Group 13 06.11.2009

1,034 views
979 views

Published on

các Slide môn Law thuộc chương trình tiên tiến K49, NEU. Nhóm 13 gồm có các thành viên: Phạm Duy Thanh, Đặng Phương Tâm, Nguyễn Tiến Thịnh, Nguyễn Văn Sơn. Giảng viên : Trần Văn Nam.

Published in: Business, Economy & Finance
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,034
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Group 13 06.11.2009

  1. 1. Acceptances<br />Case 8 – 209<br />GROUP 13<br />Dang Phuong Tam<br /> Nguyen Van Son<br />Pham Duy Thanh<br />Nguyen Tien Thinh<br />
  2. 2. Pearsall and Alexander <br /> friends forover 20 years<br />
  3. 3. “Package”<br /><ul><li>A half-pint of vodka
  4. 4. Orange juice
  5. 5. Two cups
  6. 6. Lottery tickets</li></li></ul><li>Lottery tickets<br />They won<br />Bought more<br />
  7. 7. 16/12/1982The first package bought by Pearsall <br />Yes<br />Are you in on it ?<br />Pearsall<br />Alexander<br />A half of price?<br />I has no money<br />Then, Alexander snatched and scratched boths tickets<br />
  8. 8. Pearsall snatched the tickets, scratched one and <br /> left another one for Alexander<br />16/12/1982 The second “package” bought by Alexander<br />
  9. 9. Alexander<br />Won$20.000<br />Refused to split<br />
  10. 10. DoesPearsallhave a right to<br />half the winnings ? <br />Yes<br />
  11. 11. Analyse<br />Offer + Acceptance = Agreement<br /> - Intent<br /> - Definiteness<br /> - Communication <br />- Intent<br />- Exactiveness<br />- Communication <br /> meeting of mind <br />valid<br />valid<br />Share fortunes of ticket<br />
  12. 12. Precedent<br />Plantiff: Richard Zientara<br />Defendant: Bernice Kaszuba <br />(506 NE2d 1 (IN. 1987) <br />(Sources: www.lotterypost.com )<br />
  13. 13. Richard Zientara offered Kaszuba <br /> to buy tickets for him<br />She accepted and used money<br />he gave to buy tickets regularly<br />
  14. 14. <ul><li>However, when it was a $1,696,800 winner she refused to give it to him and claimed the winnings for herself
  15. 15. He successfully sued her</li></li></ul><li> Judgment in favor of Pearsall was appropriate on this breach of agreement<br />Verdict<br />
  16. 16. Implication in Vietnam<br />Plantiff: Mr. N. T. T<br />Defendant: Mr. T. T. L<br />(Ba Ria, Ben Tre Province) (Sources: http://www.phapluattp.vn)<br />
  17. 17. 10/2006<br />L. bought 4 tickets T. bought 3 tickets<br />I have to work, hold tickets for me, please<br />Mr.L<br />Mr.T<br />
  18. 18. L scratches 7 tickets without T’s permission<br />One of 3 T’s tickets won speacial prize<br />
  19. 19. <ul><li> L received 100 millions VND, gave 50 millions for T
  20. 20. T did not know which ticket the prize came from and received 50 millions
  21. 21. 2 months later, T realized then sued L on Ba Tri court and claimed that L had to pay him 50 millions</li></ul>No. Give back to me my money !<br />Mr.T<br />Mr.L<br />
  22. 22. Decision<br />Is there any acceptance from T?<br />NO<br /> There is no agreement between T and L.<br />Judgment in favor of N. T .T was appropriate<br />
  23. 23. Group 13<br />Acceptances<br />Case 8 – Page 209<br />Thank for listening !<br />

×