whatwhen its rummies like Seth Allen and things are quiet. Were not at all like anything youve ever facedbefore, and there are plenty of other things that need attention right now. Youre always equating yourself to a protector of free speech. You act just like the Nazis who imprisoned some of my extended family members in a Polish prison camp, and then in Iran. Thats far from protecting free speech. A curious assertion from someone who writes on BigGovernment, a textbook smear/propagandaoutlet. Dec 31, 2011-b Page 18
  • 19. January 24, 2012---------- Forwarded message ----------To: Mike Stack <>From: neal rauhauser <>Date: Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:51 AMSubject: Foolish MovesTo: aaronjw72 <>Interesting timing here from your proxy. to draw attention. they did so. Jan 24, 2012-a Page 19
  • 20. January 24, 2012 (b)!/BarrettBrownLOL/status/159803031406391296!/AnonyOps/status/159800659540062210 Jan 24, 2012-b Page 20
  • 21. February 8, 2012From: neal rauhauser <>To: Michael Stack <>Cc: Ron Brynaert <>Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1:20 PMSubject: kook moves, full of fail Sorry bro, Mark Rasch aint my attorney, and I publicly resigned from Project Vigilant over ayear ago. But by trying to serve me at his office you get them interested in you, and they saw theKookpocalypse docs maybe ten days before the world did. Standing next to Tom Ryan is likegolfing in a thunderstorm - if Anonymous doesnt get him all those spooks he pissed off withRobin Sage will. The world is full of nutters who worry the CIA or NSA is after them, and there you go, pokingyour dick into a nest of retired intel peeps that were already interested in Ryan. Thats gotta begood for some kind of kook lifetime achievement award - youre one of the few who mightactually experience such excitement. Aaron went into court in Rockville today to argue his peace orders - one for him from BrettKimberlin, one aimed at me. The judge continued mine - Aaron has no idea how to serve me, soits a dead issue by next Thursday. Then he pretty much cut his own throat right there in court -claimed he thought Brett Kimberlins iPad was a bomb, claimed he didnt assault him, called adeputy as a witness and the deputy said "Yeah, he assaulted him, we stopped it." He was literallycrying about losing his law license - no need to take my word, Ill torrent a PDF of the minutes,the audio, and Ill pull out the juicy clips so theyre easy to find. The Kookpocalypse was not an event on Monday, February 6th, it is a process, carefullyplanned in secret (conspiracy!!!), delivered at the time and place and in the manner of ourchoosing. Please give ZAPEM my regards, I would hate for her to think shes been left out of thefun, its just not quite the right time 202-642-1717Attachments: Aaron Walker Peace Order.pdf Feb 8, 2012-a Page 21
  • 22. February 8, 2012 (b)Attachments: Aaron Walker Peace Order.pdf Feb 8, 2012-b Page 22
  • 23. May 19, 2012From: Qritiq <>To: mscart2012@yahoo.comSent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 9:02 PMSubject: your favorite subject: Nealhey mike -Neal told me hed like to come to an agreement with you - he wants to take down every bad thing he saidabout you, if you would reciprocate. And he said hed publicly appeal to Progressives to stop hasslingyou. I think when he saw you in person, he realized youre not the zealot he thought you were.I know its Neal, but I do think he is being sincere. About this anyway.he also said something about Nadia being amenable to adding you to her case against Frey, if that wouldbe something you are interested in. (But they havent asked the lawyer yet if they can.) Something toconsider perhaps. I havent had all that much contact with her, but she seems like a nice girl to me.anyway - you may want to think about it and contact neal to see what he proposes re a truce. Or if youdprefer that i relay a message to him, of course thats fine.It seems like a good idea to me - you have enough going on without having to battle neal. But of courseits understandable if youre not exactly in the mood to be nice to him.hope you are not too stressed and enjoying the weekend - I love May weather Re: your favorite subject: Neal May 19, 2012 10:09 PM From: Mike Stack "Mike Stack" <>; To: Qritiq "Qritiq" <> Thanks for passing the message on.... Im definitely enjoying the weekend, tanning and blogging. Thanks for the support and Ill sleep and ponder on what you just wrote about. Mike Sent from my iPhone May 19, 2012 Page 23
  • 24. May 23, 2012neal-stuff May 23, 2012 1:39 PMFrom: Qritiq "Qritiq" <>;To: mscart2012Hey Mike -guess you know Aaron skipped court. Sounds like judge not so happy about that.I think Neal actually does have a pal in FBI counter-terror. He says he could probly arrange meeting foryou if you want, but suggests you have lawyer with you during convo. (I assume that agent is in DC, but ifthey are in ny office, i could accompany you if you would like.) Neal also offering to sit down with you(and maybe FBI agent) in nyc to come to an agreement with you.If you do talk to Neal re FBI/counter-terror/etc., keep in mind that around 70% of what Neal says is true,the rest could be based in truth but exaggerated. I cant recall him flat-out lying to me before. I dunno tho,maybe I just forgot.Neal would like to try to hammer out a truce/agreement with you before tomorrow morning. Again, I thinktaking down anything negative about each other is a good idea. If Neal has requests beyond that... well,Id ask a lawyer before agreeing to anything with, but when i gave a quick look to rsmccains twitter stream the other day, it read like it wasscripted to me - just looked off and pre-planned re mccains "discovering" about Aarons battle with BK.So later, when he said he had to move his family into hiding - well, thats kinda hard to swallow. BKsupporters are spinning it like rsmccains church booted him off their property because he washosting/harboring a wacky David Kouresh-type race-baiter, and church leaders were concerned about it.I suspect the actual truth is that mccain simply took his kids away for a Memorial Day vacation. Re: neal-stuff May 23, 2012 1:49 PM From: Michael Stack "Michael Stack" <>; To: Qritiq "Qritiq" <>; Reply To: Michael Stack "Michael Stack" <> why do i need to talk to agent about counter-terror?? May 23, 2012-a Page 24
  • 25. May 23, 2012 (b)Re: neal-stuff May 23, 2012 2:24 PMFrom: Qritiq "Qritiq" <>;To:"Also-"Mike - does that mean you sent me an email before the one below in like the last half hour? cuz i didntreceive one if you didthe only way that I will even consider talking about anything is if there is no camera or recording deviceson me.I will relay that.Neal says his fbi contact would be more interested in your dealings with Frey and maybe some otherfolks, than in the SWAT. (Well, I think its all related though.) But he also did say that you may be able toget some help in investigating the swat from them.ok - i will tell neal to use me as messenger to set up potential meeting May 23, 2012-b Page 25
  • 26. May 23, 2012 (c)Fwd: neal-stuff May 23, 2012 3:17 PMFrom: Qritiq "Qritiq" <>;To: mscart2012@yahoo.comok -Neal says he will not record you and there wont be any "gotchas" like that.He says he has already taken down negative things that he posted about you. He did get someone elseto remove what they had said about you as well.Hed like to talk to you to arrange his perhaps posting at your blog to encourage other progressives toleave you the hell alone.Hed like to talk to you to ask you to delete some negative content (some items that are not about himmight be part of that conversation)He is fine with me relaying messages to arrange a potential meeting and awaits response. May 23, 2012-c Page 26
  • 27. May 23, 2012 (d)Re: neal-stuff May 23, 2012 3:26 PMFrom: Qritiq "Qritiq" <>;To: mscart2012@yahoo.comI dont think you do need to talk re counter-terror. Or talk to the agent at all. (If you dont want to, Ill tellneal that.)Its "counter-terror" i think mainly because Neals fbi contact is a counter-terror agent. I guess I didntquestion it because I think of SWATting as a terroristic crime.Neal told his fbi contact re Frey & co. shenanigans and that you had had dealings with them and he saysthat piqued his pals interest in you. Neal thought you could possibly interest them in investigating yourswat, and i relayed that message to you because i thought fbi involvement might be helpful to you if it isactually an option.-----Original Message-----From: Michael Stack <>To: Qritiq <>Sent: Wed, May 23, 2012 3:12 pmSubject: Re: neal-stuffwhy do i need to talk to agent about counter-terror?? Re: neal-stuff May 23, 2012 4:04 PM From: Mike Stack "Mike Stack" <>; To: Qritiq "Qritiq" <; I will reply to you as soon as I get home Im helping a friend do something and leaving to go home in a little bit. Sent from my iPhone May 23, 2012-d Page 27
  • 28. May 23, 2012 (e)Re: neal-stuff May 23, 2012 7:04 PMFrom: Qritiq "Qritiq" <>;To:;update:Neal sez: Im willing to exchange email and get a preliminary agreement done that way, but ... I dont think its wise to assign a where/when that might leak... Have Mike drop me a note if hes serious. Well finish off this stuff tomorrow, and then we can discuss any future after that. Its beyond unwise that he should talk about this at all ...well, Neal sounds kinda paranoid/uptight to 202-642-1717 Re: neal-stuff May 23, 2012 7:58 PM From: Mike Stack "Mike Stack" <>; To: Qritiq "Qritiq" <>; Tell him that we can do it all tomorrow and that I am not having my witness with me. I am doing this to show good faith because I want the agreement to remain a secret. I want it to be honorable I can email him and we can always agree where and when to meet at that area Sent from my iPhone May 23, 2012-e Page 28
  • 29. May 23, 2012 (f)yes, meet May 23, 2012 8:32 PMFrom: Qritiq "Qritiq" <>;To: nrauhauserIve bcc-ed Mike on this.Neal -Mike sez you two can do it all tomorrow and that he will not bring his witness with him. He wants to do thisto show good faith; he wants your agreement to remain a secret.And he also says he wants it to be "honorable"So, if youll consent to meet, Mike says he can email you; and that you can "always agree where andwhen to meet at that area"I do think Mikes proposal sounds good; it seems like it would just be easier to hash this stuff out eye toeye (at least the basics) with no-one else around to distract from the process.And I also think keeping the agreement to yourselves is a good idea too. After all, its nobody elsesbusiness anyway.And if theres other information that you may want to share but not in written form - well this way affordsyou that opportunity.You both sound legitimately conciliatory to me, and I know that Stack will treat this matter honorably, so Ihope youll be able to get together. May 23, 2012-f Page 29
  • 30. May 23, 2012Fwd: yes, meet May 23, 2012 8:57 PMFrom: Qritiq "Qritiq" <>;To: mscart2012@yahoo.comMike - i will pass this off to you now to email him directly- I didnt know which email address you wanted touse.Id suggest:-agree as you said - to plan a general area/time and confirm it later if it makes you both more comfortable-to confirm just in general terms what you want as the outcome(s) of your meeting-when he starts to write you what he wants, try to filter out the spy-vs-spy rambling and keep him focusedand concise-try to remember that he has Aspbergers and he can be kind of tone-deaf when it comes to emails/socialinteractionlol - good luckfeel free to copy me on this stuff-----Original Message-----From: neal rauhauser <>To: Qritiq <>Sent: Wed, May 23, 2012 8:39 pmSubject: Re: yes, meetMaybe just openly send a note to the two of us - lets get through this stuff tonight, so tomorrow goesquick, and then we can decide what needs to be done once were finished. May 23, 2012-g Page 30
  • 31. May 24, 2012 (a)Re: Hey May 24, 2012 11:25 AMFrom: neal rauhauser "neal rauhauser" <>;To: Mike Stack "Mike Stack" <>Mike, Given that Doug was in court with us, as well as others who may not have spoke up, I think its verydangerous that we should appear together at a known time. You havent faced this stuff yet, but Gabbietook a bullet through the back of the head and Gabe Zimmerman died along with five others in Tucson.What McCain & Walker are doing is *way* more intense than the stuff that lead up to that massshooting. I am truly worried we could end up caught in the middle of a gunfight between deputies andsome extremist group. Its never been made public, but there were members of Michigan Militiaperiodically patrolling the Occupy Lansing camp because they got a hint I was there, and before that itwas some League of the South guy in South Carolina who got interviewed by FBI hate crimes squad. As for your blog, I see the offer to take it down, but lets play this one carefully. If you just take it alldown and post an apology they know we talked. If you get quiet, say youre thinking about it, then theyare not sure. Long term I think what we do is this: 1. you make a post "I took down what I wrote about Neal Rauhauser, much of it was wrong" 2. I show up with my Wordpress and make a one paragraph comment that says "We both got played,Mike & I disagree about politics, but we will not be attacking each other". Itll look nicer than this when Ipost, but the point is to leave something that is A.) Clearly me and B.) lets guys like vets74, or anyonewho finds his writings, that he was mistaken about Air & Space and should leave you alone. So I am sure there is a state grand jury for James OKeefe because those words came out of theinvestigators mouth, and I really suspect there is a federal grand jury in D.C. for the stuff they did withpeople voting as Eric Holder. I have less of a sense of what is happening with Mike Grimm and theextortion case, but it all adds up to a centralized federal prosecution rather than the individualjurisdictions trying to do something on their own. May 24, 2012-a Page 31
  • 32. May 24, 2012 - (a2) Re: Hey -contd. I have been close to one other big federal case - bought some used equipment in late 1990s and itturned out to be from a mafia freight theft operation in the San Francisco area. What I saw was that asthey knew they were caught they threw *everyone* under the bus. I was in Nebraska at the time, butthey went to great lengths to implicate me because I went to the feds to complain. If Frey or anyonearound him can shift blame to you for anything that has happened they will try that. The FBI agent in charge of counter-terror for NYC was interested after I told her a bit about what youhad been close to, but after some consideration I think it is unwise for you to approach them on yourown. I also think you might have some sort of claim against Frey, but its not as clear as what Nadia has.This being said I think what you should do is: 1. Just dismiss on tonights mediation. I really dont want to lug a bunch of papers across three trainsystems in the rain and pay for a cab ride back and forth if were just going to agree that Frey & Co. arethe real problem. 2. I will write a note introducing you and Jay Leiderman. He is Nadias lawyer, he is not mine, so youwould be talking to him as if he were going to be your counsel in a civil suit against Frey, and he willadvise you on the particulars of talking with the feds after what you have seen. 3. Once the dismissal is done I have some stuff on the most likely swatter. Dont get excited, I think itsa beanie and they are wicked tricksy. I hunted them a bit after 2010 and decided it was hopeless - toocomplex, too dangerous for me to handle. Well look what I have over - you, me, and qritiq, then wellshare it with Allyn Lynd, the FBI agent who is most known for dealing with stuff like that. I think this is aseparate issue from Frey and so forth - we can do this without either of us being exposed to any trouble. 4. Well see what Jay has to say about Frey & Co. I know the feds will want more information on them,but lets make sure youre clear before that is set in motion. OK, look at this and let me know ... I have to leave about 3:00 to get out there by 202-642-1717 May 24, 2012-a2 Page 32
  • 33. May 24, 2012 (b)On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Michael Stack <> wrote:I cant , in good faith, just dismiss. We need to go there and hammer out our differences andmake an agreement.Too much stuff happened between us and a year of our lives was wasted with this. The judgeand mediators will not be happy that they gave us a chance to settle it once and for all and we,especially me, did not take it.As for me and the blog; I am not taking it down in whole, but taking down the posts about youand editing out your name in tags, posts and the like. I want to start blogging about things againpost Weinergate.I definitely need to be there tonight, unless you want to call and try to re-schedule.If you do, I will not say a word. You have my word, and hopefully it will mean something, thattodays events, etc., stay with me.I want to take care of this ASAP. May 24, 2012-b Page 33
  • 34. May 24, 2012 (c)Mike Stack/Jay Leiderman introduction May 24, 2012 11:34 AMFrom: neal rauhauser "neal rauhauser" <>;To: Mike Stack "Mike Stack" <>; Jay Leiderman "Jay Leiderman" <>Jay, Mike Stack is one of the people who was swept up in the Weinergate affair, and then the peoplebehind that used him to try to get at me. Here are the issues at hand: 1. Mike was swatted, I think it was a beandog (untraceable, IMHO), but Frey & Co. played this up. DoesMike have a path to a settlement from Frey? Is this something where he could be compelled to settle for$10k - $20k just to avoid discovery? 2. Mike has said things to and about me and others, based on information he has received frompeople around John Patrick Frey, and I think some of them are also connected with Robert StacyMcCain. The nature of this is such that he could be considered an accessory in a federal hate crimesinvestigation. He is willing to talk to FBI to get at these guys for what they have done to him, but I amnot sure this is a good plan. 3. We need some sort of agreement drafted between us - a mutual discharge of any civil liability, andwhatever else you think we might need. I can pay for an hour or two of your time if we can tie up theloose ends here. Jay can be reached at 805-861-8282 and Mike is at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. 202-642-1717 May 24, 2012-c Page 34
  • 35. May 24, 2012 (d)Re: Hey May 24, 2012 11:48 AMFrom: neal rauhauser "neal rauhauser" <>;To: Michael Stack "Michael Stack" <> Re: Hey May 24, 2012 12:03 PM From: neal rauhauser "neal rauhauser" <>; To: Michael Stack "Michael Stack" <mscart2012@yahoo.comTalked to the clerk, they expect us at 7:00. I guess thats that :-) As for you writing, I think you will remain a lightning rod. Its your choice, but I bet youll find morepeople like 202-642-1717 May 24, 2012-d Page 35
  • 36. May 24, 2012 (e)Re: Hey May 24, 2012 12:03 PMFrom: neal rauhauser "neal rauhauser" <>;To: Michael Stack "Michael Stack" <>Yeah, you really need to drop out. There is some stuff brewing in Wisconsin, I cant go into details, but Icould see how it would come back and get on you. I think the GOP is about to have their Weinergate andits not gonna be pretty. We are having a talk here, doing so in an honorable fashion, and thats a relief after some of the stuffthat has gone on the last year. This is like what happened with me & Jeannie McBride - we used to fightas bad as you and I, then she had a falling out with Patrick Read. Her daughter was beaten & raped, andthose jerks spent five months following her around, talking up the fact that they had her address, thatthey were going to help the rapist find them both - it was the most disgusting thing Ive ever seen. Nowwe *eyeroll* at each others politics, but we talk on the phone some times about kids and our healthand these crazy guys around Pat that wont leave us alone. As for Jay, he is not my lawyer and he has not retained me as an investigator in that stuff with Nadia,but Im kinda doing it, because what he needs is what Brett needs and thats also what the NewHampshire AG needs. It would be a huge breach if I were to involve myself as I have this morning, andthen break confidence. And keep in mind when you talk with him thats private - Ill give him background, he wont tell mewhat you discuss - that protects all three of us. I presume you and I are gonna end up like Jeannie and I - *eyeroll* to each other over views, but nothating on each other, and probably ignoring and/or smacking down anyone who tries to stir up troublebetween us. May 24, 2012-e Page 36