• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Agonquin College Keynote
 

Agonquin College Keynote

on

  • 1,646 views

Bringing Algonquin Online: Opportunities, Changes, and Challenges – What’s in it for us?

Bringing Algonquin Online: Opportunities, Changes, and Challenges – What’s in it for us?

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,646
Views on SlideShare
1,636
Embed Views
10

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
1

2 Embeds 10

http://www.slideshare.net 8
http://www.jcking.ca 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel

11 of 1 previous next

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • [src:'http://www.youtube.com/v/oCwR7uePCU4',width:'425',height:'350']

Agonquin College Keynote Agonquin College Keynote Presentation Transcript

  • Terry Anderson, PhD
    Professor and Canada Research Chair in Distance Education
  • Kaleidoscope: A Constantly changing Group or Scene
  • Values
    We can (and must) continuously improve the quality, effectiveness, appeal, cost and time efficiency of the learning experience.
    Student control and freedom is integral to 21st Century life-long education and learning.
    Current educational models do not scale for lifelong learning for all residents of our planet.
  • Dealing with Technological Determinism in Education
    A scepter hanging over teachers
    The Man with the Magic Lantern,
    a tribute to educator Ned Corbett
    • Students today can’t prepare bark to calculate their problems. They depend on their slates which are more expensive. What will they do when their slate is dropped and it breaks? They will be unable to write!”Teachers Conference, 1703
    From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
  • Students today depend upon paper too much. They don’t know how to write on slate without chalk dust all over themselves. They can’t clean a slate properly. What will they do when they run out of paper?”Principal’s Association, 1815
    From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
  • Students today depend too much upon ink. They don’t know how to use a pen knife to sharpen a pencil. Pen and ink will never replace the pencil.”National Association of Teachers, 1907
    From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
    • Students today depend upon store-bought ink. They don’t know how to make their own. When they run out of ink they will be unable to write. This is a sad commentary on modern education.”The Rural American Teacher, 1929
    From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
  • Students today depend upon these expensive fountain pens. They can no longer write with a straight pen and nib (not to mention sharpening their own quills).
    We parents must not allow them to wallow in such luxury to the detriment of learning how to cope in the real business world, which is not so extravagant.”PTA Gazette, 1941
    From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
    • Ball point pens will be the ruin of education in our country. Students use these devices and then throw them away. The American virtues of thrift and frugality are being discarded. Business and banks will never allow such expensive luxuries.”Federal Teacher, 1950
    From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
  • Online education “is not a progressive trend towards a new era at all, but a regressive trend, towards the rather old era of mass production, standardization and purely commercial interests.” David Noble, 1998
  • David Cameron’s new Age of Government - Transposed to Education
  • Age of Local Control
    Parents as teachers
    Apprenticeship
    Local control of teaching and curriculum
  • 2nd Age of School/Institutional Bureaucracy
    Centralized control
    Standards
    National and international standardization and measurement
  • 3rd Age of Networked Education
    Think and Act Globally and Locally
    Education as development of lifelong learning networks
    The Network Society: ‘a society where the key social structures and activities are organized around electronically processed information networks’
    “The advent of the Internet, calls into question the entire education system developed during the industrial era’, (Castells, 2002, p. 278).
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGCJ46vyR9o&feature=related
  • Networked Learning:
    Pulls families and children to learning by making it attractive, productive, and relevant
    Relies on peer-to-peer learning rather than formal teachers
    Creates spaces for learning where they are needed, rather than just using schools
    Starts learning from challenges that people face rather than from a formal curriculum
    The test of these approaches is whether
    they get useful knowledge into the hands of people who need it
    It is not measured by exam pass rates.
  • Learning from the Extremes - a CISCO report by Charles Leadbeater and Annika Wong"
  • Most Net Technology is not incremental but disruptive and ecological – meaning that it demands systemic response as its effects spread throughout the institution.
  • Network learning as Disruptive Technology
    Clayton Christiansen
  • Adopting Disruptive Technologies
    Constant attention to where the “puck is going to be”
    Disruptive technologies may not be valued or provide advantage to existing customers
    “Products based on disruptive technologies are typically cheaper, simpler, smaller, and frequently more convenient to use” (Christensen, 1997).
    Bottom up disruptions - new providers using OER’s are most likely threat to established colleges
  • Disruptive Technologies
    “digital dissonance” - neither teachers nor students fully recognize and utilize the potential of emerging technologies for learning” Clark, Logan, Luckin, Mee, & Oliver, 2009).
    Yet they continue to block each others’ use – ie banning of mobile tech and many social sites at school, lack of collaborative engagement on school based wikis, failure to license for re-use.
  • Barriers to Adoption of Disruptive Technologies
    Lack of understanding of the technology’s viability or strategic implications.
    Lack of knowledge about how the technologies could be developed and used most effectively.
    Uncertainty about adequate levels of acceptance by stakeholders.
    Lack of skills. Particularly technical, design, development and operations skills
    Lack of finance/funding/investment
    Adapted from Elliot, Williams & Bjorn-Andersen, 2005
  • E-Learning as Disruptive
    Makes content available –FREE
    Allows time and place shifting
    Allows global collaboration for teaching and learning
    Supports global competition
    Higher quality learning
  • Why Get involved in E-Learning?
    To Maintain market share
    To increase accessibility or flexibility for students and teachers
    To enhance the quality of teaching/learning
    To provide basic 21 century skills and meet the learning needs of net generation students
    To save money
    (from Bates, 2010)
    To gain personal satisfaction
  • Online Learning is Coming to a College Near You
    Over 3.9 million students were taking at least one online course during the fall 2007 term; a 12 percent increase over the number reported the previous year.
    The 12.9 percent growth rate for online enrollments far exceeds the 1.2 percent growth of the overall higher education student population.
    Over twenty percent of all U.S. higher education students were taking at least one online course in the fall of 2007.
    Allen , E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States, Sloan Consortium.
  • Online Learning is Coming to a College On The Internet Near You
    Over 3.9 million students were taking at least one online course during the fall 2007 term; a 12 percent increase over the number reported the previous year.
    The 12.9 percent growth rate for online enrollments far exceeds the 1.2 percent growth of the overall higher education student population.
    Over twenty percent of all U.S. higher education students were taking at least one online course in the fall of 2007.
    Allen , E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States, Sloan Consortium.
  • To increase accessibility or flexibility for students and teachers
    68% undertook online learning because of flexibility in terms of pace, time and place.
    “Freedom—I can work at my own pace.”
    “No time constraints, can work whenever I have time.”
    Learner expectations and experiencesAustralian National Training Authority, 2003
  • Flexibility works for faculty too!
    Shea, P. (2007) BRIDGES AND BARRIERS TO TEACHING
    ONLINE COLLEGE COURSES:
    Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,
  • Faculty Workload
    Still biggest issue
    Little empirical evidence of increased loads online
    Usually associated with beginning online teachers and labour intensive designs
  • To enhance the quality of teaching/learning
  • Does E-learning Really Work?
    The return on Investment Lag – Does funding on ICT and training result in higher returns on Investment? How do we measure improved learning?
    Lack of innovation and change– The horseless Carriage syndrome
    But growing evidence that online learning is both popular and effective
  • Buggy whip holders lasted over 10 years in new (1895) horseless carriages.
  • No Significant Difference
    Thomas Russel’s NSD Site
    Instructional designs- not media
    the use of problem-based learning strategies ,
    the opportunity for students to engage in mediated communication with the instructor,
    course and content information provided to students prior to class starting,
    the use of video provided to students by the instructor,
    Dell, Low & Wilker (2010)
  • No Significant Difference Ending??
    K12 over 1,000 studies 1992-2008"The overall finding of the meta-analysis is that classes with online learning (whether taught completely online or blended) on average produce stronger student learning outcomes than do classes with solely face-to-face instruction." (pg.18)
  • Bernard et al 2004
    “A meta-analysis of the comparative distance education (DE) literature between 1985 and 2002 was conducted. In total, 232 studies containing 599 independent achievement, attitude, and retention outcomes were analyzed.
  • 37
    Project 1: 2000 – 2004
    Question: How does distance education compare to classroom instruction? (inclusive dates 1985-2002)
    Total number of effect sizes: k = 232
    Measures: Achievement, Attitudes and Retention (opposite of drop-out)
    Divided into Asynchronous and Synchronous DE
    Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y. Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P.A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare to classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
  • 38
    Summary of results: Achievement
    Achievement Outcomes
    *Significantly heterogeneous average effect
  • 39
    Summary of results: Attitudes
    Attitude Outcomes
    *Significantly heterogeneous average effect
  • 40
    Summary of results: Retention
    Retention Outcomes
    *Significantly heterogeneous effect sizes
  • “On-line distance education experience had a significant effect of subsequent student achievement and persistence behaviour ”
    Dodd, C., Kirby, D., T., S., & Sharpe, D. (2010). The Impact of High School Distance e-Learning Experience on Rural Students’ University Achievement and Persistence. Online Journal of Distance Education Administration, 13(1). Retrieved From http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring121/dodd121.html.
  • What Makes E-Learning Effective ?
    1. Content
    2. Interaction
    3. Agents
    Anderson, T., & Whitelock, D. (2004). The Educational Semantic Web: Visioning and Practicing the Future of Education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. Retrieved Dec. 2007 from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2004/1.
  • Affordance 1. - Massive Amounts of Content
    Any information, any format, anytime, anywhere
    Customizable content
    Interactive content
    User created content
    Adaptable Content
    Open access content
  • Wiki and Open Courseware
    Imagine a world in which every single person is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. –
    Terry Foote, Wikipedia
  • Content - conclusion
    Cheap or free
    Need to learn to develop business models and culture allowing us to share and re-use content
    Don’t build your value on your content
    Content is necessary, but not sufficient, to create a quality educational experience
  • Affordance #2High Quality, Low Cost Communication
    Multi mode
    Synchronous, asynch
    Text, audio and video
    A2A (avatar to avatar)
    Stored, indexed and retrievable
    Reflective, emotive and cognitive
    Mobile
    Learner, teacher, community and commercially created
  • Challenge: Creating Incentives to Sustain Meaningful Contribution
    The New Yorker September 12, 2005
  • What’s so great about Face-to-Face communication?
    “I learned more about Clive by reading his introduction tonight online than I did in our entire course together last summer”
    (Kerlin, R-A, 1997) http://kerlins.net/bobbi/research/diss/
  • Increased Interaction
  • Affordance 3Agents
    Google Alerts
    MeetingWizard
    RSS
    Athabasca
    Freudbot AIML
    E-Advisor
    Are you ready for AU? Agents
  • FreudBot in SecondLifeFrom Athabasca University
  • Networks Not Groups
    Beginning Lifelong Learning at School by creation and joining networks of practice
    Gleaming from Archives of past courses
  • Affordance #3 Agents
    Data Mining and Stigmergic analysis
    Capacity to identify at risk learners seven days after enrolment – Rio Salado Community College USA
    Amazon’s individual Bookshelf’s
  • To provide basic 21 century skills
  • 21st Century Learner Attitudes
    Wants to learn things
    Continuously moves between on and offline
    Is learning to recognize and demand quality when investing in learning
    Is easily bored and often cranky
    Knows there are many paths to learning and is used to staggering amounts of content
    Normally uses a wide set of information processing, creation and communications tools
    “The decline of the compliant learner’. P. Goodyear 2004
  • enGuage Model Metiri Group http://www.metiri.com/features.htmlEn-Guage
  • E-learning to save money
    Very conflicted evidence on costs of e-learning
    Never saves money when used on ‘bolt-on’ approach. Blended learning MUST be made to reduce some costs
    How are student savings to be costed?
    Disruptive technologies always get cheaper and more functional.
  • The Business of Elearning?
    Is their an Institutional Strategy for e-learning
    What are the objectives of e-learning for both distance and blended learning?
    Who is the market- new students or existing? Off shore?
    Teaching and learning monitoring and effectiveness plan?
    Who decides on
    The type of content plus interaction model?
    Types of tools supported ?
    Role of F2F support?
    Integration with campus courses?
    Who creates the courses”?
    Lone Ranger Model
    The instructional design based course team
    See Taking The Lead: Strategic Management for e-Learning
    http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/takingthelead
  • The Business of Elearning?
    Who trains and supports the teachers?
    IT support and hardware
    Learning design support
    Software exposure, training and troubleshooting
    Who supports the students?
    Registry, bookstore, library, counseling, helpdesk, training?
    Who Determines quality?
    Standards and institutional review
    Central versus unit based control
    Peer review
  • Importance of this issue
    Educational challenges are not met through evangelism, threats or technologies alone.
    Change happens when teachers, administrators and learners make it happen
    Perceived benefits – Personal
    Readiness - Organizational
    Pressure – Inter-organizational
    Chwelos; Benbasat; Dexter, 2001)
    Each of us is an agent of change
  • Gaining personal satisfaction
    Personal Learning Environments and Net Presence
  • Conclusion
    E-learning is in your future and it will be disruptive
    E-learning is effective, stimulating and fun
    You owe it to yourself, your students and our profession to get involved.
  • "You have to be confused before you can reach a new level of understanding anything" - Dudley Herschbach – Nobel Prize winner (Chemistry)
  • “"He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever."-  Chinese Proverb
    Your comments and questions most welcomed!
    Terry Anderson terrya@athabascau.ca
    Blog: terrya.edubogs.org