Comparing DITA Support in XMetaL and FrameMaker

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Comparing DITA Support in XMetaL and FrameMaker - Presentation Transcript

    1. Comparing DITA support in XMetaL and FrameMaker
        • Simon Bate
        • Scriptorium Publishing
        • www.scriptorium.com
    2. Agenda
      • Authoring
      • Conditional processing
      • Generating output
      • Cross-references and conrefs
      • Map files
      • Specialization
      • Consider your needs
    3. About the presenter
      • Based in Research Triangle, North Carolina
      • Senior Technical Consultant at Scriptorium
      • 30+ years experience in Technical Publications
      • Long-time FrameMaker user
      • Instructor for Scriptorium classes:
        • XMetaL DITA
        • XSL in Publications
    4. A note about Scriptorium
      • Affiliated with Adobe as Adobe Authorized Training Center
      • Affiliated with JustSystems as a Certified Services Partner
      • Nonetheless, I think you'll find this presentation quite candid about each tool's strengths and weaknesses.
    5. Questions
      • Please ask questions.
      • I may defer some questions to the end of the presentation.
    6. FrameMaker highlights
      • High-quality print/PDF output
      • Formatting control is built in
      • Ability to "tweak" formatting, such as page breaks
      • WYSIWYG for print/PDF
    7. XMetaL highlights
      • Ability to edit XML directly
      • Integration with DITA Open Toolkit
      • Not WYSIWYG for print
      • Specialization support
      • DITA 1.1 support
    8.  
    9. XMetaL Authoring highlights
      • Code ("plain text") view
      • Structure view (block only)‏
      • Format-neutral WYSIOO presentation
      • No invalid content allowed
      • Elements grouped by type (Insert menu)‏
    10.  
    11. FrameMaker authoring highlights
      • WYSIWYG for print/PDF
      • Structure view is complete
      • Document window/structure view combination
      • Invalid content allowed
    12. Conditional processing in FrameMaker
      • Traditional FrameMaker conditions
        • In 8.0, allows expressions
        • FM information is saved in XML output
        • But the information is not DITA
      • Use attributes
        • Special > Filter by attributes
    13. ditaval files
      • FrameMaker:
        • only when using DITA Open Toolkit
      • XMetaL:
        • hidden by conditional GUI
        • Use Export to create ditaval file
    14. Generating output in XMetaL
      • Open Toolkit
      • RenderX for PDF via Open Toolkit
      • HTML-based help
    15. Generating output in FrameMaker
      • PDF
      • Open Toolkit (install plug-in)‏
      • FrameMaker book from DITA map
      • HTML-based help
    16. Cross-references in FrameMaker
      • FrameMaker <fm-xref> element
        • Only reference a selected set of elements
        • Creates active links in PDF files
      • DITA <xref> elements
        • Can reference any element in any topic
        • Can contain alternate text (not just the title)‏
        • Does not create active links in PDF files
    17. Cross-references in XMetaL
      • Insert > Link
        • Cross-reference
        • File reference
        • Web link
      • Can change text in <xref> element
      • Converted correctly in Open Toolkit
    18. conrefs in XMetaL
    19. conrefs in FrameMaker
    20. Map files in FrameMaker
    21. Map files in XMetaL
    22. Specialization
      • XMetaL
        • Many hooks for specialization
      • FrameMaker
        • Nothing built-in
        • Could modify EDD
    23. Which has better DITA support?
      • For print/PDF output: FrameMaker
      • For DITA authoring: XMetaL
      • For print WYSIWYG: FrameMaker
      • For output-neutral formatting: XMetaL
      • No clear winner.
    24. How important is print publishing?
      • It's much easier to produce high-end print/PDF from FrameMaker.
      • Print/PDF publishing through Open Toolkit is not satisfactory.
      • WYSIWYG presentation in FrameMaker is a plus for print-centric workflows.
      • WYSIOO presentation in XMetaL is a plus for authoring without focusing on print.
    25. How much control should authors have?
      • Because FrameMaker combines authoring and publishing, authors have more control
        • Can create and publish with invalid content
      • XMetaL enables DITA authoring; separates out publishing
        • Does not allow invalid content in normal authoring.
        • Think workflow and sharing topics
    26. Do you need cross-browser, cross-platform help?
      • HTMLHelp (CHM)‏
        • Not cross-platform
        • XMetaL and FrameMaker (3 rd -party or OT)‏
      • XHTML-based Help
        • FrameMaker and 3 rd -party converters
      • Eclipse Help
        • XMetaL and FrameMaker (via OT)‏
        • Requires Eclipse infrastructure
    27. Transition issues
      • Current unstructured FrameMaker users will find structured FrameMaker easier than XMetaL (mostly).
      • Developer types may prefer XMetaL.
      • FrameMaker includes conversion utility. (Of course, you could convert in FrameMaker and then use the converted content in another XML tool.)‏
    28. Do you need to specialize?
      • You will have to implement FrameMaker support yourself.
      • XMetaL supports use of specialized DTDs.
    29. Graphics
      • Many more formats supported in FrameMaker.
      • In XMetaL, PDF output with EPS images requires Acrobat Distiller.
      • Callouts a problem in either:
        • Layers in graphic file?
        • FrameMaker callouts are flattened on export to XML.
    30. Attributes
      • Attributes Inspector (XMetaL) is easier to use than Attributes Editor (FrameMaker).
      • But...attributes show up in FrameMaker structure view and not in XMetaL structure view.
    31. Summary
      • Your priorities will dictate which tool is a better fit for your organization.
      • Each application has significant strengths and weaknesses.
      • Authoring paradigms are significantly different.
    32. Resources
      • DITA @ OASIS
        • http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita
      • White papers
        • Available on CD at our booth
        • www.scriptorium.com/papers.html
      • Please leave a business card or your email address if you want the handouts.
    33. Contact information
      • Simon Bate
      • Scriptorium Publishing Services
      • www.scriptorium.com
      • [email_address]
      • 919 481-2701 x106
    34. Questions

    + Scott AbelScott Abel, 2 years ago

    custom

    85 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 85
      • 29 on SlideShare
      • 56 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 17
    Most viewed embeds
    • 56 views on http://www.doctrain.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 56 views on http://www.doctrain.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories