Good afternoo, I'm Ben Wild a senior project officer with The Campaign Company. We're a consultancy specialising in consultation, engagement and social marketing. I lead on the use of on-line tools in our projects particularly wikis. I have with me David Evans one of the Managing Directors from TCC. Our presentation today will be a team effort, I'll give a brief overview of Wikis in the context of engagment and consultation and then I'll hand over to David who'll talk through some case studies and what we've learnt from them.
'A wiki is a collection of web pages designed to enable anyone who accesses it to contribute or modify content'
– Wikipedia
What is a wiki?
10 million articles
250 languages
684 million visitors annually
What’s at stake?
DEFRA – The Environmental Contract
CLG – Reviving Civic Status
ONS – 2011 UK Census Outputs consultation
Whose using wikis?
Community Empowerment, Housing and Economic Regeneration Bill (http://www.commonsleader.gov.uk/output/Page2452.asp)
Gordon Brown's speech to Google EuroZeitgeist (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btE075p6Ypg)
Tom Steinberg's 'Power of Information' report (http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/reports/power_of_information.aspx)
Digital Dialogues – Final report due for publication in September (http://digitaldialogues.org.uk/)
The political context
Why should you use a Wiki?
When should you use a Wiki?
What makes a Wiki successful?
Who should use a Wiki?
.... the following case studies will help us!
The 4 ‘W’s’
Social marketing campaign to promote breast feeding in Brighton and Hove
Promoted on and off line – fliers, Facebook, launch, local press
Wiki included survey, polls, Discussion forum, ability for users to add/edit pages
Best for babies
Did it work?
Positive:
Several thousand page views
Simple features such as Polls well used
Negative:
Discussions & Wiki features hardly used
Little discussion or community on Wiki
Problems
The issue was too polarising to generate discussion, community.
The campaign didn't have a strong element of collaboration and co-production and so didn't uses the strengths of the tool
The audience didn't have sufficient buy in to make in-depth, repeated use of the Wiki
Stakeholders didn't take ownership of driving the Wiki forward
Lessons:
Wikis are appropriate when there is a genuine need for collaboration and co-production
Wikis work for more complex consultations and a more specialist target audience
Wikis are not for engaging people but for enabling those who are engaged
Pyramid of Engagement
The Top Tier
NDC Network
Isolated providers
Shared mission
Cause to collaborate
Technical and other capabilities
Lewisham Assemblies
Assemblies in every ward
Round One engaging 60 to 120 in each ward
Meetings only 3 to 4 times per year
Turn initial engagement into involvement and empowerment
How was it done before?
Local associations & community groups
Regular meetings, newsletters
Local events, action days, lobbying etc
Either through motivated local activists, or through labour intensive community development activity
So how can the technology help?
Why might a Wiki be better?
Economies of scale – reach a larger audience without the intensive resources
Allows people to engage without going to time consuming local meetings
Allows people to dip in and out – scale up or reduce their involvement according to time available
Enables collaborative, grass roots working
Wiki Features:
In Conclusion – Golden Rules
Huge amount to gain, but only if we target the correct audience and address the right issues.
Have to be designed to meet needs of the audience and have continual support and moderation through their lifetime.
Only work for consultation if they are central to the process and are part of wider engagement strategy which employs a range of appropriate tools and approaches
0 comments
Post a comment