For information on applying this template to an existing presentations, refer to the notes on slide 2 of this presentation. The Input area of the Beam can be customised to reflect the content of the presentation. The Input area is an AutoShape with a picture fill. To change this, ensure you have the image you wish to use (ideally a .jpg or a .png file) in an accessible folder. The image should have a ratio of 1:1 to ensure it does not appear distorted. It is not possible to reposition the image within the Input area. Acceptable images for importing into the Input area of the Beam are the three approved graphics (lines), and black and white photography or illustrations which follow the principles laid out on The Branding Zone. Colour images should never be imported into this area. Please be aware that replacing the Input area with high resolution graphics will significantly increase the file size. Contact your local DDC for assistance with updating the Beam. Customise the Input area of the Beam as described below. Click on the View tab from the menu bar and select Master>Slide Master Right-click on the Input graphic and select Format AutoShape From the Fill menu, under the Colour and Lines tab, click on the drop-down arrow next to Colour and select the Fill Effects menu From the Picture tab, click on Select Picture . Navigate to the folder containing the image you wish to insert in the Input area. Highlight the image and tick the Lock picture aspect ratio box . Click on OK You can now preview the image before continuing. If you are happy with how it looks, click OK to continue. Otherwise, repeat the process until you are happy with your selected image To exit from Master View, click on View>Normal . The change you made to the Input graphic should now be visible on the title slide.
CBI Energy Conference: Panel session - Presentation Transcript
Investment trends in Alternative Energy CBI Energy Conference - Panel Session: The UK’s Energy Challenge 22 October 2009
Agenda
Ernst & Young Energy & Environment practice
Alternative Energy becomes mainstream
Country Attractiveness Indices methodology
UK’s relative position
Ernst & Young’s market leadership
More mandates in 2008 than any other financial advisory firm
Source: Dealogic Global Project Finance Review 2008
Deals closed
Source: Project Finance International, January 2008
Global and EMEA
Project finance Renewable Energy Financial Advisor of the Year – Renewables Ernst & Young 2008 Top two by advisory mandates won Firm 2008 2007 2006 2005 Ernst & Young 1 1 1 1 PwC 2 2 2 2 Project finance PFI/PPP deals Financial advisor Deals Value (US$m) Deals Value (US$m) 1. Ernst & Young 31 7,758 25 5,940 2. KPMG 27 9,313 24 7,995 3. PwC 27 7,476 22 3,330
Alternative Energy becomes mainstream
In 2008, for the first time, more wind power was installed in the EU-27 than any other electricity generating technology.
The wind power capacity installed by end 2008 will, in a normal wind year, produce 142 TWh of electricity, equal to about 4.2% of the EU’s electricity demand, and avoid the emission of 108 million tonnes of C02 per year.
Source: EWEA
Source: EWEA, Platts (excl. PV)
End 07 Inst 2008 End 08 % yoy Germany 22,247 1,665 23,903 7% Spain 15,131 1,609 16,740 11% Italy 2,726 1,010 3,736 37% France 2,454 950 3,404 39% UK 2,406 836 3,241 35% Total EU-27 56,517 8,484 65,001 15% Inst 2008 %Share Wind 8,484 43% Gas 6,932 35% Oil 2,495 13% Coal 762 4% Hydro 473 2% Total 19,651 15%
The All Renewables Index at August 2009 – top 10 nations
The All Renewables Index covers a range of renewable energy technologies, with a focus on power generation
Onshore and offshore wind together make up 73% of the scores
The Index has been running since 2003 and is now distributed to over 3,000 contacts within the industry
The CAI is used by Board-level decision-makers and is recognised by governments to influence policy-making (eg. US senate hearings)
CBI Energy Conference panel session.
1. Ernst & more
CBI Energy Conference panel session.
1. Ernst & Young Energy & Environment practice
2. Alternative Energy becomes mainstream
3. Country Attractiveness Indices methodology
4. UK’s relative position less
0 comments
Post a comment