Creative Commons: Enabling Access to Knowledge
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Creative Commons: Enabling Access to Knowledge

on

  • 2,474 views

Presented at wipo conference on Enabling Creativity in the Digital Environment

Presented at wipo conference on Enabling Creativity in the Digital Environment

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,474
Views on SlideShare
1,379
Embed Views
1,095

Actions

Likes
3
Downloads
7
Comments
0

9 Embeds 1,095

http://www.technollama.co.uk 947
http://technollama.co.uk 98
http://paper.li 14
http://feeds2.feedburner.com 13
http://a0.twimg.com 7
http://www.newsblur.com 7
http://feeds.feedburner.com 6
http://us-w1.rockmelt.com 2
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 1
More...

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • I always start with an apology, I’m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I’m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I’d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it’s something that happens to them. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n

Creative Commons: Enabling Access to Knowledge Creative Commons: Enabling Access to Knowledge Presentation Transcript

  • ( Enabling access to knowledge Andrés Guadamuz )
  • ( Apologies Löki http://www.flickr.com/photos/tyltu/4041895378/ )
  • ( CC in brief )
  • ( Spectrum of rights )
  • ( Core elements Attribution: Every CC licences allows the world to ) copy and distribute a work provided that the licensee credits the creator/licensor. The author may include these other elements: NonCommercial: licensees can use the work for non-commercial purposes. No Derivatives: the work cannot be modified. ShareAlike: the work can be copied, modified and distributed if the author releases the derivative under the same licence.
  • (BY Licences Attribution )BY-NC Attribution - Non CommercialBY-SA Attribution - Share AlikeBY-ND Attribution - No DerivativesBY-NC-SA Attribution - Non Commercial - Share AlikeBY-NC-ND Attribution - Non Commercial - No Derivatives
  • Human-Readable Lawyer-Readable Machine-ReadableCommons Deed Legal Code Digital Code( <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/ 3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" ) src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- sa/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/ 3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License</a>.
  • ( Barriers to access in GLAM and education )
  • ( Copyright as barrier? Opensourceway: http://www.flickr.com/photos/opensourceway/4371001458/ )
  • ( Barriers to access ) ⊛ TPMs ⊛ Lack of clarity with exceptions and limitations ⊛ Institutional fear (often justified) ⊛ Lack of data / metadata ⊛ Standard issues ⊛ Orphan works
  • ( Orphan works curiousart http://www.flickr.com/photos/curiousart/2815049829/ )
  • ( Trouble with orphan works ) ⊛ Google Books Settlement brought issue to the forefront. ⊛ Legislating on the topic has been difficult. ⊛ Canadian approach seems to be the best legislative solution so far. ⊛ U.S. proposals have met political opposition, orphan work provisions removed from UK’s Digital Economy Act. ⊛ Technological solutions?
  • ( CC solutions )
  • ( Empowering authors through licensing Nina Pailey http://www.sitasingstheblues.com )
  • ( Licensing standard for open content )
  • ( Adoption growth 2003 - 2010 )
  • ( Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI) ) ⊛ LRMI is a project co-led by the Association of Educational Publishers and Creative Commons to build a common metadata vocabulary for educational resources. ⊛ The learning resources framework will be designed to work with schema.org ⊛ Interoperability with other metadata technologies is a priority.
  • ( Some examples of metadata ⊛ intendedEndUserRole ⊛ typicalAgeRange ) ⊛ teachesCompetencies ⊛ educationLevel ⊛ conformsTo ⊛ interactivityLevel ⊛ requiresCompetencies ⊛ learningResourceType ⊛ assessCompetencies ⊛ topic ⊛ educationalUse ⊛ subject ⊛ instructionalMethod ⊛ license ⊛ timeRequired ⊛ created
  • ( Public domain mark )
  • ( CC0 )⊛ “2. Waiver. To the greatest extent permitted by, but not in contravention of, applicable law, Affirmer hereby overtly, fully, permanently, irrevocably and unconditionally waives, abandons, and surrenders all of Affirmers Copyright and Related Rights and associated claims and causes of action, whether now known or unknown (including existing as well as future claims and causes of action), in the Work [...]”
  • ( Challenges )
  • ( Institutional adoption ) PLoS http://www.plos.org
  • ( Complexity )
  • ( Incompatibility Alexandre Dulaunoy http://www.flickr.com/photos/adulau/3011878917/ )
  • ( Too many standards? )
  • ( Concluding... )
  • http://xkcd.com/365/http://xkcd.com/365/ ( ) http://creativecommons.org alguadamuz@innovatechnology.net Thank you @technollama on Twitter CC Attribution-ShareAlike