HHIFR STEMI Program - September 2009 Case Study

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

2 comments

Comments 1 - 2 of 2 previous next Post a comment

Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

Favorites, Groups & Events

HHIFR STEMI Program - September 2009 Case Study - Presentation Transcript

  1. Hilton Head Island Fire & Rescue 12-lead ECG Case of the Month September 2009 STEMI Program
  2. EMS is dispatched to a 62 year old male with a chief complaint of chest discomfort. On arrival, the patient is found sitting at the dinner table. He appears acutely ill. Onset : Fairly sudden after sitting down for dinner 20-30 minutes ago Provoke : Nothing makes the pain feel better or worse Quality : Dull pressure/ache Radiation : The pain does not radiate Severity : 8/10 "feels like a 747 is sitting on his chest" Time : Feels slightly better since the onset Skin: cool, pale, diaphoretic Vital signs: Resp: 20 Pulse: 62 BP: 84/48 SpO2: 99 on RA Breath sounds: clear
  3. The cardiac monitor is attached at 17:54:24. Note the filter is set to “monitor mode” at 1 – 30 Hz.
  4. Using the “large block method” the heart rate can be estimated at 60/min The rhythm is sinus with P waves and QRS complexes in a 1:1 relationship.
  5. 12-Lead 1 is captured at 17:55:42 The filter selection is now set to “diagnostic mode” at 0.05 – 40 Hz. The low frequency filter must be set to 0.05 Hz to obtain accurate readings of the ST-segment.
  6. The data quality is good except for lead V6 which is showing loose electrode artifact.
  7. 12-Lead 2 is captured at 17:56:38 The data quality is now excellent but for some reason the “Data quality prohibits interpretation” message persists.
  8. 12-Lead 3 is captured at 17:58:26 The GE-Marquette 12SL interpretive algorithm is now giving the ***ACUTE MI SUSPECTED*** message.
  9. Excellent job trouble shooting the monitor and obtaining a high quality ECG tracing! The importance of this to the success of our STEMI program cannot be overstated !
  10. Critical question! Do we agree with the computer’s assessment?
  11. ST-segment elevation present?
  12. ST-segment elevation > 1 mm is present in lead II, III and aVF. Yes!
  13. Are leads II, III and aVF contiguous?
  14. Yes!   V6  Lateral   V3  Anterior   aVF  Inferior   III  Inferior   V5  Lateral   V2  Septal   aVL  Lateral    II  Inferior   V4  Anterior    V1  Septal   aVR       I   Lateral
  15. Are reciprocal changes present?
  16. I, aVL II, III, aVF INFERIOR V1, V2, V3, V4 NONE POSTERIOR II, III, aVF I, aVL, V3, V4, V5, V6 ANTEROLATERAL II, III, aVF I, aVL, V5, V6 LATERAL NONE V1, V2, V3, V4 ANTEROSEPTAL NONE V3, V4 ANTERIOR NONE V1, V2 SEPTAL RECIPROCAL FACING SITE
  17. Reciprocal ST-segment depression is present in leads I and aVL. It’s hard to miss the downsloping ST-segment in lead aVL. The flattening of the ST-segment in lead I is a more subtle finding. Yes!
  18. I, aVL II, III, aVF INFERIOR V1, V2, V3, V4 NONE POSTERIOR II, III, aVF I, aVL, V3, V4, V5, V6 ANTEROLATERAL II, III, aVF I, aVL, V5, V6 LATERAL NONE V1, V2, V3, V4 ANTEROSEPTAL NONE V3, V4 ANTERIOR NONE V1, V2 SEPTAL RECIPROCAL FACING SITE
  19. Reciprocal ST-segment depression is also present in the right precordial leads (suggesting posterior involvement). Yes!
  20. STEMI Alert criteria met?
  21. Patient has signs and symptoms of ACS 12 lead ECG shows excellent data quality Computer reads ***ACUTE MI SUSPECTED*** Paramedic agrees with computer interpretation QRS duration is < 120 ms (0.12 s) ECG shows 1 mm of ST-segment elevation in 2 or more contiguous leads (2 mm in leads V2 or V3) Reciprocal changes are present Contact dispatch and announce “STEMI Alert” Transmit the ECG to the emergency department
  22. Yes! and Yes! At this point the EMS crew has all the information they need to contact dispatch and announce “STEMI Alert!” The ECG should be transmitted to the hospital immediately.
    • When you call in, the only information you are required to give is the following:
    • Your name and medic unit call sign
    • The fact that it is a STEMI Alert
    • The first and last name of the patient
    • The patient’s date of birth
    • The age, gender and chief complaint
    • The vital signs
    • Whether or not the patient has a preferred cardiologist
    • It is assumed that STEMI patients will be treated according to protocol.
  23. Clinical pearl
  24. EMS is dispatched to a 62 year old male with a chief complaint of chest discomfort. On arrival, the patient is found sitting at the dinner table. He appears acutely ill. Onset : Fairly sudden after sitting down for dinner 20-30 minutes ago Provoke : Nothing makes the pain feel better or worse Quality : Dull pressure/ache Radiation : The pain does not radiate Severity : 8/10 &quot;feels like a 747 is sitting on his chest&quot; Time : Feels slightly better since the onset Skin: cool, pale, diaphoretic Vital signs: Resp: 20 Pulse: 62 BP: 84/48 SpO2: 99 on RA Breath sounds: clear Remember the presentation? Whenever you have a patient with acute inferior STEMI you should consider the possibility of right ventricular infarction! This is especially true when the patient presents with borderline bradycardia and hypotension!
  25. The easiest and safest thing to do is presume that right ventricular infarction is also present and treat the patient accordingly! This means that patients with a marginal blood pressure should not receive nitroglycerin or morphine! Obtain IV access and give the patient a fluid bolus before you even consider drugs that could bottom out the patient’s blood pressure! You can also consider modified precordial leads V4R and V5R, which is exactly what the paramedics on this call decided to do.
  26. V1 V2 V3 V4R V6 V5R
  27. V4R V5R V4R V5R Is ST-segment elevation present in modified chest leads V4R and V5R?
  28. V4R V5R V4R V5R Surprisingly…. No!
  29. Why?
  30. Because the culprit artery was not the right coronary artery (RCA) as we might have expected with acute inferior STEMI. Here we see the angiogram showing a 100% occlusion of the circumflex artery (LCX) which branches off the left coronary artery.
  31. Before After
  32. Once blood flow is restored, you can see how the LCX branches off into a manifold that supplies the inferior wall of the left ventricle.

+ Tom B.Tom B., 1 month ago

custom

509 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 509
    • 397 on SlideShare
    • 112 from embeds
  • Comments 2
  • Favorites 0
  • Downloads 0
Most viewed embeds
  • 112 views on http://ems12lead.blogspot.com

more

All embeds
  • 112 views on http://ems12lead.blogspot.com

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories