October learning @ glance data

349 views
313 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
349
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

October learning @ glance data

  1. 1. October Learning @ Glance Data Lincoln Avenue School, Staff Meeting November 8, 2010 Principal Kaela Zielinski
  2. 2. Learning @ Glance -3 minute observation “snapshot” of what is happening in your classroom by trained learning team members. -Measures 5 instructional practices; engagement, predominant activity, technology, cognitive complexity (Bloom’s), and high expectations -The framework for Learning @ Glance focuses on two of the Four Domains put together by Charlotte Danielson. Domains focused are 2: The Learning Environment and 4: Instruction
  3. 3. Is an educational activity taking place? yes No-Transition No-Disruption assessment
  4. 4. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ALL MOST HALF FEW (nr) Number of Students Actively Engaged in an Educational Activity District Lincoln Avenue L@G Data October 2010
  5. 5. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Cognitive Complexity of Educational Activity District Lincoln Avenue L@G Data October 2010
  6. 6. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% (nr) NO YES Differentiated Instruction is Apparent District Lincoln Avenue L@G Data October 2010
  7. 7. With the people sitting at your table discuss these questions. What data so far interests you? What does the data say? What area is in need of improvement?
  8. 8. 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Cognitive Complexity of Educational Activity Primary Grades District Lincoln Avenue L@G Data October 2010
  9. 9. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Cognitive Complexity of Education Activity Intermediate Grades District Lincoln Avenue L@G Data October 2010
  10. 10. 22% 19% 58% 60% 62% 62% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% K5 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade Percent of Students Proficient in Reading Based on the MAP Assessment NWEA Measures of Academic Progress in Reading September 2010
  11. 11. In your grade level groups discuss these questions. -What impact does the L@G data have in connection with the MAP data? -What areas can be connected between the MAP and L@G data?

×